Conference Session

Approaches to Curriculum and Policy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University; Rebecca Segal, Virginia Commonwealth University ; Alen Docef, Virginia Commonwealth University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #30511Sustainable Collaboration Paradigms Between Math and EngineeringDr. Afroditi Vennie Filippas, Virginia Commonwealth University Dr. Filippas received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Patras, Greece. After earning her M. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Texas at Austin, she completed post-doctoral research with the Institute of Accelerating Systems and Applications in Athens, Greece. Post-academically, she worked for Ansoft Corporation as a research scientist spearheading the development of the next generation code for Ansoft DesignerTM. Dr. Filippas joined Virginia Commonwealth

Collection

2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Kenneth Van Treuren

- perspectives, accessed on Jan 11.15. McGowan, K., 2018, “Embracing the Changing Workforce and Preparing for Generation Z: What Does This Mean for Engineering Firms?,” ASHRE Journal Newsletter, June 2018, https://www.ashrae.org/news/ashraejournal/preparing-for-generation-z, accessed on Jan 11, 2020.16. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., 2016, Teaching and Learning STEM, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA.17. Moore, K., Jones, C., and Frazer, R. S., 2019, “Engineering Education for Generation Z,” American Journal of Engineering Education, 8 (2), Dec 2017, pp 111-126.18. Van Treuren, K. W., and Jordan, W., 2019, “What Skills Do Engineers Students Really Need for the Workplace and Life?”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa FL, June

Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Jianchu Yao

preparation, simulation-based real-worldprojects like this not only effectively facilitate student learning and make the intricate frequencymethods easier to understand, they also boost student perception on their areas of study (and pos-sibly their future career) due to the positive experience and enhanced understanding of relevance. REFERENCES 1. N. S. Nise. Control Systems Engineering, 6th Edition, Wiley Publisher. ISBN: 978-0-470-54756-4. 2. R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, & E. J. Dietz. “A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention V.Comparisons with traditionally-taught students.” Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 469–480. 3. J. Mills and D. Treagust

Collection

CoED

Authors

Bahaa Ansaf; Neb Jaksic

) n V TT S = Cm (2) A 6/14 • TT S = Total Solidification Time [min] • V = volume of the casting [cm3 ] • A = surface area of casting [cm2 ] • Cm = mold constant [min/cm2 ] • n = an exponent, usually n=2 • Cm depends on: – Mold material – Thermal properties of the cast metal – Superheat (pouring temperature relative to the melting point of the metal) • Total solidification time (TT S

Conference Session

Maker Spaces in Design Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carolyn Keller, University of Wisconsin, Platteville ; Jodi F. Prosise, University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

at University of Minnesota and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University. She teaches courses in both Industrial and Mechanical Engineering at SAU, focusing in Engineering Graphics, Manufacturing, the Engineering Sciences, and Design. She was recently the PI of an NSF S-STEM grant to recruit rural stu- dents from Iowa and Illinois into STEM. Dr. Prosise mentors the collegiate chapter of SWE and organizes many outreach events encourage girls to go into STEM. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Brazil every-other-year, where students design, build, and implement assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Her research focus is to develop

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

that were asked onthe trip. The expectation was for them to relate their answers to concepts learned in class whichwere reinforced on the trip. The instructor(s) teaching the course with the subject most alignedwith the trip had the responsibility of grading that assignment. To make this a manageableresponsibility for the instructor, a rubric was used in grading the field-trip reports (Appendix 1).Six Sigma DMAIC LabsThe curriculum included a course in Quality Management, which covered Six Sigmamethodology and tools, lean thinking practices and tools, process mapping, and applications forbusiness process improvement. Six Sigma is a method to reduce variation in business processes.DMAIC is a problem-solving technique integral to lean Six Sigma

Conference Session

Approaches to Encouraging Student Engagement

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brantly Edward McCord, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ronald Erdei, University of South Carolina; David M. Whittinghill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

2019’s sixteen-week CGT Game Dev I course. All Fall 2019 CGT Game Dev I students retained in the course,who were sophomores or beyond, were considered participants, though due to unforeseentechnical difficulties in survey distribution and some student non-responsiveness, not everyretained student’s results were analyzed (n=56); all students belonged in the same group, withouta control comparison due to existing limitations of sample size and length of study.Figure 1. Gantt chart depicting the modes of work throughout the semester and when relevant data was collected.On the first day of lab, students were told the attendance policy: every student was allotted onefree unexcused absence without question, and any additional unexcused absences

Conference Session

Design Teams 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi, University at Buffalo, SUNY; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC 1751369. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Papert and I. Harel, "Situating constructionism," in ConstructionismNew York, NY: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1991, pp. 1-11.[2] C. Williams, J. Gero, Y. Lee, and M. Paretti, "Exploring the Effect of Design Education on the Design Cognition of Sophomore Engineering Students," in Proceedings of ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering

Conference Session

Design Across the Curriculum 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michelle Maher, University of Missouri-Kansas City; Kathleen O'Shea, University of Missouri-Kansas City; Jacob M. Marszalek, University of Missouri-Kansas City; Darran Cairns, University of Missouri-Kansas City

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering education?” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36:3, pp. 301-312, 2011.[3] K. Bain, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.[4] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol.111:23, pp. 8410– 8415, 2014.[5] J.S. Bruner, “The act of discovery,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 31, pp. 21-32, 1961.[6] J.S. Bruner, The Process of Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.[7] S. Gómez Puente, M. Eijck, and W. Jochems, “A sampled literature review of

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Camilo Andrés Navarro Forero P.E.; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

same characteristics given the current state of the system, as proposed by Ackoff´s“Interactive Planning methodology”[11] . The Idealized Design model proposed by Ackoff,allows the participants to establish the existing gaps between reality and their ideal modeland begin to co-create projects focused on eventually achieving those goals, planning in theshort, middle and long term. They are also asked to do a subsequent exercise ofprioritization of objectives to know which are the most important for the actors as a group.The final outcome of STW#2 is another set of agreements among stakeholders on the mostimportant variables to be addressed through any proposed project.STW#3The third social transformation workshop STW # 3, “Critical Systems

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Rebecca Watts Hull, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adhiraj Bhagat, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

learningand also assists the Center with its assessment needs.The Assessment Partners program entails three stages. First, faculty partners identify theSLO that most closely aligns with their course learning objectives. They agree to createan assessment for that SLO in their course through an assignment aligned closely with therubric (exam question(s), project, assignment, etc.) that they can easily share with SLSCenter. A Center staff member meets with each faculty partner to review the assignmentand ensure that it will work well with the rubric. Student work products for multiplecourses aligned with a particular SLO are then scored by a team of SLS staff and facultypartners collaboratively, using the rubric (faculty do not score the work of their

Conference Session

Flipped, Blended, Online, Oh My

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cora Martinez, Florida International University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; Lili Steiner, Florida International University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

anincreased course passing rate. Unsurprisingly, student perception ratings also increased.Table 5. Student Perceptions of Teaching Survey (SPOTs) for online course CGN2420Course S tructure Fall 16 Spring 17 Fal l 17 Spring 18 Fall 18 Spring 19 Fall 19 1 Description of course objectives and assignments 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 3.8 4.4 2 Expression of expectations for performance in this class 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.3 3.8 4.4 3 Description of grading policies in the course syllabus 4.2 3.6 4.3 4.3 4.5 3.9 4.5Learning S upport 4 Consistency in following the course syllabus

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Dym, A. Agogino, O. Eris, and D. Frey, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching and Learning,” J. Eng., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005.[2] W. L. Neeley, S. Sheppard, and L. Leifer, “Design is design is design (or is it?): What we say vs. what we do in engineering design education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2006.[3] C. J. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. E. Cardella, and J. L. Borgford-Parnell, “Engineering Design Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 201–226.[4] S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, and W. M. Sullivan, Educating engineers : designing for the future of the field

Conference Session

Improving Student Outcomes in Mechanics

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Hadas Ritz, Cornell University; Kathryn Dimiduk, Cornell University; Andrew van Paridon

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

, rational and Competency easy to follow solution process, including required diagrams and figures 80% Incorrect answer due to one or two mechanical errors but supported by a correct solution process as described above Does Not Meet Mini- 0% Incorrect answer due to conceptual or procedural error(s) mum CompetencyTable 2: Timeline for exam grading, regrading, and retakes for the midterm exams for the experi-mental section. Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Version A Grades Regrade Regrade results posted;Week I (evening) posted

Conference Session

Educational Interventions and Pedagogy in Biomedical Engineering - June 22nd

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Qi Dunsworth, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Ben Murphy, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Yi Wu, Pennsylvania State University, Erie

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

values of heart rate (slider), strength level ofleft ventricle (dropdown menu), time for simulation (slider), whether to have an assist pump(check mark), and the corresponding pump control parameters (slider). Students are also guidedin those activities to select the right hemodynamic variable(s) to display on the GUI and to makeconclusions based on the results. The scaffolding of these activities makes it natural for studentsto revisit and compare with previous test results. Students were expected to complete activity 1during the class and finish the other two activities after the class. It was brought to theinstructor’s attention that some students skipped activities 2-3 in fall 2018, likely because theywere not collected or graded. Therefore

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Mary Anna LaFratta, School of Art and Design, Western Carolina University; Lane Graves Perry III, Western Carolina University; Hugh Jack P. Eng. P.E., Western Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

client s/heworked with was not interested in it. The seven clients that the students worked with signed up todo this project voluntarily. The clients are on the Autism spectrum, and we want to use art andtechnology to bring forth their creativity. We are not sure if it is the way of communication thatcaused this misunderstanding, or if the client that the student worked with was truly unhappy tobe there. During the second meeting, the clients all presented their Arduino programming work,and the helpers to the clients were amazed and said that they wouldn’t normally do so. When oneclient missed a meeting, that client would work at home and bring back the work to us. On theexhibit day, the clients dressed up and visited their project with

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lily Krest, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julianna Ge, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; John Chen P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

using NCA factors, and ourresearch, to better support engineering and computing students.References[1] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and M., “Supporting students’ college success: The role of assessment of intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2017.[2] C. Peterson, N. Park, and M. E. P. Seligman, “Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life,” in The Exploration of Happiness, A. Della Fave, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 161–173.[3] W. Damon, J. Menon, and K. Cotton Bronk, “The development of purpose during adolescence,” Appl. Dev. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 119–128, 2003.[4] S. L. Shapiro, D

Conference Session

Research on Engineering Ethics Education and Practice

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

attributable to the aspect(s) of their way of experiencing ethics in engineering. (3) Outcome of the incident: A clear change, refinement, or crystallization in one’s view of ethics in engineering, especially pertaining to a participant’s way of experiencing ethics in engineering.Kim reviewed the selected 25 interviews and extracted potential critical incidents. Incidentsvaried in length from one to several paragraphs. In most cases a critical incident was extractedwholly from one part of the interview, but in some instances, passages later in the interview werepaired with earlier interview text to complete an incident and to capture the entirety of the abovecriteria. After this initial step, 93 potential incidents were obtained

Collection

2019 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Roy Myose; L. Scott Miller; Elizabeth Rollins

Blog, retrieved fromhttps://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/305061-stem-fund-key-to-us-global-competitiveness.3 T. Carpenter, 25 May 2011, "Governor signs KPERS, engineering bills," Topeka Capital-Journal.4 R. Myose, L.S. Miller, S. Skinner, and J. Myose, Sep 2019, " The Retention of Graduates from EngineeringEducation Expansion in Kansas," Proceedings of the 2019 Midwest Section Conference of the American Societyfor Engineering Education.5 L.J. Shuman, C. Delaney, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, and M. Besterfield-Sacre, Jun 1999, "Engineering Attrition:Student Characteristics and Educational Initiatives," in Proceedings of the American Society of EngineeringEducation Annual Conference and

Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ariana C. Vasquez, Colorado School of Mines; Amy Hermundstad Nave, Colorado School of Mines; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Eric G. Shaffer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicolas Nytko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Gender differences and interactive effects of students’ motivation, goals, and self-efficacy on performance,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ser. ICER ’16. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, p. 211–220. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960329 [2] B. C. Wilson and S. Shrock, “Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors,” SIGCSE Bull., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 184–188, Feb. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/366413.364581 [3] D. Zingaro, M. Craig, L. Porter, B. A. Becker, Y. Cao, P. Conrad, D. Cukierman, A. Hellas, D. Loksa, and N. Thota, “Achievement goals

Conference Session

Design Across Curriculum 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nicole Danielle Trenchard, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences; Christopher Lombardo, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

. Course StructureHumanitarian Design Projects is a two-credit engineering elective at the Harvard School ofEngineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) that challenges groups of engineering students todesign and implement multi-semester humanitarian engineering projects with partner communitiesaround the world. Undergraduate teaching assistants and student project managers are responsiblefor co-creating course assignments with the head instructor, which are then assigned to studentseach week and subsequently reviewed by the instructional staff. Each assignment must fit into asemester-long strategy that addresses the particular design prompt or need communicated by theproject partner(s). Each project spans multiple years, which means that each semester

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 4 - Innovating Engineering Education through Industry and Community Partnerships, Maker Spaces, Competitions, Research Initiatives, and Experiential Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Casey Thelenwood, Grand Valley State University; Paul D. Plotkowski, Grand Valley State University; Brent Michael Nowak, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

. [Online] Available:https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm[Accessed April 19, 2020].[3] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine,Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economicfuture. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007[4] S. Q. Sheikh and E. Arvaniti, STEM Education Outreach through IEEE’s Pre-UniversityPrograms – Engaging Volunteers to benefit K-12 education and local communities, 2014 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, October 22 – 25, 2014, Madrid, Spain.IEEE 978-1-4799-3922-0/14.[5] Michigan Constitution. art. I, § 26, [Online] Available:http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S

Conference Session

Novel Strategies for Studying Liberal Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Lachney, Michigan State University; Madison C. Allen, Michigan State University ; Briana P. Green, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

might social classshape FLL teams’ preparations and performances? Future work could compare FLL teams fromcommunities that represent different socioeconomic conditions. What is more, studying FLLteams from different racial and ethnic communities might help us think about culturally respon-sive robotics education. How might FLL teams engage with identities, heritages, families, andother local community assets as sources of socio-technical innovation to support their achieve-ment at FLL competitions? These questions suggest that there is much work to be done by criti-cal engineering researchers and pedagogues on the social, economic, and cultural factors thatshape pre-college robotics competitions.References 1. S. Papert, The Children’s Machine

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Zachary Minken, Arcadia University; Augusto Z. Macalalag Jr., Arcadia University; Najah Naylor

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, we gathered data from identical pre- and post-testsadministered at the beginning and end of the course to all 17 participants. The test was designedto measure participants’ knowledge of the EDP and pedagogical moves to scaffold students’learning experiences of the EDP. Similar to the study of Hynes [10] that found their teachersshowed mixed levels of subject matter knowledge of EDP, but were successful in constructing aprototype and redesign, the analysis of our findings indicate three points that bear furtherdiscussion. First, our analysis of data suggests that participants had a deeper understanding ofEDP at the conclusion of the course, with particular emphasis on ​brainstorming​, ​planning​, andprototyping a​ s steps of the EDP (see

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mais Kayyali, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

the 4+1program. Another supplementary question was asked to the remaining 16% of students (whowere still not interested following the explanation of the program), to select the reason/s behindtheir decision. Their answers were as follows: 12% due to limited funding, 18% because theyhave not heard or thought about it before, 18% not interested in graduate school, 44% prefergaining experience in industry before pursuing an advanced degree, and the remaining 9% hadlisted other responses.Students were also asked to explain if they recognize any advantages to the program and toexplain why. Approximately 95% of the respondents perceived an advantage to the programwhile the remaining 5% either mentioned that they did not see any advantages to the

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Skills Development Across the Undergraduate-to-Workforce Transition

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrea Chan, Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead); Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Emily Moore P.Eng., University of Toronto; Milan Maljkovic, Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering; Emily Macdonald-Roach

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development

final failureare themselves the units of analysis [20].In this varied arena of literature, failures can be defined as broadly as any “deviation(s) fromexpected and desired results” [17]. More specifically, these can include errors that arepredictable and preventable, as well as failures that are inevitable in work that has a complexlevel of risks and high uncertainty. Sitkin [21] conceptualizes “Intelligent failures” as minor,non-threatening failures that result from deliberate action and can most readily facilitate newlearning. Edmondson extends this idea and emphasizes intelligent failure as being at the frontierof innovation, the inherent error in ‘trial and error’ [22]. Of course, failure can also be asmundane as everyday miscommunication

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Paul Jason Weinberg Weinberg, Oakland University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

, 1998; Bolger et al., 2012; Weinberg, 2017a;2017b; 2019). In Bolger et al.’s study, children predicted and explained the motion of pegboardlinkages (Figure 1). Lehrer and Schauble interviewed second- and fifth-grade students, withinengineering tasks, to assess their reasoning about the mechanics of gears. In both of thesestudies, the majority of participants did not engage in mechanistic explanations.Figure 1. Example of a system of pegboard linkages. In Weinberg (2017a; 2017b; 2019), participants predicted and explained the motion ofpegboard linkages represented on an assessment. Most children’s mechanistic reasoning wasfragmented, displaying few of the mechanistic elements necessary to describe lever motion.First, most did not seem to

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Panagiotis Skrimponis, New York University; Nikos Makris, University of Thessaly; Karen Cheng, Columbia University; Jonatan Ostrometzky, Columbia University; Zoran Kostic, Columbia University; Gil Zussman, Columbia University; Thanasis Korakis, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Office of the CTO); Harish Krishnaswamy(EE, Columbia); Shivendra Panwar, Sundeep Rangan (ECE, NYU); Ivan Seskar, DipankarRaychaudhuri (WINLAB, Rutgers)We thank the teachers who participated in the program during the summers of 2018 and 2019 fortheir contributions to the development of the COSMOS Educational Toolkit.We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.References 1. COSMOS, “Cloud enhanced open software defined mobile wireless testbed for city-scale deployment,” https://cosmos-lab.org/ 2. D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, G. Zussman, T. Korakis, D. Kilper, T. Chen, J. Kolodziejski, M. Sherman, Z. Kostic, X. Gu, H. Krishnaswamy, S. Maheshwari, P. Skrimponis, and C. Gutterman, “Challenge: COSMOS: A

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jae Hoon Lim, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Rachel Saunders, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr., University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Madison Elizabeth Levan, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 4, 2010. [0022- 1546]. Available: https://tandfonline.com. [Accessed Oct. 10, 2019].[9] C. Interiano-Shiverdecker, J. H. Lim, P. T. Tkacik, and J. L. Dahlberg, “From the barracks: A multi-dimensional model of student veterans’ cultural transition,” The Journal of Military and Government Counseling, vol. 7, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://mgcaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2]019/11/JMGC-Vol-7-Is-3.pdf. [Accessed Sept. 15, 2019].[10] B. J. Novoselich, J. C. Bruhl, M. Scheidt, C. N. Willis, and M. S. Sheppard, “ASEE support to student veterans: Results of a 2018 leadership roundtable,” Paper presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [Online