., DeMara, R. F., Tatulian, A., & Chen, B. (2019). Quantitative impact on learning achievement by engaging high integrity testing using lockdown assessment for online delivery. Proceedings of the ASEE Southeast Section Conference, No. 45. This work was published and presented in March, 2019. http://www.asee-se.org/proceedings/ASEE2019/papers2019/45.pdf9. McGraw Hill Connect, website https://www.mheducation.com/highered/support/connect/smartbook/connect- access-code-and-purchase.html, accessed on January, 17th, 2024.10. Archer, K. K. (2018). Do Multiple Homework Attempts Increase Student Learning? A Quantitative Study. The American Economist. 63(2):056943451877479, DOI: 10.1177/0569434518774790. Colangelo College of
quantitatively investigate gender and ethnic persistent in aerospace engineeringprograms specifically. Their study utilized data from the MIDFIELD database and included 6of the 20 largest aerospaceengineeringdegreegranting institutions in the U.S., but the insti Figure 1: Matriculation method, first major declared in the engineering college, and degree received for students who entered the engineering college between Fall 2011 and Fall 2017 and ever declared a major in aerospace engineering.tution under study in this paper was not included in their data. Bir and Ahn’s 2019 study included an exploration of the effects of various identity factors, such as gender, ethnicminoritystatus, and selfreported financial confidence
society, including the development in practice of concepts such as grassroots engineering and solidarity economy and technology.However, there are some limitations too. As far as we can see, Soltec faces two significantchallenges for the students’ education: funding and evaluation. In the first case, the problem getsmore evident with administrations less sympathetic to left-wing projects, which is the case ofBrazil and both the State and city of Rio de Janeiro, currently in the hand of far-right politicians.This situation is new to Soltec, after thirteen years of the leftist Worker’s Party’s federaladministrations. However, after far-right Jair Bolsonaro came into power (2019), FederalUniversities (such as UFRJ), social movements, and
semesters, from Winter 2019 to Fall 2021(Table 1). We analyze data based on instructor sex and COVID; future work will analyze this datafor other demographic characteristics, such as race/ethnicity and nationality.Data pre-processing Some of the courses in our data are associated with multiple instructors,and some of the evaluations target teaching assistants rather than professors. We performextensive data cleaning before analysis, including: (1) removing multi-instructor courses (courseswhere multiple instructors were referenced in the evaluations); (2) removing lab and recitationsections where teaching assistants were likely to be mentioned in evaluations; (3) replacingpersonal names detected with Named Entity Recognition1 with generic PERSON
) Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (ed) Handbook ofResearch on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 493-541). New York: Macmillan.[13] Fraser, B. J. (1998a) Classroom environment instruments: Development, Validity, andapplications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.[14] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Creating a Learning Environment that Engages EngineeringStudents in the Classroom via Communication Strategies. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl. Paper ID: 26093.[15] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Teaching Engineering Virtually: A Rapid Response to Address theAcademic Challenges Generated by COVID-19. 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.March 24-26, Baylor University. Waco, Texas. Paper ID
which you do not agree, without letting the disagreement taking interfere with one's reasoning. Understanding Consider the integration of gender, nationality, beliefs of diversity and experience. Ethics Be able to face ethical dilemmas in the professional field.Collaboration Setup and TimelineWith the theoretical framework of Education 4.0 in mind, collaboration between bothinstitutions was initiated in March 2019 to establish a common ideas and interests framework.The ASEE 2019 conference presented the ideal opportunity to meet in-person for drafting ofmore detailed definitions for suitable projects with
important to understand how students conceptualizesocial issues we are asking them to address.MethodologyContext of the StudyIn order to understand undergraduate engineering students’ perceptions of homelessness, weincorporated an engineering design project focused on homelessness into a User-CenteredDesign course at our university. This paper focuses on the projects assigned in the fall semesterof 2019 and the spring semester of 2020. These two projects were both centered aroundhomelessness, but differed in their scope due to the COVID-19 pandemic during the 2020spring semester. During the Fall 2019 semester, students enrolled in the course were asked todesign a solar water heater for a mobile shower unit intended to provide services to
1504618). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The author would also like to thank thestatistical consulting resources provided by the Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences,University of Washington.References[1] U.S. Census Bureau, “QuickFacts: United States,” 2019. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/LFE046218 (accessed Jan. 28, 2020).[2] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities Report,” 2019. https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=297944 (accessed Jan. 28, 2020).[3] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and
pipeline AND career OR job OR employment OR occupation Web of All fields "career path" AND 62 January 6th, 2023 Science "high school" Scopus All fields "career path" AND 2,188 January 6th, 2023 "high school" Compendex All fields "career path" AND 87 January 6th, 2023 "high school" ASEE Peer All fields Career pathways 3390 January 29th 2023
: Needs of Returning and Direct-Pathway Students,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1238.1-24.1238.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--23171.[13] J. J. Varney, “The role of dissertation self-efficacy in increasing dissertation completion: sources, effects and viability of a new self-efficacy construct,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 932–947, Dec. 2010.[14] Committee on Effective Mentoring in STEMM, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2019, p
his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Pro- gram Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction Engineering classrooms have adopted team-based learning as a popular and effectivepedagogy for a long time [1-3]. Given the booming of computer-assisted learning technologies,instructors could easily observe the different ways of interaction and collaboration across teamsand among team
levels over the past two decades. [1,9] AlthoughSTEM education research has flourished, there has yet to be equal activity in the propagation of theseinnovations, as the National Research Council (NRC) highlighted. [10] The NRC called for the propagationof engineering education research into practice, including adopting evidence-based practices. Further, theneed for more successful propagation has also been highlighted by an ASEE report [11] that included anappeal to funding agencies to use resources to propagate better efforts that have proven successful.Although educational innovations have been produced over the past few decades, Rogers highlights aneed for knowledge of how to implement the innovation correctly and a lack of underlying
Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michi- gan. She is Fellow of both the ASEE and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), associate editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education, and member of the Governing Board of the Research in Engineering Education Network. She was previously chair of EECHA, chair of the ERM Division of ASEE, co-chair of the ASEE Committee on Scholarly Publications, deputy editor for
for 11weeks) and their group final presentation and ability to answer questions well (50 points).Table 3 shows the course grading percentages for all components of the course for 2018, 2019,2021, and 2022, both pre-project and post-project, so that a comparison of individual versusgroup work can be made. Table 4 shows the project grade, comprehensive final exam grade (thesame final exam is given each year, with only minor edits), and overall course grades withaverages and standard deviations. For a control, the year 2018 is presented. In 2018, there was noproject. Please note that 2020 is not presented as it was during COVID, and the course wastaught asynchronously and remotely with a different final exam. In 2019, when the project
results todetermine the mean and median response for each item on the survey, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to assess the level of statistical significance. A follow-on conferencepaper detailing these results will be submitted in time for the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference. 11References[1] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019-2020," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3. [Accessed 20 1 2023].[2] Herring, Cedric, “Does Diversity Pay? Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity
Initiatives to Promote Engineering Success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] P. Treuer, and L. Whisler, “Entangled learning: An overview,” retrieved from https://www.EntangledLearning.org, 2019.[3] L. Whisler, and P. Treuer, “How to entangle peer educators,” Synergy, 10, 2017.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection, and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of Exam Wrappers to Enhance Students’ Metacognitive Skills in a Large
of College Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 14-20, 2007.[8] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," ed: Journal of Engineering Education, 2006, pp. 123- 138.[9] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and C. Nelson, "Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-based Learning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences to Engineering Students ", 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019: ASEE, pp. 1-21.[10] H. L. Tuan *, C. C. Chin, and S. H. Shieh, "The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 27, no. 6
, 2019.[12] M. Ong, N. Jaumot‐Pascual, and T. Ko. Lily, "Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581-615, 2020.[13] M. Borrego, K. Jennifer, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes, "Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 472-512, 2013.[14] B. Beigpourian, and M. W. Ohland, "A systematized review: Gender and race in teamwork in undergraduate engineering classrooms," In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15-19, 2019.[15] N. M
teams: a systematic review," Team Performance Management, vol. 25 No. 7/8, pp. 369-401, 2019.J. D. Carrico, J. Anjum, and A. Anjum, "An interdisciplinary project-based service learning and action research project with mechanical engineering and speech-language pathology students," in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, June 22, 2020 - June 26, 2020.L. Fogg-Rogers, F. Lewis, and J. Edmonds, “Paired peer learning through engineering education outreach,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(1), 75–90, 2017.K. Geeraerts, J. Vanhoof, and P. Van den Bossche, “Teachers’ perceptions of intergenerational knowledge flows,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 56, pp. 150-161, 2016.E. Kearney
founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is the principal formative evaluator for the AGEP-NC project. She has also served as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advised com- puter science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with
. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00277.x.[5] F. Ishikawa and N. Yoshioka, “How Do Engineers Perceive Difficulties in Engineering of Machine-Learning Systems? - Questionnaire Survey,” Proc. - 2019 IEEE/ACM Jt. 7th Int. Work. Conduct. Empir. Stud. Ind. 6th Int. Work. Softw. Eng. Res. Ind. Pract. CESSER-IP 2019, pp. 2–9, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CESSER-IP.2019.00009.[6] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 439–462, 2017, doi: 10.1002/tea.21372.[7] P. R. Backer and C
to Engineers without Borders and Critical Global Engagement at Cal Poly.Dr. Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jane Lehr is a Professor in Ethnic Studies and Women’s & Gender Studies and Director of Student Re- search at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She is affiliated faculty in Computer Science and Software Engineering and Science, Technology and Society. She is also the 2019-20 Inclu- sive STEM Initiatives Fellow in the Colleges of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, and Liberal Arts and Faculty Director of the California State University (CSU) Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Partici- pation (LSAMP) in STEM Program at Cal Poly. She previously
Engineering Stress Culture," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," Journal of engineering education, vol. 99, pp. 319-336, 2010.[10] Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane, Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2006. 5(1): p: 80-92.[11] MacQueen, K. M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein, B, Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cam
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15th-19th. Retrieved fromhttps://peer.asee. org/32861, 2019, January.[4] J. A. Leydens, J. A. and J.C. Lucena, Engineering justice: Transforming engineeringeducation and practice. New York City, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2017[5] A. E. Slaton, Race, rigor, and selectivity in US engineering: The history of an occupationalcolor line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.[6] M. Gecan, Going public. New York City, NY: Beacon Press, 2012.[7] D. Riley D, E. K. Foster, J. Karlin “Show up and disrupt,” Journal of Engineering Education,2019 Dec 20, pp. 2-9.[8] E. A. Cech and H. M. Sherick, “Depoliticization and the structure of engineering education,”in International perspectives on
joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Exploring ‘Ways of Thinking’ of Interdisciplinary CollaboratorsAbstractCalls have been made for novel ways of thinking about engineering education research. Buildingon an earlier qualitative inquiry, this work in progress study examined the number and nature offactors underlying the constructs of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking within thecontext of interdisciplinary engineering education research. Exploratory factor analysis of surveydata (n =111) supported a correlated
undergraduate engineering population be enhanced through curricular change?” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, 2004.[7] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers,” ASEE, 2017.[8] “Degree Attainment,” Research and Trends for Women in STEM, 17-Aug-2016. [Online]. Available: https://research.swe.org/2016/08/degree-attainment/. [Accessed: 18-Mar-2019].[9] “Report - S&E Indicators 2018 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and- engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states. [Accessed: 18-Mar- 2019].[10] N. R. Center, “Science & Engineering Degree Attainment - 2017,” National
standing (two sophomores, six juniors,and two seniors).One current measure of success of the 2018 SURE Program is the number of student researchpresentations at the local or regional level. At the local level, each participant presented his orher research in the form of a poster at the beginning of the fall 2018 semester at The CitadelSURE Research Conference. At the regional level, five of the SURE posters were presented atthe Southern Conference Research Forum at Wofford University in November 2018 and onestudent presented his research at the 2019 ASEE-SE Conference in March 2019 at NC StateUniversity.Brief Description of Several 2018 SURE Research ProjectsOne research project focused on preliminary research in developing a low-cost passive
. Computers & Education, Vol. 133, pp. 43-55, (2019).[10] University of Colorado Boulder. PhET Interactive Simulations. Available at:https://phet.colorado.edu/[11] J. D. Rush and M. M. Hynes. “The Role of Gender in Pre-college Students’ Perceptions ofEngineering,” in ASEE annual conference proceedings (2017).[12] K. Shapley, D. Sheehan, C. Maloney, and F. Caranikas-Walker, “Effects of TechnologyImmersion on Middle School Students’ Learning Opportunities and Achievement,” The Journalof Educational Research, Vol. 104:5, 299-315, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/00220671003767615
adjunct associate professor in the Technology, Engineering, and Design department at NC State and earned her doctorate in Technology, Engineering, and Design in the College of Education at NC State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Evaluation of collaborative REU exploring the energy spectrum from body-heat harvesting to smart grid technologyEngaging in research is one of the few and critical project-based learning experiences of theundergraduate engineering career. Typical students are rarely exposed to authentic applicationsof engineering design, research, and/or multidisciplinary content until the capstone course at theend of their undergraduate curriculum
). Essentially, one in every four 4-year HBCU institutionsexperienced a resignation or termination at the highest level. Presidents at HBCUs have asignificantly shorter tenure, with an average of 3.3 years, than those of other four-yearinstitutions, with an average tenure of 7 years (Kimbrough, 2017; Gagliardi et al., 2017;Washington Lockett, 2019). These changes have been deemed a “crisis” and an added challengeto the ongoing recovery efforts of many HBCUs that are disproportionately impacted by theglobal pandemic. Particular examples highlighting the extent of this crisis include the state ofMississippi, which saw four presidents leave their eight public institutions within one year(Moody, 2023). Two of the four were Jackson State University and