it is common for studentsto work alone on projects at the undergraduate level.For many second-year engineering students, on the other hand, team projects have been anessential part of the curriculum since starting college. By the time of graduation, it is expectedthat these students have developed as specialists who can contribute to a larger project in whichmultiple disciplines are required to achieve a solution. Thus, it is not surprising that theteamwork aspects of an undergraduate engineering curriculum affected students‟ perceptions ofinterdisciplinary engineering work.During the focus groups, students identified critical components of a successful interdisciplinaryengineering team as good communication, trust, and mutual respect
specific things happen (i.e., change theatmosphere). Without effective communication skills, a good idea could be overlooked. Another example is Yahoo! Hack-U, which is a 24-hr programming contest. Under the time constraint, clear communication and teamwork are necessary among team members. I was able to divide the work, integrate my part with others and change the atmosphere to one that was both enjoyable and memorable.In this last example, the participant describes specific outcomes (e.g., gain funding, convinceothers, prove something is worthwhile) that engineers might desire and asserts that effectivecommunication will empower them to achieve these outcomes. In the work place, an engineer needs to be able to
annually in courses organized to ensure student success through rigorous academics in a team-based environment. His responsibilities in- clude operations, faculty recruiting, curriculum management, student retention, and program assessment. Dr. Merrill received his Ph.D. in Instructional Design and Technology from The Ohio State University in 1985, and has an extensive background in public education, corporate training, and contract research. He has made frequent presentations at conferences held by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and its affiliate conference, Frontiers in Education (FIE). He is part of the research team that was recently awarded an NSF grant to study strategies for maximizing
% higher as compared with science and mathematics majors. The grantproposed to (1) integrate the science and mathematics majors with the engineering majors duringsummer orientation, (2) expand student learning community offerings to STEM majors, (3)create a General Sciences course for STEM students who are underprepared in mathematics, and(4) offer an elective, non-credit bearing mathematics online review course, free of charge, tostudents entering the university in STEM majors. An underlying and important rationale forwidening the advisement base to include all STEM majors in an inclusive manner is the fact thatmany freshmen are unsure of their major. Therefore orientation materials were prepared thatemphasized the commonalities between majors
strong reputation of excellence. He has developed a strong track record of teaching effectiveness based on consistently good teaching evaluations, and he has won some departmental awards in this area. Dr. Gonzalez and colleagues from UTPA and Michigan State University were awarded Honorable Mention in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2004 Curriculum Innovation Award competition. Furthermore, his service as an Associate Editor for The IEEE Transactions on Education has provided him with a means of enhancing and maintaining his knowledge on the issues affecting engineering education. In the area of professional achievement, he has been able to obtain over Four Million Dollars in funding for his academic
requirements and launched with only oneinternational destination – China. The choice of this destination was a strategic decision on thepart of program administrators and reflected recognition of the impact that China is having onthe careers of many engineering graduates of today. The GEARE Junior Year program was alsodesigned to seamlessly integrate with the mechanical engineering curriculum at PurdueUniversity. The Spring semester of 2009 was the first semester that the GEARE Junior Yearprogram was offered. Participants in the GEARE Junior Year program study abroad at Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity along with participants in the GEARE program. The focus of the study presented inthis paper was on the first cohort of participants in the program
Ph.D. degree in Engineering from TTU in 1999. From 1999 until 2004 he was employed by Square D Company / Schneider Electric in Nashville, Tennessee, where he served as a senior electrical engineer, then as an engineering manager. He is currently an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green. His research in- terests involve computational electromagnetics, application of electromagnetics to the analysis and design of electromechanical devices, and photonics. Page 22.1090.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
. Even in curricula were labs are offered, the approach used is generally atraditional one where students perform prescribed experiments with little or no critical reasoningof what they are performing 7. Therefore, students should be provided with integrative labexperiences that promote inquiry relevance using hands on experiences and team orientedapproaches. Such labs satisfy the vision of the National Science Foundation to improveengineering education 8. Although very important to biomedical engineers, implementing a cellular engineeringlaboratory in the biomedical curriculum is challenging for the following three main reasons.First, handling cells require students’ prior training on issues associated with safety, sterilizationand
the curriculum of an Electrical and Computer EngineeringTechnology program, the biomedical course is redesigned so that the students can follow thetheory with laboratory experiments for processing biomedical signals utilizing System DesignApproach (SDA). Isolated experiments focused on a single topic never conveyed the holistic feelthat is gained through a complete instrumentation platform design.This course is offered in the form of Learning Modules. The paper discuses the coursesystem design learning modules which encompasses: 1) Bio signal, Transducers and SignalConditioning, 2) Microcontrollers based Embedded System design, 3) Embedded SystemProgramming, 4) Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) Design, 5) Use of Graphical UserInterface (GUI
seamless integration of the codedeveloped by different groups. Additionally, user testing of prototype implementations adds asense of real development to the project. Since simple graph theory topics are an important aspectof a computer science education, the project also gives an opportunity for the students to presenttheir tool at local and regional computer science meetings that encourage student participation.1 IntroductionMany computer science programs include some type of capstone course in the senior year as a wayto challenge their students to apply all of the knowledge they have gained on a substantial project.However, there are typically not many opportunities in the second and third year of these programsto introduce students to a team
content totheir curricula that directly supports education in those fields. Students were also given theopportunity to interact with an off-campus client, which provided an additional uniqueexperience that is not typically found in the classroom. This interaction allowed students tofurther develop their project management and communication skills. This paper will describe theresults of the project, assess the methodologies used to educate the students and review theimpacts of this approach on incorporating novel content into an engineering curriculum.IntroductionHow can students be taught new ideas in emerging technologies in a timely manner? This is achallenge many universities face, incorporating novel content into their curricula
, and lecture-lab timing is suggested.References1. Krupezak, J., Disney, K., and VanderStoep, S., “Laboratory projects appropriate for non-engineers and introduction to engineering.” 2009 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009-603, American Society for Engineering Education.2. Sinba, A., “Engineering laboratory experiments – an integrated approach of teaching the introductory engineering course,” 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007-189, American Society for Engineering Education.3. Dekker, D., “Recent developments in mech lab I at the university of south florida,” 2007 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2007-410, American Society for Engineering Education.4. Salehpour, A., and Antoline, S., “Rapid prototyping as an
until November 2003. Antonio started his pursuit of the Doctor of Philosophy degree at the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University in January 2004 under the supervision of Dr. Reginald Perry. Upon completion of his PhD, Dr. Soares was immediately hired as an assistant professor (Tenure Track) in the Electronic Engineering Technology department at FAMU. Dr. Soares has made many contributions to the department, from curriculum improvements, to ABET accreditation, and more recently by securing a grant with the department of education for more than half a million dollars.Chao Li, Florida A&M University/Florida State University Dr. Chao Li is currently working at Florida A&M University as an assistant
Page 22.1111.7into the COE requires organized advising of these students. The COE Dean’s Office hasreviewed and refined their processes for transfer students. Prior to transferring, students enteringthe COE have their credits evaluated, receive initial advising assistance through New StudentEnrollment or by key COE staff, and are assigned an adviser appropriate for their chosen major.The integration of UNL resources and interaction across the COE has been of great benefit tofaculty and transfer students. It is energizing to experience the system being proactive,responsive and receptive to the needs of STEP transfer students and transfer students in general.UNL-STEP Pathway Engineering Courses UNL-STEP is best described by
AC 2011-1415: AVOIDING INFERIORITY: GLOBAL ENGINEERING ED-UCATION ACROSS JAPANGary Lee Downey, Virginia Tech Gary Downey is Alumni Distinguished Professor in Science and Technology Studies and affiliated Profes- sor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. A mechanical engineer (Lehigh) and cultural anthropolo- gist (University of Chicago), he is co-editor of What Is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010). Author of The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist Sits Among Computer Engineers, he is Editor of The Engineering Studies Series at MIT Press and Global Engineering series at Morgan & Claypool, as well as the Engineering Studies journal
AC 2011-280: A MODEL FOR INITIATING ABET-ACCREDITED ENGI-NEERING DEGREE PROGRAMS USING DISTANCE EDUCATIONDarrin S. Muggli, Benedictine College Dr. Muggli is a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Department at Benedictine College. Previously, he was a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota, where he taught both traditional and distance courses for ten years. Dr. Muggli received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1998. He has taught a broad range of chemical engineering and foundational general engineering courses.Brian Tande, University of North Dakota Brian Tande is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the
system starting with the panel to end user arevirtually absent in the literature. Many courses across the nation are ME courses that focus moreon solar radiation and the thermal aspect. A few EE courses devote about fifty percent of thecourse to semiconductors and the remaining to system hardware. The fundamentals of the systemcomponents are covered in other courses in EE curriculum and no focus on integration to solarconversion is presented. However this approach needs serious revision in view of the importanceand national focus on harnessing alternate energy, and the need for graduates trained in this field.In the design of the proposed course materials, emphasis will be placed on the hardware designstarting from the solar panel output to end
forth “linguistic intelligence,musical intelligence, logical-mathematical intelligence, spatial intelligence, and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence”3 to name a few. Gardener views intelligence as an individual’s abilityto solve problems or create products that are valued by society. The implication for teachingand learning is that instructors need to vary the inputs and have a repertoire of strategies forfacilitating learning. The more ways we find to process material, the stronger learningbecomes. We need to recognize there’s no “one best way.”Learning is enhanced in an enriched environment. The physical environment of the classroomis certainly important (aesthetics, climate, etc.), but so too is the learning environment that wecreate to get
assessments, teams met to develop a consensus evaluation of the workshop. Thisprovided an opportunity for the team to discuss their individual perspectives and develop aclearer understanding of the assessment dimensions. The average of all team’s consensusassessments determined the grade receive by the workshop presenters.The two exams in the course covered only material presented in the workshops (20% of semestergrade). Students took learning the workshop material seriously and performed well on the exams. Plan for Self-MasteryStudents developed their personal plan for developed from the compilation and integration ofwritings throughout the course. Each of these writings had been commented on and some sharedwith teammates. There were numerous
welcomedstudents in 1984 and is now available on-line, and an Integrated Product DevelopmentProgram with both graduate and undergraduate sections.12,13Collaborative working in teams was a feature of the IBM Manufacturing TechnologyInstitute that was established in Manhattan in 1981 to revitalize the old-style IBMmanufacturing workforce.12 During the next decade teamwork started to become a featureof the K-12 curriculum and several competitions such as FIRST (For Inspiration andRecognition of Science and Technology) for 9-12 grades in 1992, and a Future CityProgram for 6-8 grades in 1993 were inspired.14 The imaginative and innovative skills thatare unleashed in contests of these types should not be suffocated (and destroyed) byexcessively prescriptive
optimize robots tocompete in a “Capture the Flag” style game. This paper will describe the course content andsummarize assessment results from the Fall 2010 pilot course.IntroductionIn Fall 2010, Harvey Mudd College began offering a new core curriculum with more electivity,including, for the first time, an elective in the fall semester of the freshman year. Most existingelectives have prerequisites and are not aimed at first-semester students. As part of thiscurriculum revision, HMC faculty have created a variety of new courses tailored to incomingfreshmen. The authors have recently completed teaching one of these courses, titled E11:Autonomous Vehicles, which offers an interdisciplinary hands-on introduction to engineeringmotivated by a robot
interests include Robotics, Vibrations, Controls Systems, Internet-based Quality Control, and Renewable Energy Systems. Page 22.515.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 E-Quality Control Method for Measuring Solar Cell EfficiencyAbstractRecent results of laboratory and course development under an NSF, CCLI sponsored project,“CCLI Phase II: E-Quality for Manufacturing (EQM) Integrated with Web-enabled ProductionSystems for Engineering Technology Education” (NSF Award # 0618665) are presented. Thispaper discusses an educational effort that incorporates Renewable Energy in a senior
mounting a campaign to a) take computer science to the high schools, b)increase the visibility of computing as a career, and c) develop curriculum and studies on how toconvey an appealing message that describes the opportunities and challenges of the field24.Compounding this problem is the fact that once we have prospective majors in the classroom,their prospects for success are not great. Low enrollments and high DFW rates are obviouslyconnected. Although computer science advocates claim computer science is not about mindless Page 22.985.6abstract programming done by lone hackers late at night, that is almost exactly what mostintroductory
integrated PBL curriculum to address this need. Additionally, the “soft skills” learningthat have been previously presented during the capstone sequence will now be delivered in thePBL curriculum. We have learned that faculty mentors are key role players in achieving successwith the project in terms of meeting the learning outcomes. The faculty member has to develop abalance between meeting the needs of the customer, a completed product, and the experimentallearning that must take place over the course of the project. Finally, student teams who engagethe customer frequently throughout the progression of the project meet the requirements of theproject more frequently. The 2010-2011 capstone year now requires faculty and industry mentorsto meet one
, and M. Nanny. 2003. “Turning techno-savvy into info-savvy: au- thentically integrating information literacy into the college curriculum.” Journal of Academ- ic Librarianship, 29(6), 386-98.xv Kuhlthau, ibid.xvi Holliday, Wendy, and Qin Li. 2004. “Understanding the Millennials: updating our knowledge about students.” Reference Services Review 32(4), 356-366.xvii Purzer, Senay, Meagan Ross, Ruth Wertz, Michael Fosmire, and Monica Cardella. “Assess- ing Engineering Students’ Information Literacy Skills: An Alpha Version of a Multiple- Choice Instrument.” In Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference, June 26-29, 2011 Vancouver, BC
showingsomething unexpected the students realize a gap in their knowledge and have a newfoundfascination and personal motivation for solving the mystery. The preceding steps help to engagethe students on an emotional, behavioral, and cognitive level, and thus induce intrinsicmotivation. This paper will discuss the pedagogy of the“Room with A VUE” system and concludewith a case study of curriculum development aimed at creating hands-on exploration experimentsin materials engineering to apply the system. This paper is not meant to be a resource of visualdemonstrations – such a resource is forthcoming from the author. The system to be discussed is rooted in the psychological motifs of behavioral,emotional, and cognitive engagement. Motivation
systems to find leaks. Any leakage in an unconditioned area, such as an attic or vented crawl-space, is a huge energy drain. In addition, duct leakage within the home can cause pressure differences that drive air out of or into the home. Blower Door Testing – A blower door is a precisely variable speed fan installed in an exterior doorway (or other location to be studied) that depressurizes or pressurizes the home. This diagnostic tool helps quantify air leakages in a home that are otherwise difficult to detect. Infrared Thermography – An infrared camera sees temperature difference, which helps to find hot and cold spots in a home, often due to lack of insulation, water leak or the presence of thermal
22.1156.6Category 7: Human-centered design is Empathic Design, basing design on knowledgeEmpathic Design gained through a connection with end users, not on preconceived ideas and assumptions. A very broad understanding of stakeholders is developed beyond scope of project by interacting with users informally and in social situations. (William, Maddie, Greg, and David)The seven categories of description resulting from the study formed an outcome space that wastwo-dimensional with distinct, but not independent, axes: “Understanding of the Users” and“Design Process and Integration” as shown in Figure 1. The axes depict complex constructs andhave scales that were derived from the categories themselves and are
-levelunderstanding (i.e., breadth) of a modern digital communications device while focusing onseveral key aspects (i.e., depth) in the design and implementation of these systems. However,learning how to use an actual software-defined radio platform for prototyping digitalcommunication systems is often a lengthy, tedious, and complicated process. As a result, thistechnology is usually not employed within the undergraduate curriculum due to the relativelyshort duration of a typical undergraduate course, e.g., 7-14 weeks. Conversely, if the laboratoryexperiments and SDR modules have been pre-packaged for the students enrolled in the course,this would allow for a controlled exposure to SDR experimentation while simultaneouslyenabling the hands-on learning
, we report on the creation of the DLCI, particularly the public Page 22.142.2dissemination of version β1.0 at several institutions. The construction and dissemination of theDLCI were supported through funding under the Course, Curriculum, and LaboratoryImprovement Program of the National Science Foundation. To maintain the integrity of the instrument, we do not provide the whole DLCI. The DLCI isavailable only by request to the authors.2. Background To better explain the purpose of the DLCI, we first define what a CI is and what it is not. A CI is a short, multiple-choice test that can classify a student as someone who thinks in