. 0431947. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] United Nations Development Programme. 2003. Millennium Development Goals: A Compact Among Nations to End Human Poverty. Human Development Report, 2003. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. See also http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/.[2] Bartlett, A. A. “Reflections on sustainability, population growth and the environment”, Renewable Resources Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1998, pp. 6-22. Page 11.566.9[3
reader will need to understand the text. Page 11.781.15THEORETICAL BACKGROUND24. Mathematical model used to predict system behavior presented with ample explanation and leadin 25. Equations numbered 26. Punctuation with equations (: with follow/s/ing only) 27. Equations have spaceEXPERIMENTAL SETUP ANDPROCEDURE28. Schematic of equipment used29. Figures/Tables correct (Figure 1. Title)30. Figures oriented correctly Clearly labeled and referenced31. Highlights of equip. used32. Highlights of the procedure (not specific steps)RESULTS AND DISCUSSION33. Data presented with clear indication of what data applies to34. Reader will understand what this data
pursue Page 11.1287.11new ideas that emerge from the integration of personal experience, technical content, andconcepts in ethics.References 1. Mattei, N.J. Is covering ethics in an analysis class effective? ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2005, p 9069-9079. 2. Dyrud, M.A. Four reasons for including an ethics component in engineering classes. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003 p 2317-2322. 3. Dyrud, M.A. Training faculty for ethics across the curriculum. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2000, p 6409-6415. 4. Riley, D., Ellis, G., and Howe, S. “’To Move People from Apathy’: A multi-perspective approach to ethics across the
predictionwith finite element analysis for turning processes. Submitting to Journal of Undergraduate Research, SouthDakota State University.12. National Science Foundation. (1998). Shaping the future. Volume II: Perspectives on undergraduateeducation in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Arlington, VA: NSF.http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf98128/nsf98128.htm#pdf, 1998.13. Qian, L. (2005). Teaching multi-axis complex surface machining via simulation and projects. Proceedingsof the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. June 13-16,2005.Portland, OR.14. Lamancusa, J. S., Jorgensen, J., Zayas-Castro, J.L. (1996). Putting design and manufacturing back into theengineering curriculum. Proceedings of
instructor. When students know that the instructordemonstrates genuine interest in their learning on an ongoing basis, and they see that s/heis willing to spend the extra time to ensure that they fully understand the concepts taughtin class, they will be more motivated to learn, and are more likely to rate the instructorhighly in the course evaluations.For instructors interested in adopting this technique in their courses, the first step is todevelop a detailed listing of the course topics in the order they will be covered in thecourse. Use an easy-to--read textbook or provide a set of concise course notes so that thestudents can readily map the various course topics in the module surveys to appropriatesections in the textbook or course notes. The
Aluminum channelBoard of Education End of metal rod Rubber bandBattery pack (servo power) Sump Pressure Transducer Page 11.1320.10 2.0 Volumetric flow rate, Q / mL s-1 Figure 2. Flow data Data obtained with a fully opened valve 1.5 l linear fit
Rapids, 1989.5 Meade, J., “Cheating: Is Academic Dishonesty par for the Course?”, Prism, Volume 1, Number 7, pp30-32, 1992.6 Harding, T., On the Frequency and Causes of Academic Dishonesty Among Engineering Students, presented at theA.S.E.E. Annual Meeting in Albuquerque, June 2001. In CD based Proceedings (no page numbers).7 Moffatt, M., Undergraduate Cheating, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1990.8 Carpenter, D.D., Harding, T., Montgomery, S., and Steneck, N., P.A.C.E.S.—A Study on academic integrity amongengineering undergraduates (preliminary conclusions), presented at the A.S.E.E. Annual Meeting in Montreal, June2002, in CD based Proceedings (no page numbers).9 Seebauer, E.,and Barry, R., Fundamentals of Ethics for
this project.The authors also thank the RREE Executive Committee members who participated in therevisions of the 2005 RREE: Robin Adams, George B. Forsythe, Frank Huband, MarciaMentkowksi, and Marilla Svinicki. Additional thanks go to Robin Adams forconversations that led to the development of the participant poster activities.References[1] S. Fincher and R. Adams, presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004.[2] O. H. Griffin Jr., A. Aning, V. K. Lohani et al., presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.[3] R. Streveler, K. Smith, and R. Miller, presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR
’s who encourages her Wellesley students to question their traditionalconservative values. While she possesses many of the necessary traits, she may lose your vote inthe scene where she publicly and inappropriately confronts recalcitrant student Betty Warren(Kirsten Dunst) in class. However, she never used that technique with any other student and itwas Betty Warren, who chases Ms. Watson’s departing taxi the longest and touches her handfrom her bicycle. Later Betty writes, “She came to Wellesley to make a difference, but to change for others is to lie to yourself. My teacher Ms. Katherine Watson lived by her own definition and would not compromise it even for Wellesley. I dedicate this, my last editorial, to
. A. Eadie - The Undergraduate Teaching of Measurement and Instrumentation - Engineering Science andEducation Journal, pp. 109-113, June 1997.5. A. S. Eadie. E.A. Knight, and I.J. Kemp - Work-based Learning in Instrumentation - Measurement andControl, Vol. 31, pp. 137-140, 1998. Page 11.448.126. C.D. Johnson – Process Control Instrumentation Technology, Prentice Hall, 2003.7. G. Karady and K. A. Nigim – Improve Learning Efficiency by Using General Purpose MathematicsSoftware in Power Engineering - – IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp 979-985, 2003.8. T. Laopoulos, March - Teaching Instrumentation and Measurement in the
. Each group wasallowed five minutes to present their report which included question and answer sessions. In the first group, the two male members monopolized the presentation with the threefemale members only participating during the question and answer portion. The initial groupalso provided no introductions of group members nor motivation(s) for the experimental work.Prior to the beginning of second presentation, the instructors gave immediate feedback onpresentation strategy and reminded the students about the required equal participation from allgroup members. This method of immediate comments to influence the presentation behavior ofeach group was followed for all presentations and the expected improvements in
educators, we need to utilize the above-identified techniques and tips toensure the very best learning experiences for our students.Bibliographic InformationAlbanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomesand Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.Angelo, T.A., (2001). Classroom Assessment: Guidelines for Success. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center forTeaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 12, No 4, 2000-2001.Bennett, J.B., (2001). Teaching With Hospitality. In “Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching,University of Southern Maine. Vol. 12, No 1, 2000-2001.Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St
classroom,” PC World, January 21, 2004 or Microsoft’s site on “Tablet PC: Transforming Education”at http://www.microsoft.com/Education/TabletPC.mspx2 Bach, M., “The Tablet PC High School,” NCCE Conference, February 2006.3 Garfield, M. J., “Acceptance of Ubiquitous Computing”, Information Systems Management, 22(4), 24-31, 2005.4 Colwell, K. E., “Presentation Technology: Digital Ink and Notetaking,” TechTrends, 48(3): 35–39, 2004.5 Frolik, J. and Zurn, J.B., “Evaluation of Tablet PCs for engineering content development and instruction”, Session1620, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 2004, Salt LakeCity, UT.6 Brophy, S. and Walker, G., “Case study of the pedagogical impact of tablet PCs as a
students and we are not planning additional programs at this point intime. Two of RIT’s goals are to have no more than 10% attrition for freshman studentsfrom the freshman to sophomore year and a graduation rate of 74% in 2011 for enteringfreshman students. The ET departments would like to see increases in our studentsuccess rates so we can be active participants in achieving these goals.Bibliography 1. Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, V, (2006) Framing the Engineering Outsourcing Debate: Placing the United States on a Level Playing Field with China and India Retrieved 2/2006 from http://memp.duke.edu/outsourcing 2. Richardson, C., Gupta, S., Valentine, M., Merrill, R., Amuso, V., Multi-department Engineering and Engineering
attitudes and beliefs of the millennial generation. Journal of College and Character, 2. http://collegevalues.org 4. Wilson, M.E. (2004) Teaching, learning, and the millennial student in New Directions for Student Services (106), pp59-71. 5. DeBard, R. (2004). Millennials coming to college in New Directions for Student Services (106). pp 33-45. 6. Davis, Douglas A. (January-February, 2003) Academe (89)1 9-22. 7. SAGSET, The Society for the Advancement of Games and Simulations in Education and Training. Site last accessed May 10 2005. http://www.simulations.co.uk/sagset/ 8. Poggenpohl, S (2003) “Communication Spaces: Games - a transactional context.” Creating Communicational Spaces Conference
Leung, Y. K. (1984) Computer Simulation of End-linked Elastomers. I. Trifunctional Page 11.168.12 Networks Cured in the Bulk , Journal of Chemical Physics, 80, 3877-3884.6. Eichinger B. E. and Leung, Y. K. (1984) Computer Simulation of End-linked Elastomers. II. Bulk Cured Tetrafunctional Networks, Journal of Chemical Physics, 80, 3885-3891.7. Hagn, C., Wittkop, M., Kreitmeier, S., Trautenberg H. L., Holzl, T., and Goritz, D. (1997) The Creation and Spatial Structure of End-Linked Bimodal Polymer Networks: A Monte Carlo Study, Polymer Gels and Networks,5, 327-337.8. P. R. von Lockette and E. M Arruda
they have also gained valuable engineering related experiences whichcan be used later on in their career.VI. References[1] J. L. Schmalzel, A. J. Marchese, J. Mariappan and S. A. Mandayam, "The Engineering Clinic: A four-yeardesign sequence," presented at the 2nd An. Conf. of Nat. Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance, Washington,D.C., 1998.[2] J. L Schmalzel, A. J. Marchese and R. P. Hesketh, "What's brewing in the Clinic?," HP EngineeringEducator,2:1, Winter 1998, pp. 6-7.[3] New Jersey Clean Energy Program http://www.njcep.com, New Jersey Clean Energy Program[4] NJ Anemometer Loan Program - Official Website: [Available ONLINE] http://users.rowan.edu/~mcdevi24/clinic_website/website_pages/homepage.htm[5] Rowan University Clean
engineering curriculum entirely. In fact, this has been the trendnationwide as many university power programs have declined in recent years.[4] At ColoradoSchool of Mines we are working to reverse the trend of diminishing interest among U.S. studentsin the electric power industry.Deregulation during the 1990’s caused tumultuous change for the energy sector. During theseturbulent times the utility sector also largely neglected its need to cultivate technical expertise.Reorganization of the industry caused many of the technically-oriented jobs to disappear. At thesame time, fewer students were studying power engineering, because they found the “glamorousand exotic (and quite often better paying)” high-tech areas of electrical engineering to be
] Bloswick, D. S. and Budnick, P.M., An Introduction to Electrical Safety for Engineers, NIOSH Instructional Module, Cincinnati, OH, 1993.[23] Cadick, J., Capelli-Schellpfeffer, M., and Neitzel, D., Electrical Safety Handbook, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 2006 Page 11.1301.11Appendix A: Electrical Incident Safety Investigation, A Case StudyAn electrical incident investigation is one of the major assignments given during the one-weeksafety training module. Student groups of three are required to prepare a thorough engineeringreport and make a formal presentation of their findings to a faculty panel on the
Page 11.359.10students that benefits them in subsequent design projects.Bibliographical Information1 Dally, J. W. and Zhang, G.M., “A Freshman Engineering Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 2(1994).2 Quinn, R. E., “Drexel’s E4 Program: A Different Professional Experience for Engineering Students and Faculty,”Journal of Engineering Education, 82, 4 (1993).3 Froyd, J. E. and Ohland, M. W., “Integrated Engineering Curricula,” Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1(2005).4 D. K. Ludlow and K. H. Schulz, "Writing across the chemical engineering curriculum at the University of NorthDakota," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 83, pp. 161, 1994.5 J. A. Newell, D. K. Ludlow, and S. P. K. Sternberg, "Progressive development
pick up and grade randomly selected homework problems andcheck the rest for completion. Problems of copying and inappropriate collaboration still exist, butnonetheless this approach’s monitoring and feedback generally are helpful. A difficulty is thatfeedback is limited to only the selected problem(s) and to the degree that the professor expendstime writing comments on the homework.Students still seek help with homework during professors’ office hours, but that practice hastended to evolve to the posting of solutions. Factors affecting both professors and students havecontributed to this trend. Professors spend more time conducting research and raising funds, andstudents’ jobs can make it difficult to use office hours. Postings can occur
-Mechatronics 3,000 2,750 800 - 3 Mold Automation 2,080 2,100 - - 3 Med-Mechatronics 2,520 1,600 - - 1 Precision Machine Tools - 2,100 4,350 3,068 8 Precision Components(S) - 1,500 3,248 1,130 4 Precision Components(N) - 2,500 4,814 5,068 6 Annul Input Budgets 18,940 22,000 27,596 20,114 54 Table 1. ERC’s Budgets Allocated by the Program Office (1,000 NT$, 32 NT$ = 1 USD).It may be also worthy to look at the number of the participants or students that
subject):Math General Physics Physical Tech. Engineering Science Science Education11 4 2 2 4 0Grade levels taughtGrade level(s) 5th 6th 6,7,8 7,8 8th 9,10 9,10,11 9,10,11,12# of teachers 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1The Number of College-Level STEM Courses Taken by FellowsThe following chart indicates the number of college-level courses taken by each STEMFellow in math, science, technology, and engineering. Seven out of the elevenparticipants had never taken an engineering course. However, nine out of the eleven hadtaken some technology courses
. Page 11.1002.14Component Average 13Keynote: Engineering a Sustainable World: 9.3Roundtable discussions with engineers, students and college 9.1faculty:Keynote: Engineering for Everyone: 8.6Engineering Challenges: 8.7Symposium as a Whole: 9.1Both the Keynote: Engineering a Sustainable World and the RoundtableDiscussions received 10’s from the majority of participants.Reference/BibliographyKatherine L. Hughes & Melinda Mechur Karp
: State of the Art ?” ed. Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering Management” – Engineers in Law and Business Development – February, 200413. Kao, John J., The Entrepreneurial Organization (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1991).14. Edwards, Robert. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)15. Palmintera, D., J. Bannon, M. Levin and A. Pagan. “Developing High Technology Communities: San Diego”. Report produced under contract to Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Innovation Associates, Inc., Reston, Virginia
Wiley & Soncs, Inc., 2000.3. Muff, D.J., Heindel, T.J., and Sundararajan, S., “Demonstrating Electromagnetic Noise in an Undergraduate Measurement and Instrumentation Course,” in 113th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Paper 2006-863, 2006.4. ASTM, “E1876-01 Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration,” in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2004. Page 11.1367.13
Nordic SME Research Conference, Umea Universitet, June 198612. Staub-French, S. “Entrepreneurship and Engineering Management” – Engineers in Law and Business Development – February, 200413. Kao, John J., The Entrepreneurial Organization (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1991).14. Edwards, Robert. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)15. Palmintera, D., J. Bannon, M. Levin and A. Pagan. “Developing High Technology Communities: San Diego”. Report produced under contract to Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration, Innovation Associates, Inc., Reston, Virginia 2000.16. Pacific Partners Consulting Group. “An Economic Impact Study of Stanford
other fields of study (p 48)” and from Standard 9, “the engineeringdesign process involves defining a problem, generating ideas, selecting a solution, testing thesolution(s), making the item, evaluating it, and presenting results (p102)”.Results—Affective GoalsThe affective goals, developing increased math confidence and fondness, were assessed with thesame pre-survey that was given at the commencement of the unit. The survey began with eightstatements, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 Fondness/Confidence Assessment Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Agree Disagree 1. I am good at Math
. Hospital facilities areunder almost constant renovation as medical treatment technologies, patient age demographicsand patient demand for comfort amenities evolve. Infectious control represents one of the morechallenging aspects of selective demolition and remodeling to hospital constructors. Hospitals (aswell as other structures) pre-dating the 1970’s may be home to hazardous materials such asasbestos, PCB’s and lead paints. Demolition contractors are often the first to encounter thesehazards which represent a challenge whether they are to be encapsulated or abated and landfilled.It is hypothesized that a course focusing on selective demolition and remodeling could serve bothspecializations equally well.In addition to a heavy equipment course, a
specifications, team roles, effective conduct of team meetings, written and oralECE 361 – Engineering Practice (Junior – 2 credit) communication skills, ethics and professionalism, completion of team project(s). System engineering, team project involving conception, design specifications, conceptual design, scheduling, project management, business plan, market survey, andECE 362 – Principles of Design (Junior – 4 credit