has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research inter- ests include Engineering Ethics, Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recognition, Bioinformatics and issues of under-representation in STEM fields. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Ac- creditation Commission, and is on the board of the ASEE Ethics Division and the Women in Engineering Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Can ABET Assessment Really Be This Simple?AbstractWith the hard roll-out of ABET’s new outcomes 1-7 in the 2019
can apply when engaging communities. Finally, it concludes with lessonslearned from this criteria development and curricular integration for engineering educatorscommitted to educating students to become socially responsible engineers and making theirprojects both socially just and sustainable for communities.1. IntroductionIn engineering education, there has been a proliferation of projects aimed at communitydevelopment, most of these motivated by strong personal desires to help solving big andcomplex problems like poverty, climate change, lack of drinkable water, etc. and also byinstitutional needs to enhance students experiences and professional development, exposure tointernational education, and, in some cases, to contribute to program
offered in the senior year.It is also a year-long course where students work in teams on a given problem statement. Hencethe design methodologies course serves as a design training course for students to preparethemselves for working on design and research projects, collaborating and delivering the productat the end of the course.Design Methodologies course offered in the spring semester is also a mandatory 1- credit hourcourse. A total of 71 students were enrolled in this course. These students entered the course withno prior background in design courses or team working. The reason this course was selected forthe study is the nature of the course which allows students to enter a new world of problemsolving. Unlike the other theoretical classes
using the traditionalapproach by the same instructor between 1986 and 2005. The class sizes ranged from 28 to 58.Overall course scores and grades sometimes include factors such as participation, attendance,etc. that are not direct measures of how well the students met the learning objectives. For thisreason, the combined exams scores, normalized to a 100-point basis, were used here as themeasure of student attainment of the learning objectives. The students’ exams scores are plottedas a function of the percentage of the homework assignments that the students submitted inFigure 1. 100 Exams Score (%) 80 60 40 20
to a PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) test report [1], only 10 % ofthe Paraguayan student participants have passed the tests on reading, mathematics and science.Space-related educational programs have become a very inspiring way to implement STEMeducation. One CanSat (Can-Satellite) training program for teachers, that later will perform similarprojects with their students, is a very effective tool to motivate students into STEM. During theprogram, teachers build a “very small and simple satellite” (a pico-satellite) that has similarfunctions as larger ones. They learn how to plan, design and solve problems as if they were on areal space mission. The objective of our study is to measure the performance of teachers as
experiments,students analyzed the real beam system by characterizing the damping coefficient of the beam.They observed and measured the frequency changes of the beam with various loads applied.Students also observed and measured resonant frequency of the beam due to rotating unbalance.At the end, the experimental results were compared to the theoretical results. The newlydeveloped experiments have received positive feedback from students, as they have expressedthat these labs have helped them better understand course concepts.1. IntroductionEducators have developed various ways to teach the difficult topics of the dynamics behavior ofmechanical systems. Today, simulation software programs are available that accurately emulatemany technical and
, dynamics, and function of the heart at multiple length-scales. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 CardioStart: Development and Implementation of a Tissue Engineering Summer High School ProgramIntroductionCurrently, the United States faces a shortage of STEM graduates while the amount of STEMoccupations are expected to grow [1, 2]. One such occupation is biomedical engineering with thenumber of jobs expected to increase by 23% over the next ten years—with a notable fraction ofthese jobs in tissue engineering [3, 4]. To fill these roles in the future, today’s high school studentsneed more exposure to STEM [5]. Although high school programs explore the sciences
reviews common themes across mentor evaluation data and discusseshow these factors are contributing to the development of future faculty members prepared towork with diverse student populations. Our preferred method for delivery is a short traditionallecture followed by facilitated discussion of best practices among session attendees.IntroductionThe positive effects of receiving mentoring have been well researched and documented.Mentoring has been linked to the academic success [1], research accomplishments [2], andmatriculation to graduate school [3] of undergraduate students. Furthermore, mentoring has beenfound to be especially important for students from underrepresented backgrounds. For example,mentoring relationships empower
, through which he studied in the Stereotypes, Identity, and Belonging Lab (SIBL) at the University of Washington during the summer of 2018.Zhihui (Sherry) Chen c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 CAREER: Actualizing Latent Diversity in Undergraduate Engineering EducationIntroductionCultivating a culture of inclusion is critical to engineering education. The environment in whichstudents learn shapes not only their competencies but also who they become or their identities asengineers. Developing an engineering identity has been found to be important for a number ofdifferent outcomes including academic and personal development [1]–[5] as well as retention [6]–[8
gamblingcasinos. The Monte Carlo method (MCM), also known as the method of statistical trials is atraditional marriage of two major branches of theoretical physics the probabilistic theory ofrandom process dealing with Brownian motion or random walk experiments and potentialtheory, which studies the equilibrium states of a homogenous medium. It is a method ofapproximately solving problems using sequences of random numbers. It is a means of treatingmathematical problems by finding a probabilistic analog and then obtaining approximateanswers to this analog by some experimental sampling procedure.Monte Carlo methods have three characteristics: 1. Random sample generation 2. Known input distribution 3. Numerical experimentsThe direct output
Universities – Larger programs. The current total enrollment is 10,417. It is aregional public university located in San Angelo, a city with a population of approximately100,100. San Angelo is in the West Texas region of the state and is a three hour or longer drivefrom any major urban center. The university draws students largely from West Texas.The university is a Hispanic-Serving Institution with a Hispanic enrollment of 40 percent asshown in Figure 1. However, as the data in Figure 1show, the faculty are significantly lessdiverse than the students with only 8 percent of faculty identifying as Hispanic.Within the engineering program, the diversity picture is dramatically different as shown by thedata in Figure 1. The students within the engineering
this course received a certificate for onsite training issued in FANUCAmerica provided format and signed by the primary author. Figure 1(a) shows the first evergraduating batch of Engineering Technology students who received this certificate. Thiscertification of training will certainly encourage our students to get more involved hands on forrobotics training. The department is now working diligently to send authors for further trainingand hoping to take the advantage of being a FANUC recognized official training site by offeringtrainings to industry personnel. The training schedule in Houston TX and at FANUC America siteis limited and seats fills up real quick. Engineering Technology department at SHSU will be agood alternative and serve the
feasible, viable, credible and desirable solutions.Dr. Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, formerly visiting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group at Stanford University. Barbara’s research focuses on four areas: 1)grounding a blend of theories from social-cognitive psychology, engineering design, and art to show how cognition affects design; 2) changing the way people understand the emotion behind their work; 3) shifting norms of leaders involved in entrepreneurial-minded action; and 4) developing teaching methods with a storytelling focus in engineering and science education. Founder of the Design Entrepreneuring Studio
desired program outcomes will also be outlined.2.0 Curriculum OverviewFigure 1 presents an overview of the new architectural engineering program. Highlights of thisprogram include the following: 1) the students alternate between academic and coop work terms,with the exception of having two back-to-back academic terms in their fourth year; 2) each termfeatures a studio course – as mentioned earlier, each of these courses will involve the planningand execution of a series of design projects that integrate and put into practice concepts coveredin the other courses the students will be taking; 3) the core courses in the first two years are builton the established civil, environmental, and geological engineering programs at the sameinstitution, and
Education, 2020 Integrating the IDEO Design Process to Find Solutions toEngineering Challenges in a Freshman General Education ClassIntroductionHow undergraduates are introduced to the discipline of engineering at the college level can havelong-term educational and professional implications, including influencing decisions to pursue orleave engineering majors and validating beliefs about the purpose of engineering in society [1].Classroom lectures have been traditionally used within introductory engineering courses as theycan transmit large amounts of content [2]. However, they are generally less effective in helpingundergraduates engage with and apply content [3]. In recognition of this, learner-centeredapproaches are increasingly being used in
Change of Major Policy and its EffectsAbstract: Considerable attention has been paid to factors affecting student's selection ofEngineering and related majors [1, 3, 5] and issues affecting retention and graduation in thesemajors [4, 7]. Lesser attention has been paid to change of major policies and their effects [2].We study the history and effects of "change of major" policies in the Erik Jonsson School ofEngineering and Computer Science at the University of Texas at Dallas. We further focus ontwo closely related degree programs (Computer Science and Computer Engineering) that aredelivered by different departments within the School. A university-wide policy that justrequired "good standing" to change major up to four years ago has evolved into
of the EAMU vector is described and data collected from the 2018-2019 academic year is presentedto show both an increase in the fidelity of the assessment data and the creation of meaningful student performancedata trends over time.The ABET accreditation visit found no shortcomings in Criterion 3 – Student Outcomes. For this reason, this paper isapropos, as it may reduce challenges for any other mechanics-based programs seeking initial accreditation or thoseprograms seeking to revise their assessment framework in preparation for ABET accreditation.Introduction and BackgroundQuality assurance in engineering education is paramount [1], [2]. Programmatic and peer review contribute to boththe quality and relevancy of engineering programs by
engineering vicarious experiences, they can inform their ownteaching practices and practice reflective teaching as they teach lessons. IntroductionWithin the last decade, there has been a push for engineering to be taught in the K-12 schoolsystem. Integrating engineering into the classroom is especially important due to the expressedneed for engineers from organizations such as the National Academy of Engineering and fromreports like PCAST that predicted a need for one million more STEM professionals by 2020 [1],[2]. In addition to this expressed need, research shows that students begin making career choicesas early as, if not before, high school, so it is important they gain an understanding of
Society for Engineering Education, 2020Changing an Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Culture from the Bottom Up: Action Plans Generated from Faculty Interviews Previous research [1] has documented the pressures encountered by STEM faculty at R1institutions: weighty teaching loads, pressure to “publish or perish,” urgency to obtain funding,mentorship of graduate students, and the stress of promotion/tenure all can have deleteriouseffects on the well-being and job satisfaction of faculty. Moreover, these pressures interact withthe disproportionate barriers faced by underrepresented faculty [2]. Given the predicted growthof faculty positions in coming years (11% from 2018-2028) [3], and that many of these positionswill be
departments for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Changing 3rd World Lives Through STEM Education in HondurasAbstractDuring the summer of 2018
outreach ambassadors’ discursive interactions withelementary student design teams adds to the growing conversation about ambitious instruction inengineering. Introduction Engineering outreach educators, or engineering outreach ambassadors, have the potential toinfluence significant numbers of precollege youth; university-led engineering outreach programsreach approximately 600,000 K-12 students each year in the United States [1]. Despite theprevalence of these programs, little is known about the ways in which outreach ambassadorsinfluence youths’ participation and progress in engineering practices. Understanding the ways inwhich outreach ambassadors interact with and support youth to learn engineering is critical tofurthering the effectiveness
their design patterns and descriptively identifiedthe least and most prominent patterns students implemented.Keywords: design strategies, design thinking, generating ideas, conducting experiment, revisingand iterating, troubleshooting.IntroductionEngineering design is an iterative decision-making process of generating, evaluating, andspecifying concepts for systems or components to meet desired requirements [1]. Designthinking, which includes cognitive, strategic, and practical aspects of a design processes, is acrucial part of engineering design. Due to their strategic nature, design thinking processes shouldbe taught and learned through design strategies such as those described in the Informed DesignTeaching and Learning Matrix [2]. In this
activity. This evaluation showed that 96% of thestudents had developed an intuition for inductor design, and 62.5% of the students were able tocorrectly identify the concept for magnetic coupling including proper alignment, the distancebetween two coils and the relative size of the receiver coil with respect to the transmitter coil. Thestudents gave an average rating of 8.2/10 for how much they liked the competition, furtherindicating their engagement in the activity.IntroductionThe transportation sector accounts for 28% of global energy consumption and 23% of total CO2emissions [1]. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recommends up to 60%reduction of the CO2 emissions from the transportation sector by 2050 to meet the target of
process path to produce their spherifiedproduct on a large scale.Motivation Chemical engineering is about developing and designing processes that change raw materials intouseful products on an industrial scale. They must manage their resources to get the best result whileprotecting health and safety, and making the smallest environmental impact possible. Chemicalengineering is an abstract concept to many, especially younger children; the aim of this activity is to bringit onto a more understandable plane, especially the concept of scale up, and make it tangible for studentsin a way that isn’t intimidating.Learning Goals 1. A chemical reaction is a process in which two or more molecules interact and are converted into different
any interested faculty to seek direct contact by email with any questions orrequests for materials, such as grading rubrics or reading guides.Introduction & BackgroundThe most recent survey of (primarily U.S.) chemical engineering programs in the “How WeTeach” series which focused on the Senior Design course took place in 2013 and revealed that: aplurality (46.8%) of respondents offered a single course (semester or quarter), a similarpercentage of lead instructors are full professors, most draw projects from a combination ofsources including industrial or faculty sponsorship and the AIChE design challenge, and a largeplurality use Turton, et al. for their textbook and Excel & Aspen Plus for software applications inthe course [1]. The
behavior can be directly tied to their attitudes towards thatbehavior [1, 2]. For example, engineering students likely have strong positive emotions andattitudes towards math which could be a reason that they major in engineering. Positive attitudesor emotions may also impact retention of students in a major, as positive feelings towardsengineering have been shown to be correlated with retention rates in engineering programs [3].This can have important outcomes with regards to diversity in engineering programs as femaleshave been shown to have more negative attitudes or feelings towards engineering than males [4],which may contribute to differences in gender balance in some engineering programs.As attitudes and emotions are important in shaping a
. MethodologyStudy Context The focus of this study centered on a K-12 career awareness/outreach event, titledManufacturing Week, which was developed through industry-education partnerships facilitatedby a regional commerce group. This event was designed to (1) bring awareness to the communityabout manufacturing in the region, (2) share with the future workforce the vast opportunities andcareer pathways available to them, and (3) provide opportunities for local youth to discover howthey can learn, work, and live within the region. To achieve these goals, Manufacturing Weekserved three different grade-level groups, K-5 (ages 5-11), 6-8 (ages 11-14), and 9-12 (ages 14-18), through three distinct types of activities. The K-5 students participated in a
Designed for 3rd-5th Connect what we have 45 minutes - 1 hour grade students. learned about electricity and circuits to real world applications.Objectives: Next Generation Science Standards:Students will be able to demonstrate 4-P S3-2. Make observations to provideknowledge of how circuits function. evidence that energy can be transferred from place to place by sound, light, heat,Students will be aware of multiple ways to and electric current.create circuits with household materials. 4-P
Number of Credit Hours 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 10 15 20 Number of RespondentsFigure 2.1. Number of respondents specifying the number of credit hours, n=56Survey responses capturing interaction between students and the instructor of record, otherfaculty and/or mentors was also solicited. The number of hours allocated on average for eachteam for meetings with faculty members, practitioner
recognize themselves in this group. Instead, civil engineering studentspredominantly believe the effects of global warming will start to have a serious impact onthemselves, their family, and people in their community in 25 to 50 years. These results aretroubling because if those beliefs translate into students waiting to address climate change foranother two to five decades locks in more emissions and increases the chance of future and moresevere global humanitarian crises. Educational interventions are needed to change theseperspectives about time and impact.IntroductionClimate change caused by humans is irreversibly affecting future generations and is one of themost urgent issues facing society [1]–[3]. The effects of climate change are already