/Engage, a structuredand coached course process of reflection to one´s own identity and personality, while within ateam setting. The rationale for presenting this learning method and practice is that the processdoes not happen by itself; therefore, by definition, it is more based on social rather than naturalscience and hence, cannot by typically coached by engineering educators without solid structureand a step-by-step process description with rationale included. Methods introduced in this papershed light on this matter and we argue that if implemented accordingly, they can be used by avariety of educators. Storytelling Based Learning is a context driven approach that borrows frominterpersonal psychology, organizational psychology, social
, L., D.E. Pritchard, J. DeBoer, G.S. Stump, A.D. Ho, and D. T. Seaton. 2013. Studying learning in the Page 26.1558.16worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 13-25.2. Guo, P. J., J. Kim, and R. Rubin. 2014. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study ofMOOC videos. Paper presented at L@S 2014, March 4–5, 2014, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.3. Kim, J., P.J. Guo, D.T. Seaton, P. Mitros, K.Z. Gajos, and R.C. Miller. 2014. Understanding in-video dropoutsand interaction peaks in online lecture videos. Paper presented at L@S 2014, March 4–5, 2014, Atlanta
traditional curriculum and its numbered course. In this case,the SPOC (Small Private On-Line Course) was blended: the text of the course was madeavailable (accumulatively) in parts at the time of each of eleven video presentations (Skype),which were presented a few days in advance of a seminar/discussion (Skype).The course, its origins, aims and presentation are described, and its limitations and potentialconsidered in the light of current discussions on the integration of engineering and liberaleducation, and developments in the role of technological and engineering literacy.Abstract 225 words.Key words. Blended, Humanities, SPOC, Transdisiplinary.Transdisciplinarity and InterdisciplinarityIn the 1960’s a number of novel degree structures emerged in
assistance in the development of the SVT digital curriculum, datacollection, and for serving as teaching assistants during the course; Monica A. Sweet, Ph.D. forguidance with assessment; Christine Alvarado. Ph.D. for guidance with App development;Jessica Block, Deborah Forster Ph.D, Jurgen Schultz Ph.D., and Philip Weber (QualcommInstitute) for getting the software and project off the ground; Sheryl Sorby and Cengage LearningInc. and for use of exercises from their workbook; and the Qualcomm Institute at UC San Diego,the Academic Senate at UC San Diego, and Engaging Students in Engineering (ENGAGE) fortheir financial support for the development of the Spatial Visualization Trainer (SVT) andcorresponding studies.References:[1] Sorby, S. A. (2009
– between 1200 °C and 1500°C. It seems that Kihara doesn’t have to be as meticulous as we thought…” Idea- Examines authoritative “The video tells us that the process supportive – information from yields steel with varying carbon alternative alternative perspective(s) because the steel does not fully points of to advance collective melt. Part of what makes the steel view understanding/further good is the variation in the yield. develop an idea Every bit of
. Although the bracket appears to be a simplecomponent, accurately simulating its nonlinear behavior under loading is a challenging problemeven for upper-division undergraduate engineering students.BackgroundAdditive Manufacturing (AM) is a computer-automated process in which objects are built up,generally layer-by-layer, by the addition of material. Since its invention in the mid 1980’s, AM(also called rapid prototyping) has advanced in both materials and processes. Early AM usedmostly polymer-based materials and was employed mostly for design conceptualization and formand fit checking. More recently, advances in processes and materials have led to a greatexpansion in the usage of AM to include the direct fabrication of functional products across
., and Anbari, F. T., Editors. Praeger Publishers. Page 26.1654.113. Beck, K., Beedle, M, van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Retrieved from http://agilemanifesto.org/ .4. Schwaber, K. (2004). Agile project management with scrum. Microsoft Press.5. Cockburn, A. & Highsmith, J. (2001, November). Agile software development, the people factor. IEEE Computer, 34(11), 131-133. doi: 10.1109
themselves with editing, saving, compiling, and executing the codes.Since its initial inclusion in the aerospace design course in 1999, the most time-consuming aspectof the design-build-test panel project has been the computer programming. Lack of appreciableprogramming experience, particularly in Fortran, means students have to devote considerabletime to resolve common mistakes that cause compilation difficulty, and develop an ability todebug a code to identify and eliminate the source(s) of error. Through consultation with theinstructor and teamwork, students gradually overcome the hurdle and complete the analysis andoptimization programming, which is essential before they can proceed with the fabrication and
Paper ID #11809Revitalizing an Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseThomas E McDermott P.E., University of Pittsburgh Thomas E. McDermott is an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, with over 30 years of industrial experience in consulting and software development. His research interests include electric power distribution systems, renewable energy, power electronics, electromagnetics, and circuit simulation. Tom is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and an IEEE Fellow. He has a B. S. and M. Eng. in Electric Power from Rensselaer, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia
University. His scholarly interests span computing education research, information technology for teaching and learning, and software engineering. Prior to coming to Drexel, Dr. Hislop spent eighteen years working in government and industry where his efforts included software development and support, technology planning and evaluation, and development and delivery of technical education.Dr. Sarah Monisha Pulimood, The College of New Jersey S. Monisha Pulimood is on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science at The College of New Jersey. She has been successfully incorporating immersive learning experiences and multidisciplinary collaborative projects into her courses for several years; has published on undergraduate
ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.[5] Flat World Knowledge. http://catalog.flatworldknowledge.com/. September 2014.[6] For Dummies eLearning. https://learn.dummies.com/. February 2015.[7] Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M.P. Wenderoth. Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pgs. 8410 – 8415, 2014.[8] Galles, D. Data Structure Visualizations. https://www.cs.usfca.edu/~galles/visualization/Algorithms.html. February 2015.[9] Hagerty, G. and S. Smith. Using the Web-based Software ALEKS to Enhance College Algebra. Mathematics and Computer Education, Volume 39, No. 3, pgs
, Longman2 E. L. Boyer and L. D. Mitgang, Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice, Princeton, NJ, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1996.3 J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.4 C.D. Hundhausen, N.H. Narayanan, and M.E. Crosby, “Exploring Studio-Based Instructional Models for Computing Education,” Proc. 2008 ACM Symposium on Computer Science Education, 392, New York, ACM Press.5 M. Oliver-Hoyo and R Beichner, "The SCALE-UP Project," Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors,” edited by V. S. Lee, Stylus
During Class After Class Preparation activity: Short lecture Finish application Reading, video, or assignments, open lab problem(s) Activities Prepare for next class Evaluation: online quiz Application or turned in solution assignments or labMethodsThis study was conducted under Institutional Review Board exempt protocol #2013E0570 inaccordance with the Office of Responsible Research Practices.We have collected data through online surveys and daily preparatory work quizzes given via theonline
ITEEA representative, and local employers. The college is responsible for providing theoverall coordination between the college, CCBC, ITEEA and the local LEA(s), and for arrangingand providing facilities for the trainer, teacher, and counselor training. Together the college andLEA will 1) conduct a crosswalk between the college’s Introduction to Engineering Technologyor similar class and the EbD curriculum to identify topics missing from ADA and EngD; 2)identify writers and trainers for ADA and EngD to create missing material and to becomecertified ITEEA trainers to conduct PD for local teachers; 3) work with ITEEA to oversee thecreation and piloting of new materials (if required); 4) create an articulation agreement for theIntroduction to
the world, and the use ofonline educational resources, amongst several others. Their corresponding benefits in terms ofsolving the large scale real world problems are also highlighted.References 1. Marjoram T., Engineering shortage a threat to development, underlines UNESCO’s first global report on engineering. Basic and Engineering Sciences, Natural Sciences, UNESCO Press, France, October 2010. 2. Morell L., Borri C., Rajala S. A. et al, IFEES: Enhancing Engineering Education at a Global Scale. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia (ABENGE), Vol. 27 N. 3, ISSN 0101-5001, 2008. 3. Kulacki F. A., and Krueger E .R., Trends in Engineering Education-An International Perspective. http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE1998/Icee/papers
Higher Education, 5(3),203-221.6 Rochin, R., & Mello, S. (2007). Latinos in science: Trends and opportunities. Journal of Hispanic HigherEducation, 6(4), 305–355.7 Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward athree dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355-368.8 Stevens, R. O’Connor, K., & Garrison, L. (2005). Engineering student identities in the navigation of theundergraduate curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference. Portland, OR: ASEE.9 Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, andaspirations in
Page 26.351.7 access procedures.Table 2. Data indicating status of lights (on or off) and photosynthetic photon flux density(PPFD) (umol/m2/s) in the raw data (left) and simpler (though approximate) virtual data at 5minute intervals (right) (January 27, 2014) Raw Data Virtual Data Time Light_9 PPFD Time Light9_% on PPFD 9:15:00 9:15:00 1.00 133.71 9:16:05 133.89 9:20:00 0.93 138.97 9:18:05 138.71 9:25:00 1.00 161.27 9:19:39 FALSE 9:30:00 0.37 166.70 9:19:49 TRUE 9:35
, though, our ability to facilitate a community of practice is weakened, since the classbecomes less of a laboratory, and more of a classroom. Our job as professors of communicationis not simply to share information; it is to help students develop an identity of competentpractice, to promote citizenship in the broadest sense of the term.REFERENCES1. Johnson, I. J. (2010). Class size and student performance at a public research university: A Cross-Classified Model. Research in Higher Education 51: 701-723.2. Williams, D. D., Cook, P. F., Quinn, B., and Jensen, R. P. (1985). University class size: is smallerbetter? Research in Higher Education 23: 307-318.3. Kopeika, N. S. (1992). On the relationship of number of students to academic level
receiving a STEM tool. Typically, a STEM field teacher in the school is the primary point of contact and specifies concepts that the STEM tool should convey. 2. With the initial request, desires, and STEM tool requirements provided by the K-12 school and teacher(s), the engineering design students develop initial concepts and visit the K-12 classroom. During the initial visit, the engineering students introduce themselves and present early design efforts. Additionally, a market survey is administered to the K-12 students and teacher(s), in order to involve them in the design process and specifics of the resulting STEM tool. Market survey questions range from “what color would you like the
. We are currently further testing ourhypothesis that gamification and two-way teaching should not simply be the addition of gamerules to course content but to replicate the intrinsic motivation that comes from playing a game.In the near future we plan to further improve our lesson plans to better fit the student’s interestsand background. We also recognize that the scenarios should reflect the current culture and beupdated continually.7. Bibliography1. Temple University General Education Program (2015), http://Gen-Ed.temple.edu2. Wieman C. E. (2014) Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (111), 8319-8320.3. Freeman S, et al. (2014) Active learning increases
shattered.Case Study of Student 0214Student 214 came into the class having already worked with a non-profit organizationand being aware of the challenges of working with underserved communities. After thefirst day of class she wrote, “Today’s session really got me thinking about whathappiness is and what it means to ‘change the world’.” She was struck by learning aboutthe conditions of community as expressed in the following quotes: “Hearing about thedifficulties that women face on a day-to-day basis was heartbreaking to hear, andalthough I am grateful I have the opportunity to learn about the realities of somepeople’s situations, it still makes me very sad.” “[S]ometimes I feel almost guilty abouthow many comforts and rights I have compared to others
Page 26.1774.5used to document student experiences.References:[1] E. Litzler and J. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the project to assess climate in engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, issue 2, pp. 319–345, April 2012.[2] J. D. Karpicke, "Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning," Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 21, issue 3, pp. 157–163, 2012.[3] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Science Education, vol. 88, issue 4, 493–534, July 2004.Acknowledgement
grown about 50 percent, but the number of engineering graduates has stagnated at around 130,000 (White House, 2011b). One Decade, One Million more STEM Graduates. Engineering graduates are 4.4% of total college graduates.• National Priorities: In June, 2011, President Obama called for the training of 10,000 new American engineers a year (White House, 2011a).• K‐12 Standards. The January 2013 draft of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) fully integrates engineering and technology into the structure of science education by raising engineering design to the same level as scientific inquiry at all levels of K‐12 education. U.S. bachelor’s degrees in selected S&E fields per 1,000 20–24
. John, Digital Systems Design Using VHDL, Second Edition, Thompson, Toronto, Canada, 2008.2. Lee, S., Advanced Digital Logic Design: Using VHDL, State Machines, and Synthesis for FPGAs, Thompson, Toronto, Canada, 2007.3. Harris, D.M. and S.L. Harris, Digital Design and Computer Architecture, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2007.4. Hwang, E.O., Digital Logic and Microprocessor Design with VHDL, Thompson, Toronto, Canada, 2006.5. Hayne, R.J., "An Instructional Processor Design using VHDL and an FPGA," Computers in Education Journal, ASEE, Vol. 3 No. 2, April - June 2012.6. Hayne, R.J., "VHDL Projects to Reinforce Computer Architecture Classroom Instruction," Computers in Education Journal, Vol. XVIII No. 2, April
received feedback from the circulating instructors/TAs. The first semester ofa restructured course is a learning experience for the instructor(s), TA(s), and students; however,by staying open to feedback, improvements can be made along the way. Our final in-classactivity was certainly the smoothest of the semester, with fewer groups stuck without a way tomove forward in solving the problem, positive group dynamics, and appropriate timing.In our experience, feedback can come from the students, fellow instructors/TAs, outsideobservers, assessment results (e.g., exams), or personal reflection. Pre-, mid-, and post-surveysof the students (separate from course/instructor evaluations) can be useful in identifying theirexpectations, prior experiences
systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. (American Society for Engineering Education, 2009). at 2. Prince, M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004).3. Ambrose, S., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C. & Norman, M. K. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. (Jossey-Bass, 2010).4. Hjalmarson, M. et al. Developing interactive teaching strategies for electrical engineering faculty. in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Conference (2013).5. Kober, N. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate
engineering education. In: International Conference of Engineering Education, Heraklion, Greece.; 2008.2. Cross, N. The expertise of exceptional designers. In: Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS) 6, Expertise in Design. Sydney, Australia; 2003:79–103.3. Lawson, B, Dorst, K. Design Expertise. In: Design Expertise. Architectural Press; 2009.4. Next generation science standards: For states, by states.; 2013.5. Driver R, Newton P, Osborne J. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Sci Educ. 2000;84:287–312.6. Purzer Ş, Goldstein M, Adams R, Xie C, Nourian S. An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. Int. J of STEM Educ (IJSTEM
research but can also serve as a guide for others who may attempt similar work in the future.Project Goals for 20151) Development, testing, and validation of the engineering innovativeness measurement instrument for both student and practicing engineer populations through the collaboration and support of ten universities and ten corporations in three phases: a. Classical item analysis and instrument testing. b. Pilot testing and factor analysis. c. Validation testing of instrument[s].2) Planning for full evaluation studies in 2015-2018 of Engineering Innovativeness at all 20 collaborating academic and corporate institutions. a. Project plans for research studies to be conducted at the participating collaborating
-level 3Dprinting sessions for returning students and/or expanding the program to other middle schools inthe local area.References 1. Gonzalez, S. and D. Bennett. (Fall 2014). Planning a 3D Printing Service in an Academic Library. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship. 78. DOI:10.5062/F4M043CC 2. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf 3. Johnson, M., M.J. Clapp, S.R. Ewing, and A.G. Buhler. (2011). Building a Participatory Culture: Collaborating with Student Organizations for 21st Century Library Instruction. Collaborative Librarianship. 3(1), 2-15