Department of English, Fine Arts, and Communica- tions at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina, where she teaches STEM-focused technical writing and communication, writing-intensive courses for international students, and linguistics. She re- ceived her PhD from Purdue University in Linguistics, and she has a BA and MA in English with concen- trations in TESOL and writing pedagogy from Youngstown State University. Her research and teaching interests are in technical and scientific writing pedagogy and the interaction of language and cognition. She is a member of Sigma Xi and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Using the Swivl
engineering education, software, and hardware engineering.Dr. Racheida S. Lewis, University of Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Ed- ucation Transformations Institute (EETI) and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She has been recognized as a Gates Millennium Scholar, GEM Associate Fellow, New Horizon Scholar, and a 2019 inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society. She completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech where she focused on the impact matriculation structures have on self-efficacy development in electrical and computer engineering students. As well, she received a Bachelor of Science and Master of Engi- neering in Electrical
–215, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TE.2019.2898151.[8] F. Khan, N. Birchfield, and K. V. Singh, “Revitalizing the Engineering Curriculum Through Studio Based Instruction,” in Volume 5: Education and Globalization; General Topics, Houston, Texas, USA, Nov. 2012, pp. 131–138, doi: 10.1115/IMECE2012-89547.[9] K. Cummings, J. Marx, R. Thornton, and D. Kuhl, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 67, no. S1, pp. S38–S44, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1119/1.19078.[10] P. Little and M. Cardenas, “Use of ‘Studio’ Methods in the Introductory Engineering Design Curriculum,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 309–318, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00610.x.[11] D. A. Schön, “The Architectural Studio
& MotivationAs makerspaces become an increasingly influential part of the development of products andideas, the need for a standardized classification system becomes increasingly apparent.Makerspaces are "workshops organized with an open community model where people withtechnological interests can come together to socialize, collaborate, share and expand theirknowledge" [1]. This definition is explicitly broad to allow for the many types of spaces underthis umbrella term. Today, makerspaces exist in various forms to serve different stakeholders andfor other primary objectives. Within the ASEE PEER database, over 370 articles related to theterm "makerspaces" have been published since 2015.With an ever-growing body of research, there is a
American Societyfor Engineering Education, 2019.[7] Talbert, R., “Specifications grading: We may have a winner”, https://rtalbert.org/specs-grading-iteration-winner/, 2017.[8] Stutzman, R. Y., & Race, K. H., “EMRF: Everyday Rubric Grading”, The MathematicsTeacher, 97(1), pp. 34-39, 2004.[9] Arshad, M., Romatoski, R., “Effective Learning Strategies: Grading Rubric to EnhanceStudent Learning”, ASEE 2020 Annual Conference & Exposition, Virtual Conference, June2020, ASEE2020-29374, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34498
, vol. 45, pp. 137-158, 2015.[21] A. Hurst and O. G. Nespoli, “A two-dimensional typology for characterizing student peer and instructor feedback in capstone design project courses,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 2016.[22] A. Hurst and O. G. Nespoli, “Comparing instructor and student verbal feedback in design reviews of a capstone design course: Differences in topic and function”, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 221-231, 2019.[23] Ö Eris, Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.[24] G. W. Lehnert, The Process of Question Answering. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science/Engineering Education and Director of FAU’s STEM Collaborative. She is currently PI on the Title III Hispanic Serving Institution STEM Articulation grant and Co-PI on the College of Engineering and Computer Science’s NSF S STEM grant guiding engineering majors toward completion of a MS degree in Artificial Intelligence. Her work is focused extensively on science and engi- neering activities to promote enhanced classroom engagement of students and increased discipline-based educational
., "Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion.," Washington, DC, 2015.[3] N. Curtin, J. Malley and A. J. Stewart, "Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students," Journal of Research in Higher Education, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 714-738, 2016.[4] J. Gordon, Haynes, C. and May, G., "Impact of mentoring and enrichment activities on the academic careers of underrepresented STEM doctoral students," in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[5] J. Mondisa and S. A. McComb, "The role of social community and individual differences in minority mentoring programs," Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 26
., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 15 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE and a former board member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Her research interests include the educational climate for students, faculty, and staff in science and engineering, assets based approaches to STEM equity, and gender and race stratification in education and the workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Who benefits most from a holistic student
Paper ID #35186Smooth Transition from Face-to-Face to Fully Online ClassesDr. Duc Hoai Tran, CSULB I received my bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Ho Chi Minh International University (HCMIU) in 2009, and master’s degree in electrical engineering from California State University Long Beach in 2013. I then received my Ph.D. in Engineering and Industrical Applied Mathematics from Claremont Graduate University in 2019. My research is on the theory and application of internet of things (IoT), distributed optimization and control for cyber physical systems such as: smart grids, smart buildings. I’m also
Systems Engineering and from Purdue University with an MS in Industrial Engineering and PhD in En- gineering Education. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research in- terest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first- generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2018 ASEE/IEEE Fron- tiers in
solutions.Finally, two recent related studies—in 2019 and 2021—by Watkins, Portsmore, and Swansonexamined evidence of effectiveness of their four-course online graduate program in engineeringeducation for elementary ISTs [25, 32]. One aspect of their assessment involved interviewingprogram participants at three distinct points in their program for video of student engagement inengineering within their classrooms. The researchers selected a 2–7-minute video clip thatincluded evidence of student thinking or teacher-student interactions. During each interview,researchers asked each teacher what they noticed within the clip. The 2019 study was a casestudy of the growth of one teacher in the program, Alma. Her video analyses were initiallyfocused on which step
continuous hours(see Figure 2). Class Discussion (took place in May 2019) Before Task - Collection of SSA Data Working on Human- Centred Designing Task After Task - Collection of SSA Data Figure 2 – Lecture Procedure LayoutSelf-awareness and Social-awareness Assessment– SSA InstrumentThe Self-awareness and Social-awareness Assessment (SSA) was designed by Joslyn &Hynes [20] and is based on Scheier and
in Industrial Engineering from UPRM and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Dr. Santiago has over 20 years of experience in academia and has been successful in obtaining funding and publishing for various research projects. She’s also the founder and advisor of the first ASEE student chapter in Puerto Rico. Her research interests include investigating students’ understanding of difficult concepts in engineering sciences, especially for underrepresented populations (Hispanic students). She has studied the effective- ness engineering concept inventories (Statics Concept Inventory - CATS and the Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory - TTCI) for diagnostic assessment and cultural differences among
in Engineering (WIE), American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and SWE. She is the Students activities chair, IEEE Northeast Michigan Section since 2014. She is the member of Institutional Review Board Committee, reviewer of Consumers Energy Engineering Talent Scholarship, and member of C of IDEAS at SVSU. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Using Cost-Effective Robotics Kits in Engineering EducationAbstractThe field of robotics is multidisciplinary, employing fundamental knowledge and building uponskills acquired in electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and computer science courses.Hands-on engagement, which has become
teaching behavior, ratherthan tool use per se, which the authors posit is not necessary for faculty observation programs[22]. Excluding the use of instructional artifacts misses tool mediation, a key tenet of ActivityTheory and an essential point in our work. It is critical to capture when (and what) technologiesare used, if they successfully support the intent of the activity, and what the ramifications of thisuse are because tools shape the way people interact with their reality; knowing how to use a tooldemonstrates transmission of social and cultural knowledge [12].A more recent protocol, the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) [5], developedin 2019, references the RTOP, TDOP, and COPUS, and distinguishes itself from those
, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[17] J. Borenstein, M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “The engineering and science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 387–407, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z.[18] M. J. Drake, P. M. Griffin, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 223–231, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005
, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's
.81.3.151-159.[5] M. S. Patterson, L. R. Gagnon, A. Vukelich, S. E. Brown, J. L. Nelon, and T. Prochnow, “Social Networks, Group Exercise, and Anxiety Among College Students,” J. Am. Coll. Health, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679150.[6] J. Thibodeaux, A. Deutsch, A. Kitsantas, and A. Winsler, “First-Year College Students’ Time Use: Relations With Self-Regulation and GPA,” J. Adv. Acad., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 5– 27, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1932202X16676860.[7] M. Kebritchi, A. Lipschuetz, and L. Santiague, “Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review
courses, or through research centers [2].However, bio-inspired engineering is less common in K-12 education. In 2019, the NSF funded aK-12 project entitled Biologically Inspired Design for Engineering Education (BIRDEE), tocreate socially relevant, accessible, and highly contextualized high school engineering curriculafocusing on bio-inspired design. Studies have shown that women and underrepresentedminorities are drawn to curricula, courses, and instructional strategies that are integrated,emphasize systems thinking, and facilitate connection building across courses or disciplines[4].The BIRDEE project also seeks to interest high school girls in engineering by providingcurricula that incorporate humanistic, bio-inspired engineering with a focus
received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from The Ohio State University. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of simulation modeling, logistics optimization, and inventory analysis applied to manufacturing, distribution, and health-care systems. He serves as an Asso- ciate Editor for the International Journal of Modeling and Simulation and is active in IIE, INFORMS, and ASEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Creating a Multi-College Interdisciplinary B.S. Data Science Program with ConcentrationsAbstractThis paper describes the development of a multi-college
correspond to the two different study cohorts consisting of the ELDM alumni and CoEComparison group. The ELDM alumni cohort was surveyed in 2018 and reported on previouslyby Gehr (2019) and Lang et al. (2020). Within the ELDM cohort, contact information wasavailable for 451 alumni. A recruitment email was sent with a link to the study survey and 136responded, resulting in a response rate of 30.2%.The College of Engineering non-ELDM cohort was surveyed in 2019. Contact information wasobtained through three LinkedIn alumni groups where an initial group of 600+ individuals werecontacted to make initial connections. All contacts were consolidated from the followingLinkedIn groups: “Penn State Engineering Alumni Society (Official)”, “Penn State
thank their committee for their advice while designing this dissertationresearch project, and specifically Dr. Allison Godwin for feedback on this paper. Also, the authorwishes to thank each participant who was involved in this research project, especially Simone,who specifically shared an insightful story that has the power to shape undergraduate engineeringeducation.References[1] NASEM, “Fostering the Culture of Convergence in Research,” Washington DC, 2019. doi: 10.17226/25271.[2] D. M. Riley and Y. Lambrinidou, “Canons against cannons? Social justice and the engineering ethics imaginary,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23661.[3] L. R. Lattuca, D. B. Knight, H. K
, Sustainable resource recovery and zero waste approaches. Elsevier, 2019.[11] M. Finkbeiner, A. Inaba, R. Tan, K. Christiansen, and H.-J. Klüppel, "The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044," The international journal of life cycle assessment, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 80-85, 2006.[12] T.-L. B. Tseng et al., "Embedding Computer Simulation Based Classroom Activities to Enhance the Learning Experience for Manufacturing Systems," 2020.[13] T.-L. B. T. Aditya Akundi, Md Fashiar Rahman, and Eric D Smith, "Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) and Evaluation Using Ultrasonic Testing Equipment to EnhanceWorkforce Skillset for Modern Manufacturing," presented at the ASEE Annual Conferences