generate explanations based on the learner Student: " What is missing from the following definition of degrees of well as adjust the following responses. freedom in dynamic systems: it is the total number of displacements in a system." AI: The definition of degrees of freedom (DOF) as "the total number of TABLE V. EXAMPLE UNDERSTANDING BERNOULLI S EQUATION IN displacements in a system" is partially correct but incomplete. It misses the THE CONTEXT OF PUMP DESIGN following key points: 1. Independent Movements:ß Student: 2. Type of Motion: ... to pump design. 3
, longitudinalassessments of participants will be conducted over the next few years, as the program is ongoingand expected to continue until 2025, providing deeper insights into its effectiveness. The authorsalso plan to evaluate the impact of various program components on student outcomes and comparethe program's effectiveness with similar initiatives at other institutions, ensuring continuousimprovement and a broader understanding of its success.ReferencesAlaee, D. and Zwickl, B. (2021). A Case Study Approach To Understanding A Remote UndergraduateResearch Program., 480-485. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2021.pr.zohrabi_alaeeBosman, L., Soto, E., Ostanek, J., Garcia-Bravo, J., Lee, S., & Leon-Salas, W. (2023). Nsf ReuEntrepreneurially Minded Applied Energy
professionals,innovators, entrepreneurs and leaders in industry. In today’s global economy, engineeringinnovation is recognized as a continuous, systematic needs-driven process, which is highlydependent upon the provision for lifelong learning, growth, and development of the nation’sgraduate engineers and technologists in industry beyond their entry-level undergraduatebaccalaureate preparation. Because of profound changes in engineering practice for real-worldinnovation, a transformation is underway in the U.S. Science and Engineering (S&E) innovationsystem. A concurrent, nonlinear model of needs-driven systematic engineering innovation, whichis supported by directed scientific research, is replacing the sequential, linear research-drivenmodel of
discussions that followed the presentations ofpapers, I drew on notes that I took or, for the sessions I was not able to attend, obtained from themoderator or organizer (or both). Using this method, I created discussion notes for all technicalsessions. Each set of notes begins with a brief synopsis of the general theme(s) of that session.Most of the content of the notes is questions posed by the papers and discussion that might be thesubject of further research in the broad range of areas addressed within LEES scholarship. Notesfor all 13 sessions appear as appendices to this paper. Figure 1 below provides illustrativeexcerpts from the discussion notes for session U434B: Diversity and Inclusion: Concepts, MentalModels, and Interventions. U434B
used on most hob-by CNCs are: • Lead Screws: Ball or ACME lead screws with anti-backlash nuts are commonly used in traditional CNC machines. The lead screws can be chosen with a high start ratio for in- creased speed or a single start ratio to generate more linear force. • Timing Belts: Belt-based systems typically require a pulley, idler(s), and belt clips and can be arranged in either a closed (closed loop belt) or open (belt segment) configuration. Timing belts require constant tension during operation and are prone to stretching during abrupt direction changes, in particular under load. Table 2-2: Comparision of Mechanical Motion Methods
set of data with the question,“How is our imagination being constrained by current social structures in society and when doesit break free from these narrow constructions of engineering practice?” From the set of twelveinterviews, we selected two FG interviews for closer analysis, which had evidence of both“narrow” and “expansive” reasoning. These focus groups were: Malik, Serena, Molly, & Joanna(M+S+M+J) and Dustin & Harveen (D+H) (all pseudonyms). Within these FG interviews, ourco-authoring team collaboratively identified candidate focal segments that: (a) exhibited highly“narrow” design thinking where implicit assumptions about the status quo were dominating theimagination, and (b) exhibited more “expansive” or liberatory design
To identify which factors/effects are important.Response Surface To maximize or minimize a response. designs To reduce variation by locating a region where it is easier to manage. To make a process robust (note: this objective may often be accomplished with screening designs rather than with response surface designs).Regression To estimate a precise model, quantifying the dependence of modeling response variable(s) on process inputs. Page 13.370.12© American Society for Engineering
existingschema to better fit incoming stimuli. The accommodation process represents a change in aperson’s thinking. S/he adjusts to new experiences or objects by revising an earlier method ofinformation processing. In other words, when there is a discrepancy between what a person expectsand what happens (a discrepancy between expectations and experiences), there is a temporarydisequilibration, followed by the process of accommodation. Engineers as problem solvers mustexpect to be disrupted or disequilibrated on a regular basis. They must be able to continually absorbthe new stimuli posed by the problems to be solved by recreating and adjusting their existingschema. We believe that engineering education therefore must include training that
. Taran and Carter,44 Mee and Teune,45and Robillard46 indicate that trust is central to team collaboration in most professions. Taran andCarter state, “Becoming worthy of trust and learning to trust are active processes that require theparticipants to communicate and interact.” (p.99)44 In Morell de Ramirez et al.’s study, in orderto build trust among team members, “students are given a seminar on organizational behaviorand participate in a number of hands-on activities to expose the newly formed teams to situationsthat accelerate team cohesiveness”. (p.434)43 Brown, Flick and Williamson suggest that buildingtrust is one of the important components of social capital that should be taught in engineering.47They summarized that “development of
#10509the Department of Engineering-Economic Systems at Stanford University (1984). She received an NSFPresidential Young Investigator Award in 1985; Pi Tau Sigma Award for Excellence in Teaching in 1986;Ralph R. Teetor Educator Award in 1987; SME Young Manufacturing Engineer of the Year Award in1987/88; Best Paper Award (with S. Bradley) at the ASME-Design, Theory and Methods Conference in1990/91; Best Paper Award at the AI Applications ’92 Conference; Most Outstanding Alumnus at the Uni-versity of New Mexico in 1992; elected AAAS Fellow in 1994; Best Paper Award (with Andy Dong) at theArtificial Intelligence in Design’96 Conference (with Robert Paasch); elected to the National Academy ofEngineering in 1997; Best Paper Award (with Ann McKenna) at
cultivate, as itis a fundamental element of a successful engineering career.60,61 Lastly, engineers mustdemonstrate their depth of knowledge by communicating their ideas and design decisions to theirrelative audience.Communication of ideas and professional skilldevelopment: The philosophies of EngineeringEducation began to grow and drasticallytransform in the mid 1990’s, valuing a morewholesome engineer. Surely the focus continuesto include the traditional solidly rooted STEMskills, but also includes professionaldevelopment skills such as: communication,teamwork, global and ethical awareness, andskills for life-long learning.12 In addition tolearning the foundations of design, helping futureengineers master such professional skills as teamwork
developed by Cabrera and Cabrera [39] because their framework helpsdevelop a mental model needed to practice systems thinking [36]. Further, their framework haspreviously been used in educational contexts and is universally applicable to individuals withvarying disciplinary backgrounds [36]. Cabrera and Cabrera [39] defined systems thinking as afour-part cognitive skill consisting of tenets like making distinctions (D), organizing the system(S) into parts and wholes, recognizing relationships (R) between parts and wholes of the system,and taking multiple perspectives (P). Taken together, this four-part skill helps develop a holisticapproach to designing a solution to a problem.In the context of threat modeling, the systems thinking approach
400 0 350 0 300 0 250 0 200 0 150 0 100 0 400 0 350 0 300 0 250 0 200 0 150 0 100 0 W av enu mber s ( c m- 1) W av enu mber s ( c m- 1
greatly assisted in theresearch and writing process, enabling the author to gather and organize information for their analysis.References[1] S. Rajala, "Beyond 2020: Preparing Engineers for the Future," Proceedings of The IEEE - PIEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1376-1383, 05/01 2012.[2] J. Froyd, P. Wankat, and K. Smith, "Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1344-1360, 05/01 2012.[3] N. Abbas, J. Whitfield, E. Atwell, H. Bowman, T. Pickard, and A. Walker, "Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education," International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 41, pp. 308-326, 2022/05/04 2022.[4] F. Clarizia, F. Colace, M. Lombardi, F. Pascale, and D
-group interaction-process quality during the murder mystery. Theexperiment ended with informing the participants about the experiment`s background andanswering their questions.3.2. Measures3.2.1. DemographicsThe demographic survey consisted of 17 items to assess the participants’ age, gender, enrolleddegree program, semesters spent in higher education, the degree of familiarity in each small-group, the participants’ personality traits, and the device used during the experiment. Thedemographic variables were used (a) to describe the sample in detail and (b) to ensure theinternal validity [24] of the experimental approach by capturing possible systematic participantrelated differences between the sub-samples of the three experimental conditions
, Practical Synthetic Data Generation. O’Reilly Media, Inc, 2020.[3] N. Gürsakal, S. Çelik, and E. Birişçi, Synthetic Data for Deep Learning. Berkeley, CA: Apress L. P, 2022.[4] N. Patki, R. Wedge, and K. Veeramachaneni, “The Synthetic Data Vault,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2016, pp. 399–410. doi: 10.1109/DSAA.2016.49.[5] A. Singh, S. Karayev, K. Gutowski, and P. Abbeel, “Gradescope: A fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work,” in L@S 2017 - Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3051466.
, and D. S. Thomas, “An roi comparison of initiatives designed to attract diverse students to technology careers,” Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 105, 2016. [8] M. K. Ponton, J. H. Edmister, L. S. Ukeiley, and J. M. Seiner, “Understanding the role of self-efficacy in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 2, p. 247, 04 2001, copyright - Copyright American Society for Engineering Education Apr 2001; Last updated - 2023-02-15; CODEN - JEEDEQ. [Online]. Available: https://login.proxy.lib.duke.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ understanding-role-self-efficacy-engineering/docview/217958437/se-2 [9] C. Pannier, C. Berry, M. Morris, and X
Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Combining Problem-Based Learning with the KEEN ‘s Framework for Entrepreneurially Minded Learning in a Fluid Mechanics Course: Pilot ImplementationAbstractThis paper describes the implementation and the results of problem-based learning (PBL)pedagogy infused with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network’s 3C’s in a senior levelAdvanced Fluid Mechanics course within the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET)program. The work, a close collaboration between engineering and education faculty, aligns withthe New Research Areas (National Engineering Education Research Colloquies 2006), ABETCriteria for
development", Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.25 No. 1, pp. 5-32. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590110380614 [Accessed April 10,2023]. [4] Kaya, N., Aydın, S. ve Durgut, S. (2016). Training performance evaluation using the360-degree feedback method. 19th EBES Conference. s. 623-628. [Online] Available:http://acikerisim.maltepe.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12415/2875 [Accessed February 28, 2023]. [5] Phuong, T.T., Foster, M.J. and Reio, T.G., Jr (2020), Faculty Development: ASystematic Review of Review Studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human ResourceDevelopment, 32: 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20294 [Accessed February 10, 2023] [6] Draper, L. (2022, August), “Lessons Learned: Boosting Faculty
.[3] Hartman, H., S.Lezotte, R.A. Dusseau, T.R. Forin, and S. Farrell, 2020. Transfer Students inUndergraduate Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #29472.[4] Meardon, S, Our Community College Engineering Students are Your Transfer Students.2019. ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.[5] Bloom, N.E., J. Johnson, J.M. Duis, and P. Entin, 2019. Facilitation Transfer Student Successin an Engineering Baccalaureate Program. ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #26328.[6] Laugerman, M., D. Rover, S. Mickelson, and M. Shelley. 2019. The Middle Years inEngineering: An Effective Transfer Partnership Drives Student Success in STEM. Advances inEngineering Education, Fall.,[7] Manteufel, R.D., and A. Karimi. 2023. Analysis of Transfer Credits in
the articles andthe design of the comment template. We believed that the reading assignments have helpedimprove students’ reading comprehension, writing techniques, and critical thinking skills.References1. S. A. Lei, K. A. Bartlett, S. E. Gorney, and T. R. Herschbach, “Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 219- 229. 2010.2. D. Pecorari, P. Shaw, A. Irvine, H. Malstrom, and S. Mezek, “Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes,” Quality in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 235- 256, 2012.3. C. M. Burchfield and J. Sappinton, “Compliance with required reading assignments,” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 27
. Someinstitutions (20%) have design courses throughout the curriculum in addition to the capstonedesign sequence, but more programs (40%) have design projects within non-design coursesthroughout the curriculum. The course or courses in the capstone design sequence are primarilyoffered only once a year (78%) with a slight edge to the spring semester/winter quarter (80%)over the fall semester/quarter (72%). Most institutions (78%) include instruction in software orprogramming as part of the course(s). The culminating design project is most often a theoreticaldesign (68%) as opposed to one based on experiments (3%) or resulting in a prototype (7%), andmost institutions do not use the AIChE Design Competition problems (70%). Professional skillsare mainly
of Problem-based Learning,” Interdiscip J Problem-based Learn, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1314.[4] K. M. Markham, J. J. Mintzes, and M. G. Jones, “The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 91–101, 1994, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310109.[5] L. Hsu and S.-I. Hsieh, “Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in a Nursing Course,” J Prof Nurs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 141–149, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.04.006.[6] D. M. Torre, B. Daley, T. Stark-Schweitzer, S. Siddartha, J. Petkova, and M. Ziebert, “A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps,” Med Teach, vol. 29, no. 9– 10, pp. 949–955
Mississippi State University. As a 2015 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Hall obtained her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Hannah Glisson American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022In this session we will think about the latter stages of a transfer student’s journey. Much research has focused on pre‐transfer and the first semester post‐transfer, but in this session we will think about students’ experiences beyond that initial semester. We will be drawing on a set of interviews with transfer students who participated in an NSF‐funded S‐STEM program.The project is a collaboration between Virginia Tech
Ethics, https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics, accessed 16 January 2023.[2] E.A. Cech, "Culture of disengagement in engineering education?" Sci., Tech. Human Values, vol. 39[1], pp. 42-72, 2014.[3] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J.L. Harrison, “Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, pp. 491–507, 2020.[4] K. Litchfield and A. Javernick-Will, "'‘I am an engineer AND': A mixed methods study of socially engaged engineers," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 104, pp. 393-416, 2015.[5] D.S. Schiff, E. Logevall, J. Borenstein, W. Newstetter, C. Potts, and E. Zegura, "Linking personal and professional social responsibility development to
suitable measuring procedure given available devices and fixtures; they thenproceed with measurement basic GD&T features on provided samples (Figs. 2a-e). Each group isfree to choose combination of contact-type metrology device, tool, and fixture for their group.During this stage, the TA only helps to clarify the part requirement and usage of metrologydevice without showing the solutions. After 30-45 minutes, each team takes turn presenting to their classmates how they set upand measure a feature, showing the measured data, and concluding if the part is accepted orrejected. The TA then comments on the approach, selection of tooling and fixture, and maysuggests alternative ways to constrain datum(s). Common mistakes are observed when