, 1.2, 1.3)1.2 Identify and explain appropriate measuring tools, ≠ Use a variety of hand tools and machines to hand tools, and power tools used to hold, lift, change materials into new forms through carry, fasten, and separate, and explain their the external processes of forming, separating, and combining, and through safe and proper use. processes that cause internal change(s) to1.3 Identify and explain the safe and proper use of occur. (1.2) measuring tools, hand tools, and machines (e.g., band saw, drill press, sander, hammer, screwdriver
, ∂A ∂A ΔA = Δh + Δw + higher order term s . (16) ∂h ∂wThe higher-order terms involve products and integer powers of Δh and Δw that are negligible inmagnitude compared to the first-order terms. Neglecting them and dividing by A yields ΔA Δh Δ w = + . (17) A h w Page 15.923.11The transverse strain terms Δh/h and Δw/w for metals and cubic crystals can be expressed interms of
Information Technology Education 1 (3), 143-154.18 Newton, S., LeRouge, C., & Blanton, J. E. (2003, April). The systems developer skill set: Exploring nature, gaps,and gender differences research in progress [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS Conference onComputer Personnel Research: Freedom in Philadelphia--Leveraging Differences and Diversity in the IT Workforce(Philadelphia, PA). SIGMIS CPR '03. ACM, New York, NY, 150-153.19 Bassellier, G., Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: Adefinition and research model [Electronic version]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 159-182.20 Bassellier, G., Reich, B., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information
people are affected by poverty,” and • “This project increased my knowledge of the culture(s) of another country.” Table 5. Societal and cultural awareness. Strongly Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Agree Disagree Awareness of people in 19 (21%) 42 (47%) 22 (25%) 5 (6%) 1 (1%) poverty Increased cultural 6 (7%) 32 (36%) 33 (37%) 15 (17%) 3 (3%) knowledgeThese results may
activity.Through instruction, research, and service, the University promotes regional economic andcultural development, explores solutions to national and world issues, and supports scholars whocontribute in the advancement of knowledge, cultivate aesthetic sensibility, and improve thematerial conditions of humankind.During the 1990’s, the State’s Board of Regents was concerned that the length of time requiredto complete a baccalaureate degree was growing beyond the stated four years. Therefore, it wasstipulated that the program length for the baccalaureate degree be 128 semester hours, and anyprogram requiring more than 128 must be properly justified. Baccalaureate degree programs at[University A], in general, are 128 semester credit hours or less, which
CurriculumAbstractAs the United States tries to remain technologically competitive with other nations the demandfor engineering professionals is expected to increase. Since the early 1990‘s, many K-12engineering outreach programs have been incorporated into middle schools either through hightech electives or in tandem with the State prescribed math and science curriculum with the intentof fostering student interest in science and engineering. In spite of both approaches the ratio ofscience and engineering degrees awarded annually to the college aged population in the U.S. isless than in other countries. Furthermore, the number of underrepresented minorities earningthose degrees is 12% according to the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering
exploring new opportunities to create and sustaintechnology enhanced learning in STEM disciplines. Page 15.1154.15UW- Madison Sponsoring Deans: Dean Paul S. Peercy, College of Engineering Dean Margaret M. Molly Jahn College of Agricultural and Life SciencesUW-Madison Key Contributors Greg Moses, Professor, College of Engineering Robert Kohlhepp, Director, Computer Aided Engineering, College of Engineering Regina Nelson Lead Technology Consultant and Ph.D. candidate, College of Engineering Sandra Shaw-Courter, Director, Engineering Learning Center, College of Engineering, retired. Tim Tynan, Lead Technology Consultant and Ph.D. candidate, College of
,participation, understanding, and that enhance lives, and should always be collaborative betweenthe researcher(s) and community partners15. Authors often cite PAR as being rooted in the workof Paulo Freire, who advocated re-thinking traditional, top-down education in favor oftransformative, empowered “co-learning”4, 7, 13 .This paper begins with proposition that engineering programs seeking to engage in humanitarianand sustainable development will require interdisciplinary skills. In that sense it tests the theorythat there is value in preparing engineers to engage in teamwork with partners trained in differentskills and that view projects through diverse lenses and methodological frameworks. Throughtriangulation of the experiences of three different
gapbetween research and practice: The research is not sufficiently persuasive or authoritative; Theresearch is not relevant to practice and does not address the issues and concerns of teachers; Ideasfrom research have not been accessible to teachers and are either difficult to find or understand; Theeducation system itself is either too intractable or too unstable, and therefore unable to engage insystematic change. Further, she notes that the gap between educational research and educationalpractice has been an ongoing phenomena and complaint of educational researchers since at least 1934.Careful experimental design was a focus of educational research in the 1960’s, but such research did notresult in broad and rapid adoption of researched
towards its lack of intellectual inquiry and critique. He viewed the relationshipbetween professional bodies and academic professionals as being inherently in conflict with theindependent pursuit of knowledge within the ideal university. According to this argument,accreditation is prejudiced because the people who are doing the accrediting likely owe a greaterallegiance to the profession than to the university: an inherent conflict of interest.Consider John Henry Newman´s core ideas regarding the value of liberal education put forwardin his 19th century book The Idea of a University [12]. Newman argued that the university is ahybrid educational environment which serves to educate students for life by means of“collegiality”, “enlargement of mind
them. The remainingstudents indicated that they were attracted to this profession because of a specific interest inchemistry and mathematics, or other specialized interests.Free response question: What career path(s) are you interested in?Table 1 summarizes the student responses to this second question. Unlike the numbers in theabstract, which were rounded off percentages for the entire class, these numbers are percentagesof the respondents whose answer included a career in the category.Table 1. Student Career Interests(Totals exceed 100% as some students listed more than one career choice) Career Interests Percent of Respondents Biology related (pharmaceutical, biomedical
. Oliver, David W., Timothy P. Kelliher, James G. Keegan, Jr. Engineering Complex Systems with Models and Objects, McGraw-Hill, New York (1997).33. Shigley, Joesph E., Charles R. Mischke, Standard Handbook of Machine Design, 2nd Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York, (1996).34. Merritt, Frederick S., M. Kent Loftin, Jonathan T. Ricketts, Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers, 4th Edition, Mc-Graw Hill, New York (1996).35. McCabe, Warren L., Julian C. Smith, Peter Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill (2005).36. Ullman, D. The Mechanical Design Process, First Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1992).37. Stoll, H.W., Product Design Methods and Practices. Marcel Dekker, New York (1999).38. Ogot, M., and G
academic year. This successful program ran from 2003-2008 with76 students and over a 92% retention and graduation rate in engineering and computerscience. Diversity was an emphasis and 65% of the students in the program were eitherfemale or an underrepresented minority.13 In particular, 29 (38.2%) of the transferstudents were women. This percentage is much higher than the current 18.2% of womenenrolled. For more information on these programs see references 4-13.The CIRC/METS program continues with an NSF S-STEM grant (#0836050), so thecontinuing students, from the first CIRC/METS program, when it ended are now beingsupported in a second CIRC/METS program with $4,000 scholarships per year. When aCIRC/METS student graduates and continues full-time
-938.12. Garvin, D. A. (1988). Managing quality – The strategic and competitive edge. New York: Free Press.13. Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2003). Quality management: introduction to total quality management for production, processing, and services (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.14. Gryna F. M. (2001). Quality planning and analysis. Boston: McGraw-Hill.15. Juran, J. M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality. New York: The Free Press.16. Khalil, T. M. (2000). Management of technology: The key to competitiveness and wealth creation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.17. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.18. Loendorf, W. R. (2008). Transition of the tooling industry in a
a long way to making the work doable.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to acknowledge the support of the Gerhart Center for Philanthropy &Civic Engagement and the Center for Learning & Teaching at the American University in Cairo.Bibliography1. Geiger, E., ―Service Learning Toolbox: Work Pages and Checklists to Help You get Started and Keep you Going,‖ http://www.iun.edu/~cetl/servicelearning/S-L-Resources/S-L-Toolbox.pdf2. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., ―Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices‖, Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, pp 87 – 1013. Reid, K.J., ―Implementing Active and Collaborative Techniques: Lectures, Labs, Grading, and More‖, Proceedings of 2002
2004 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference, June 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.[4] Dorsey, J., Continuous and Discrete Control Systems, McGraw Hill, 2002.[5] Franklin, G., et al., Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 3rd Ed., Addison Wesley, 1994.[6] Goodwin, G., et al., Control System Design, Prentice Hall, 2001.[7] Huang, H.-W., The HCS12/9S12: An Introduction, Software & Hardware Interfacing, Thomson DelmarLearning, 2006.[8] Morton, T., Embedded Microcontrollers, Prentice Hall, 2001.[9] Nise, N., Control Systems Engineering, 4th ed., John Wiley, 2004.[10] Ogata, K., Modern Control Engineering, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, 2002.[11] Pack, S., et al., Embedded Systems, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005[12] Stefani, S., et al
, Daniel M. White, ‘Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design’, J. EngineeringEducation, July 1999.8. Millard, D., Chouikha, M., Berry, F., ‘Improving Student Intuition via Rensselaer s New Mobile StudioPedagogy’, ASEE 2007 Annual Conference, Honolulu, HW, June 2007.9. Comolli, N., Kelly, W. and Qianhong, W., ‘The Artificial Kidney: Investigating Current Dialysis Methods as aFreshman Design Project’, ASEE 2010 Annual Conference.10. Dinehart, D., Gross, S., Yost, J., Radlinska, A., “The Role of Structural Engineering in Multi-DisciplinaryFreshman Projects”, ASEE 2010 Annual Conference.Appendix A: Desired Skills from FEC Recommendations 1. Non-technical a. Teamwork b. Conflict resolution c. Communication (oral
students are members ofclubs and classes throughout the Philadelphia School District and participate in various Page 15.1060.9competitions during the academic year. Mentors spend three hours a week at an assigned school.In total five schools were visited during the six week competition period for BEST Robotics. Inaddition, in 2006, almost two dozen Robotics educators, from the School District of Philadelphia(SDP), gathered at Villanova University' s Center for Engineering Education and Research(CEER) to take part in an AT&T sponsored three-day computer-aided design workshop. Thisprogram was repeated in 2007 when 26 teachers visited Villanova
Quantification of LearningTheories abound for ways of measuring learning. Fundamentally, learning is about contrasts:contrasts at points in time regarding knowledge, understanding, and skill that is transferred fromthe instructor to the student. The transference of information alone does not constitute learningin its full measure, although this mode of learning is easily quantifiable (exams for example). Ahigher mode of learning is using facts to arrive at understanding. To quantify understanding it isnecessary to frame the instrument of measure in the context of the central concept(s); Ericksoncalls this a “conceptual lens” [22]. For example, after learning the facts about expansion andcompression, the concept of heat transfer becomes more apparent. A
cadets take in their major. Each major contains at least one integrativeexperience course that serves as the culmination of the cadet’s academic experience. For theengineering majors this is the Capstone course(s). Most of the engineering and computer sciencemajor programs are accredited by ABET. Cadets majoring in ABET-accredited engineeringprograms have to take at least 44 courses in order to meet the required hours for math, basicscience and engineering topics since cadets take such a large load of core courses in thehumanities and social sciences. Cadets may also graduate with honors if they meet certain gradepoint average and curriculum objectives. The overall academic curriculum prepares cadets wellto ‘respond effectively to the
Continuous Improvement Plan. Retrieved January 7, 2010 from http://www.coe.montana.edu/met/6. The project described was supported by Grant from the Montana Board of Research and Commercialization Technology, 301 S. Park Avenue, Helena, MT 59620.7. Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE). A Friendly Guide to Biofilm Basics & the CBE. Retrieved January 7, 2010, from http://www.erc.montana.edu/CBEssentials-SW/bf-basics-99/bbasics-01.htm.8. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., Designing Effective Instruction, 4th ed., 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.9. Glatthorn, A. A., Jailall, J., Curriculum for the New Millennium, Education In A New Era, ASCD Yearbook, 2000, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA
, 2008.4. Gary B. Randolph, “Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, 2000, Vol. 89, 119—122.5. L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, “The ABET “Professional Skills”–Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, January 2005, 41—55.6. S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, “Engineers Learn “Soft Skills the Hard Way”: Planting a Seed of Leadership in Engineering Classes,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, January 2007, 18—23.7. D. Shetty and R. A. Kolk, Mechatronics System Design, PWS, Boston, MA, 1997.8. C. W. de Silva, Mechatronics: An Integrated Approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2005.9. D. J
incentive of up to $7.50 perhour for a qualified student. This reimbursement is available for up to 400 hours of the student’sinitial hours of employment. The employer must be willing to provide at least a minimum wage(in Michigan this is currently $7.40 per hour), for that same time frame. Thereby assuring this isa legal employment contract between an employer and employee. Employers are also asked toprovide a job description or work plan for the intern, as well as a brief company profile and signa letter of agreement regarding these terms. Employers submit a job description for aninternship position to the Office of Career Services and students apply for the positions and theemployer determines the most qualified candidate (s) for their
Examination isbeing used as a bench-mark of progress. The several aspects of the rebuilding project aredescribed along with a report of progress and lessons learned. The paper concludes withobservations about the ethical and cultural nature of engineering education and somerecommendations about changes that are required to achieve the desired outcomes of therebuilding project.Historical Backdrop:The Faculty of Engineering was established in the 1960’s and 70’s by a consortium of USUniversities with USAID sponsorship1,2. The project was a “turn-key” project that provided abuilding, laboratories, and US based education for the new Afghan Faculty members. Facultymembers from the participating US Universities established and taught classes and
Foundation underGrant No.(NSF/EESE#0832852). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Herkert, J. R. (2000). Engineering education in the USA: Content, pedagogy, andcurriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), pp. 303-313.[1a] Herkert, J. R. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering education. The Bridge, 32(3).[2] Vesilind, P. A., (2001). Engineering as Applied Social Science, Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 127, No. 4, October2001, pp. 184-188,[3] Winkelman, P., (2006). Integrating Open-Ended Design in a Science
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[9] Ulrich, K. and S. Eppinger, 1995, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill.[10] Hannukainen, P. and K. Holtta-Otto, 2006, "Identifying Customer Needs -- Disabled Persons as Lead Users," ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Philadelphia, PA, Paper Number: DETC2006- 99043.[11] Otto, K.N. and K.L. Wood, 2001, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Page 15.571.15Appendix A: Extreme Experience Design Project Assignment (ENGR 1812, LeTourneau U
decisions when they lack complete information. In contrast many design textbooks describe a much more rational decision-making process. This finding suggests that the cognitive literature in heuristics and decision-making can provide a theoretical foundation for understanding why students have difficulty enacting the design process as described in textbooks. Page 15.1120.13The author wishes to thank the student participants in this study. Without their engagingdiscussions, this work would not be possible.References1. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D., ed. (2005). How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom. Washington, D.C
), relevance (5 questions), confidence (8 questions), and satisfaction (3 questions).The survey also contained 3 open-ended questions at the end. Students in both groups submittedthe survey at the end of the course (The survey questions and ARCS indicators are presented athttp://ipt.boisestate.edu/msensf/ASEE2010ARCSSurvey.htm). Internal reliability of thequestions measuring each of the four ARCS factors was an acceptable level. The CronbachAlpha values for the sets of questions measuring A, R, C, and S were .86, .90, .93, and .89,respectively.ABET Program Outcomes Pre and Post Surveys: The ABET program outcomes survey askedstudents to rate on a 7-point scale (1 being ‘no improvement’ and 7 being ‘a lot ofimprovement’) how much they thought