University where he was a member of the civil engineering faculty and served as the Walter L. Robb director of Engineering Lead- ership. Dr. Schuhmann teaches classes in engineering project management, leadership, and entrepreneur- ship. He is active in both local and international water resource engineering projects, and in supporting U.S. State Department efforts to promote innovative engineering enterprise development in North Africa. Page 23.851.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Learning Expectations and Outcomes for an
the dots between classroom learning and real worldapplications. We assessed this program informally during tests, projects, and an industry visitduring the first semester, and then formally via an online evaluation in the second semester of theprogram. This manuscript presents the outcome of the teaching mentorship experiment. Ourapproach could provide a pathway for new engineering faculty to become effective teachers andsuccessful mentors.I. Introduction and BackgroundThe 2lst century has seen a significant shift from bricks to clicks, from simultaneous to non-simultaneous engineering and communication cultures. 1-2 Traditional classrooms, in the walls ofbricks, have transformed with integration of software and design tools, digital
approximately 100 papers and has been awarded over $3 million of research grants.Dr. Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME from Louisiana State University in 1982, and his MSME in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1989, both from Purdue University. He teaches mechanical engineering design and geometry modeling for design. Dr. Crawford’s research interests span topics in computer- aided mechanical design and design theory and methodology. Dr. Crawford is co-founder of the
communication interaction scenario,selected from the CareerWISE content, is presented here: Monique wants to talk with her advisor, Dr. Hernandez, about taking the lead on an upcoming project in their lab. She is not sure how supportive Dr. Hernandez will be since she is already committed to a number of other projects, so she is trying to proceed cautiously and deliberately to convince him that she is capable of handling the extra work. In order to broach the topic with him, she uses the following plan to devise her approach…This particular communication interaction scenario pertains to multiple themes. Monique iscarefully planning the best strategy for negotiating with her advisor to secure a lead role on
retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering. Page 23.429.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development of an Interview Protocol to Understand Engineering as a Career Choice for Appalachian YouthAbstractAs part of a grant funded by the National Science Foundation, we are conducting a three-phase,sequential mixed method project to research the factors influencing the choices Appalachianyouth make about pursuing or not pursuing engineering degrees
: (i) technicalcompetence; (ii) managerial & leadership abilities; (iii) business communication skills; (iv)ethical & professional matters; and (v) social awareness.Training is a crucial component and process in the development of these qualities of aprofessional engineer. It is a period for a candidate to acquire practical knowledge, skills, andattitudes which can be learnt only in an industrial or commercial environment, and arecomplementary to those he has already acquired in college through formal education. Thetraining is aimed at developing the technical and managerial abilities of the candidate so as tobetter prepare him to undertake engineering projects as a professional engineer in his later careerwith due consideration of
also designated severalsubgroups ideal for various scenarios in the engineering academic environment at any institution;a few consistent with Mercer engineering students analyzed are outlined in Table 2. Table 2. Professional competencies for students3 TTI Description Effectively collaborate in a Applying critical and Persist through and learn team setting creative thinking to from failure ambiguous problems Mercer Equivalent Group projects/assignments Design phase of senior Student’s overall (PDR, CDR) design, R&D projects
-orbit sensor characterization but has also managed technical teams as a technical team lead and a deputy Integrated Project Team lead within the SEIT (Systems Engineering Integration and Test) organi- zation. Boyd has presented his work at both academic and industry conferences. Furthermore, to address his passion for leadership development and community building, he kickstarted a chapter of Connect1NG; a professionally recognized yet non-traditional development program focused on engaging and assimilat- ing new employees to the workplace through leadership development activities and networking. He is currently one of two Western Region liaisons for the program. Boyd was also selected to be a part of the company’s
engineers from different cultures• Cross cultural communication (intercultural communication skills; strategies; comparative analysis)• Problem solving involving scientific knowledge from multiple disciplines being applied to non-US centered problems (not just problem solving; it’s why we need the engineers; understanding of cross cultural similarities and differences in practice; ability to adapt to a project to local circumstances)• World view (understanding impacts of global connectedness)• International professionalism (ability to articulate global engineering practices in general and how their career as a future engineer impacts engineering practices globally)• Curiosity• Self-cultural awareness (aware of one’s own cultural perspective
research project on more effective teaching in core materials classes, the research questionhere is, "What is the effect on student learning and attitude of differing modes of feedback fromstudents' Muddiest Point reflections?" One method is to restructure the notes from a given classand place the set on Blackboard so the new notes respond to student issues raised in MuddiestPoints. This can reinforce class learning, clarify muddy points, and potentially assist in solvinghomework problems. A second method is with Class Warm-ups, which consist of a slide or twofor discussion at the beginning of the next class which can help clarify confusing or difficult-to-grasp concepts. Another method is to create Muddiest Point YouTube tutorial screencasts
Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their un- dergraduate student population. She currently serves as the principal evaluator for the Teachers Attracting Girls to Computer Science project which aims to increase and diversify the student population studying computer science in high school. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF
Paper ID #6210Using Video to Tie Engineering Themes to Foundational ConceptsDr. Darshita N. Shah, Teaching and Learning Laboratory at MIT Darshita (Dipa) Shah is the Associate Director for Teaching and Learning in MIT’s Teaching and Learning Lab (TLL). Dipa’s primary role is to assist in the development of curricular innovations on campus and to provide professional development around teaching and learning for graduate students and faculty. Before joining TLL, Dipa played an integral role in developing instructional materials for the Engineering is Elementary (EiE) project at the Museum of Science in Boston. Used by more
student epistemological development can provide needed insight into the beliefs thatstudents hold about engineering knowledge, how those beliefs relate to student understandingand success and how those beliefs and their relationship to understanding change as studentsprogress through school and transition into the workplace.Goals and Objectives The purpose of this project is to determine when conceptual and epistemological changesoccur for engineers on the path from undergraduate-student to early-career, practicing engineer.The project is also designed to explore how these changes occur and how they interact with eachother. In order to achieve this purpose, we are tracking two cohorts of students; one betweentheir sophomore year in college
Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) grant by the USDepartment of Education. The project, entitled Student On-ramp Leading to Engineering andSciences (SOLES), aims to increase the participation, retention, and success of underrepresentedand educationally disadvantaged students interested in pursuing careers in STEM fields. Amongthe strategies developed for this project is the Summer Math Jam – a two-week intensivemathematics program designed to improve students’ preparation for college-level math courses.This paper summarizes the results of the implementation of the Math Jam and its one-weekversion, the Mini-Math Jam, over the last four years.2. Incoming Student Interest and Level of Preparation for EngineeringCañada
background to go Graduates pursue advanced education, research, to graduate school and do research and development in science and engineering. Graduates have leadership and teamwork skills Graduates participate as leaders on team projects Graduates are aware of ethics and professional Graduates conduct themselves in a professional and responsibility in the workplace ethical manner in the workplaceLack of Alumni Involvement in Defining PEOsSince the PEOs pertain to achievements by recent graduates, the program alumni should beinvolved in writing and reviewing them from time-to-time. Most programs have an externaladvisory committee (EAC) that has some members who are program alumni. Hence using
Current Industrial Capability 40 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Range, milesFigure 1. Electric GA Aircraft Transportation PotentialStudy ObjectivesThe principal objectives of this study are as follows: to develop an electric GA technologyroadmap to identify this new industry potential, and to explore the transition of such technologyinto operational and practical hardware applications. The investigation itself is limited to theformulation of first-order forecasting projections and the application of
are encouraged to read the latestdesign textbooks, learn how to use a few basic statistical equations, plunge into the details ofparametric mass properties analysis. To manage the growing and ever-changing body of weightestimation knowledge, and bridge the gap in Mass Properties education, a standardizedengineering “tool-box” of conceptual & preliminary design weight estimation methods wasdeveloped for future projects in the UTA AVD Lab. It will also be used as a living body of workfor use by future students in the AVD Lab. This “tool-box” consists of a weight estimation method bibliography containing unclassified, open-source literature for conceptual andpreliminary flight vehicle design phases. To provide structure, a logic scheme
and deliver a two with rubrics in class. minute and a ten minute presentation 5. Use video feedback- 3. Students will appraise the presentations of their peers peer & self-appraisal.Comments Task: 6. Pair up students inMisconceptions 1.Use creativity/idea generation techniques for finding class practices to getabout presentation and selecting their course project topics more individualskills and best 2. read text: Winning Presentations in a Day attention through peerpractices in 3. Provide script drafts and
presentation and selecting their course project topics more individualskills and best 2. read text: Winning Presentations in a Day attention through peerpractices in 3. Provide script drafts and practice in/out of class their feedback.presentations are two minutes and 10 minute pitches 7. Video tape and postcovered in the text 4. Review and critique videos of previous classes and idea pitch and finaland in readings. winning 2 minute Idea Pitches exam presentations. 5. Reflect on and assess their idea pitch performance 8 Arrange external
scientific workshops and symposiums• Foster Revolutionary Basic Research for Air Force Needs - 1291 extramural research grants at 201 U.S. universities - 313 intramural research projects at AFRL, USAFA, AFIT - 1900 PIs, 3500 grad students, 603 post-docs supported• Transition Technologies to DOD and Industry - 907 funded transitions (follow-on-uses) from FY11 PI data call - AFRL is the principal transition path - 152 STTR small business - university contracts 5 AF Basic Research Budget *FY13
EFT-1 EM-1 EM-2 Launch Launch Launch FOCUSED TOWARD Human Space MCR Flight Project SRR/SDR PDR CDR SR FRR Reviews ✔ ✔ 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016 2017 2021 CDR: Critical Design Review MCR: Mission Concept Review EM: Exploration Mission PDR: Preliminary Design Review
last decade4. There are many textbooks andsupplements that include projects in MATLAB, Maple or Mathematica5. There is a fine line towalk, however, between having the CAS solve the ODE for the student, and the student using itas a tool to help them solve the exercise. The author will share how she has implemented Mapleuse into her classroom. The paper will also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using Page 23.720.2programs such as TechSmith’s Camtasia to record lectures to post online and to answer studentquestions.BackgroundClayton State University is a small liberal-arts institute that has a strong emphasis on technologyuse. Students
by theNernst potentials of the constituent ions. This parallel conduction model for nerve and musclesignal generation is basic to bioelectricity and although difficult to develop, months later, allstudents retained their understanding of this concept. Also, all now appreciate the contributionof Hodgkin and Huxley to engineering science and to society in general. Students providedmany examples of the societal impact of Hodgkin and Huxley’s contributions from present dayliterature.A few of the titles of projects developed by student laboratory groups were; “The Effect ofHeart Rate on Response Time Using LabChart,” “Eye Tracker Lab Project,” “Turning on andDimming a Light Bulb with Arm and Finger Motion,” and “Heart Rate Variability.” Such
Study on Simulated Spaceborne Microwave Radiometer Measurements of EarthAbstractThis paper describes a NASA internship case study in which the outcome can be implemented ina classroom setting. Through this case study, the students can learn numerical interpolation andintegration of functions in a real world project as well as the error analysis. A tradeoff expectedto be observed is between the speed of obtaining results and getting accurate results. As a result,recommendations are expected for various data sets to ensure fast and accurate results. Thesimulation can also be carried out using Matlab.The case study discusses numerical convergence of simulated space-borne microwaveradiometer measurements of earth brightness
pass rate for students who completedat least 80% of the homework was 96.9%. The pass rate for the 22.5% of the class who did lessthan 80% of the homework was 33.3%. We are interested in why 22.5% of the students do notcomplete at least 80% of the homework. The goal of identifying the characteristics of studentswho do not do homework is to enable appropriate intervention techniques to be developed. Thispaper presents a work in progress, describing the research process and giving preliminary results.There is debate over the role of homework, its usefulness, and its role in learning [e.g Vatterott(2009) and a current NSF project reported by Kaw and Yalcin (2010) examining whethercollecting homework improves exam performance]. This research does
), mechanical toys, gear kits, train set. § Games/Puzzles Board games (Blockus, Chess, Crack the Case, Guess Who?), Sudoku, puzzles § Computers West Point Bridge Designer, educational computer games (math or physics), helping to install programs.Hands-on Activities § Building Paper airplanes, helping around house, crafts, model car, sand castles, and simple construction projects. § Experiment Chemistry experiments (cleaning pennies, Mentos & Coke), science fair projects, combining materials and noting results. § Tinkering
withpracticing professionals from the community, and weekend group activities. Field SummerBridge includes one week of safety training, a for-credit calculus or other advanced mathematicsclass, and a five-week field internship working with scientists and engineers. Each SummerBridge student makes a presentation for the partner sponsors at the end of the summer. Studentswho successfully complete the component requirements are awarded scholarships.Summer Bridge students: • work on real projects with practicing engineers and scientists; • earn money for college; • complete a college-level mathematics class for credit toward their BS degree; • solidify their vision of a career as a scientist or engineer; • learn to navigate on the campus
Paper ID #6684A Natural Experiment: NAE’s Changing the Conversation Report and Stu-dents’ Changing Perceptions of EngineeringDr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the Director for Research at the University of Washington (UW) Center for Workforce Development (CWD) and an Affiliate Assistant Professor in UW Sociology. She directs re- search projects from conceptualization, methodological design, collection of data and analysis, to dis- semination of research findings. Dr. Litzler manages the Sloan-funded Project to Assess Climate in Engineering (PACE), which uses quantitative and
relating to this laboratory work, preference fordesigning with solar cells as an option on their design projects, and greater enthusiasm forstudying renewable energy. The students even received some unexpected recognition from theirnon-engineering peers. The paper presents sample costs of the equipment and typical resultsfrom four simple but insightful experiments that the students performed within a single hour-long class period using commonly available instruments in their laboratories.IntroductionA number of universities have begun to teach topics in renewable energy. Textbooks of goodquality and appropriate to support a wide breadth and depth of coursework have appeared. Someof the more advanced academic experts have even placed some superb
Paper ID #6699A structural equation model correlating success in engineering with academicvariables for community college transfer studentsDr. Marcia R Laugerman P.E., University of Iowa Dr. Laugerman is a PE in Industrial Engineering with over 20 years of University teaching experience. She is currently working as a research fellow in the Department of Teaching and Learning at the University of Iowa on an Institute for Education Sciences project to increase critical thinking skills in science through an inquiry-based instructional method. Her teaching and research interests are in STEM.Prof. Mack Shelley, Iowa State