that do not have a lab section. In addition, the majority of the students feel thatlearning outcome would be incomplete without the project. Hence, it could be concluded basedon the student response that the experiment based project introduced has high impact onlearning. Every student selected one or more options for question 4 which showed that theproject has substantially contributed to the improvement of various important skills includingdata analysis, experiment design etc.Future ImprovementsA number of improvements can be made to the current prototype resulting in better performanceand reliability. Some of the improvements that are currently being implemented or planned forthe future are summarized below:(i) Durability and reliability
parameters of PV systems; 4. Design, troubleshoot, and test PV systems; 5. Effectively communicate technical concepts.To provide students with hands-on and real-world experiences, a major course project is included.The objective of the project is to introduce students to the process of product design andrealization, and more specifically, (1) to generate system requirements, specification documents,design documents, and test plans; (2) to properly size system components such as batteries,inverters, charge controllers, and solar panels for a specific location; and (3) to test andtroubleshoot a PV system.Before the semester starts, the course project solicitation is posted and project proposals fromboth for-profit and non-profit
from faculty and students participating in the outreachactivities, in the near future we are planning to improve these programs by: • Increasing the availability of financial aid for prospective students from minorities to motivate enrollment • Creation of scholarships and grants with focus to minorities, to attract high performing students • Introduce techniques, other than standardized testing (SAT,ACT, etc.) as a measure of students potential that allows students from non-traditional educational experiences to succeed in the engineering programs • Creation of honor courses with focus in engineeringReferences[1] Georgia Southern University: Office of Strategic Research and Analysis, Comprehensive
was as shown in Figure 4. Figure 3. Instruction: Team Development Model Figure 4. Experimental groupsThe class leader explained the common task to the teams. They were to build a structure with theprovided 10 craft sticks. The structure dimensions were constrained to a maximum 12” x 6” x 4”size and a minimum 1” height per Figure 5. The objective of the structure build was to supportthe weight of ten US quarter coins. Moreover, the task was tested prior to the class activity with ahigh school AP science student to demonstrate that it was feasible to complete within thetimeframe planned, with her solution shown in Figure 6. When teams asked the class leader foradvice during the exercise
or 79 internet-based) or (2) IELTS minimum base score of 5.5.Exit RequirementsFollowing the completion of the program of study, including the thesis or final researchpaper, the student will present the final research paper, open to the public, to the graduatecommittee for critique and must pass a final oral examination administered by the graduatecommittee.Plans for AccreditationThe College of Engineering plans to seek recognition of the Professional Science Master’s inManufacturing Sustainability degree through the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) as aconcentration in a Professional Science Master’s program at Tennessee TechnologicalUniversity. The Professional Science Master’s is a unique professional degree grounded innatural science
. A Guide to Workplace Safety and Health in Washington State; F416-132-000; Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, 2013. 3. About WISHA, DOSH, and OSHA. A-Z Safety & Health Topics, http://www.lni.wa.gov/safety/topics/atoz/about/default.asp (accessed Jan 31, 2016). 4. Frequently Asked Questions. Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs | State Plans, https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/index.html (accessed Jan 31, 2016). 5. Larson, N.; Rasnack, W.; Hoekstra, N.; Boland, C.; Leone, E.; Santos, I.; Healy, K. R.; Chawla, T. S.; Schoepe, S. Development Of a Solvent-Based Prepreg Treater. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference And Exposition; American Society of Engineering Education
supportlearning.Final considerationsThe use of multiple forms of learning support is satisfactorily perceived by students and teachers,corroborating significantly to the teaching-learning process. Balancing support activities fordirect or indirect learning support proved to be a wise option. According to the authors’perception, the most successful results are related to students’ motivation and commitment inPhysics class. Students’ commitment must always be encouraged, throughout the academic year.Implementing similar activities in others schools will demand planning efforts and commitmentfrom teachers’ teams.References[1] CUTRI, R.; STEM, N.; MATTASOGLIO NETO, O.; SILVA CAMPOS, L. DA; MARTIN, P.A.; SOUZA,K.P.V. DE. Student’s perception of actions to support
specific corporate accounts, use of shared resources across thedivision, and a divisional marketing plan to highlight the focus on the customer.Meeting the Needs of our CustomersThe results of our efforts have been noticeable. There has been a reduction in effort for getting internal and external stakeholders to engage in a meaningful way
. Throughout the evolutionof the interdisciplinary teaching strategies, the authors gained knowledge, experience andconvictions that guided future experimentation. This article aims to share these experiences anddescribe future plans to measure the impact on learning. A subsequent article will discussattempts to measure changes in students’ learning.The theme of the interdisciplinary, experiential learning in the two courses is the societal impactsof new technologies. The courses are elective courses from different departments; Nanoscienceand Nanotechnology, a science elective, and Science Fiction, a general studies elective, areintegrated with three activities focused around this theme. In the nanotechnology course, societalimpacts of nanotechnology
Work:We plan to continue to follow the progress of the students from the three sections of ME 1001,taught during fall 2015.The authors also are busy currently implementing fully collaborative learning communities, tyingthe two-credit Introduction to Mechanical Engineering course with other courses commonlytaken by incoming freshman: English Composition 1, and Introduction to Graphics. We areactively recruiting faculty members who wish to collaborate in these learning communities sothat the students can fully benefit from the documented advantages of such communities. We donot have a budget to compensate faculty members who agree to collaborate, so we are insteadworking on marketing efforts to educate the faculty members to the many possible
andhence they were familiar with each other, and have a history of prior collaboration for workingon different problems.Data Sources• Discourse moves. Student teams completed a performance task towards the end of the semester. The task included an information and data package and asked student teams to decide on the best system to reduce the energy consumption and cost of a town library (adding solar panels, installing a green roof, or making no changes to existing design) and make a recommendation to the client. The task also promoted students to document their problem scoping, their plan for managing time and team, explain the formulae for total system cost, construct a graphical representation for 10-year cost for current
and Research Scientist II at Georgia Tech’s Center for Educa- tion Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluat- ing programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, K-12 STEM programs after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from a multi-level evaluation plan de- signed to assess program impact to methods such as program monitoring designed to facilitate program improvement. She received her Ph.D. in Research, Measurement and Statistics from the Department of Education Policy at Georgia State University (GSU
-efficacy,motivation, outcome expectancy, and anxiety). We also wanted to include our own questionsregarding future career plans, ability to recall previous coursework, and attitude toward designand associated skills. Because there is no requirement or incentive to complete the survey, it is inour interest to make it as quick to complete and simple as possible. For that reason, we reducedthe Carberry instrument to no more than two self-concepts (self-efficacy for all three surveys,and anxiety in surveys 2 and 3).The course uses Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) tocapture and assess team dynamics.7-9 CATME provides summary and analysis of teams andindividuals based on a set of algorithms, and in certain cases flags
implementation, PID controller design andsimulation, op-amp based closed loop system implementation, and testing. Student outcomesassessment data for the laboratory experiment are also presented along with plans for furtherimprovement to the experiment.Student outcomes for the proposed experimentAfter conducting the proposed control system experiment, students will develop: • an improved understanding of various controller configurations (P/PD/PI/PID), • an improved ability to design PID controllers for the end-of-semester course project, • an ability to identify which gains (KP, KI, and KD) to be increased and which gains to be decreased in a controller to improve system response, and • an ability to prototype and test an op-amp based
] National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington VA: National ScienceFoundation (NSB 12-01).[8] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2011). Science &Engineering Degrees: 1966-2008. Detailed Statistical Tables NSF 11-136. Arlington, VA. Available athttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf11316/pdf/nsf11316.pdf[9] Office of Planning and Analysis (OPA), Montana State University (2013). [Online]. Available:http://www.montana.eedu/opa.[10] Yoder, B.L., (2011). Engineering by the Numbers, American Society of Engineering Education.
or research on the actualimpact the SeaPerch program has on student interest in, and perception of, sTEm.UUR The Utah Underwater Robotics (UUR) program recently finished its third consecutiveyear of operation. UUR was instigated because MIT graduate, Tadd Truscott, then working as amechanical engineering professor at Brigham Young University (BYU), decided to involve theBYU community in an effort to excite young students about STEM topics 9. Due to Dr.Truscott’s experience with the Office of Naval Research (ONR), the UUR curriculum followsthe structure of the SeaPerch program. Initially the program did not have a research agenda,however, as planning stages progressed it was decided to include a survey instrument. For the first
microcontroller or embedded system project. Itis best suited for student proposed multi-week term projects. Since the App Inventor platform isvery simple, the concepts can be covered in one or two recitation sessions. Students can thendecide whether to use it in their projects. They may need one or two additional weeks to learnthe basic functionalities and derive the needed app. Students can use their own Android devicesor the lab can stock a few entry-level Android phones, which can be obtained between $50 and$100. Except for the SMS feature mentioned in Section 4.3, no active phone plan is needed. This idea has been introduced in an advanced digital systems and senior design classes andseveral student teams chose to incorporate the device into
ETAC of ABET and is on the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Technology.Prof. Robert De La Coromoto Koeneke, Daytona State College Robert Koeneke is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology at Daytona State College. He received his B.S. in Electronics Engineering from Universidad Simon Bolivar in 1977 and his M.S. in Computer Science from Santa Clara University in 1982. His 34 years of professional career covers: teaching at undergraduate and graduate level, planning, developing and managing project in the areas of Telecommunications and Information Systems. His research interest includes embedded systems, digital programmable devices and computer communications. He is a member of IEEE
167 141 147Table 1: Mathematics and Computer Science Enrollment at Lamar UniversityIt is our observation and findings that ASCENT students enjoy doing research. Research of thefirst three cohorts of ASCENT Scholars (22 students) have resulted in 52 presentations inregional and national conferences, and 3 publications. The experience they have with the Bridgeprogram helped them to focus their attention on research more than they had previously. Manyof them are likely to be engaged on research in some capacity after they graduate. Even thoughmost of them plan to go to graduate school at some point, many of them enter industry beforethat. Out of 11 students graduated from this program, five of them are working in STEM fieldand two of them
activities can also automate gradingroutines and facilitates unique testing environments with variable content generation [3]. This isa powerful tool that enables the instructor to create unique assignments, and facilitates for quickand efficient grading of complex configurations.3. ConclusionsInstead of having to choose using either PT or GNS3 for network development, it might be aneven better idea to use them both together. As previously discussed, both programs target distinctaspects of an overall project, and can be used to complement each other. PT can be used to createa networking plan that incorporates the internal and external functions of a network. PT couldfurther facilitate ease of assessment and automated grading. GNS3, on the other hand
sustainability module into first-year courses for civil and environmental engineering students. J. Profes. Iss. Eng. Edu. Pract., 137, pp. 78–8510. Stolk J. 2015. Can Disciplinary Integration Promote Students’ Lifelong Learning Attitudes and Skills in Project-Based Engineering Courses? International Journal Of Engineering Education ·11. Aktas, C., Whelan, R., Stoffer H., Todd, E., Kern, C. 2015. Developing a University-Wide Course on Sustainability: a Critical Evaluation of Planning and Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production 106, 216- 22112. Oswald Beiler, M. and Evans, J. (2014). "Teaching Sustainability Topics to Attract and Inspire the Next Generation of Civil Engineers." J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract
. Figure 8: Survey Results.Future WorkCurrently, the review modules on Mathematics of Engineering and Microprocessor are beingclass-tested in their respective undergraduate courses at the School of Electrical and ElectronicEngineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.The next phase of the development of OnTEn website is to add more engineering contents. Tothis end, we have visited a number of universities in several countries and plan to continue thevisits to several other universities. The universities visited so far are the University of SouthernCalifornia, Los Angeles, California (USA); University of California, Davis, California (USA);California State University, Northridge, California (USA); Chinese University of Hong Kong(Hong
classroom (located at the second floor of the building).When the two groups were separated, their means of communication changed. They decided to use an instantmessenger to communicate throughout the workday but often found it difficult to understand one another. Toremedy the problem, the two groups set designated times for video chat meetings before lunch and beforeeach workday ended. After encountering some difficulties with this method, a leader was elected in eachgroup and the leaders were allowed to meet in person at the end of each workday to discuss the progressmade that-day and plans for the following day. The forced separation also introduced technical difficulties.Although the requirement for the project was identified and documented
time the course is taught.They also have the option of using a different software that they are comfortable with and haveaccess to. One of the groups opted to use HyperMesh and OptiStruct as they were planning onusing that software to design bridges for the SAMPE student bridge contest. Students getintroduced to the composites workbench in the surfacing class with CATIA and strengthen theirknowledge about how models are designed using orthotropic materials. Two lectures are setaside to instruct the students with the FEA laboratory. Examples of a model setup and thedisplacement results obtained by one of the student groups for flexural testing are given below(Figures 1 & 2.) Figure 1. CATIA model of flexural test using Figure 2. FEA
applicable to trying to explain their career plans.The SCCT model has 4 core variables: self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, interests, andgoals. In a study of 579 male and female college students (sophomores) in Spain, there were “nostatistically significant differences in outcome expectations or goals.”15 This was based onquestions related to a students’ appreciation for an engineering degree positively influencingtheir professional career, and on the extent of their academic plans. The students were also askedabout their level of confidence in earning high marks on courses with basic requirements forengineering majors, and on their interest in engineering related activities such as solvingmathematical problems. The answers indicate that
expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The Step-outs to Stars Engineering Retention FrameworkAbstract This research paper, grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory, investigates the relationshipbetween interest, first semester GPA and first year retention in engineering
focus on 32 of the student responses since one ofthe students did not respond to this study’s key questions. All student survey questionswill be referenced by using SQ#, where SQ indicates it is a question from the studentsurvey and # being replaced by the referred question number. SQ2: University of Arkansas Student ID Number SQ4: Gender SQ5: Ethnicity SQ6: Race SQ7: What degree plan are you most interested in? SQ8: Please indicate if you experienced any of the following activities prior to coming to the U of A (check all that apply)? SQ14: What is your perception of current job opportunities for industrial engineering (7 point Likert scale – very bad to very good
time? following job or work activities in the first five - Ask a lot of questions years after you graduate? - Generate new ideas by observing the - Searching out new technologies, processes, world techniques, and/or product ideas - Experiment as a way to understand - Generating creative ideas how things work - Promoting and championing ideas to others - Actively search for new ideas through - Investigating and securing resources experimenting needed to implement new ideas - Build a large network of contacts with - Developing adequate plans and
Paper ID #16487Preliminary Analysis of Spatial Ability Improvement within an EngineeringMechanics Course: StaticsSteven David Wood, Utah State University - Engineering Education Steven Wood is a junior in the Civil Engineering program. After finishing his BS he plans on completing a MS in Civil Engineering. In addition to studies, he is a teacher’s assistant and he teaches a recitation class for the Statics course. His Interests in the field of engineering are public transportation, specifically in rapid and heavy rail systems. His research interests include spatial ability, learning styles, and gender differences in