-Colleges-Are- Best- and/245758?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=61c76ff393544f33916 cdf7efa62f902&elq=1228defe891449bf8337f489863032f4&elqaid=22356&elqat=1&elqC ampaignId=110123. Burgher, J.K., D. M. Finkel, B. J. Van Wie, and O. O. Adesope, "Implementing and Assessing Interactive Physical Models in the Fluid Mechanics Classroom," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2501–2516, 2016.4. Hunsu, N.J., O. Adesope, and B.J. Van Wie, “Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered?” Instructional Science, vol. 45, pp. 789-804, 2017.5. Liu C., C. Chen, S. Chen, T. Tsai, C. Chu, C
pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[3] E. J. H. Spelt, P. A. Luning, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and M. Mulder, “A multidimensional approach to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761– 774, 2017.[4] D. Gerrard and C. Variawa, “Bridges and barriers: A multi-year study of workload- related learning experiences from diverse student and instructor perspectives in first- year engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[5] T. Geyer and W. R. Loendorf, “Handling increased faculty and student workload
could incorporate the algorithms coursework to develop a massively multiplayer networkbased game.References[1] “Occupational Outlook Handbook: Software Developers Job Outlook”, Bureau of LaborStatistics, Sept. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htm#tab-6 [Accessed Jan., 2020][2] Ashok R. Basawapatna, Kyu Han Koh, and Alexander Repenning. “Using scalable gamedesign to teach computer science from middle school to graduate school,” In Proceedings of thefifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education.(ITiCSE ’10) Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 224–228.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1822090.1822154[3] S
Professoriate, vol. 3, 2010.[10] C. M. Lewis, N. Shah, and K. Falkner, “Equity and Diversity,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 481–510.[11] G. Rulifson and A. Bielefeldt, “Health stress and support system narratives of engineering students,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, 2020.[12] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2008.[13] S. E. Walden, D. A. Trytten, and R. L. Shehab, “Research-based recommendations for creating an inclusive culture for diversity and equity in engineering education,” in 2018
first-year students programmingcurriculum. The Arduino Uno was the chosen microcontroller since the platform is excellent forteaching basic circuitry and programming, such as having easily accessible digital and analoginput/output ports.ENGR 111 uses a scaffolded set of lessons to introduce circuitry, programming an Arduino, andinterfacing between an Arduino and circuits. These lessons start with basic circuits usingbreadboards, basic components, and wires. Programming the Arduino is the next set of lessons,and these lessons focus on basic programming concepts and how to interact with the Arduino.Finally, there is a series of lessons that help the students create circuit(s) and program(s) thatinteract with each other.Although the ENGR 111
willobserve and complement that material with a twenty-minute presentation that relates the focalconcept to an industry problem and application. In parallel, the project team and industrymentors will work on up-to-date application-based problems/projects to be implemented in thecourse instructor's homework and assignment(s). The project team will also work with safetyprofessionals to blend essential topics like process safety, risk management, and environmentalimpact into the targeted course.Figure 1. Schematic of constituent relations of different approaches. Interpersonal andintrapersonal skills are labeled as professional skills.We hypothesize that the “Synergistic Approach” will engage students in a new and compellingmanner, introducing them to
] Johnson, C. M., “A survey of current research on online communities of practice,” InternetHigh Educ, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-60, March, 2001.[4] Wenger. E, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 318.[5] Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. S., Sutton, M. M., Mantel, S. J. Jr., Project Management in Practice (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2010. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceDr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State UniversityAnn Gansemer-Topf is an Associate Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs, andFaculty Fellow in the Center for Excellence in Learning
-YearEngineering Students” 126th ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Tampa, Florida, June 15-192019.[6] J.K. Morgan, “Examination of the Development of Grit in First-Year Engineering Students”10th FYEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Glassboro, New Jersey, July 24-26 2018.[7] A. L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[8] E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, “Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 5-12, 1988.[9] M. C. Murphy and C. S. Dweck, “A Culture of Genius: How an Organization’s Lay TheoryShapes People’s Cognition, Affect, and
teaches various mechanical engineer- ing courses e.g. Engineering Mechanics, System Dynamics and Controls. His teaching philosophy is to promote instinctive/inherent understanding of engineering concepts, and productive student-faculty inter- actions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Efficacy of teaching entrepreneurial mindset using a game-like activity Dr. Anoop S. Grewal, Layla Reitmeier Arizona State UniversityAbstractWe developed, 'Thank You for Your Service' (TY4YS), a web-browser based, game-like activityas a way to introduce and reinforce the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) for
learning by editingand re-editing. This opportunity to do technical writing in a language other than his nativelanguage seemed to be an aspect that he appreciated as it improved his written English.Bibliography1. J T. Black, R. Kohser. DeGarmo’s Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 11 th edition. John Wiley and Sons. p. 529.2. S. S Crump. Rapid Prototyping Using FDM, Modern Casting, 1992, 82(4), p 36-383. The Plastic Industry Trade Association, Definitions of Resins - Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (ABS), Retrieved by http://www.plasticsindustry.org/aboutplastics/content.cfm?itemnumber=1384&navitemnumber=1128 379 4. R. Quintana, J
of the Maa Trust and Josephine Miliza of the Internet Society in Kenya.References:[1] https://www.ewb-usa.org/mission-and-history/ (Accessed February 24, 2021)[2] J.P. Delplanque, J. Gosink, and J. Lucena, “Initiating a Program on HumanitarianEngineering: Rationale, Implementation, Problems and Perceptions”, Procs. 2004 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT[3] D. Budny, S. Arjmand and D.V.P. Sanchez, “Comparison of student’ outcome to differenttypes of project based service learning experiences for CEE senior design”, Procs. 2016 ASEEAnnual Conference, New Orleans, LA June 2016[4] T. Thompson and L. D. Zavodney, “On providing engineering students with culturally-appropriate design experiences in developing countries
measured by the REFERENCESstudents GPA after Introduction to Engineering. Studentswere divided into two groups according to their nationality, [1] J. L. Hieb, K. B. Lyle, P. A. S. Ralston, and J. Chariker, “Predictingand divided again according to which version of the course performance in a first engineering calculus course: implications forthey took. The interaction effect between nationality andFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference July 31 – August 2, 2016, Columbus, OH W1A-3
other educators and researchers. The data collected through the DEFT system will then beused to develop a pedagogical framework for engineering design.References[1] Ball, J. and Ormerod, T. C. Structured opportunistic processing design: a critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(1):131—151, 1995.[2] Guindon, R. Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5(2):305—344, June 1990.[3] Fricke, G. Successful Individual Approaches in Engineering Design. Research in Engineering Design, 8(3):151—165, 1996.[4] Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., and Saleem, J. Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert
underrepresented minorities.References[1] Puccinelli, TJ, Fitzpatrick, M., Masters, G., Murphy, JG, The Evolution of the Freshman Engineering Experience to Increase Active Learning, Retention, and Diversity--Work in Progress. American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[2] B. M. Olds and R. L. Miller, "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[3] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in a freshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288, 1998.[4] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and
. Edwards, R. P. Ramachandran and U. Thayasivam, ``Robust Speaker Verification With a Two Classifier Format and Feature Enhancement’’, submitted to IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, May 28—31, 2017.6. Y. Mehta, R. Dusseau and R. P. Ramachandran, ``Conducting State-of the-art Research in an Institution with a Strong Undergraduate Education Focus”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 23--26, 2013. (with)7. S. Davis, M. Frankle, R. P. Ramachandran, K. D. Dahm, and R. Polikar, “A Freshman Level Module in Biometric Systems”, IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems, Beijing, China, May 19–23, 2013.8. R. P. Ramachandran, R. Polikar, K. D. Dahm
and the College ofDesign provided a 3-year contract for a shared faculty appointment and funds for travel,maintenance, and upgrades to the program with the the goal to be self-sustained and/or supportedin large part by external funds and grants.Session OverviewAs of June 2017, FLEx has delivered a total of 171 sessions both on campus and around the stateof Iowa (Figures 3 & 4). The number of sessions have continued to increase each year, with2017 poised to exceed 2016’s previously record total. Notable sessions and locations include theIowa State Fair, 4-H, Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE), Precollegiate Programs forTalented and Gifted, Upward Bound, and Science Bound.Sessions begin with a short 15-minute presentation on design
manipulated the physicaltools. Based on their observations, participants confirmed or changed their predictions madeduring the verbal explanations phase by using PMT. Figure 4 shows the sequential steps duringthe test of predictions by using PMT phase. Figure 4. Sequence of the testing predictions by using PMTParticipants explained what they felt/observed using the PMT, and based on their observation-they were asked to confirm or change their answers from the prediction phase. If a participantwanted to change her/his prediction, s/he were asked to elaborate what was wrong with theprevious response and why they think their new idea is better.Exit feedbackThe exit feedback allowed learners to share their final thoughts, comments, and
component areas: research,interdisciplinary curricula, entrepreneurship, global experience, and application of engineering tomeet social needs. Each student chooses her own unique set of experiences, to achieve thedistinction of Grand Challenge Scholar, endorsed by both the university and the NAE. Amajority of the experiences must also be aligned with the Grand Challenge(s) they have chosento dedicate their efforts toward solving. At ASU, students choose one of five grand challengetheme areas (Education, Energy, Health, Security, Sustainability) or one of the 14 NAE GrandChallenges [2]. Students are admitted to the GCSP as freshmen, and most start work on theprogram requirements in their first semester. Prior to starting their first semester
sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi- year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.[3] Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.[4] Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.[5] Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist
Circuit Design and thatboth engineering instructors reported applying the principles to other courses that they teach(outside of SOAR’s purview). We are also optimistic that these two courses are moving in theright direction as both instructors are methodically refining their redesign strategies, which theywill continue to implement this semester and in future semesters. Our goal is to continue ourefforts in both courses and hope to find the right formula for improving them – especially theDFW rate in Engineering Statics – as we move ahead with the project. We look forward toreporting our complete results at the conference in June as well the direction of futureengineering course redesign efforts at Temple University.ReferencesAmbrose, S. A
instruction: a review of the literature on effectiveness inprekindergarten through 12th grade classrooms” Rivier academic journal, volume 7, number 2,fall 2011[6] Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description, MedicalEducation, 17, 1116. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSU[7] Scarbrough H , Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Laurent, S., Newell S. and Swan, J. A. The processesof project-based learning: An exploratory study. Management Learning, 35 (2004). 491-506.[8] Sullivan, J.P., Watkins, W.A., “A design/Build/Test Environment for Aerospace Education”,Proceedings of 30th SEFI Annual Conference, Firenze, Italy, 2002[9] Malmqvist, J., Young, P.W., Hallstrom, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., and
Used To Enhance Introductory CircuitAnalysis Paper presented at 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.https://peer.asee.org/7076[6] Stace, S., & Medoff, H., & Margle, J. (2003, June), Incorporating Musical Instrument DesignInto A Freshmen Engineering Course Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville,Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/12535[7] Rogers, C., & McDonald, J., & Nocera, T., & Cyr, M. (1998, June), The Design AndPerformance Of Musical Instruments Paper presented at 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle,Washington. https://peer.asee.org/7015[8] Robinson, C., & Baxter, S. C. (2013, June), Turning STEM into STEAM Paper presented at2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/22656[9
ambiguityand understanding of multiple perspectives. This tool may also be used to track thechanges in student perceptions related to design over time or to measure the impact ofintroductory, on-going, or senior-level design experiences throughout engineeringcurricula at a variety of institution types. LIST OF REFERENCES1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K. & Colby, A. Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Vol. 3 (Jossey-Bass Inc Pub, 2008).2 Crismond, D. P. & Adams, R. S. The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 738-797 (2012).3 ABET. (2011).4 Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. & Leifer, L. J
simpler design canvas model. The essential ingredient in the development of thedesign canvas tool of [9] is the S*Metamodel proposed in [25]. Specifically, according to [25], theS*Metamodel constitutes a minimal representation with which an engineering system can bedescribed accurately. This S*Metamodel framework provides the foundation for the developmentof the design canvas wherein the smallest amount of data is needed to represent the underlyingsystem and characterize the relationship among its disparate components. See [25] for detailedexplanations about how the S*Metamodel framework is enacted to design models of engineeringsystems.In creating a business or design canvas tool with the aid of S*Metamodel, it is essential to identifythe
References[1] Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) and Policy and Global Affairs (PGA). (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Engergizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington DC.[2] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.[3] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1115/ESDA2008-59324 10[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Occupational outlook handbook.[5] York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and
that engineering students have to have an innate initial propensity inmathematics versus an ability that is learned. For these reasons, many students who did not fare well in the traditional high schoollevel math sequence, attempting to try a similar path in college may be settingthemselves up for a repeat conclusion. According to Snyder and Dillow (2011), morethan 1.7 million students enter the community college system. Based primarily uponperformance on a placement test, approximately 60% of these students are placed intoone, if not more, developmental mathematics course(s). Fully 80% of them do notcomplete any college-level mathematics courses within as many as three years (Bailey,Jeong, & Cho, 2010).At our North Dakota Tribally
Paper ID #26340Work in Progress: Awarding Digital Badges for Demonstration of StudentSkillsDr. Joan B. Schuman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Joan Schuman is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department at Missouri S&T. She earned her Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from University of Arkansas and completed her Ph.D. in Polymer Science and Engineering from the University of Southern Mississippi. Schuman is a Project Management Professional (PMP) certified through the Project Management Institute. She worked for several years
in others to continue their efforts, when obstacles or oppositions are encountered, until the goal is achieved.• Inspiring Others: This leader induces positive emotions within a group/person to achieve a goal or become stronger/better individuals. The distinction between a motivator and an inspirer is that inspiration serves to create a positive feeling, but does not necessarily cause the person(s) to apply themselves to achieve the goal/improvement.• Serving Others: The person serves a community or the needs of society. They are not leading for personal gain, but to help those in need or improve societal conditions. They solve problems in society through their technological or scientific advancements. They use the
goals of this research are to have colleagues from other departments createvideos for their areas and to make the videos public, so that any instructor or student has accessto the videos.AcknowledgementsThe research in this paper was supported by a Graduation Initiative 2025 Innovation Grant fromCalifornia State University, Fullerton.References[1] S. H. K. Kang, "Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning: Policy Implications for Instruction," Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2016.[2] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe and M. L. Brannon, "Online modules enable prerequisite review and mastery during design courses," in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference &