provide an efficient, effective, sufficient, and consistent protocol for assessingglobal competency. Specifically, the MGUDS-S evaluates individual’s Universal-DiverseOrientation (UDO), defined as an “an attitude of awareness and acceptance of both similaritiesand differences that exist among people.” Specific measures included within the MGUDS-SUDO: 1) diversity of contact with others (behavioral); 2) relativistic appreciation of oneself andothers (cognitive); 3) degree of emotional comfort with differences (affective).In this paper, we report on our efforts to initiate an assessment project employing the MGUDS-Sto establish a baseline of global competency of engineering students at our university. Threestudent groups participated in this study
been around for nearly four decades; there was noagreement on its objective definition. It was only in 2002, when Lamont Adams put forth 10 factorscalling them "Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming” that a step was taken in this direction 15.These factors, as given in Table 1, seem to have found wide conceptual acceptance. We decided to makeuse of them to get a measure of "egoless behavior".Any approach to develop egoless software engineers inherently implies the development of egolessbehavior. Hence, the factors would ideally fall into two categories – first the generic factors thatcorrelate to an egoless individual and second coding factors that would correlate to an egoless developer.Considering this, the factors in Table 1 after a group
Page 20.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Internationalization and Civil Engineering Program InnovationAbstractIn the early 1990’s, the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction (CEC) at BradleyUniversity developed strategic objectives to introduce internationalization to our students andcurriculum. Initially, four objectives for the CEC Global Explorer Program were outlined: 1) tosend students abroad for study either for a short mini-semester or full semester; 2) persuadeinternational students to come to Bradley; 3) embark on a faculty exchange; and 4) to fosterinternational research exchange between the CEC department and
infrastructure and gain strategic insights into current global business challenges, best business practices, emerging business trends, and development of new awareness to make informed decisionsThe ICIC has a unique organization structure that motivated participants and created effectivesynergies between educators, professionals, elected officials, and government officials fromaround the world. Initially, areas of geographic proximity around the globe were defined andpotential participants were identified to form local ICIC committees. A total number of 350decision makers participated not only in the conference but also six executive summits involvingglobal problems of common interest. Figure 1 shows a map of the world identifying the
America and the United States: 100,000 U.S. students studying inLatin America and 100,000 Latin American students studying in the United States. The overallpurpose of the initiative is to promote increased intercultural understanding and prosperitythroughout the Western Hemisphere so that people from across the region may work togethermore effectively to address global challenges that connect us in important ways, especially:“citizen security, economic opportunity, social inclusion and environmental sustainability.”1 Inthe words of President Obama: “Because when we study together, and we learn together, wework together, and we prosper together.”2With the President’s focus on promoting student mobility in order to focus specifically onaddressing
classrooms and Engineering Departments at US Universities Maya A. Trotz1, Joniqua Howard1, Helen Muga2, Ken Thomas3, Sheena Francis4, Jeanese Badenock5 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 2Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mount Union, 3The Honors College & Biosystem Engineering Department, Auburn University, 4Department of Biology, University of the Technology, Jamaica, 5 Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the West
exploring other cultures.Mr. Duane B Swigert, Metropolitan State University of Denver Page 20.38.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 The Development and Integration of Humanitarian Engineering Curriculum in an Engineering Technology Program Brown, Aaron1; Swigert, Duane Metropolitan State University of Denve, Department of Mechanical Engineering Techmology Po box 173362, Denver, CoAbstract Humanitarian Engineering is the application of engineering research and work to directlybenefit marginalized people (1
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Page 20.40.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Using Social Media to Create a Global Community of Sustainability-Engaged StudentsINTRODUCTIONPrograms that enable engineering students to study outside of the United States have beeneffectively integrated with engineering education (1). These programs are exposing students toglobal concepts of sustainability (2). They are also helping students develop core competenciesin engineering, while simultaneously building higher cognitive levels in some
Domestic Undergraduate Research Experiences1. IntroductionThis paper presents the results of a study that examines how international and domesticundergraduate research experiences affect the intercultural maturity of students in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. This question is timely given theincreasingly multinational nature of research collaborations. In its 2014 Science Indicators, theNational Science Foundation (NSF) reported that 35% of U.S. articles published in 2012 wereinternationally coauthored, up from 32% in 2010, with U.S.-Japan coauthored papers comprising7% of this total. Internationally coauthored papers in science and engineering now comprise one-fourth of all papers worldwide.1 The percentage of U.S
student learning. Preliminary results are presented. This work is ongoing.IntroductionA recent report on Challenges and Opportunities in Hydrologic Sciences by the NationalAcademy of Sciences states that the solution to the complex water-related challenges facingsociety today begins with education.1 The realization of the need to educate people about watersustainability is not new. At least as far back as 1974, there was a realization that water qualitywas difficult for people to describe.2 Around the same time, various indices of water quality weredeveloped to help quantify water quality in a way that could be more easily understood.3 Morerecently, Covitt, Gunckel and Anderson assessed students’ understanding of water quantity andquality
Experiences inEngineering) assembles students with such skills, as well as high academic achievementin technical classes, and seeks to further develop those skills. That development mainlyoccurs through preparing those undergraduates to teach a small set of class periods andthen having those students teach those class periods multiple times. Two potential benefits exist for a college of engineering to have such anorganization. First, the peer teaching provided by the organization has the potential toenhance the teaching in a college of engineering for a number of a reasons includingdecreasing instructor-to-student ratios [1–2]. Second, because the organization developsthe professional skills of students who are excelling in their technical
American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Workflow for the development of online content for a hybrid learning courseIntroductionHybrid learning, or blended learning (an alternative terminology with similar meaning), isintended to combine the best features from a traditional face-to-face learning environment withthe added benefits that can be obtained by using a technology-based learning environment 1.Typically hybrid learning courses include e-learning activities such as online lectures, onlinequizzes, synchronous or asynchronous discussions, and group work sessions 3. Hybrid learning isan emerging concept which, when executed correctly, has been proven to increase efficiency forthe institution and learning for the students 2. An early
Paper ID #8512Workforce Development in Mechatronics- A three year NSF-ATE projectDr. Niaz Latif, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Dr. Niaz Latif is the Dean of the College of Technology at Purdue University Calumet (PUC). Dr. Latif served as an Assistant Dean for Statewide Technology Administration in the College of Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, before joining Purdue University Calumet on July 1, 2007. He is the Principal Investigator of the 2010 NSF-ATE grant, ”Meeting workforce needs of Mechatronics Techni- cians.” Also, he is a Co-PI of another NSF-ATE grant, ”Leadership Capacity
(American Society of Civil Engineers). He also has significant experience in statistical analysis of transportation safety data. He is recipient of the Young Researcher Award from the Transportation Research Board Committee on Safety Data, Analysis, and Evaluation. He has co-authored more than 25 manuscripts that have been either published or are forthcoming in peer reviewed journals such as AAP, TRR, and IEEE transactions on ITS. Page 24.1402.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 1 Workforce of the Future: Ideas for Improving K-12 Outreach by Transportation 2
4 + 1 program so that qualified students could take two or three approved coursesand have them double count for the Bachelor’s and Master’s degree. This program was Page 24.1403.2successful in helping more students choose graduate school since they could get a Master’sdegree in just one year past the Bachelor’s degree, saving both time and money. However, not allstudents eligible for graduate school choose to do the 4 + 1 plan or are qualified for theaccelerated program and money is still a problem for these students. Therefore we addedgraduate scholarships (maximum of four semesters) to the S-STEM programs for students whohad graduated
wherethey are responsible for developing an entire course. Engineering students more often haveresearch assistantships, and available teaching opportunities can be limited to facilitating alaboratory section without developing its content.1 As a consequence, engineering students canbe left without the curriculum development experience necessary to become the next generationof excellent instructors. Some disciplines have recognized the need for graduate student teachingdevelopment;2-4 however, these programs are not widespread.Undergraduate students in engineering are often required to learn specialized skills such asMATLAB, Mathematica, Excel, SolidWorks, and COMSOL Multiphysics. These skills areindispensible in many areas of engineering, yet
of course concepts. Page 24.1405.4Table 1: Response to survey on homework abstracts, administered in Fall 2012. For allquestions, responses were defined as 1=never, 2=almost never, 3=sometimes, 4=frequently,5=always 1 2 3 4 5 Average1. Does the process of explaining to someone 1 3 9 21 13 3.89else how to solve a problem change or enhanceyour own understanding of the problem solution?2. Did writing abstracts for homework solutions 11 12 14 10 0 2.49change or enhance your understanding of whyyou approached the
technical material. Curriculum-level approaches to teaching engineeringwriting can generally be categorized relative to two extremes along the integration spectrum,namely: (a) a highly focused delivery of writing instruction, with the most focused deliverybeing a single, stand-alone course in technical communication, or (b) a diffused approach, inwhich technical writing instruction is integrated throughout the curriculum.Case Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Formal writing in Formal writing in a composition and None None Senior Design or communication course
Innovation II, is a required second semester, 2-credithour course for all FYE students. In this course, students learn how to use computer tools to solvefundamental engineering problems, how to make evidence-based engineering decisions, developproblem-solving, modeling, and design skills, and develop teaming and communication skills.The students were enrolled in 15 sections run over four days. Each section had a maximumcapacity of 120 students. Sections met every two hours starting from 7:30 am and ending at 5:20pm (Table 1). Students in each section met twice a week at the same time.Table 1 – Time and days of sections 7:30-9:20am 9:30-11:20am 11:30am-1:20pm 1:30-3:20pm 3:30-5:20pm Tuesday 7:30 Tu/Th a 9:30 Tu/Th a
array of industries, Page 24.1408.2yet the general public has a limited perspective of these careers.[1] Research has linked K-12students’ limited knowledge and/or negative image of engineering careers to the shortage in thenumber of college graduates receiving degrees in engineering.[2,3] Students’ images ofengineering, also referred to as stereotypes, frequently identify engineers as car mechanics,construction workers or train operators.[4,5] Other stereotypes include: engineering is boring,engineers work alone or at a computer, and engineers help society.[4,5,6]Students’ images of engineering stem from a variety of different sources: knowing
derivative appears on the left side of the equation. If an initial conditionof the form y(x0) = y0 is also specified, then the only solution curve of of interest is y’ = f(x,y)the one that passes through the intial point (x0,y0). For the first-order initial-value problemthe popular graphical method also known as Euler method can be used that satisfies theformula given below yn+1 = yn + hf(xn ,yn )which can also be written as yn+1 = yn + h(y’n ), where the approximate solution at xn isdesignated by y(xn), or simply yn. The true solution at xn will be denoted by either Y(x n) orYn. Note that once yn is known, equation y’ = f(x,y) can be used to obtain yn’ as
300 have some type of center for entrepreneurship [4]. In 1996 the GlobalConsortium of Entrepreneurship Centers (GCEC) [9] was established and has become the leadingorganization for faculty and staff of university-based entrepreneurship centers to collaborate,share ideas and discuss ongoing challenges and opportunities. Of the 200 GCEC members, 152of these universities have engineering programs (see Appendix 1). Drawing on the 15-yearhistory of having a Center for Entrepreneurship (now expanded to the Center for Leadership,Entrepreneurship, and Innovation) at University of Portland, we describe how curricular and co-curricular programs developed by experts in entrepreneurship education can be successfullyutilized by engineering students to
engagement in theclassroom. Given that, we selected the following criteria based on guidelines provided byBuilding Engineering and Science Talent (BEST) Commission, National Science EducationStandards and National Science Resources Center:16 1. Challenging Content/Curriculum 2. An Inquiry Learning Environment 3. Defined Outcomes/Assessment 4. Sustained Commitment/SupportLiftOff allows TSGC to continue to build upon its partnership with the NASA JSC. Forparticipants, visiting a NASA Center, interacting with scientists and engineers, and gainingexpertise in areas where they previously were not comfortable teaching, are all highlights..LiftOff also enhances our partnership with Space Grant Consortia in those other states thatchoose to
, and mathematics are critical skills for our modern world. Inorder to understand this world, it is vital to foster engineering and technological literacy amongall people, starting with young children. Technology and engineering are new fields at theelementary school level; however, this is where such education needs to start. Just as it isimportant to begin science instruction in the primary grades by building on children’s curiosityabout the natural world, it is crucial to begin technology and engineering instruction inelementary school by fostering children’s natural inclination to design and build things, and totake things apart to see how they work.1 It is during primary school that students establish firstimpressions of possible career
from engineering, another 20% from environmental science policyprogram, and the rest from all majors across the campus. Students participate in a variety ofactivities including online group discussion and debate, projects and site visits.The characteristics of the five faculty participants at the time the project was initiated and theirinstructional contexts are summarized in Table 1. One of our professors accepted a position atanother institution.Table 1. Faculty participants’ characteristics and the context of their instructional media.Faculty Campus Gender Years of Number of ApproximateMember Location teaching in courses number of students
obstacles to their Page 24.871.2intended activity. 1 An overview of project-based learning in engineering education Problem-based learning pedagogy has a long history in medical education, wherePBL has increasingly been integrated into core curriculum, even in more conservativeeducational institutions [2, 10]. Medical PBL encourages collaborative investigation ofmedical cases, where students take the lead on case research and resolution and facultyplay an expert advisor role. Meta-analysis of PBL effectiveness studies suggests themove to PBL has shown weak
. Amelink, Virginia Tech Page 24.872.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Living, Learning, and Staying: The Impact of a Women in Engineering Living and Learning CommunityAbstractA number of studies highlight living and learning communities (LLCs) as a factor contributing tostudent persistence, particularly in STEM programs.1-3 For several years, the University ofMaryland – College Park has housed Flexus: The Dr. Marilyn Berman Pollans Women inEngineering Living and Learning Community. This LLC is solely for first and second yearwomen, who are in vital years of
students’communication skills and is important for the development of a quality end-product. Whilecompleting projects for persons with disabilities or the underprivileged is not unique to ourprogram, it is a critical component to the success of our virtual teams because it appeals to thestudents’ desire to complete the design successfully and motivates them to work through anydifficulties encountered with team dynamics.Program planning and managementPrior to the start of the semester, faculty from each institution carefully organize and discuss the Page 24.873.3course organization, delivery, and management (Figure 1). Two main faculty, one at eachinstitution
CurriculumAbstractLike many engineering programs, the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering at Brigham YoungUniversity has recognized the need for cultivating leadership skills in its engineering students.In 2005, planning efforts were initiated for rolling out an inclusive, college-wide engineeringleadership curriculum. These efforts have resulted in a structured experience that providesgraduates with proficiency in leadership knowledge and skills starting with the freshmen yearand culminating in practiced leadership experiences in senior project courses 1. Implementationof an inclusive curriculum required substantial support from each of the individual college units,thus the roll-out was staged with strong consideration to department timelines. Each program
; Mathematics), Baton Rouge Community College 9/2007 – 4/2011 Supervisory Mechanical Engineer, Southern Regional Research Center, Louisiana 8/2000 – 9/2007 Research Assistant, Louisiana State University, Mechanical Engineering Department 8/2005 – 7/2007 National Science Foundation Fellow, K-12 Program, Louisiana State University (NSF GK-12) 1/2001 – 12/2005 Teaching Assistant, Louisiana State University, Mechanical Engineering Department 10/1996 – 8/2000 Teaching Instructor, Arab Academy for Science and Technology and Maritime Trans- port, Egypt 3/1995 – 10/1996 Assistant Barge Engineer, Santa Fe International Drilling Company Relevant Publications: James Rodgers, Karim Elkholy, Xiaoliang Cui, Vikki Martin, Michael Watson