Paper ID #35596Inequities in ”Stuckness”: Exploring mobility patterns to higher rankedinstitutions from undergraduate to graduate school based on students’race/ethnicity and first generation in college statusDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B. Knight is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Special As- sistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the
?Instruction Mentorship• Course policies & planning • Look for opportunities to support interests and efforts of minoritized• Course content, framing, exposure students and colleagues to critical thinking • Consider your own strengths and• Being friendly & learning about the weaknesses as a mentor goals of your students• How you encourage discussion and • Differentiate between your skills as a mentor, adviser, and critical thinking supervisor/manager
student support systems which could provide the encouragement that studentsneeded to offset any internal or external doubts or challenges that they might encounter. Colindemonstrated this in the excerpt below as he discussed helping a student navigate a mental healthcrisis: I had a student who was probably their sophomore year maybe… second semester of their sophomore year, in one of my classes, you know, had a huge kind of nervous breakdown. And struggled to finish the class. And so, we kind of worked on a plan to basically say if they will, you know, you’re several assignments behind, I can delay your final grade for up to 30 days. Just get me some of these assignments, you know, it doesn’t have to be all of
coordinated approach to promote inclusion and equityIn 2011, a university-wide Inclusion Implementation Plan (IIP) was completed which identifiedfour key areas: Access and Equity, Campus Climate, Diversity in Curriculum/Co-Curriculum,and Organizational Learning. GVSU has been a leader in campus climate assessment andcompleted its fifth assessment in 2015. Data from this was used to drive strategic decisions in thenext phase. Moving forward, GVSU’s commitment includes sustaining institutional efforts toensure that equity is embedded across the campus, and ingrained in all functions, decisionmaking, and planning [23]. The next phase focuses on the following three broad areas: Equityand structural diversity, Inclusion and campus climate, and Learning
overburden marginalized students and needing to have theirinvolvement according to the principles of community engagement. Advancing equity workregularly comes at the expense of graduate students themselves, especially those that come frommarginalized communities. Equity work and the emotional burdens produced by doing said workoften go unnoticed and uncompensated within academia. The purpose of this paper is to presentthe initial plans for exploring how to shift more power to graduate students through communityengagement so that graduate students will have a voice within PROTEGE.IntroductionAs part of a broader effort to diversify engineering education, greater attention has been puttowards improving the experiences of people from marginalized
Paper ID #36498A climate case study for understanding inclusion, equity, access, anddiversity for broadening participation and reducing systemic barriersDr. Gregory E Triplett Jr., Virginia Commonwealth University Experience involves strategic planning, resource management, consensus building, program development with a focus on continuous improvement. Research activities include biophotonics, semiconductor device modeling and fabrication, sensor net- works, andMrs. Rachel Levena Wasilewski ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A climate case study for understanding inclusion, equity
, worked on theSims, Tiger Woods golf, will probably do more amazing things in her career Instructor meetings • Recap previous lesson • Pinpoint where students did not understand concepts • Review next week's topics Adjust lesson plan INSTANTLY based on instructor recommendations - -> dynamic curriculum and instruction style Recap email to students after every classTHE SWEET SOUNDS OF CODING CONECD 2022 Both platforms The virtual classroom MS Teams Allowed audio/video • Hosted by Pittsburgh Public Schools sharing • Instructors were not allowed to host
leisure, so I started with a social justice mindset. It was interesting to see that the statistics for woman-identifying athletes in male-dominated sports are like those for first-year incom- ing engineering and computer science students.” In addition to owning her own business and her role at Clemson, Johnson serves as the past president of the WEPAN Board of Directors. She is honored to serve the WEPAN community alongside the executive leadership team. Together they will ensure WEPAN continues growing, and create a strategic plan, mapping out goals and objectives for three, five, and ten years into the future. Johnson is a writer, adventurer, and family woman outside of work. Together with her partner, Adam, they
series.The PDE design and faculty involvement.The Research Research Question: What is the impact of participation in TIME on faculty conceptions of diversity and inclusion in the classroom? Participants 12 faculty from six STEM Schools ● Biological Science ● Computer Science ● Engineering ● Health Science ● Pharmaceutical Science ● Physical ScienceParticipant overview. Data Collection and MethodologySurveys● Purpose of surveys were to understand faculty experiences during the professional development series and gauge their plans to continue the work beyond the professional development series.● Surveys were deployed a week
Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. Knight currently serves as the co-Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Credit Loss forEngineering TransferStudents:Visualizations Across Students &StructuresTHIS MATERIAL IS BASED UPON WORK SUPPORTED BY THE NATIONALSCIENCE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND CENTERSUNDER GRANT NUMBER DUE-1644138. ANY OPINIONS, FINDINGS,AND
offormal programs. Thus, some new efforts are being made into including socialization with othersin the program. Some of the challenges in the program were in sustaining engagement by students due totheir location over two campuses and their responsibilities and workloads of their graduatestudies. Thus, finding a common time was not possible so creating access through varyingdays/times and modalities was necessary. In addition, there were also challenges due to thepandemic affecting in-person event planning and the strain many students felt at that time. Inaddition, more participants are needed to measure self-advocacy knowledge and skills ofgraduate students more broadly before they engage in this type of professional development. If
the first research project, the participating ambassadors will employethnographic methodology to examine “weed-out” [25] culture in engineering education, with aparticular focus on how the structure and environment of barrier courses contribute to theoppression of marginalized engineering students. The ambassadors plan to leverage the JEDIAmbassador Program to initiate conversations with professors in which they share their findingsand advocate for students’ educational needs. The ambassadors involved in the second researchproject will conduct a series of in-depth interviews with LGBTQ+ engineering students tounderstand the extent to which they feel safe to be their authentic selves in engineering spacesand how their experiences in CEC have
. The exosystemrequires her to be involved in one of the systems, and not involved in the other system, forexample, when a student joins a large organization where they interact in some of theorganization’s spaces but not in all of them. The macrosystem requires the student to speak aboutthe culture or overall system that affects her or how she plans to change the culture. Finally, thechronosystem would involve the student speaking about how their capitals have changed. In thatinstance, it would be common for capitals to appear in both the chronosystem along with anotherring. For example, if the student used their friend group to discover different majors, but thendescribed how she tapped into another friend group to decide on a minor that
including more voices fromAfrican American students in engineering at PWIs as we expand beyond this pilot study. Also,these findings are not necessarily limited to Black and African American students at PWIs;future studies could expand on our findings to explore other minoritized populations atinstitutions that were not designed with them in mind. A second limitation of this study is the fact that the results are preliminary and call forfurther study that aims to explore the cultures cultivated in different engineering programs atPWIs and how African American students navigate them. We plan to collect and analyze furtherdata to identify how students use their navigational capital to achieve this aim. Finally, this study looks at the
Education (CoED) divisions, and with the Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation, Interdivisional Town Hall Planning Commit- tee, ASEE Active, and the Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Estell has received multiple ASEE Annual Conference Best Paper awards from the Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019 and the Computers in Education Division’s Service Award in 2022. Estell currently
Paper ID #40691S-STEM Partnerships Supporting Low-Income Engineering Students: ADescriptive Case StudyDr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Walter Lee is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the director for research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College
activities.A Relational Mentorship Model Implementation An integration of these five dimensions of mentorship (mentor, mentee, functionalrelationship, organization, and community) to relational trust and connections is shown in Figure4. This model can be implemented through various types of mentoring mechanisms. Theeffectiveness of the mentoring plan depends on the trust relationship and the motivation of thementee to willingly engage in the growth opportunities created by the mentor. Implementing RMM as a functional mentoring process involves creating a healthymentoring relationships shown to be critical in preparing graduate students for careers [33].Functional mentoring results in both the success and satisfaction of mentees in
support of a senior faculty to at least have signatures in terms of support, but we did get our first grant of $135,000 to upgrade the lab. I plan on doing a little bit more of that, of bringing equipment, novel equipment.Individuals sometimes create relationships with others, due to the need to “introduce meaninginto their lives” [10, p.183]. Building on this thought, Eva, Jody, and Samantha “introducedmeaning” to their roles through the helpful connections they established with their peers therebyhelping them to find resources and support needed for their jobs. This job-crafting endeavor bythese EIF could enhance their positive identity at work [10], an area for future study. b. Building meaningful relationships with
approach to address this issue, and it involves transforming a directednetwork into an undirected one while accounting for missing ties. The survey data initiallyrepresented directed relationships between organizations, indicating the strength of connection ineach category (contact, information sharing, and co-planning). To prepare the data for SNA, asymmetrization process was employed using the average or mean method. We employed thisprocedure to treat relationships as bidirectional, assuming mutual organizational interactions.While no approach to dealing with missing data in SNA is perfect, alternative methods, such asdeletion of missing data or imputation, risk the loss of valuable information. Symmetrizationcircumvents this issue by leveraging
• HYB RID TALK I NG C IRC LE & F OCUS G ROUP M ET HOD OLOG Y • BUILD RELAT IONS HI P W IT H C OM M UNI TY • G AIN BLE SS ING F OR RE SEAR CH • D EV ELOP PLAN F OR RE CI PROCIT YA common and important role in Indigenous communities is
Science and Engineering group, existing within the university. We alsoimplement virtual COVID19 pandemic programming, and then assessed the results and best practices for our mentoring program. 9The Lean Six Sigma DMAIC methodology was applied with many tools that helped tocollect the voice of the customer, or potential mentors and mentees, women in scienceand engineering.In the Define phase, the project charter is developed to understand the problem, thegoals and scope of the project. A stakeholder analysis is performed to understand whohas a stake in the project. The project plan is developed and the working team isformed.In the Measure phase, the
present narratives drawn from traditionally feminine hobbies and interests,such as caring for animals, planning parties, and focusing on friendships, which assume aspecific set of life experiences and interests. Using stereotypes in marketing these toys may beharmful to young children, especially those who are already less likely to see themselves inrepresented in engineering, and are also developing their engineering identity, sense of self, andfuture career aspirations.This review concludes by describing areas of future research, namely, the need to understand therelationship between toy narrative, engineering identity, and children’s interest in and access toSTEM toys. Understanding the relationships between these constructs can help girls
professionals looking to expand their networks, and similar aspects. In synthesizingand providing these resources in a consolidated repository, we provide an informationaloverview and easier access to resources that help support Black persons interested in computingand CS. As a result, this repository can be used as an assets-based instrument that can be sharedto increase awareness about resources and opportunities as well as interest to help broadenparticipation in computing and CS. In addition to this publication, we plan to disseminate thisrepository as an information source for a virtual mentoring chatbot created by one of the authors,and also through National Science Foundation reporting. Second, the compilation of this repository allows us
. Here we want to highlight the work and calls to action from variousfields, including higher education and the social sciences, which argue to disaggregate the data ofAsian Americans [2][8].Initially, we planned to include this research question for this paper: how do Asian Americanstudents’ cultural identities intersect with their engineering identity? When reporting our findingsfor this paper, we could hardly find any evidence from the already small number of papersselected to respond to this research question. In other words, none of the nine papers selectedhave critically examined how Asian American students’ cultural experiences interact with theirexperience as engineering students. It is unclear how Asian students’ cultural values
, fellows develop knowledge about cross-culturalmentoring, promoting diversity in doctoral programs, and facilitating departmental dialog.Faculty fellows work within their departments to develop and implement sensemaking initiativeswith the goal to share information with faculty and to provide opportunities to learn and buildinclusive doctoral programs. This requires that the faculty fellows and the faculty in thedepartments/programs critically examine policies, procedures, practices, and department climatethat may serve to promote or impede the success of Ph.D. students from underrepresented groupsand develop an action plan to remedy existing barriers and enhance graduate program climate.Detailed information about the inception and organization of
, creativity, self-confidence and post-graduation plan and 116 to academic support. The vast majority of the studies in this category were focused on disability services and academic support programs. These are now excluded but now become part of our future work.● Our future work will consist of finishing the study selection process and proceeding with the last steps of the framework, which include charting the data (incorporating a numerical summary and a qualitative thematic analysis) , and collating, summarizing, and reporting the results (identifying the implications of the study findings for policy, practice or research). Once we finish this work, we will move on to phases 2 and 3, which consist of
type, academichistory, geographic region, and college attendance of family. The students interacted inthis space and could understand and relate to each other regardless of their academicdifferences. During the two weeks of the program, students participated in numerousactivities with the goal of exposure to a faculty, student, and professional network. Thispaper is a stepping stone for further program evaluation that further serves theparticipants’ voices.A combination of program theories emerges in the planning and establishment ofDISTINCTION, including organizational learning and systems theory, or a focus oncontinuous improvement as well as adjustments in coordinated ways that speak to theentirety of the program [5]. The structural
• Extensions to STEM disciplines • Long-term impacts of participationAs we continue to expand our reach, we're exploringopportunities to extend the 3C Fellows program beyondcomputing to encompass broader STEM disciplines likebiology, chemistry, engineering, and math. We are alsolooking at partnerships with technology companies tobring this program to industry. Our goal is to have over1,000 total participants from computing and STEM withinthe next 5 years.In addition, we want to evaluate the long-term impacts ofthe program beyond the two-year completion. We plan to 20conduct longitudinal monitoring changes in diversity attheir institutions and measuring shifts in workplace culturesand
DISCUSSIONThe first author led the efforts to conducted a preliminary data analysis for thisconference presentation and developed a visualization to describe trends that theynoticed in the data. On this slide, we plan to walk through the data analysis process:open coding, themes, visualization, and verification. Open coding was done withMAXQDA by a 4-author team, financial themes were identified by a 3-author team,visualization was done by a 3-author team, and preliminary verification was done by athree-author team. This big (and small) project has very much function in ‘stages’ andwe are still in a preliminary stage. 9 Preliminary Findings INTRODUCTION
Colorado,Boulder Institutional Review Board (IRB) to access the de-identified results of the broader study.I presented them with a multitude of themes. A few examples included receiving,comprehending, processing, and remembering information; demonstrating knowledge: when,what, where, and how; and physical, social, and cultural environments. Following our discussion,I decided to expand this effort into a broader study.I plan for the broader study to focus on multiple facets of structural dis/ableism. I believe this isnecessary to adequately explore the rich, in-depth, and extensive nature of this research. Thecontributors and I also found it prudent to disseminate some of the key findings from this firstphase of research through multiple timely