Master’sprograms in three main fields: Humanities and Social Sciences; Science, Engineering andTechnology and Biomedical Sciences. In 2010 approximately 37000 students were enrolledat K.U.Leuven. The Engineering Faculty is part of the Science, Engineering and Technologygroup. In the current academic year 4369 students are enrolled at the Faculty of Engineering.The engineering curriculum consists of a three year Bachelor’s program that prepares thestudents for a subsequent Master’s program of two years. The Faculty organizes Master’sprograms in several disciplines, like Architecture, Electrical Engineering, MechanicalEngineering, Chemical Engineering, Materials Engineering, Civil Engineering, BiomedicalTechnology, Computer Science, Energy Engineering
precedent analysis and other influences are integrated with the students’ own creative process, this influence and process should be directly recognized by the student and discussed with studio critics during the process.Generating AI ArtThis section documents the steps required and the processes behind generating AI art ‘in thestyle of’ a designer for a generalized building. LAION-5B is the dataset provider. Midjourney isthe AI text-to-image algorithm generator. Discord is an instant messaging application with anembedded bot that communicates with the user through prompt commands.How the Diffusion Model WorksThe AI art process requires a web crawler, dataset of images and associated text descriptions, adeep learning algorithm
Paper ID #41618A Liberatory Co-Curricular Program for Engineering Students: InvestigatingImpacts and Limitations Through Alumni PerspectivesBailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International University Bailey Bond-Trittipo is an engineering and computing education Ph.D. candidate within the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. Her research interests center on employing critical theoretical frameworks and qualitative methodologies to study liberatory pedagogies in engineering education and undergraduate engineering students’ participation in
between cognition and student outcomes. The study represents an extensive search of 27,464 published studies from 10 library holdings and 10 Journals in engineering education. Twenty studies, meeting study criteria, were coded for 39 variables in six categories. Studies were assigned to one of two groups based on the statistical evidence that was reported. Group I reported p-values only and Group II reported F, t, or chi square values. Significance of Group I studies is shown through a summary chi square and p value. A summary weighted unbiased effect size was determined for Group II studies. With only 0.07% of studies meeting search criteria, it was determined that there is a limited amount
years.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University William (Bill) Oakes is the Assistant Dean for Experiential Learning, a 150th Anniversary Professor, Director of the EPICS Program, Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University, and a registered professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education having courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum and Instruction. He was the first engineer to receive the U.S. Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning and a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. He
, introductory materials science, electronic materials, kinetics, and microelectronics processing. She has been involved in a number of innovative curriculum development programs and educational research projects on improving student learning in engineering through the use of active learning and service learning. In 2010, she was awarded the College of Engineering Award for Excellence in Service. In 2007-2008, she was an SJSU Teacher Scholar. In 2002, she was awarded the College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching award.Katherine Casey, SJSU College of Engineering Katherine graduated with a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. in Experimental Psychology from SJSU. She now works in the College of Engineering as Engineering
engineering design, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineering teams, and elementary engineering education.Dr. Adetoun Yeaman, Northeastern University Adetoun Yeaman is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the First Year Engineering Program at Northeastern University. Her research interests include empathy, design education, ethics education and community engagement in engineering. She currently teaches Cornerstone of Engineering, a first-year two-semester course series that integrates computer programming, computer aided design, ethics and the engineering design process within a project based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University
solveproblems in more creative way and share information [07].5. Let’s Go Folks! - The ProjectAs mentioned before this special program is based in an integrated educational method usingcomputers as the tools to increment the learning process aiming the betterment of fundamentaleducation system, the K12.Engineers, Pedagogues, Social Agents and others scientists and technicians involved witheducation have been working in the implementation and development of this project.It encompasses top technologies with access to Internet and complete didactic material designedfor this kind of proposal.The project has been named “Let’s go folks!” as a strategy to reach the young students. Anotherstrategy of marketing to get the attention of them is the name of the
]. Theymust now demonstrate their ability to “adopt an inclusive approach to engineering” [22]. TheRoyal Academy of Engineering [24] define six engineering habits of mind; systems thinking;adapting; problem-finding; creative problem-solving; visualizing; and improving. These areaccompanied by the following learning habits of mind: ethical consideration; curiosity, openmindedness; resilience; resourcefulness; collaboration; and reflection. It is therefore clear thatthis ‘new’ engineer of the future must have skills beyond the technical domain and Spinks,Silburn and Birchall [25] define three roles of an engineer: the first as a technical specialist;the second as an integrator who can work across boundaries in complex environments; andthird as a change
conditions under which humans and nature can exist in productive harmony to support present and future generations” [7].Sustainability principles have been integrated by diverse industries into their operations throughthe combined consideration of environmental protection, community needs, and economicvitality, known as Triple Bottom Line (TBL), for both current and future generations [8].Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) has purposefully broadened the triplebottom line to include operational efficiency. According to ACI-NA, “Airport sustainability, in effect is a holistic approach to managing an airport so as to ensure the integrity of the Economic viability, Operational efficiency, Natural Resource
pandemic.KeywordsEducation, Recession, Epidemic, PandemicIntroductionThere has been much research on what happened during the recent global pandemic due to Covid-19(McEntire at al. 2021, Naeem and Bhatti 2020, and Adhikari et al. 2021). In countries where an epidemic-level disease spread has not been recently seen, it may be difficult to imagine how they affect theeducation system. The CDC provides some guidance on the difference in the terminology of diseaselevels, but these definitions lack specificity. An epidemic is a sudden increase in cases, and an outbreakindicates a spike in cases in a limited geographic area. In contrast, a pandemic indicates an epidemicspread over several countries or even continents (CDC 2012). With previous epidemics and pandemics inthe
, American Society for Engineering Educationprecise timing alternative. This last feature exceeds the capabilities of the existing in-classexperiment and plays an important role in conducting the uncertainty analysis where sources oferrors need to be estimated as part of the uncertainty analysis. Figure 4. The On-line Experiment InterfaceExperiment WebsiteThe remote experiment described above is part of a more general curricular improvementinitiated in the last decade by IIHR for instruction in fluid mechanics at the CoE of UI. Centralto this pedagogical initiative is integration of simulation technology into undergraduateeducation through complementary computational fluid dynamics (CFD), experimental fluiddynamics (EFD
DEI-related construct) versus the ability toimplement inclusive teaching strategies (qualification with DEI-related construct) in theircourses. We did not ask respondents to describe where in the application package they wouldexpect to see information to inform their evaluation of these constructs; however, we expect theywould be evident to varying degrees in many common application documents, most notably theteaching statement and cover letter, and perhaps, in the curriculum vitae with evidence ofprofessional development in the area of inclusive teaching and/or awards received (e.g., teachingassistants who receive teaching awards).Quantitative data cleaning and statistical analysis were carried out using Jamovi (2021), an open-source
specificobjectives and skills that must be attained for engineering students. While nearly all of thecriteria could be achieved in the classroom, service learning programs more effectively addressthe following criteria5: • An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams; • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; • An ability to communicate effectively; • A broader educational goal in which they understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context; • An increase in knowledge of contemporary issues.International service learning is rapidly becoming a popular credit-bearing study abroad optionfor engineering students (6-8). This learning experience integrates a multi-faceted, real
identifiedrecommendations for best practices in new engineering curricular models and the bullets belowsummarize these points. • Implementation of “engineering up front”: the exposure of freshmen to hands-on, real- world engineering practice early in their undergraduate education, ranging from ‘professional level’ laboratory facilities to realistic design projects. Many engineering programs have postponed this experience until the junior or senior year. • Integration of students working in teams rather than independently, including cooperative learning, especially in the earlier undergraduate years. Although the study found an emphasis on a team approach as a difficult process (including problems related to team composition, organization, methods
Paper ID #23188Work in Progress: Healthcare Economics and Information Literacy - Re-sources for Success in Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering EducationMr. Alexander James Carroll, North Carolina State University Alex Carroll is the Research Librarian for Engineering and Biotechnology at the NCSU Libraries. He facilitates faculty research and offers curriculum-integrated information literacy instruction to students in the College of Textiles and the College of Engineering, with particular emphasis on areas that intersect with human and animal health. Alex received his BA from James Madison University, and his MSLS from
assessment of the studentlearning outcomes have been done using both a test prepared by the school and a standard testknown as the SSCI.The Signals and Systems Concept Inventory (SSCI) [2-3] is a set of multiple-choice questionsthat measures students’ understanding of fundamental concepts such as signal transformations,linearity, time-invariance, transforms, convolution, etc. There are two versions of the SSCI forLinear Systems. One deals with Continuous-Time (CT) systems and the other deals withDiscrete-Time (DT) systems.The paper is divided into six sections. In Section 2, we describe our Electrical Engineeringundergraduate curriculum. In Section 3, we describe the Linear Systems course contents. InSection 4, we discuss an assessment test used
Hira, Boston College Dr. Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program and the Department of Teaching, Curriculum and Society (by courtesy) at Boston College. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work In Progress: Promoting Belonging in Engineering through the Creation of Youth-centered Technology-Rich SpacesIntroduction In 2024, we are not offering a novel idea when we contend that the promise ofmakerspaces to achieve inclusion across contexts has not been met [1], [2]. While suchtechnology-rich spaces still have the potential to support youth from minoritized groups to createartifacts aligned with their interests and values [3], [4
understanding the needs of students with disabilities, with a particular focus oninclusive classroom environments that actively promote a sense of belonging. Institutions anddepartments should consider developing more robust support structures that go well beyond whatis typically considered an accessibility service. For example, creating opportunities for studentsto be mentored with peers or professionals who might share similar experiences. Perhaps one ofthe strongest interventions to support and promote sense of belonging would be curriculum andpedagogy adjustments that include more diverse perspectives, especially including those ofpeople with disabilities. For example, this could involve integrating case study examples thathighlight the
, which considers how individuals’ neurocognitive variations contribute to humanecosystems to support persistence and adaptation. This approach provides a framework forviewing neurodiversity as an integral part of human adaptation and suggests that the inclusion ofneurodivergent individuals in STEM fields may enhance our collective potential for innovationfor the benefit of society [39]. We also take a strengths-based approach that emphasizes theassets related to neurodiversity, while acknowledging individual challenges and questioning therigid conceptualizations of “normality” [40].Researcher Perspectives/PositionalityOur motivation and approach to this work is shaped by the personal experiences of severalauthors with ADHD and/or dyslexia, as
Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, 1990.4 Cochran, D. S., “Enterprise Engineering, Creating Sustainable Systems with Collective System Design:Part II,” The Journal of RMS in Systems Engineering, Spring Journal, 2010.5 Ohno, T., Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, 1988.6 Monden, Y., Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time, CRC Press, Taylorand Francis, 3ed., 2012.7 Cochran, D. S., Duda, J., Linck, J., and Arinez, J., “The Manufacturing System Design Decomposition,”SME Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 20, No. 6. (2000/2001).8 Hopp, W. and Spearman, M., Factory Physics, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2nd, 2000.9 Forrester, J., Principles
practice is an important skill for computing students to master; responding toreflection prompts can aid students in developing problem solving skills. However, there is limitedempirical evidence on the effectiveness of reflective practice in Data Structures courses, in whichcomputing students are honing problem-solving skills. To fill this gap, we evaluate theeffectiveness of assigning guided reflection prompts with programming assignments in anundergraduate Data Structures course in encouraging students to articulate their problem-solvingstrategies. 219 students completed two programming assignments and were asked to respond toreflection prompts after each. Students’ responses were (1) analyzed for word and sentence countas a measure of
Paper ID #10264Home Experiments: EarthBag Construction as Teaching Tool in RwandaProf. Yutaka Sho, Syracuse University Yutaka Sho is a partner of GA Collaborative, a US-based design firm that works with non-profit, municipal and academic partners. In Rwanda GAC is building a village of 50 homes with an association of builders and architecture students. She has researched and practiced in Bangladesh, Japan, Lebanon, Turkey and Uganda. She received a bachelor’s degree in landscape architecture from Rhode Island School of Design and a master’s degree in architecture from Graduate School of Design at Harvard. Sho is an
the brain utilizedfor a task vary depending on the subject’s expertise or field of study. The study outlines thedifferences in the brain regions used by mechanical engineers from those used by architects [2].Another crucial factor to consider is the motivation of the students toward these designexperiences, especially throughout the curriculum. Research on student motivation has proventhe dynamic nature of motivation, even over a short time. Another study has shown that essentialmotivation factors also vary with the study year the student is currently enrolled in [3].Additionally, the influence of the presentation of problems in design projects is an importantaspect that educators may consider. In a focused investigation, Gero [4] compared
Paper ID #39291Analyzing the Needs of Engineering Teaching Assistants: Examining HiddenDeficit IdeasDr. Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas, San Antonio Dr. Karina I. Vielma is a first-generation college student who dreamed big. As the eldest of five children, Dr. Vielma became very resourceful, attributing her skills to growing up in poverty. Her parents had high expectations for school and this prepareDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas, San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an Associate Professor with joint appointment in the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and the
in course design and teaching practice encourage instructorsto increase diverse representation within the curriculum and create a welcoming classroomatmosphere. Ultimately, such changes may correct previously exclusive signals, both subtle andexplicit, that impact student belonging and thus make it more likely that minoritized groups willpersist within STEM [8]–[10].However, less of this critical examination of higher educational practice has focused on thegrading itself and the choice of scoring mechanisms that instructors use to describe theperformance of their students. Generally, the benchmark by which instructors may judge theefficacy of inclusive teaching practice has been an increase in exam scores or final grades.Essentially, an
Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program atAmerican University. Dr. Larkin received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Physics from South DakotaState University in Brookings, SD in 1982 and 1985, respectively. She received the Ph.D. in Curriculum andInstruction with special emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University in Manhattan, KSin 1997. Dr. Larkin’s research interests primarily involve the assessment of student learning in introductory physicscourses. Dr. Larkin has been an active member of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) and theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) for many years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directorsfor ASEE from
Paper ID #39681Common Metrics: Lessons from Building a Collaborative Process for theExamination of State-level K–12 Computer Science Education DataRebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group Rebecca Zarch is an evaluator and a director of SageFox Consulting Group. She has spent nearly 20 years evaluating and researching projects in STEM education from K-12 through graduate programs.Sarah T. DuntonJayce R. Warner, University of Texas, AustinMr. Jeffrey XavierJoshua Childs, University of Texas, AustinDr. Alan Peterfreund, SAGE ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Common Metrics: Lessons from
“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”choices, and may include time spent in industry or other commercial venues, in government orprivate laboratories, or in clinical settings, as an intern or co-op student.The European undergraduate engineering experience is usually undertaken after thirteen years ofprevious training and is typically five years in duration. The first two years of a Germanbioengineering curriculum would include extensive instruction in chemistry, physics, biology,mathematics and basic engineering. There is little or no exposure to arts and humanities in thiscurriculum; such coursework
in Dynamics1Abstract In an effort to produce more, better graduates faster than in previous years, theUniversity of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) integrated multi-intelligence principles into asophomore-level dynamics class. The principal hypothesis is that students who arepresented with authentic real world problems will be better equipped to solve traditionaltextbook problems. The belief is that confronting real problems enhances learningthrough the establishment of a context making the information relevant and meaningful.In this environment, students are more apt to learn and retain the information through theenhancement of student interest. A secondary hypothesis is that real problems will stimulate student creativity and,therefore