that final exams (a proxy for knowledge retention), were much poorer (13-point mediandifference) for students taking the course in the middle of the pandemic. By spreading material over four exams, instead of three, and flipping a class – thereby allowingstudents access the lecture material at their convenience, we hoped for overall student improvement. Thiswas not the case. REFERENCES[1] S. Asgari, J. Trajkovic, M. Rahmani, W. Zhang, R. C. Lo, and A. Sciortino, “An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 4 April, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250041.[2] N. L. Ramo, M. Lin, E. S. Hald, and A. Huang-Saad
thesimilarities and differences of the APL to Python. Upon completion of the “Programminglessons”, there is a series of activities designed to help the students create circuit(s) andprogram(s) that interact with each other.The programming and circuitry scaffolded modules prepare students for an end-of-semesterCornerstone Project. ENGR 111 currently has two different Cornerstone Projects. TheCornerstone Project is determined by the semester and year that the course is taken. The firstCornerstone Project (Project 1) is comprised of a windmill power generation system. Project 1has students constructing a windmill and using Arduino programming to interpret sensor dataand calculate system performance. The second Cornerstone Project (Project 2) is comprised of
Inclusive Education, 20(4): 347- 363, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273[4] Equalities Act (2010), UK General Public Acts, Available to download: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents[5] Kumar, K.L. and Wideman, M. (2014), “Accessible by design: applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course”, Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1): 125-147[6] Bunbury, S. (2020) “Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum?” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(9): 964-979, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347[7] May, H. and Thomas, L. (2010) Embedding Equality and Diversity in the Curriculum: Self Evaluation
interviews. It maynot be able to reflect the full extent and complexity of entrepreneurship education. The modelproposed here is intended to be a starting point for discussion rather than a fully validated model.In the future, we would like to continue to conduct a deeper investigation of program setups toinclude co-curricular and extracurricular activities in our program analysis. We would also like tointerview more universities to understand if the model captures the elements in other universitiesas well. The authors would like to receive feedback and welcome collaborations on this topic.References[1] E. Fisher, A. R. Reuber, S. Business, and T. Branch, The state of entrepreneurship in Canada. Industry Canada Ottawa, ON, 2010.[2] I. Government
reasons why certain topics are more popular than others. 2. Conduct a demographic analysis of the students to find out if there is any connection between the groups they identify with and the module they choose. 3. Examine the impact of these DEI-themed modules in an upper division algorithms course taken by all students in the computer engineering track in our department.References: 1. National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads: The National Academies Press. 2. Handelsman J., Elgin S., Estrada M., Hays, S., Johnson T., Miller S., Mingo V., Shaffer C., and Williams J., “Achieving STEM Diversity: Fix the
," 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S3G-1-S3G-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673256. 2. Rahman, F., & Andrews, C., & Wendell, K. B., & Batrouny, N. A., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019, June), Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32699 3. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 4. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond
Paper ID #38789Stigma of mental health conditions within engineering culture and itsrelation to help-seeking attitudes: Insights from the first year of alongitudinal study ˜ University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkMatilde Luz S´anchez-Pena, Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on the development of cultures of care and wellbeing in engineering education spaces
alsoincludes adding more EM related activities to existing laboratory and design courses and usingan updated assessment tool to compare the mindset of students in laboratory and design coursesacross the college. We plan to increase the survey response rate with multiple reminders andadditional incentives for Spring 2023.References[1] KEEN, “The Framework,” Engineering Unleashed, 2022. https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework (accessed Apr. 28, 2022).[2] C. Winberg and S. L. Winberg, “The role of undergraduate laboratories in the formation of engineering identities: A critical review of the literature,” The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4102/td.v17i1.962.[3] L. D
] Hadim, H.A., Esche, S. K., ‘Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum through Project-Based Learning,’ 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, pp. F3F-F3F, (2002), doi:10.1109/FIE.2002.1158200.[5] Cassie Wallwey, Meris M. Longmeier, Donnelley Hayde, Julia Armstrong, RachelKajfez, Renee Pelan, Consider “HACKS” when designing hackathon challenges: Hook, action,collaborative knowledge sharing, Frontiers in Education, 10.3389/feduc.2022.954044, 7, (2022)[6] Fernanda Gobbi de Boer Garbin, Carla Schwengber ten Caten, Diego Augusto de JesusPacheco, ‘A capability maturity model for assessment of active learning in higher education,’Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0263, 14, 1, (295-316), (2021)[7] S. Hood, N
-implementation-of-a- power-and-energy-engineering-minor-with-limited-resources-first-results-and-lessons- learned[6] P. E. Hertzog and A. J. Swart, “Design and development of practical instruction for freshmen engineering students in a renewable energy course,” in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Apr. 2017, pp. 838–843. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942944.[7] L. (Heidi) Jiao, “Solar Energy Education at Grand Valley State University,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/solar-energy-education-at-grand-valley-state-university[8] S. Pullen and K. Brinkert, “SolEn for a Sustainable Future: Developing and
contribute to the advancementand better understanding of both Education for Sustainable Development and SustainableDevelopment Goals.Even though the spread of Sulitest in Europe (without France) and the Americas region hasreached 15% and 21% respectively [13], there is an invitation to higher education institutions toincrease the effort and knowledge of students towards sustainability. This research providesmeaningful insights to understanding students’ sustainability knowledge in higher educationinstitutions and strengthen the design of future sustainable global engineering courses.A sustainable future can be feasible if education for sustainable development is disseminatedworldwide.References 1. S. Ling, A. Landon, M. Tarrant, D. Rubin, “The
Undergraduate Engineering Education. Cambridge,MA:WorldwideCDIOInitiative.Crawley, E. F., & Hosoi, A. E. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET)programatMIT-Buildingcommunity,developingprojects,andconnectingwithindustry.In2019 ASEEAnnualConference&Exposition,Tampa,Florida.Crawley,E.F.,&Hosoi,A.P.,&Mitra,A.B.(2018).RedesigningundergraduateengineeringeducationatMIT–the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,SaltLakeCity,Utah.deGraaff,E.,Markkula,M.,Demlová ,M.,Kuru,S.,&Peltola,H.(2007).Innovativelearningandteachingmethods. In C. Borri & F. Maffioli (Eds.), TREE: Teaching and research in engineering in Europe
, innetworking courses to address the difficulty of teaching networking concepts to electricalengineering technology students.OMNet++ Network Simulation PlatformOMNeT++ is a framework and library that is essentially used to create and primarily simulatecommunication networks. The simulations are composed of individual modules written in C++and then connected to form larger components using Network Description Language (NED),OMNet++’s proprietary high-level language [11-13]. During the simulation, OMNeT++ willperform calculations given the user's parameters and then output the results. These resultsinclude throughput, queue times, round trip time, and more. These results represent theperformance of the communication network set up by the user. A library
current state of forensic engineering education.AcknowledgmentOne of the authors was funded by FIU University Graduate School Dissertation Year Fellowship,and this support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the FIU University Graduate School.References[1] W. DeWitt, L. Geddes, F. Johnson, and L. Reader, “A master of science curriculum in forensic engineering,” in 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), 2001, pp. F2B-8. doi: 10.1109/fie.2001.963696.[2] R. J. Heywood, “Responding to
Agency. (2019). Community-port collaboration. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/community-port-collaboration 3. Mendoza, D. L., Pirozzi, C. S., Crosman, E. T., Liou, T. G., Zhang, Y., Cleeves, J. J., Bannister, S. C., Anderegg, W. R. L., & Paine III, R. (2020). Impact of low-level fine particulate matter and ozone exposure on absences in K-12 students and economic consequences. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114052. DOI 10.1088/1748- 9326/abbf7a 4. Cserbik, D., Chen, J.-C., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Sowell, E. R., Schwartz, J., Hackman, D. A., Kan, E., Fan, C. C., Herting, M. M. (2020). Fine particulate matter
Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023,” retrieved fromhttps://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/#GC5, 13 March 2023.Mosher, G., “Enhancing team-based senior capstone projects: opportunities and challenges,”Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference, ASEE-NWMSC2014-A1,(2014).Mostafapour, M., Hurst, A., “An exploratory study of teamwork processes and perceived teameffectiveness in engineering capstone design teams,” Int. J. Eng. Ed. 36:1(B), 436, (2020).Paretti, M., Layton, R., Laguette, S., Speegle, G., “Managing and mentoring capstone designteams: considerations and practices for faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Ed. 27(6):1192, (2011).Appendix: Table
Conference, Washington, District of Columbia. 10.18260/1-2— 62752. Walther, J., & Miller, S. E., & Kellam, N. N. (2012, June), Exploring the Role of Empathy in Engineering Communication through a Transdisciplinary Dialogue Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--213793. Wang, L.M., Beamer, B., Moore, K.J., and Krain, C., Case study - Lesson plan for noise control engineering concepts for use in ABET accredited engineering programs. Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2021, Aug. 1-5, 2021. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Zone 1 ConferenceAppendixStudent Learning OutcomesStudent Learning Outcomes
visit possible and staffing the tour; V. Sbovodafrom CTU-Prague for facilitating remote access to the GOLEM tokamak: T. Vouse and S.Woodruff from SciVista Inc. for allowing the use of their VR models and platform.References.[1] R. F. Post. “Controlled Fusion Research - An Application of the Physics of High Temperature Plasmas”. Rev Mod Phys 28, pp. 338-362 (1956).[2] P. Galison and B. Bernstein. “In Any Light: Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954”. Hist Stud Nat Sci 19, n. 2, pp. 267-347 (1989).[3] C. Warrik. “Fusion turns to engineering”. Ingenia 52, pp. 39 - 43 (2012).[4] W. Choi, A. Cho, H.-K. Chung, H.-S. Tho. “An exploratory study on application of big science business ecosystem for K-DEMO project”. Fus
Delaware. She received her Bachelorˆa C™s of Engineering (2001) in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Delaware, and her MS (2004) and PhD (2006) in Mechanical Engine ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Measuring adaptiveness among college students and working professionalsThe concept of adaptive expertise (AE) describes individuals with both deep content knowledgeand the ability to apply this knowledge more broadly in practice. Four characteristics of adaptiveexpertise have been identified in the learning sciences literature, specifically: 1) multipleperspectives, 2) metacognition, 3) goals and beliefs, and 4) epistemology.Within the realm of education, engineering programs are
Grayson, L. P. (1993). The Making of an Engineer: An Illustrated History of Engineering Education in the United States and Canada, New York: John Willy and Sons10 Hart, R., Polk, T. (2017). An Examination of the Factors that Influence Students’ Capstone Project Choices. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 1422– 143111 Howe, S., Rosenbauer, L., & Poulos S. (2017). The 2015 Capstone Design Survey Results: Current Practices and Changes over Time. International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 1393–142112 Ihde, D., Selinger, E. (2003). Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press13 Issapour, M., Shepard, K. (2015). Evolution
–277, (2016).https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733[2] Mills, J. E., Treagust, D. F., ‘Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-BasedLearning the Answer?,’ Australasian Journal of Engineering education (AAEE), ISSN 1324-5821, (2003)[3] Shekar, A., ‘Project-based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing BestPractices,’ Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,Indiana. 10.18260/1-2—22949[4] Hadim, H.A., Esche, S. K., ‘Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum through Project-Based Learning,’ 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, pp. F3F-F3F, (2002), doi:10.1109/FIE.2002.1158200.[5] Cassie Wallwey, Meris M. Longmeier, Donnelley Hayde, Julia Armstrong, RachelKajfez, Renee Pelan
from researchers and communities. Theorganization of this second event and the results will be subject of a follow-up paper. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023References[1] "East Carolina Univeristy," Retrieved from: https://www.ecu.edu/.[2] "East Carolina University, Graduate School Research Creative Achievement Week," Retrieved from: https://gradschool.ecu.edu/research-creative-achievement-week/.[3] "East Carolina University, I-Corps," Retrieved from: https://icorps.ecu.edu/.[4] "East Carolina University, College of Buisness Pirate Entrepreneurship Challenge," Retrieved from: https://business.ecu.edu/msoe/pec/.[5] I. I. Berchin, A. R. d. A. Dutra and J. B. S. d. A. Guerra. (2021). "How do higher
, including introductory-level STEMclasses, to increase student engagement and material comprehension.References1. Barnard D. History of VR - Timeline of Events and Tech Development. Virtual Speech. https://virtualspeech.com/blog/history-of-vr. Published October 6, 2022. Accessed November 13, 2022.2. Spayde D, Green M, Kinard K. Student response to the introduction of programmable logic controllers through the use of a virtual engineering laboratory environment. In: ASEE Southeastern Section. ; 2019. Accessed November 10, 2022. http://sites.asee.org/se/wp-content/uploads/sites/56/2021/04/2019ASEESE78.pdf3. YILDIRIM B, TOPALCENGİZ ES, ARIKAN G, TİMUR S. Using Virtual Reality in the Classroom: Reflections of STEM
problem-solving and sustainable development. They need to be supplemented with human initiatives, creative innovations, and prompt action, all based on values that are grounded in pursuit of the common good through principles upholding non-hierarchical and democratic processes, personal courage, and a shared commitment to helping others—othercentredness instead of self-centredness. These strategies need to proceed from recognition that people on the ground are invaluable sources of local knowledge, wisdom and insight, which should be called upon for problem solving and new knowledge creation. (pp. 4–5)PALAR allows the faculty researcher(s) to participate in action learning as a collaborator. Amore
psychobiology and political science from Wheaton College in Massachusetts.Dr. Shernita Lee Dr. Shernita Lee is the Assistant Dean and Director of the Graduate School’s Office of Recruitment, Di- versity, and Inclusion at Virginia Tech. She holds a bachelorˆa C™s degree in mathematics from Alabama State University and a doctorate from Virginia TechDr. Nina Parshall, The Ohio State UniversityMs. Alissa Sperling, Drexel UniversityDr. Jacqueline E McDermott, Purdue University Dr. Jackie McDermott joined the College of Engineering at Purdue University in August 2018 and is the Associate Director of Graduate Diversity and Inclusion. Jackie completed her Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Biology from Brandeis University and has over
. Cady and G. Pearson, “Building educator capacity in K-12 engineering education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2020.[2] S. S. Guzey, T. J. Moore, and M. Harwell, “Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher- developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol 6, no. 1, p. 2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129.[3] M. A. Bakah, K. A. Nihuka, and A. G. Anto, “Fostering the sustainability and scalability of curriculum innovations through collaborative design,” In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning, pp
content. Students value that these authentic experienceshelp to answer “overarching scientific question[s] for most of the labs and we weredoing the lab for a purpose.” Course evaluations for Cellular Engineering report a4.83/5 overall evaluation score, with a 5/5 score for intellectually stimulatingcontent. Likewise, Molecular Engineering course evaluations report a 4.00/5overall evaluation score, with a 4.53/5 score for intellectually stimulating content.Additional questions on integrating these new gateway courses with advancedtopics and electives are pending, along with long-term success of the new courseson student engagement in primary research at Duke University, industryconnections and career success.Introduction Linsenmeier and
diversity.4 The program consists of five classes,unique to the minor, that span across two academic years (4 semesters) and relies on the use ofcohort-based program structure, near-peer mentoring, and project-driven learning. The cohortstructure allows for close relationships to form, combatting the social isolation that historicallymarginalized students may feel in CS classes. Peer mentoring benefits students by offeringfurther academic, social, and professional development support within the program. Project-based learning provides strong ties to students’ major area(s) of study (primarily biology andbiochemistry) and supports students’ future success in fields that are becoming increasingly data-driven.1 Finally, the minor program courses focus
Science Foundation grant efforts includ- ing S-STEM, REU, and Includes Alliance grant efforts.Dr. Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University Jennifer Love is a full-time faculty member of Northeastern University’s College of Engineering, most recently in the First Year Engineering program. She is currently the Associate Director for the Center for STEM Education. She has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1993), a Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from The University of Iowa (1997) and a Doctorate in Education from Northeastern University (2022) where she recently completed her dissertation in elementary STEAM education. She also worked as a professional
duration of the ten-week program. REFERENCES[1] L. Hong, and S. E. Page, "Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers," Economic Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385-16389.[2] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy," in Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[3] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifiying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.[4] A. Bandura, "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales," Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 307-337, 2006.[5] R. Scherer and F. Siddiq, "Revisiting teachers