instudents’ college careers can be particularly impactful, as students’ first year, and to a lesserextent their second year, is when they make crucial academic decisions, including their choice ofmajor [4].STEM bridge programs are a type of early (pre-college) STEM intervention. They are residentialprograms that take place the summer before matriculating STEM students begin college and aredesigned for students who have been identified as relatively underprepared for STEMcoursework, often female and/or underrepresented minority students in particular [5]. A primarygoal of STEM bridge programs is to increase the number of students who have access to a strongSTEM foundation by increasing students’ STEM knowledge and exposure to STEM content [6].Bridge
to engineering courseat the UA. Prior studies show a positive relationship between interest in a subject and persistencefor science and engineering majors.4,5 Furthermore, lack of commitment to a career inengineering may be key to explaining non-persistence.6 It is not surprising, then, that studentsreported that having a choice of which Elective Unit to study had a positive impact on theirlearning. Four of the six Units clearly increased the number of students strongly interested in thetopic they chose (see Table IV), which suggests reinforcement of the students’ choices and thismay be related to why students also report an increased commitment to engineering (Table II).One very important consideration in offering these Elective Units as
the University of California, Davis. Dr. Brown is a licensed professional civil engineer and has six years of experience designing water and waste water treatment facilities in central California. He was the recipient of the NSF CAREER award in 2011. Dr. Brown’s research interests are in conceptual change, epistemology, and social or situated cognition. Specifically, his research focuses on theoretical approaches to understanding why some engineering concepts are harder to learn than others, including the role of language and context in the learning process.Dr. Brian F French, Washington State University Dr. Brian French is an associate professor in Educational Psychology and co-director of the Learning and
the exit focus groups informed studentexcitement and continued interest in nanotechnology and related course content. Studentsindicated that it would be helpful to have more information on how nanotechnology conceptsrelate to their academic and career goals.B. NANOTECHNOLOGY II: DEVELOPMENT OF AN SEMESTER-LONG HANDS-ONRESEARCH-BASED COURSE: This course was offered for the first time during the Spring2011 semster in the department of Mechancial Engineering. The course was designed to enhance Page 23.690.7student participation in research conducted by NUE faculty members in the area of nanoscienceand nanoengineering. Topics were
in a simulated job interview. Forthe job interview, each student gave a presentation to the class and discussed why he/she was thebest candidate for the given job. The interviewees used their education, experience, personalcharacteristics to convince the audience that he/she was the best fit for the job. Feedback wasprovided by the instructor and questions were asked by other students. These job preparationskills helped student be more effective at job career fairs, forced them to have updated resumes,and sharpened their oral communication skills.Course Activities (The years 2nd, 3rd, and 4th)For the actual project, the 25 students were divided in 5 teams with 5 students per team. The taskfor each team was to choose a real company that hires
serving as the department chair. His current research interests include incremental and online learning, learning in nonstationary and evolving environments, ensemble based systems, and various applications of computational intelligence in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. He has over 140 peer-reviewed papers in journals and conference proceedings. Dr. Polikar is a senior member of IEEE, and member of ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, and Eta Kappa Nu. His recent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems Programs. He is also an Associate Editor of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.Dr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and
CoachingPeer mentoring and reciprocal peer coaching are integral components of our project, as weexpect the engineering peer mentors to provide real-time, instructive feedback as well asguidance on efficient study habits to students enrolled in calculus and who are consideringengineering as an academic major. Moreover, we use peer mentors to connect students to campusresources as well as to one another. Peer mentoring is regarded as a successful intervention toaddress issues of student retention in academic programs12. Peer mentoring, as defined byKram13 is “a helping relationship in which two individuals of similar age and/or experience cometogether … in the pursuit of fulfilling some combination of functions that are career-related andpsychosocial
University – Community College partnership to includeoutreach to secondary school educators. The focus of these activities is on increasing theawareness of careers and opportunities in nanotechnology. Page 23.295.8In 2012, we ran a week-long “Summer Nanotechnology Institute” for high school educators,with over 24 contact hours. Ten teachers had enrolled for this workshop, with six instructorsfrom both partner institutions and a number of engineering graduate students helping. This wasalso an opportunity to test the collaborative video system and the nanofab trainer. Theparticipants were awarded one graduate credit-hour for no charge and were given the
. Unfortunately, the poor ranking is in part due to current high school science classroomsthat suffer from many problems: 1) state standards typically require many different topics to bereviewed in a time-frame that is unrealistic; 2) students do not appreciate why the material is Page 23.331.2relevant to everyday life or their future careers; 3) many teachers do not fully understand thecontent they are teaching; and 4) many teachers have weak pedagogical skills. To change thissituation, we must have teachers do more than create a few lectures/demos based on theirsummer research experiences and we must provide a large amount of support for teachers to
AC 2012-4151: GUIDED DISCOVERY MODULES FOR STATICSDr. Javier Angel Kypuros, University of Texas, Pan American Javier Kypuros received a B.S.E. in mechanical engineering from Princeton University in 1996. He later received a M.S.E. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering in 1998 and 2001 from the University of Texas, Austin. Kypuros began his career at the University of Texas, El Paso in 2001 and later joined the faculty at the University of Texas, Pan American (UTPA) in 2002. He is currently an Associate Professor and departmental ABET Coordinator. Kypuros received the UTPA Faculty Excellence Award for Teaching from the College of Engineering and Computer Science in 2012. His research interests include dynamic
experience.IntroductionThe growing need for professionals with specific training in sustainable building practices willincrease significantly over the next decade as the importance of accelerating sustainability in abuilt environment has been well recognized all over the world. Thus, undergraduate studentsneed to advance their career and maintain their competitive edge with training in the greenbuilding areas. Many schools, with undergraduate engineering programs in many disciplines,attempt to include environmental sustainability and sustainable design in their curricula.5 Thechallenges and opportunities are laid out in construction engineering management disciplines asto how to incorporate sustainability practices into their educational formation.1, 5, 6, 9
. The lab sequence schedule listed in Table 2 is grouped based on thecontents but they can be varied if necessary. For instance, Lab #13 in Table 2 was actuallyoffered in week 3, after students completed a few lab practicums and before they started to writetheir first journal article-like lab report. In the last week of the semester, students will give a 10-minute presentation on the selected laboratory module/topic that matches better with their futureresearch/career interest.3. Exemplary Experimental ResultsDue to the page limitation, the experimental results of the three-week lab series on GNSs wereselected for presentation in this paper (see figures 1-4). Laboratory results on AgNPs relatedcontents have been published in the Journal of
(SEM) and atomic forcemicroscopy (AFM) and their related modes and diagnostic methods. These microscopystudio labs serve as key bridges to encourage faculty-student interactions, cultivatestudent interest in careers in nanotechnology, and promote and recruit for our programwhich links five academic departments (Biology, Physics, Chemistry, MechanicalEngineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering). Key topics that were covered in the course included: static versus dynamic self- Page 23.258.3assembly, atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, biomimetics,engineered systems and directed self-assembly, and AFM and SEM studies
projects.Instruction EvaluationInstruction evaluation was done by means of surveys. In addition to an End-of-Course survey,surveys were conducted at the end of each module. Since the instructors had developed goodrapport with the students, even before the course started, they considered themselves to beparticipants in the development of the course and provided valuable feedback and suggestionsfor the improvement. The course was well-received by the students. They agreed with thestatement that the course was useful for their studies and career preparation. They indicated that,as a result of taking the course, they felt better prepared to work in the nanotechnology field.In the light of the experience gained by faculty members as well as feedback from the
curriculum 1, 2, 3. We have had positive assessment results from our ownpilot testing at Rowan University and with the use of some of the materials in the FreshmanChemical Engineering course at the State University of New York-Stony Brook 4. We havedisseminated some of our results through ASEE conference papers, and some of the problem setsdescribed in this paper will be used in the next edition of Felder, Rousseau and Newell,Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, 4th ed 5.Our current efforts are to expand our dissemination through the ASEE Chemical EngineeringDivision (CHED) Summer School. This will help extend the reach of our materials to anaudience of educators early in their careers who will be able to directly impact the students
Ames, Iowa in 2000 in electrical engi- neering and biomedical engineering. He is a Professor of electrical and computer engineering at Rowan University, Glassboro, N.J., where he chairs the department and also directs the Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition Laboratory. His recent and current works are funded primarily through National Sci- ence Foundation’s CAREER and Energy, Power, and Adaptive Systems programs. His primary research interests encompass various related areas of computational intelligence, neural networks, and learning systems, including ensemble based learning, incremental and nonstationary learning, data and decision fusion, and their real-world applications, in which he has more than 120
) Laboratory. He received his B.S. (1989), M.S. (1992), and Ph.D. (1997) degrees in mechanical engineering with emphasis on manufacturing engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara in Turkey. In his academic career, he worked at the University of Toledo (1997-1999) and the Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly University of Missouri, Rolla) (1999-2006) before joining UTSA in Aug. 2006. For more, please visit http://engineering.utsa.edu/˜saygin/. Page 25.1270.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Template–Based Image Processing Toolkit for
Paper ID #43257Board 191: A Model for Engineering Education Professional Developmentfor K-12 Science TeachersMrs. Kathleen Ann Dinota, Stony Brook University Kathleen Dinota received her B.S. in Marine Science and M.S. in Secondary Education, retiring in 2017 after teaching in public schools on Long Island, NY for 31 years. During the course of her career, she taught earth science, biology and chemistry as well as science research. Kathleen has also worked in test development at NY State Education Department as an Education Specialist for the Regents Physical Setting Chemistry exam for the past 20 years. She is a former NYS
century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Mr. Talha Naqash, Utah State University Mr.Talha Naqash is currently pursuing his doctoral studies in Engineering Education at Utah State University. With a profound educational background spanning multiple disciplines, he holds an MS in Telecommunication and networking. His extensive research contributions are reflected in numerous publications and presentations at prestigious IEEE & ASEE conferences, Wiley’s, and Springer Journals. His research primarily revolves around understanding Cognitive Engagement Analysis, Assessing Methods in Engineering Education, and
which was not their first choice. Despite the project’smisalignment, they embraced the opportunity driven by a passion for interdisciplinary research.The REU experience, albeit not aligning precisely with their research interest, proved to be avaluable opportunity for the participant to immerse themselves in a distinctive researchenvironment.Prior to their involvement in the REU, the participant’s research pursuits primarily revolvedaround osteology, with a year and a half of collaboration with a professor at their home institute,a public university in West Virginia designated as M3: Master’s Colleges and Universities –Small programs. While this work was relevant to the participant’s future career objectives, itconfined their research exposure
/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturized environmental sensors and sample handling devices. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002. He worked as Research Engineer at Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) from 1993 to 1997. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2004 and was given the WCU (World Class University) Visiting Professorship under the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea in 2009. He is currently leading the NSF-supported HSI IUSE (Improving Undergraduate STEM Education) Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe). In this project, a team of
-dimensionalapproach to STEM instruction described by the NGSS [4], [9]. Engineering education allowsstudents to authentically apply content related to real-world phenomena so they can understandhow the intertwined nature of science and engineering addresses the community and globalissues they are facing today. Engineering education better prepares students to think critically,make decisions, and pursue STEM careers and educational trajectories. Yet many teachers,particularly in elementary grades, lack sufficient professional development and self-efficacy toinclude engineering in their curricula and embed it in meaningful ways that connect to students’lives and communities. This phenomenon is augmented along gender, geographic, andsocioeconomic lines [10-13
research focuses on empowering engineering education scholars to be more effective at impacting transformational change in engineering and developing educational experiences that consider epistemic thinking. She develops and uses innovative research methods that allow for deep investigations of constructs such as epistemic thinking, identity, and agency. Dr. Faber has a B.S. in Bioengineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education from Clemson University and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University. Among other awards for her research, she was awarded a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2022 to study epistemic negotiations on interdisciplinary engineering education research
PS5 1 Sense of Community, Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students, Grade Point Average 2 3 (Overall and Gateway 8), 4 Success Measures (Various), 5 Program SatisfactionThe Engineering Self-Efficacy survey (Frantz, Siller & Demiranda, 2011) measures students’judgments concerning their academic performance in engineering courses and an engineeringprogram, their expectations about an engineering career, and their persistence in pursuing anengineering education. In addition, at the end of each academic year, students participated in afocus group to discuss their personal experiences in the program and offer suggestions forchange
summer and fall of 2023. Research participants were remindedabout confidentiality and the goal to leverage underrepresented students’ voices to reassure themand encourage candid responses. Two interviews were fully conducted in Spanish to supportstudents’ preferences. A 13-question protocol guided the interviews. Interview topics includedstudents’ background information; STEM knowledge and skills; STEM curricular experiences;knowledge and perceptions of career opportunities, campus support services, and campuspolicies; and perceived sense of belonging. Interviews were audio recorded, and notes/memoswere typed after each interview. Interviews lasted 31 to 112 minutes (average 57 minutes). The sample included 23 male students (56%) and 18
Paper ID #43375Board 426: Work in Progress: Real-Time Ecological Momentary Assessmentof Students’ Emotional State in StaticsDr. Diana Arboleda, University of Miami Diana Arboleda, PhD, is a civil engineering Lecturer at the University of Miami, Florida. She received her B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Miami in 1988 and after a full career as a software engineer in corporate America she returned to earn a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering. Her research interests are in engineering education.Dr. James Giancaspro P.E., University of Miami James Giancaspro, Ph.D., P.E. is an associate professor of civil
current ethics curriculum is effectively fostering moral reasoning development or if the EERImight be insufficient in capturing the subtleties of students' situated understanding and ability toreason and act ethically in authentic scenarios. In response to these findings, we broadened thescope of our study to encompass the full duration of students’ undergraduate careers. Thisexpansion was driven by the hypothesis that a single semester of ethics education within thecurriculum might not be sufficient to effect significant changes in students’ ethical reasoning.However, we speculated that over the entirety of their undergraduate experience, a more notablechange in their ethical reasoning might become evident. The details of the study can be found
overwhelmed with information at the beginning of the RET to seeing connections totheir classrooms. A greater mastery of the material led to enough understanding to create lessonstailored to their students. For example, early in the RET experience, teachers in rural schoolcommunities where agriculture is centrally important culturally and economically brainstormedways to engage students in understanding how the semiconductor industry has impactedagricultural technology. Other teachers took it upon themselves to find career statistics so theycould talk with their students about exactly what semiconductor jobs would be available to themin our state with various levels and types of post high school education. The teachers’ effortsduring the first five
college enrollment. Educational Researcher, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 595–606, DOI: 10.3102/0013189X2110275286. Matusovich, H. M., Carrico, C. A., Paretti, M. C., & Boynton, M. A. (2017). Engineering as a career choice in rural Appalachia: Sparking and sustaining interest, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1B, pp. 463-475.7. Shamah, D., & MacTavish, K.A. (2009). Rural research brief: Making room for place-based knowledge in rural classrooms. The Rural Educator, 30 (2), 1-4.8. Bartholomaeus, P. (2006). Some rural examples of place-based education. International Education Journal, 7 (4), 480-489.9. Bielefeldt, A.R., & Rulifson, G. (2018). Environmental considerations in engineering: students’ goals
brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students," Science, vol. 331, no. 6023, pp. 1447-1451, 2011.[12] M. M. Chemers, E. L. Zurbriggen, M. Syed, B. K. Goza, and S. Bearman, "The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students," Journal of Social Issues, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 469-491, 2011.[13] S. M. Aguilar et al., "Research productivity of East Asian scientists: Does cosmopolitanism in professional networking, research collaboration, and scientific conference attendance matter," Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 41-62, 2013