? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 700– 17, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0026659.[21] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Fostering Female Belongingness in Engineering through the Lens of Critical Engineering Agency,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 938–952, 2015.[22] E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.[23] J. Jorgenson, “ENGINEERING SELVES Negotiating Gender and Identity in Technical Work,” Manag. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, 2002, Accessed: Mar. 10, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/doi/pdf/10.1177
. [Online] Available:https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm[Accessed April 19, 2020].[3] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine,Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economicfuture. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007[4] S. Q. Sheikh and E. Arvaniti, STEM Education Outreach through IEEE’s Pre-UniversityPrograms – Engaging Volunteers to benefit K-12 education and local communities, 2014 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, October 22 – 25, 2014, Madrid, Spain.IEEE 978-1-4799-3922-0/14.[5] Michigan Constitution. art. I, § 26, [Online] Available:http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S
-.014 Q2. Explain the best way to accomplish these goals to my team members .027 .802 .201 -.203 Q3. Independently initiate new individual or team projects -.095 .580 .060 .127 Q4. Organize and structure a group to accomplish a common goal .117 .480 .180 .045 Q.5 Motivate my team members to accomplish predefined goals .027 -.085 .815 .065 Q7. Effectively delegate projects and authority to other people -.131 .231 .565 -.005 Q8. Actively encourage my peers to solve problems .088 .027 .647 -.045 Q9. Easily explain and discuss the fundamental elements of a
American Educational Research Association, New York, 2018.[21] H. Boone and A. Kirn, “First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingness in Engineering,” in Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[22] S. Allie et al., “Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: Improving student learning in engineering education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 359–367, 2009.[23] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “Identity theory and social identity theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., pp. 224–237, 2000.[24] R. Stevens, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos, “Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view
attendeeswith a synopsis of research presentations that would be presented prior to the actual presentation.Because the elevator pitches were shared in advance, the audience could post questions/commentsprior to the event. The Q&A session that followed the presentation of the research videos wastransformed into a discussion session where the teams would more informally discuss aspects ofthe research that were not captured in the formal presentation and to address any question that wereasked in advance.Projects SummariesTraffic Video Analytics (Morgan State University)Participants gain experience in computer vision and machinelearning techniques for vision-based traffic analytics such astraffic object localization, traffic object identification
professional development activities.Table 1 outlines the day-to-day structure of the program. Any space designated as “Free”indicates that students had the option of choosing how to spend their time (preparing for the nextday’s classes, working on the group project, etc.). Table 1. E-GIRL Program Structure Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday8:30 AM Intro to Presentation9:00 AM Engineering and Practice Industrial Environmental Q&A with9:30 AM Project
any preliminary prototype data to a review panel. This panel consists offaculty with appropriate backgrounds who are not part of the project team. The instructor aloneassesses the quality of the presentation. The panel is instructed to focus solely on the quality ofdesign; they are NOT involved in the assessment process. The purpose is to allow students theopportunity to honestly present their ideas and get feedback on their designs before entering theExecuting Processes. The students provide a copy of their presentation slides to the panel a fewdays before the review, present during the review for 20 minutes, and spend 40 minutes in a Q/Asession.Prototype Demonstrations - Teams are required to include prototype demonstrations in theirproject
2: The annual program cycle from application to final deliverable. Text in black indicate participant tasks while text in blue refers to program coordinator tasks. Key Dates Activity 1-Oct Applications Open 15-Jan Applications Close List of Municipal, Industry, Faculty clients confirmed 1-Mar Applicants are notified: Accepted/Waitlisted/Scholarships Q&A Sessions via Skype; Send out Project List 1-Apr Confirmation of Acceptance Due 1-May Pre-Course Assignment Due: 1st, 2nd, 3rd choice project with Cover Letter Pre-program survey administered (content) 15-May
=e59adb2e0267339ae9aa40a0c1da0d94.30. Torres D, Zoltowski CB, Buzzanell PM, Feister MK, Oakes WC. Using Social Network Theory to Elucidate the Impact of Diversity on the Social Processes in Design.31. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a Feather : Homophily in Social Networks. Annu Rev os Sociol. 2001;27:415-444. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2678628.32. Hoppe B, Reinelt C. Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(4):600-619. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.06.004.33. Smith DG, Schonfeld NB. The Benefits of Diversity: What the Research Tells Us. About Campus. 2000;5(December):16-23. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703993104.34. Astin AW. What Matters in College? : Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco
: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom, (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42. Capobianco, B., & Lehman, J. D., & Huang, Q., & Nyquist, C. (2016, June), Impact of Elementary School Teachers' Enacted Engineering Design-Based Science Instruction on Student Learning (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25540 Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the learning of mathematics, 19(2), 2-10. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design
of engineering education. In G. L. Downey & K. Beddoes (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 45-76). San Rafael, CA.: Morgan and Claypool.Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Hompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 8(1), Article 1, 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol8/iss1/1Knight, D., & Sullivan, J., & Louie, B. (2007, June), Expanding Understanding of First Year Engineering Student Retention and Team Effectiveness Through Social Styles Assessment Paper presented at 2007 Annual
students with disabilities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem),” Atlanta, GA: Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012. [9] M. Q. Patton, “Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective,” Qualitative social work, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 261–283, 2002.[10] S. B. Merriam, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from” Case Study Research in Education.”. ERIC, 1998.[11] L. M. Smith, “8: An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies,” Review of research in education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 316–377, 1978.[12] M. B. Miles, A. M