complex projects in an ongoing effort to establish the pedagogical limits ofthis model.Project Selection Matrix The project selection process is currently an ad-hock process where VIP team membersdiscuss project ideas of their own or those that have been submitted by industry personnel orstudents. The process is becoming increasingly structured and the underlying selection matrix isbecoming more focused based on past experience. The prior project experience provides a basis ofnegotiation as to what can be realistically achieved to inform the final s and the ability of facultymembers.Communication and the VIP CalenderPolyCom At the heart of the VIP is the ability to communicate. Teams of faculty and students must beable to communicate
Publ ic Buil ding Adder OR Affordabl e Housing Adder NO Green School s Adder NO Rebate ($) $ 130,000.00 Rebate ($/w att dc) based on total proj ect size $ 2.60000Carbon Footprint. Students in the course perform a personal carbon footprint to evaluate how lifestyle decisionsaffect
amplify them. A weightedsummer circuit for the LM35 temperature sensor [8] was used as is shown in Figure 2. where theLM35’s output range is 20mV to 1500mV. With this design the group was able to manipulate theoutput to the proper 0V to 2.5V required by the microcontroller. In order to condition the outputsignal from the Figaro TGS6810 [11] gas sensor, an AD620 operational amplifier was used (seeFigure 2). This was necessary because each Figaro sensor has an offset that needs to be adjustedby means of a differential voltage. The AD620 is capable of amplifying the output of the gassensor to range from 0V to 2.5 Volts. Not all components in the system though are intended to aid in amplifying a signal. In thecase of the circuitry that
from the Technical University of Gdansk, Poland, and S.M.Arch.S from MassachusettsInstitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Contact: andrzej.zarzycki@njit.eduBibliographyFord, Ed; The Details of Modern Architecture; Cambridge: MIT Press; 2003Guidera, S., 2006, BIM Applications in Design Studio: An Integrative Approach to DevelopingStudent Skills with Computer Modeling, in “Synthetic Landscapes”: The ACADIA 2006Leatherbarrow, David; “Architecture’s Unscripted Performance”; Performative Architecture –Beyond Instrumentality; NY: Spon Press; 2005.Penttila, Hannu; Dong, A, Vande Moere, A & JS Gero (eds), Early Architectural Design andBIM, CAADFutures’07, 291-302. Springer.References1. Alberti, Leon Battista; On the Art of Buildings in Ten Books
Student Outcomes" , Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA: ASEE, 2008.2 King, Paul H., ―Capstone Design and ABET Program Outcomes in the U. S.‖, European Society for Engineering Education, TN 37235-163.3 Helbling, Jim, David Lanning, Ron Madler, Angela Beck, and Patric McElwain. ―Integrating Communications into Team-Taught Senior Design Courses‖, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington DC: ASEE, 2005.4 Catalano, George D.. "Senior capstone design and ethics: A bridge to the professional world.", Science and Engineering Ethics
efforts.Bibliography 1. Cone, C., Chadwick, S., Gally, T., Helbling, J., and Shaffer, R. (2005). "Interdisciplinary Freshman Experience," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. 2. Helbling, J., Lanning, D., Madler, R., Beck, A., and McElwain, R. (2005). “Integrating Communications into Team-Taught Senior design Courses,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. 3. Helbling, J., Lanning, D., Madler, R., Marriott, D., and Siebold, K. (2007). "Impact of New Facilities on Engineering Student Outcomes," Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24-27, Honolulu, Hawaii. 4. Coffin, L.F. Jr. (1954). A
more of*; what activity should have less time allotted*. (*Asked only during summer 2009session.) These were analyzed to reflect on the objectives of the program, and to providefeedback for modifying future programs. In 2008 post-program surveys were collected from 14of the 16 girls. In 2009 surveys were collected from all 24 of the girls who participated.In the fall of 2009, graduate and undergraduate student participants were contacted to determinetheir motivation for participating in the program, and to determine the impacts of the program ontheir career goals, etc. Student were first asked about their involvement with STEP (whatyear(s), what roles) and educational program (what major(s), what year in program). Studentswere asked to rate
such as regulatory, economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, constructability, and sustainability. (4) Provide a platform where student performance against the ABET general criteria for engineering programs 3 a-k and civil engineering program specific criteria can be assessed.The senior design experience was tailored to ensure coverage of the appropriate programmaterial – items (1) – (3) in the above list suggests this. In some ways, constructing theappropriate assessment vehicle(s) was a more considerable challenge. The open-endednature of realistic design does not always lend itself to concrete assessmentmethodologies. The rest of this paper briefly outlines the UT Tyler CE program
the world to connect with patients in the developing world using moderntechnology and communications infrastructure.10 Trained operators at Mashavu stations indeveloping communities collect essential medical information including weight, bodytemperature, lung capacity, blood pressure, photographs, stethoscope rhythms, and basic hygieneand nutrition information for each patient. We are designing ultra-inexpensive biomedicaldevices based on virtual instrumentation. Web servers aggregate this information from variousMashavu stations over a cell phone link and provide it on a web-based portal. Medicalprofessionals can view the patient’s information and respond to the patient and the nearestdoctor(s) with their recommendations. Validation efforts
previously the recipient of a Pitt Partners scholarship from the University of Pittsburgh which facilitated his service at Carnegie Mellon University from 2008-2009.Nancy George, University of Pittsburgh Nancy S. George has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Language Communications from the University of Pittsburgh and a Master's Equivalency degree in Education. She has been a junior high language arts teacher for 30 years. She will complete her Master's degree in Library and Information Science in April, 2010, from the University of Pittsburgh. Page 15.1146.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010
area.NaturalisticThe most recent addition to the bank of intelligences, a person with strengths in this area is Page 15.574.8capable of recognising forms in nature and understanding nature’s systems. Agriculturalistsand hunters possess this strength.In addition to these eight intelligences, the so-called “candidate” intelligences of spiritual andexistential intelligence were not included in this study, as these have not been fully endorsedby Gardner, due to their failure to fulfil all the criteria to be considered intelligences (Gardner,2006).One criticism of the theory of Multiple Intelligences has been that these eight areas do notrepresent intelligence(s) at
AC 2010-275: A POSSIBLE CIVIL ENGINEERING BOK2 CURRICULUMDebra Larson, Northern Arizona University Debra S. Larson is a Professor and Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, AZ. She served as department chair for civil and environmental engineering at NAU for four years. Prior to her faculty appointment at NAU, Debra worked as a structural and civil engineer for various companies. She is a registered Professional Engineer in Arizona. Debra received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Michigan Technological University. She received her Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Arizona State
concepts.Methods of Data CollectionTo track the DREAM program’s effectiveness at imparting physics knowledge in the mentees,inventories were systematically administered at Austin High School, Chavez High School, andKIPP Houston High School.These inventories were intended to span the field of topics that occurred in the design projects ofboth the spring 2009 and fall 2009 semesters, to measure long-term retention. The inventorieswere broken into two parts. The first page was designed as an Intuition Inventory (I.I.). TheI.I.’s from spring 2009 and fall 2009 are nearly identical, as shown in the Appendix. Theseserved to gauge the mentees’ physics intuition without computation or algebraic representation.The primary topic covered on the I.I. was the
problem into the basic elementsof one (or more) LED(s) shining on a surface during the early stages of model development.Those who succeeded better in developing the mathematical relationships saw this as important.We do not yet know whether the sketching contributed to their ability to generate a model, butour initial analysis suggests exploring this in more detail.It is possible that the phototherapy problem was too difficult as a first attempt at modeling. Wechose phototherapy because students all had some background in previous coursework related tolight, and because it was unlikely to give an advantage to any students as a problem inmechanical or electrical modeling might have. We would have given students credit for amathematical approach
, it was possible to identify opportunities. Some ofthe modalities for implementing those opportunities have to be developed through administrativearrangements, logistics, technology, scheduling and other means. The good thing is that it waspossible to identify possible failures before they occur.References:1. Adewale, O. S. 2002, Surveying and Geomatics Curricula in Nigerian Universities – The Professional and Educational Challenges. FIG International Conference, Washington D.C. April 19 – 26, 2002.2. Carnoy, M. 2005. Globalization Educational Trends and the Open Society. Open Society Institute Education Conference. Budapest, June 30 – July 3, 2005.3. Derby, F. W. 2000. Integration of Information Technology into Surveying
that upon approval by the University the new geomatics engineering program willempower graduates to meet the needs of the geospatial data user community.References1. American Society of Civil Engineers. (1985). Definition of the Term "Engineering Surveying". Journal of Surveying Engineering. IN(2), 16 - 164.2. Buckner, R.B. 1981). Does the Surveying Profession have Future Goals and Directions? Surveying and Mapping, 411(4), 391-398. Commonwealth Association of Surveying and Land Economy. (1988). CASLE in the 1990s. CASLE. 10p3. Dracup, J. 1995. History of geodetic surveying. ACSM Bulletin 154:15.4. Hollwey, J. R., Bancroft, A. D. and Longdin, W. S. (1969). The Future of the Land Surveyor. Chartered Surveyor No. 1
://www.asce.org/raisethebar).3. ASCE Levels of Achievement Subcommittee of CAP^3. 2005. Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry Into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.. Page 15.1212.10 BLOOM’S LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT (LOA) OUTCOME
; Bacon. ISBN: 978-0205522590. 6. Paradis, J., Zimmerman, M. (2002). The MIT Guide to Science and Engineering Communication: Second Edition. Boston, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262661270. 7. Beer, D., (2003). Writing and Speaking in the Technology Professions: A Practical Guide: Second Edition. Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN: 978-0471444732. 8. Schwalbe, K., (2007). An Introduction To Project Management, Second Edition. Course Technology/Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1423902201. Page 15.758.14 9. Satzinger, J., Jackson, R., Burd, S., (2009). Systems Analysis & Design In A Changing World, Fifth
control groups. The feedback will becontinuously incorporated into the course design in order to optimize delivery ofinstruction, and increase options for students on campus as well as those learning atremote sites.References [1] Montana State University computer engineering labs going online as part of pilotprogram. FirstScience News, 17 July 2009.[2] John Watson et al (2004). “On-line laboratories for undergraduate distanceengineering students,” Proceedings of the 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference, October 20-23, 2004, Savannah, GA.[3] Bourne, J., Harris, D. & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online engineering education: Learninganywhere, anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 131-146[4] Palmer, S., & Hall, W
the conversion infrastructure. Figure 2 – Data conversion infrastructureHolistic assessment interfaceThe difficulty with encouraging divergent thinking is theinability of traditional criterion referenced assessment toaccurately measure the process of the activity. Themeasure beyond the artefact or finished product is criticalto ensuring the sustainable value of concept drivencompetency.A web based holistic interface together with the finishedartefacts formed the assessment mechanism. Thisnon-criterion reference formed the blank canvas forstudents to not only present the journey throughdesigning the solution, but also leading the assessortowards what they valued about their solution(s). • Students were given a blank
, Page 15.405.12http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/pages/4005.asp[4] Missouri Alternative and Renewable Energy Technology Center. Retrieved January 7, 2010,from, http://www.crowder.edu/MARET/[5] Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon Sustainability Program. Retrieved January 2,2010, from, http://lanecc.edu/sustainability/susprog.html[6] San Juan College, Farmington, New Mexico Renewable Energy Program. Retrieved January6, 2010, from, http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/reng[7] Bronx Community College, Bronx, New York The Center for Sustainable Energy. RetrievedDecember 30, 2009, from,http://www.csebcc.org/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&screenKey=cmpEducation&s=cse[8] Meeroff, D.E., Integrating Green Building Concepts into the
). Recent innovations in undergraduate civil engineering curriculums.Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122:3:123-133.6. Caverly, R., Fulmer, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J., Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R.,Yost, J. (2010). Project-based freshman engineering experience: The core course. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition. Louisville, KY, June.7. ASCE (2009). Report card for America’s infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers. Page 15.1253.16
design projects. Critical Review Assignment1: M.Eswaramoorthy and S. Shanmugam, “A Feasibility Study on Solar Thermoelectric Hybrid Power Generation”, Proceedings of International Conference on Energy and Environment, march 19-20, 2009. Read the paper and prepare your critical review the keeping following points in your view: 1. Is the presented material scientifically solid? 2. Did the authors miss any thing, or concept or in error? 3. Do you think, is it feasible? 4. Read one prominent reference and try to support or criticize the authors. Page 15.34.6
10Bibliography1 Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R., 1996. “Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement toself-efficacy.” Washington, DC: American Psychological Association2 Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview,” EducationalPsychologist, 25, 3-17.3 Boekaerts, M. (1997). “Self-regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers,Educators, Teachers and Students”, Learning and Instruction: Current and Future Directions”, Electronic Journal ofResearch of Educational Psychology, 2(1), pp 1-34.4 Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.American Psychologist, 34, 906-9115 Mayer, R. (1998). 'Cognitive
encourages students to accept responsibility for learning and shows them how tobecome independent learners. However, it is more difficult and time consuming thantraditional courses.ACKNOWLEDGMENTWe wish to acknowledge support for this project NSC 97-2511-S-018 -021 from the NationalScience Council.REFERENCES[1]. King, R.H., T.E. Parker, T.P. Grover, J.P. Gosink, and N.T. Middleton. 1999. A multidisciplinary engineering laboratory course. Journal of Engineering Education 88 (3): 311-16.[2]. Eaton, J.K., "Computer-Based, Self-Guided Instruction in Laboratory-Data Acquisition and Control," Proceedings, 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 1992.[3]. Ojha, A.K., "Data Acquisition Experiments," IEEE SOUTHEAST-CON Proceedings, 1996
, http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/security/fingerprintreader.html.4. S. Cotter, “CSI Union: understanding forensic and biometric technologies”, NSF CCLI Award DUE-0837458, June 2009.5. Matlab, ver. R2009a, Jan. 2009, www.mathworks.com.6. Fake Name Generator, Corban Works LLC, http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/.7. GoldWave Audio Editor, ver. 5.55, Goldwave Inc., http://www.goldwave.com/.8. J.P. Campbell Jr., “Speaker recognition: a tutorial”, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 85 (9), pp. 1437-1462, Sept. 1997.9. L. Rabiner and B.-H. Juang, Fundamentals of Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall, 1993.10. Matlab Image Processing Toolbox - Getting Started, http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/ toolbox/images/f0-3373.html.11. R. Gonzalez