discussionsto write rules and norms for their teams helps to raise awareness in students of these issues. Theresults show a positive impact of the introduced interventions, especially around teamwork andcollaboration with peers. The results offer insights on how we can continue this study and followthe cohort of students through time to see if the impact lasts beyond the first year.Pre-/Post-survey data ResultsResults from comparing the pre- and post-survey results are shown in Table 2. A value of 1indicates No Agreement and 7 indicates Strongly Agree. There was no significant difference inthe survey results for Question 1 either from the beginning to the end of Fall 2020 or between theend of Fall 2019 and Fall 2020. When comparing Fall 2019 (no
Engineering Education, 2021 Minority Student Experiences in Engineering Graduate Programs: Socialization and Impact on Career TrajectoriesAbstractThis paper examines the academic and social interactions during graduate engineering programenrollment among racially underrepresented doctoral and master’s students and how thoseinteractions shape their career goals. Using socialization theory, this study explored dailyinteractions of students with faculty and peers, overall perceptions of fit, knowledge about thegraduate school process, and opportunities for mentoring provided in the institution as well asthrough outside engagement during industry internships. The findings presented in this paperbuild upon an earlier study conducted
different audience levels.MethodsThe efficacy of the course project, reinvented to be adaptable to a semester impacted by COVID-19, is assessed through two main methodologies. First, a direct assessment of student work isperformed using “teacher research” [31], [32], [33]. That is, student created artifacts from thecourse project are analyzed to determine degree to which students learned skills and enhancedcontent knowledge. In particular, students’ writing from various project milestones areexamined, with a specific focus on reflection pieces. Throughout the milestones students wereasked to evaluate the videos produced by Wired Magazine and their peers, as well as completeself-reflections at multiple time points. As discussed in the introduction
included a case 7 Via Zoom study and small-group power mapping activity. Midterm Synchronous, Midterm session with student peer review 4 Presentation & mixed section and discussion of project proposals across Feedback groups sessions. Session Writing Asynchronous Video on the writing rubric and how to 5 workshop videos evaluate writing for clarity, economy, and precision. Video on how to properly cite scientific research. Oral Asynchronous Videos on how to create good
develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty, an Outstanding Teacher Award and a Faculty Fellow Award. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, an M.S. in Materials Science from the University of Connecticut and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Stephanie G
Aviation in Cincinnati, Ohio, leading the certification effort for the LEAP-1A/1C HPC airfoil vibratory stress responses. Dr. Cress received his doctoral and master’s degrees from the University of Notre Dame, both in aerospace engineering; and his undergraduate bachelors of mechanical engineering degree from the University of Dayton.Dr. Patrick W. Thomas, University of Dayton Dr. Patrick W. Thomas is Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in English at the University of Dayton. His research interests include workplace literacy, writing technologies, empirical methodologies, computer-mediated communication, and professional and technical writing instruction. Since 2011, he has taught a variety of
students” to improve learning within the university.based on the idea of students teaching and learning from each other. Student attitudes aboutteaching and learning from peers are explored, along with the relative importance of factors Background and Motivationhighlighted in the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) of intrinsic motivation- autonomy, masteryand relatedness (i.e., feeling a connection to a larger group). The first approach described is the The work in this paper was motivated by a desire to improve student performance in Aerospaceuse of capstone design projects with explicit educational objectives to enhance the hands-on Engineering (AE) capstone design at a mid-sized southeastern private university. At this school
, whichmakes students try to write perfect notes without missing their instructors’ lecture notes duringclasses. However, these traditional conventions affected student learning as they used onlineresources clearly aligned with the dynamics course. Based on his personalized learningexperience, Oscar articulated how the online video resources affected his previous learningapproaches. I think I feel very prepared, because the way that the information is delivered to us it's very easy to organize and understand…I think it's changed the way that I use online resources. And also the way that I interact with my peers, because a lot of other assignments that we have to hand in are online assignments where you have an unlimited
students to write a summary of what has been covered in the lectureto asking them to collaboratively work on real-world problems and projects. The effectiveness of activelearning strategies compared to the traditional lecture approach, when implemented well, has beenempirically validated and documented in engineering education literature. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore engineering faculty’s use of active learning strategies in their teaching in aMidwestern university’s college of engineering context. Data sources included a survey about the facultyknowledge and use of active learning strategies and follow-up semi-structured interviews that aimed togather an in-depth understanding of their implementation of active learning
conceptual design in Deliv-erable 1, they were required to write a minimum one-page literature review on developments inAV technology related to their deployment on roads, with a specific requirement to cite five ormore references, which could be articles in magazines/websites, peer-reviewed journal articles,articles from conference proceedings, reports, or any other source. Successful completion of thistask would expose students to the variety of thoughts and approaches being used in research forAVs and setup a general set of assumptions that they would make about the performance of AVson roads. While wider public consultations was not possible within the limitations of this course,this task would also equip students to use feedback from such
of ● Outline of metacognitive ● Implement yourLearning videos (Teaching possible student activity (logistics, metacognitive activityExperiences: Metacognition to Help responses and identify content) - brainstorm list ● Write short review at theHomework Students Own and metacognition in those of other possibilities; completion of yourBefore Next Improve their Learning: responses focused description of implementationWorkshop Parts 1 and 2) and ● Watch pre-workshop activity showing ● Complete peer complete the provided video on assessing alignment
– The First ExperimentAs previously reported (Peterson, 2001) in the winter semester of 2000 I was assigned to teach agraduate seminar in engineering management for the first time. The course was an elective intwo overlapping master’s programs – one in industrial engineering and one in engineeringmanagement. The course was offered off-campus over a 12-week period. Each class was a threehour and twenty minute block that was to start at 6:00 PM. The catalog’s course description(Western Michigan University, 2000) of the course was as follows: “ISE 622 Industrial Supervision Seminar (3-0) 3 hrs An analysis of the writings, literature, and philosophy concerning line supervision and employee direction in manufacturing industries
Award. Her dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Negotiating Belongingness: A Longitudinal Narrative Inquiry of a Latina, First-GenerationCollege Student’s Experience in the Engineering CultureAbstractResearch studies have long argued that a sense of belonging is essential for minoritized students’continued engineering persistence. Common factors that have been found to promote a sense ofbelonging include campus diversity, institution’s culture, perceived class comfort, facultyinteractions, and peer support. Yet
[18]. The report assignment counts for 20 percent of the final grade and is holisticallygraded with guidance from a 27-item grading checklist divided into four categories: content,organization, design, and style/grammar/punctuation (see Appendix A for this checklist). Thischecklist guides students while writing their reports, teams during peer reviews, and instructorsduring grading. For grading, instructors lean on the checklist and give about 25% of the gradingweight to each of the four categories. Students, teaching assistants, and instructors haveappreciated the detailed guidance provided by the checklist—assignments that meet all itemsreceive a 100% grade. Across and within the categories, individual instructors may weight whatthey deem
ourinstitutions. This shift has changed the mindset in both students and faculty, greatly expanding the rangeof problems that students can explore at the sophomore level. Computing projects offer the ability tointroduce more open-ended problems in the mechanics courses where students can think about certainconcepts more deeply. It also provides the opportunity to introduce important ideas of numerical analysisin a way that makes those techniques immediately relevant. The projects also encourage students to getmore creative, in courses often viewed as skill development, by seeking means to verify their codes andthen use those codes to explore the target problem without the encumbrance of tedious hand calculations.Requiring that each student write a full
policies (e.g. tenure clock extensions) and developingresources for faculty and evaluators (e.g. guidance on writing COVID impact statements). Wenext discuss emergent challenges as well as implementation strategies, including working withcampus stakeholders, promoting awareness of policies, and adapting existing programmingtargeting recruiting, retaining, and promoting faculty from underrepresented groups. Weconclude by offering guidance for how institutions can remain attentive to COVID-19 impactson faculty careers in the coming years, with a focus on ongoing evaluation of new policies andprogramming, and institutional research to monitor equity
network of computers that stores transactional data in replica across every com-puter (node) in the network. This data is called a distributed ledger. The following are the coreblockchain architecture components: nodes, transactions, blocks, hashes, chain, miners and con-sensus.3.1.1.1 NodesA node [4] is a user or computer within the blockchain which is also known as peer or participant.Nodes are distributed across a widespread network and carry out a variety of tasks. All nodes on ablockchain are connected to each other and they constantly exchange the latest blockchain data soall nodes stay up to date. They store, spread and preserve the blockchain data. Figure 1 shows howmultiple nodes, designated in the Ethereum implementation as Ethereum
Paper ID #32955Exploration Elective: Students from all Disciplines Explore Engineeringand SciencesDr. Esmeralda Campos, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico Dr. Esmeralda Campos is a postdoc researcher at Writing Lab at Tecnologico de Monterrey, and she has taught undergraduate physics courses at the School of Engineering and Sciences. She obtained her bach- elor degree in Engineering Physics at Tecnologico de Monterrey in Mexico. She studied a Master degree in Education, with a specialization in Science teaching and learning, and moved forward to the PhD in Educational Innovation, both at Tecnologico de Monterrey
communication skills training and analyzing students’improvement. Box plots with line plots were used to graphically represent the changes indescriptive statistics of pre and post-peer evaluation ratings for specific presentationevaluation criteria. Finally, to understand the influence of students’ socio-demographicprofiles, an ordered probit regression was conducted. Female and first-generation studentsexpressed a deficiency of communication skills and may benefit greatly from innovativecommunication skills activities that can successfully foster students’ growth. The results ofthis research emphasize the significance of developing minority students’ presentation skills.The findings of this study also provide insights into a sustainable implementation
primary motivation for writing this paper is that in 2020, because of the COVID-19, severalinstructors worldwide had to move their courses to online environments. My experience transitioningfrom teaching face-to-face to online learning environments two years before COVID-19 could help otherinstructors strengthen the skills and knowledge needed for succeeding in online teaching. Besides thetypical challenges related to being a subject matter expert and even a pedagogical expert tied toteaching any course, online teaching of large course environments offers additional challenges. Forexample, mentoring several undergraduate peer mentors (AKA undergraduate teaching assistants) anddeveloping strategies that engage students and retain students until
(15.2%) compared to enrollment patterns in the general student population (21.7%). Disparitiesin enrollment are partnered with inequitable rates of course completion, with historicallyunderserved students completing 71% of these courses with a grade of C or better, compared toan 82% course success rate for their peers. These demographics mirror national demographictrends that indicate student access to degree and career opportunities in STEM offered by twoyear colleges disproportionately favors students who identify with hegemonic norms in STEM[2],[3]. The SEECRS project represents one institutions attempts at designing programming todismantle structures that reproduce these disparities.Beginning in 2018, Whatcom Community College started
backside of your concept map, please write down answers to : a) In your presentation, what about that concept was difficult to explain to peers? b) What ideas did you get from the group to understand this concept better?While concept map exercise was completed by all students when they came to the class wherediscussion activity was held, the self-reflection on concept maps was turned in by 46 students outof 86, for an extra credit. From student responses to prompt a), the difficulties students reportedin explaining to peers were thematically coded. The frequency of the concepts mentioned asdifficult to explain was also accounted for generating a word cloud. Student responses to promptb) were analyzed to get an insight
their non-ELC peers.BackgroundPrior research has suggested several potential contributing factors to lower rates of academicsuccess and retention within undergraduate engineering. These include lack of support andrecognition [2], inadequate advising [3], and feelings of disconnection to peers and faculty [4]–[6]. In addition to these factors linked with negative student outcomes, research has alsoidentified a host of best practices linked to positive student outcomes. Called high-impactpractices, these include learning communities, first-year seminars, writing-intensive courses,problem-based learning, collaborative assignments, and research and service opportunities [7].Specific to engineering, the use of hands-on collaborative design projects
pedagogy, we found them surprising.As a result of this survey, it became clear to us that many of our university’s instructors neededto be engaged in more conversation and training around pedagogical research, rather than beingleft to come to their own conclusions about what they feel the most important elements of theirpedagogy are. We may not have anticipated this particular need when we began designing theITM, but it is precisely the kind of opportunity it was designed for nonetheless.Beginning in the fall of 2020, the commission began to integrate the ITM into many of thepedagogical development activities it offers: actively during the annual workshop andconference, during new faculty training, and voluntary peer observation, as well as
International Online Learn- ing; Sloan-C Blending Learning; eLearning Consortium of Colorado Conference; SUNY Online Learning Summit (SOL); DOODLE; the Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference (TLT), and the Con- ference on Instructional Technologies (CIT). All of her presentations focused upon the various topics that support her mission for student success and efficient class management. Loretta has been recognized by Open SUNY as an Open SUNY Fellow Expert Online Instructional Designer. In addition, she is a member of the MERLOT Teacher Education Editorial Board and a MERLOT Peer Reviewer Extraordinaire. As a certified Quality Matters Master Reviewer and peer reviewer in general, she peer reviewed numerous
ofwork confronting each team. Based on student comments provided in the student course ratingof the instructor, the laboratory work was a highlight of the course.The introductory course taught to electrical engineering and computer science students in the fall2019 semester included a robot building team project and competition designed to further engagestudents with the course content. Teams consisting of three to four students were formed at thestart of the project. Each team was given the task to assemble a small robot and write softwarefor the same such that it is capable of following a path designated by a line on a surface. Allteams were provided with an identical package of the hardware components necessary toassemble a robot chassis. Two
peer evaluation or students are quite uncommon. At Farmingdale construction studentsare able to evaluate their peers in terms of their input for successful assignment completion. It is not onlythe peers’ capability or their understanding of the subject matter but also their role of helping otherstudents to learn. So, such assessment says more about validity of cooperative learning than justevaluating individuals.Self-Assessment in Group EnvironmentIn any course students are likely to learn more if they are capable of clearly articulating their goals andmaking connections between those and course goals and requirements1 . Self-assessment is crucial tolearning progress. Most students do have learning goals, although they may find it difficult to
scientific research. Finally, this activity encouragesstudents to practice making explicit connections between mathematical concepts, real-worldengineering problems, and policy.“Graph Theory and Gratitude”In the second activity, designed for the closing weeks of a course, students are invited to writenotes of appreciation, anonymous or otherwise, for peers who have elevated their learningexperience during the semester (additional details in Appendix B). These notes are collected anddistributed to their intended recipients; based on the flow of notes, the instructor constructs ananonymized directed graph (Figure 2).This activity reinforces numerouslearning objectives. At a basic level,by presenting yet another context inwhich a data set is
to think about experiences they had working in teams in othersituations and contexts. With these experiences in mind, students were asked to individuallybrainstorm attributes of an ideal team member by writing down as many attributes as they could,with each attribute written on a separate sticky note. The brainstorming session lastedapproximately five minutes. Reflection Brainstorm Introduce the Map attributes to Identify Identify attributes Share identifiedattributes of an definition of three elements of top 15 self and peers attributes with ideal team teamwork as a virtuous teamwork
by stress patterning; (2) low-cost, crack-tolerant, advanced metallization for solar cell durability; (3) thin film processing and nanoscale surface corrugation for enhanced light trapping for pho- tovoltaic devices; and (4) microsphere-based manufacturable coatings for radiative cooling. He has close to 70 publications in peer-reviewed journals and over 200 invited/contributed papers at academic insti- tutions, national laboratories, and conferences. He received a UNM Junior Faculty Research Excellence Award in 2005 and an NSF Career Award in 2001. He is a recipient of STC.UNM Innovation Award consecutively from 2009 to 2018, and he was elected as the 2018 STC.UNM Innovation Fellow. Dr. Han holds 17 UNM