Conference Session

Engineering Literacy: Champions of Engineering in General Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

musical instruments that are used in heavy metal music function. 4. Students will explain how each instrument serves a musical need for specific subgenres of heavy metal. 5. Students will identify the worldwide influences and impact of heavy metal music. 6. Students will describe how heavy metal music serves as a vehicle to know about global culture and government function.This course serves to discuss engineering and technology through heavy metal’s creation andevolution. Additional discussions explore social perceptions of and responses by the culture ofmetal, and how its growth reflects politics and society worldwide. In these ways, the courserepresents many of the tenets of liberal education promoted at the host

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2: Curriculum and the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew J. Czuchry, East Tennessee State University; James H. Lampley, East Tennessee State University; Addison Scott Karnes, East Tennessee State University; Leendert Menist Craig, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

experience. Some professions may callthe experience hands-on learning or real-world projects, and “learning-by-doing” is a phraseoften heard in the trades or in technical education.Regardless of the name, the goal is the same - allow students to gain experience in solvingproblems. Experiential learning may include all these activities and more. There must be a finalcomponent, a self-evaluation by students about what went wrong and what went right in theirexperiential learning project. This reflective process is what elevates a hands-on experience toexperiential learning. * * * *Authors’ NoteHow does this article relate to Engineering Management Education? A special thanks goes outto the reviewers

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jani Kalasniemi, Aalto University; Joona Kurikka, Aalto University; Lauri Repokari, Politecnico do Porto

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

validation offered by this paper. The topics are: 1. How the time and the way coaches helped the teams reflects the team’s design outcome? 2. How much team members helped each other? From the pictures, it was clear that teams were asking each other for help during the challenge. How much the other team members helped and how much it helped, would be good questions for this kind of a study 3. How did the code written by the participants evolved during the different stages of the challenge and can this be reflected to measure what the participants learned during the challenge?References[1] R. Terry and J. Harb, “Kolb, Bloom, Creativity, and Engineering Design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., vol. 2

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Shane P. Corbett, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

the antenna to vary. 2 We care about both the VSWR and the bandwidth because they tell us how our antenna will perform in the RF spectrum. VSWR is a measure of the reflected power from the antenna back to the hardware. The value is typically represented as a ratio of the max voltage in the line to the minimum voltage. Ideally, you would want a VSWR of 1, but any value below or around 2 is perfectly acceptable. When the VSWR becomes too high, on the order of 5 or so, the mismatch is too great to transmit signals over the antenna at that frequency. From the three design parameters we can calculate most characteristics of the

Conference Session

Edifying Engineering Education through Multidisciplinary Efforts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hsiao-Wen Wang, National Cheng Kung University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

the domain of engineering. Communication skills: The content of the report used clear logic and appropriate content. Creative thinking: The project demonstrates fluency of thought, representing a number of appropriate concepts (identical to those evaluated in the ATTA creativity test). Problem solving: The proposed idea is feasible (effective) as well as demonstrating flexibility in thought and approach, addressing problem detection, solution, and prevention aspects. Critical thinking: Demonstrating a depth of thought and reflection in solving problems and making decisions.Table 4. Project Performance RubricsItems Questions 1. The extent to which the core questions were clarified. 2

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Actively Engaging Students

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daria Gerasimova, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

learning from their peers. One member who learned a teaching strategy fromanother member reflected, “That’s something I don’t think I would have ever been exposed to ifI hadn’t met in a group like this.” Learning from their peers was also valuable because itprovided opportunities to learn from first-hand experience (i.e., strategies that were already triedby others in the group). In addition to peer learning, participants were also learning from thebooks and articles they read as part of their group participation. While some of the learned ideas were not useful to participants (e.g., not applicable totheir classes), other ideas interested them as something they could try in the future in theirclasses. An interest in those ideas led some

Conference Session

Pre-college: Blending Computers, Computational Thinking, and Engineering Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Chanel Beebe, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

thinking competencies in the context of problem solving in children.  The computational thinking competencies which most frequently appeared in educational apps appropriate for K-2 aged children.Each of the two researchers engaged in this process first coded one app individually. Next, weshared our experiences and findings to come into agreement about what certain activities in theapps required users to do. We then were able to generate examples and non-examples ofcomputational thinking. As we developed a collaborative understanding, we modified thecodebook with examples and non-examples reflected in Appendix 2.Next we used the codebook from Appendix 2 to code all 41 apps. Researchers spent exactly 30minutes

Conference Session

Innovations in Aero Curriculum and Program Level Administration

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mark D. Maughmer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

, stimulate intellectual discipline, and increase studentself-confidence and time management skills.2 Homework is notably part of the engineeringcurriculum for it “…unquestionably reflects the nature of engineering practice, wherein problemsare solved in an open setting in marked contrast to time-constrained and closed-book testconditions.”3 There are, however, some drawbacks to homework, the most notable being that it iseasy for students to find solutions on the Internet and copy and share them with classmates.Another drawback to homework may be students’ inability to manage their own learning. Thereis a body of knowledge around self-directed learning that is defined by Knowles4 as “a process inwhich individuals take the initiative, with or without

Conference Session

Student Division Innovative Research Methods Technical Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne Marguerite McAlister, The Ohio State University; Dennis M. Lee, Clemson University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Student

underGrant Number EEC-1531641. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.ReferencesBenson, L. C., Kennedy, M. S., Ehlert, K. M., Vargas, P. M. D., Faber, C. J., Kajfez, R. L., & McAlister, A. M. (2016). Understanding undergraduate engineering researchers and how they learn. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (20), 37–46.Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Third Edit). Los Agneles: Sage

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

contribution of this paper is to summarize research on self-assessment overtime, including where it has and has not proved successful, as well as to survey severalapproaches and software applications for incorporating self-assessment into a course.Keywords: self-assessment, peer assessment, evaluation rubric1. IntroductionSelf-assessment is a powerful mechanism for enhancing learning. It encourages studentsto reflect on how their own work meets the goals set for learning concepts and skills. Itpromotes metacognition about what is being learned, and effective practices for learning.It encourages students to think about how a particular assignment or course fits into thecontext of their education. It imparts reflective skills that will be useful on the

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame; Maria Krug, University of Notre Dame; Alicia Czarnecki, Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem; Ryan M Nell, Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem; Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame; Victoria E Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

project was the Arduino workshops, whichshowed a quick increase in technical skills by the participants, as only 3 out of 30 participantshad prior knowledge of the technology. Building and testing their own Arduino projects alsogave interns experience with hands on maker skills.By collecting written reflections from interns throughout the summer, BCe2 identified progressin key goals of increased positive perceptions of South Bend through shifts in student perception,especially from students who are native South Bend residents. A significant example was anincreased sense of ownership and personal connection to the people that were impacted by theirwork, with a notable shift from referring to “those people” in “the neighborhood” to “ourneighborhood

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kellie Schneider, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

settingclear community engagement and learning goals with students as well as incorporating criticalreflection into the projects to generate and deepen learning [6]. With community-engagedscholarship, it is imperative for project goals to balance the needs of the community partnerswhile providing meaningful experiences for students. Additionally, the students must engage incritical reflection that includes articulating linkages between course concepts and communityengagement, addressing power and privilege, analyzing one’s role as a justice minded citizen,and examining new perspectives and changed views. A very valuable resource in formalizingthis type of engagement and reflection is the Community Engaged Learning PartnershipAgreement form provided by

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Breid, Saint Vincent College; Lawrence Machia, Saint Vincent College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

, anddid not allow students a chance to feel they were working on something “real”.The 2016 implementation modified the course in several ways. The list of topics covered wasaltered to reflect those topics most directly relevant to the evaporator. Most notably, transientconduction, analogous mass transfer, and computational methods were dropped, and boiling wasadded. Other topics were expanded (convection) or de-emphasized compared to the 2015 course.Initially, it was anticipated that the format of the course would move away from lecture and moretowards directed analysis of the evaporator. However the course ended up enrolling a singlestudent*, who expressed a strong preference for lecture-style class meetings. Out of respect forthis preference

Conference Session

Outreach, recruiting, and retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

D. Raj Raman, Iowa State University; Amy L. Kaleita, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Biological & Agricultural

significantly different graduationrates, both within and outside engineering.In a parallel and unpublished effort, our institution contracted with an academic analytics firm(EAB, a subdivision of The Advisory Board Company, Washington, DC) to undertake alongitudinal analysis of student success at our institution, with a focus on how examining gradesin courses reflect graduation rates by university, college, or major. The results from the EABeffort allowed individual degree programs to evaluate the linkages between course grades andstudent graduation rates. Furthermore, it allowed establishment of success thresholds in keyclasses based upon a desired graduation rate.The motivation for the work reported herein was to combine our risk-prediction efforts

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

a multi-institution study that queried students about the primary factor that influenced theirdecision to leave engineering, 8% of student respondents indicated that they found the curriculumtoo narrow; one female student reflected, “The curriculum was extremely narrow…there was littleto no room for any humanities…or any other type of class. I feel that this is a major failing of theengineering program.”9The same question about the potential impact of curricular choice applies to computing, which—like engineering—suffers from gender diversity that is not representative of the population at large,nor the over 50% of bachelor’s degrees earned by women in the U.S. each year.10 In 2014, just 14%of computer science and 12% of computer

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony J Petrosino Jr, University of Texas, Austin; Walter M Stroup, University of Massachusetts

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

town, as supported by the use of thesimulation environment, is to engage students in ways that mirror how scientists or engineersapproach and solve problems and are also to have qualities that lead to extended inquiry. Ideallythe students have some familiarity with the challenge, but need to research more or try outpossibilities to better comprehend the problem, identify potential solutions, and then generateand execute a plan to solve it. Within a traffic simulation where each student controls one lightin a simulated city, students may start off using hit-or-miss or highly localized strategies forcontrolling traffic ((Wilensky & Stroup, 2000, Stroup & Wilensky 2014).As they extend their inquiry and reflect on the overall outcomes for

Conference Session

Division Experimentation and Lab-Oriented Studies - Best of DELOS

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Boyan Li

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

analyzed.Previous WorkAccording to one of the well documented and widely accepted learning theories, Kolb1 in hisexperiential learning cycle theory claims that people learn best if they follow a cycle consistingof four steps (axes): experiencing (concrete experience), watching (reflective observation),thinking/modeling (abstract conceptualization), and applying/doing (active experimentation).This learning theory has been implemented in various engineering education programs such ascivil2-4, mechanical4, chemical2,3,5, industrial6, aeronautical4, and manufacturing2,3,7 engineering.While there was only a single student team that built and programmed the humanoid robotsmany other engineering and non-engineering students benefited from the workout challenge

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Edward Schmidt, University of Pittsburgh; David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh; Samuel J. Dickerson, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

intheir fields of study.IntroductionHomework is essential to undergraduate student development. Out-of-class learning activitiesreinforce topics presented in lecture and serve to expand student comprehension. Thedevelopment of educational techniques to improve upon the efficacy of homework is an activeresearch area [1-4]. While educators agree upon the positive impact of homework, the form-factor and delivery method continues to be a topic of discussion [5-7]. Additionally, studentattitudes towards homework are also changing to reflect access to digital online modalities.While students often prefer an online presentation of homework, a recent study has shown thatperforming homework online does not significantly impact final grade performance as

Conference Session

Engineering Social and Human Ethical Impacts

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University; Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

therefore be readand interpreted as reflecting how student subjects typically understand ethics, morality, andrelated concepts rather than how these terms are more formally or technically defined.Rule/norm-based. The first major theme in the findings is comprised of those statementscharacterizing ethical or moral character as involving adherence to rules or norms in general.Approximately two-thirds of the interviewees made comments falling in this broad category,with the most common and most general type concerned with knowing and/or doing what is“right” or “best.” Representative examples of this type of statement include “to understandcomparatively what is truly right,” “doing the right thing”, and “making the right decision.” Asubset of this

Conference Session

Pre-college: Blending Computers, Computational Thinking, and Engineering Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chandan Dasgupta, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Jie Chao, The Concord Consortium

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

to reflect on the design decision. AlthoughSam claimed to have a good orientation of the panels, Ms. KM problematized the claim. She didso while making sure that Sam remained motivated. She provided positive feedback (“Yeah yournumbers came way down. You’re moving in the right direction…”). At the same time, she alsomade sure that Sam knew that she would come back and check on the progress (“I’ll come backand check in a little bit”). In the process, she conveyed that the design process was not completeyet and there was room for further improvement thereby encouraging Sam to perform moreiterations. Ms. KM also ensured that her students had the authority and felt ownership of their work(Engle & Conant, 2002). For instance- KM

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey M. Otey, Texas A&M University; Jorge D. Camba, Purdue University; Nicholas Danney, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

the curriculum and inindustry. Specific course topics include two-dimensional and three-dimensional projectionmethods, linking files, data extraction, topography and catchments, virtual surfaces, earthworkand grading, surveying and parcels, corridors and intersections, pipe networks, rendering, andanimations.Initial results reflect that the course has been successful in student competitiveness andpreparation for industry and that student visualization skills have improved, validated by pre- andpost-course completion of the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test (object rotation) and the DATfor PCA Space Relations Test (3D object from 2D pattern).BackgroundHistorically, the College of Engineering required all first-year students to take a sequence

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Emily Diehl, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Student

process was extremely useful. With regards to teaching assistants, some of theinsight that we gained were why the students trusted TAs, “I also listened closely to the TAs advicebecause they have been through the class before”,as well as different ways they use TAs within thesame process, “ After that, I asked a TA a questionabout the way I was labeling my coordinate system.… I may also ask a TA to see if my first justificationis logical for this problem.” One student, who hadonly used one of the resources available through thecourse identified flaws in their current problem-solving process through the reflective portion of thesurvey, “I waited way too long to get started, andadapted the basic kinematic equations into verticaland horizontal

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach P.E., TGE Consulting; Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University; Neal A. Lewis, Fairfield University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

. Those texts completed before the TCJA arelikely to be revised in their next edition. It is hoped that this paper might influence the coveragein those future editions.ResultsDepreciation methods for valuation and taxesAccording to the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), there are only fourdepreciation methods that are permitted for asset valuation: straight-line, declining balance, unitsof production, and sum-of-years’-digits. Straight-line is the most commonly used. Decliningbalance may be chosen because a constant rate of decline in the assets’ book value may moreaccurately reflect true market values. Declining balance with a switch to straight-line is part ofthe basis for MACRS, and is covered in some textbooks.Beginning in

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning and Skills

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Cyrus Rezvanifar, University of Akron; Rouzbeh Amini, University of Akron

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

providestudents with the opportunity of active engagement in class sessions and applying course materialsinto solving real-life problems.Initially proposed by Bandura in 1977, self-efficacy is a term that describes “the belief in one’scapabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to produce given attainments” [4,5]. Perceived academic self-efficacy has been increasingly considered as a highly effectivepredictor of students’ motivation and persistence [6, 7], as well as an important contributor to theiracademic development [4, 5, 8]. Career decision-making self-efficacy is of equal, if not greaterimportance in engineering education, as it reflects students’ ability to make an informed decisionabout a career path to pursue in the process

Conference Session

Issues in Mechanical Engineering Technology I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maher Shehadi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

associated with PBL environments.Wlodkowski [5] indicated that analyzing and studying real-world problems are essential for anyPBL environment in order to motivate critical thinking, collaboration, and professional skills. Itis important to define achievable and reasonable rubrics that students can follow and accomplishsuccessfully. Those rubrics should reflect a safe and successful environment where students areencouraged to participate instead of feeling embarrassed. It should promote an interesting andrelevant experience, as well, where the students are allowed to fully engage in a professional roleto fulfill the goal they are working on.Student-centered environments can increase communication skills, ability to work with others ina team

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kenneth Reid, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

understanding of empathy has also been pursued in the fields ofengineering and technology for purposes relating to the ability of robotic technologies to imitatehuman abilities [8]–[10]. In our study, we focus on the aspect of empathy research concernedwith the ability of people to consider how their decisions affect others.Service learning (S-L) is a well-studied approach to teaching and learning [11]–[16]. It is one ofseveral pedagogies for engaging students in learning. In this study, by service learning we meana learning environment where students are taking a course for credit, serving a community aspart of the course and reflecting on their experience also as a component of the course [12], [17].S-L has been identified as a helpful pedagogy for

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Philip Jackson, University of Florida; Joshua Rudaitis, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

Cycle”wherein multiple stages of learning are introduced. These stages are Concrete Experience,Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization and Active Experimentation. According tothe theory, they create the “learning experience”. Armed with this information, the studyintroduces the concept of an E-Portfolio. This E-Portfolio provides users of remote labs with theability to record the work they performed and document their findings. The concept of thisportfolio does not stop at being a simple digital notebook, however. The study asserts that thisportfolio can be used by professors to check on students’ work or be opened to the public inorder to add a social dynamic. The study calls the social aspect a “community” and says that itcan

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Dana Corrina Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

researchers observed that improving 3-Dvisualization leads to better performance in engineering graphics and in most other engineeringcoursework resulting in improved retention and graduation rates. The majority of the 3-Dvisualization exercises currently being used by students in Design and Graphics classes presentthe objects in isometric views already in 3-D, asking the viewer to create multiple views, foldpatterns, manipulate, reflect, or rotate them. Other exercises present the objects in incompletemulti-view projections and ask the students to add missing lines. The newly proposed methoduses a different approach. It uses the standard multi-view projections to show a number ofrectangular bricks arranged in various patterns. The viewer must count

Conference Session

New Media for Ethics Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Allen R. White, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

assessed via observation during the simulation and others via evaluation of post-simulationreflective statements. Table 3 contains the parameters, their assessment area, and assessmentmethod.The ethical parameters assess each students ability to recognize the potential impacts of theirdecisions on society and their ability to identify a framework to ethically resolve the conundrum.Both were evaluated via student comments in a reflective exercise and are rated on a Likert scaleusing the guidelines in Table 4. The ethic assessment criteria (Criteria 1) was taken directly fromthe ethics assessment criteria used at our university assessment of student outcomes. The ethicalframework (Criteria 2) is a modified version of ethical frameworks from

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development (ATE)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kathleen Alfano, College of the Canyons

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

%)represented at the workshop. The gender statistics reflect the gender breakdown at 2-yearcolleges generally.2018 Workshop evaluationA Post-Workshop survey was developed using the workshop survey instrument createdfor the prior PSE-2YC project and was administered immediately after the workshop tocollect faculty feedback on four different aspects of the workshop: ParticipantBackground and Attitude, Pre-workshop Preparation, Workshop Content (materials,presentations and other activities), and Workshop Outcomes. Participants were asked torate (from 1 to 5) various aspects of the workshop. The specific descriptive ratings thatcorrespond to the numeric ratings for each question are shown in the table.Participants rated the workshop, materials, and