Session 1202 Integrating Graduate and Undergraduate Education Through Student Design Competitions Daniel P. Schrage, Professor School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0150 ABSTRACTThe Georgia Tech graduate program in Aerospace Systems Design was initiated in 1984with two rotorcraft design courses as part of the Georgia Tech (U.S. Army ResearchOffice sponsored) rotorcraft center of excellence. The American Helicopter Society(AHS)/industry student design
personnel training is carried out insome engineering departments of our university. The training objective is decided accordingto the three categories. The first category is a program for Master of Engineering includingBachelor of Engineering, i.e. Bachelor and Master combined program, in which the trainingprocess will be optimized and the training of “the both ends will be intensified, and themiddle will be optimized”. One end refers to strengthening basic education on modernengineering technology and comprehensive personnel quality, and the other end is to enhancethe practical engineering training with a macro-concept, including engineering scientificresearch, comprehensive ability training in designing and the training of comprehensiveability
Interactive Web Activities for Online STEM Learning Materials Alex Edgcomb and Frank Vahid Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California, RiversideAbstractWe are developing a repository of parameterized interactive web activities to aid in learningSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) concepts. Much web-based materialtoday, including online textbooks, online tutorials, and MOOCs (massive open online courses),include quiz-like activities to support interaction with the user. Varied customizable interactiveactivities, such as drag-and-drop definition matching, or shooting or navigation games driven byquiz-like
AC 2010-2422: INTEL: PRESENTING REALISTIC EXERCISES IN A STATICSCLASSChristine Valle, Georgia Institute of TechnologySue Rosser, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJanet Murray, Georgia Institute of TechnologyWendy Newstetter, Georgia Institute of TechnologyLaurence Jacobs, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 15.786.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 InTEL: Presenting Realistic Exercises in a Statics ClassAbstractStatics, a foundational engineering course, introduces a unique approach to problem solving,which is characterized by model-based reasoning. The major intended course outcome is forstudents to develop the ability to create and utilize
material to help students learn and gain knowledge more effectively.We always try to address most of these issues by paying attention to the delivery mode, keepingin mind different options that students appreciate, some feel more comfortable with face-to-faceformat while others prefer online mode of delivery. This paper examines some of the deliverymodes used to achieve these objectives especially by our institute.GLOBAL IMPACTFor over two centuries, the competencies that engineers have been expected to gain fromengineering education have been associated with countries [17]. Increased mobility in the Page 20.4.2workplace is
abackground that differs from typical engineering upperclassmen. In particular, they have alreadyseen the topics of modeling using transfer functions, state space and simulation diagrams,frequency response, and the rules for sketching Bode plots, and typical response of first andsecond order linear systems. With this in mind, the author has developed a series of laboratoriesto foster understanding of control systems topics. In particular, labs 2 and 4 seek to enhanceunderstanding of the Bode and Root Locus plots respectively by requiring the students togenerate these plots from experimental data. The sequence begins with time and frequencydomain system identification, segues through basic control actions, experimental determinationof the Root Locus
Paper ID #10249Improving retention of student understanding by use of hands-on experi-ments in StaticsProf. Carisa H Ramming P.E., Oklahoma State University Carisa Ramming joined the faculty at Oklahoma State University as an assistant professor in January 2009 after a stint as a visiting professor in the School of Architecture during the 2007-2008 academic year. Professor Ramming is a graduate of Oklahoma State University with a Bachelor of Architectural Engineering degree in 2001 and dual masters degrees; Master of Science in Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Construction Engineering and Master of Architectural
Session 2147 Project LIVE: A Classroom for Students on the Go J. R. Porter, J. A. Morgan, and J.A. Ochoa Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843Abstract The classical lecture environment represents one of the most important opportunities todirectly interact with students, allowing professors to leverage an array of communication andteaching techniques and to be immediately responsive to students’ questions. However, during alecture students must absorb considerable amounts of new information
Session 1526 A State-of-the-Art Energy and Electric Drives Laboratory Designed and Implemented by Undergraduate and Graduate Students Steven M. Hietpas Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science South Dakota State University, SD 57007AbstractEnergy Conversion courses for the past 100 years have primarily focused on the fundamentalconcepts of machine theory and the conversion between mechanical and electrical energy. Based onthese concepts an undergraduate energy conversion course would typically cover
present, civil engineering studentsare not adequately prepared in newly developed technologies in asphalt pavement design andconstruction.II. Challenge for undergraduate educatorsHow can we make sure that today’s young and dynamic engineering students are educated in thelatest asphalt technology so that they can apply these techniques effectively into practice? Theanswer is by providing practical education and training in asphalt mixture production facilities,equipment of construction, methods of construction, contracts, plans and specifications, basicstatistics, and quality control techniques. With this goal in mind, the Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering (CEE) department at WPI has adopted a philosophy of strong practical experience inits
SESSION 2320 Thermodynamic Cycles: A Multimedia, Independent Study Course Christine E. Hailey, David E. Hailey Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering / Department of English Utah State University Abstract During the 1999-2000 academic year, we developed a one-hour multimedia course covering the final third of a traditional thermodynamics course. In the paper we use the term “media” to describe the manner in which the content is delivered. The thermodynamics course is delivered via CD-ROM or Internet. We introduce the
Students’ Cognitions When Using an Instructional CD For Introductory Thermodynamics Roman Taraban Arne Weigold Department of Psychology roman.taraban@ttu.edu arne.weigold@ttu.edu Edward E. Anderson Department of Mechanical Engineering ed.anderson@ttu.edu Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX 79409 M. P. Sharma Department of
Physics webpage; http://physics.dickinson.edu/~abp_web/abp_homepage.html, accessed10/12/10Bernhard, Jonte. Improving Engineering Physics Teaching - Learning From Physics Education Research.In Physics Teaching in Engineering Education. 2000. Budapest.Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. 2000 How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School.Washington, D.C.: Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National ResearchCouncil.Carlton, K. (2000), 'Teaching about heat and temperature', Physics Education, 35 (2), 101.Chi, M. T. H. Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions AreRobust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2005. 14. 161-99.Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and
Paper ID #30196A study of the effects of peer tutoring in relation to student GPADr. Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University Dr. Scott Steinbrink is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering, primarily tasked with teaching computer methods and design.Mr. Adam Finn NogajDr. Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University Dr. Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is the Dean of the College of Engineering and Business and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering
Paper ID #42944Unmasking Cognitive Engagement: A Systematized Literature Review of theRelationships Between Students’ Facial Expressions and Learning OutcomesMr. Talha Naqash, Utah State University, Logan Mr.Talha Naqash is currently pursuing his doctoral studies in Engineering Education at Utah State University. With a profound educational background spanning multiple disciplines, he holds an MS in Telecommunication and networking. His extensive research contributions are reflected in numerous publications and presentations at prestigious IEEE; ASEE conferences, Wiley’s & Springer Journals. His research primarily
Paper ID #19401Impact of a Sophomore BME Design Fundamentals Course on Student Out-come Performance and Professional DevelopmentDr. Christa M Wille, University of Wisconsin, Madison Christa Wille is a Biomedical Engineering doctoral student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received an undergraduate degree in Biomedical Engineering and went on to get her clinical doctorate in Physical Therapy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She advanced her clinical skills through a Sports Physical Therapy Residency at UW Health. Although continuing to practice Physical Therapy, Christa has returned to academia to continue
Paper ID #14971Measuring Student Response to Instructional Practices (StRIP) in Traditionaland Active ClassroomsMr. Kevin A. Nguyen, University of Texas, Austin Kevin Nguyen is currently a Ph.D. student in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education department at University of Texas at Austin. He has a B.S. and M.Eng in Environ- mental Engineering both from Texas Tech University. As an engineering education researcher, he has worked on projects regarding self-reflection, teamwork, active learning, and participatory science com- munities.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
theirunderstanding of design itself: To focus the design process on the needs of the user and customer rather than on the capabilities of technology requires a change in mindset, one often resisted by engineers. We were surprised to find that the journals helped to change their minds. Journals actually gave the students a place to think through their objections to the principles of user-centered design, allowing them to convince themselves of the value of these principles. 8These practical studies of the ways in which students benefit from writing that takes placeduring the “thinking” phases of projects give credence to the concept of invention, whichhas been dismissed by some as a romanticized mystification. Even though it is not yetfully
for a hospital in the United Statesmay not work well in a hospital in Ethiopia. Students learn that just because a solution mayappear better for a context they are familiar with doesn’t mean it actually is better for the contextin which the product will be used. By learning about and engaging with the difficulties ofdesigning medical devices for a low-resource hospital, students must also reckon with the rolethat engineering plays in social and economic inequalities, both globally and domestically.Products like medical devices tend to be designed for communities with the most money to payfor them and the most resources to build them, and therefore often can’t meet the needs of thosewho need them the most.With these ideas in mind, the surgical
the cartridge heatersused for the compression zone that slides onto the barrel and is held in place by a pair of set screws. Figure 4 – Extruded 3D printing filament (left) Desktop 3D Filament Manufacturing Device Finished Prototype (middle, right)An important aspect of this project was that it is marketed for educational use. One way to demonstratean Engineering process is to supplement with a lab book. Student team designed a supplemental lab bookwith a few things in mind. The first was that we wanted the user to be able to understand the basics ofplastic extrusion and the mechanics behind the process. The next thing was to include information onplastic recycling and to show what plastics
due to a new application.Effectual thinking thus can be very useful in identifying entrepreneurial opportunities inmanufacturing and for that the technical details of the means should be known in full detail.2.1 Choice of ApproachThe literature identifies six different approaches for educating entrepreneurship. Out of these,resource based approach is identified as the one close to engineering students. Engineeringstudents need to realize that they can easily identify the opportunities if they keep their minds inthe ‘Polling Condition’ (refers to basically anything that periodically checks (polls) for data or acondition). However it needs a clear understanding of the capabilities of the science ortechnology they are considering. This is a
those dispositions, skill levels,and practical tasks that are reasonably expected of graduates.6Within the United States, a similar call has been made for incorporating an entrepreneurialmindset into undergraduate engineering curricula. EM is a multi-faceted concept comprising awide range of characteristics, skills, and attitudes; its curricular presence is often implemented inways that enable an institution to best leverage its resources, including faculty background,available partnerships, and funding opportunities. 7 As defined by KEEN, entrepreneurial mindsetis a habit of mind geared toward action; a way of thinking about the world that empowers peopleto identify opportunities and create value in any context.8 Network members from more than
real difference. · The Unlike zone: Which represents high level aspirations very difficult to achieve.Unfortunately, it is important to keep in mind that trying to measure performance of education isnot always easy , while some factors can be easily quantified, some others elements or outcomesmay take years to measured. Page 7.209.11 Proceedings of the 2002 American society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe indicators selected for the system are shown in Figure 6. The indicators are groupedaccording with the stakeholders. As
board for SGA. Nur aspires to pursue PhD and work in research, eventually becominga professor so she can inspire the young minds of tomorrow.Kabilan AsokanKabilan Asokan is a fresh graduate from Southeast Missouri State University with a bachelor’s inElectrical Engineering. Kabilan is an international transfer student from Malaysia. While takingclasses, Kabilan has worked at the University Center as an Event Services Manager. Currently,Kabilan is doing his OPT (Optional Practical Training) and would like to further his studies inCanada. Kabilan has been working on the “Auto Garden” capstone project since Fall 2020. He wasinspired to work on this project due to his interest in gardening. Moreover, this project unites hislove for farming and
questions: ● Can hypermedia support group learning of engineering design and improve teamwork? ● In the context of the developed tool, can various issues in the design of hypermedia-based applicationsfor instructional purposes be resolved through iterative development? Method A study was conducted with the above objectives in mind. Forty-five undergraduate industrialengineering students participated in this study. These students were enrolled in a sophomore-level engineeringdesign course that surveys methodologies for designing engineering systems and provides the studentsexperience in the application of these methodologies to the design of a specific engineering system. At
Paper ID #17923Engagement in Practice: Engaging a Non-Profit to Facilitate Effective Assess-mentDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a member of the Department of Technology Systems faculty, College of Engi- neering and Technology, East Carolina University, where he has taught since 1986. He is the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s vice chair and in 2015, he completed his second term as the director of publi- cations for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and the Engineering Design Graphics Journal editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual
Paper ID #31352An Improved Design for a Viscometer ApparatusMr. Joseph Michael Derrick, IUPUI I am currently a model-based development engineer at Carrier specializing in dynamic modeling. My main responsibility is the development of system level models of HVAC products to be used in control verification. Additionally, I assist design engineers through the design optimization process of their prod- uct. I have also played a support role in the VMEA process using developed product models. I am currently pursuing my PhD in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University in Indianapolis. My area of research is in the
, there are too many so called professionals, who rely blindlyon test data with no or very little understanding of basic principals of engineering. Figure 3: “Dog bone” sample in the tester. Page 12.1166.6Theoretical calculations will sink deeper into the minds when people see the end result. AT308,Inc. delivers exactly what is needed: learning by validation of the theoretical side of the course.There is another way to learn. The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham,Massachusetts offers a different approach to engineering education. Guizzo reverses the “theoryfirst, practice later” model and gets students
. Relationships expand as teams become larger and include office colleagues, consultants, constructors and possibly others”2 • “Self-motivation tends to be an inherent characteristic of people in architecture firms and other professional organizations.”3 • “An effective team is much more than the sum of the individuals who populate it. One of the (project) manager’s challenges is to build the team – actually help team building itself – Page 8.1089.1 into an effective working group.”4Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2003, American
initiated for software development in a corporatelanguage literacy, and communication skills. With this setting. XP promotes a systematic and shared approachin mind, are there potential benefits to be derived from to generating computer code. With XP, programmersteamwork for novice programmers? Is it possible and is follow a code development structure and take onit easier to teach computer-based problem solving to predefined responsibilities to generate code as a team.new engineers by having them work in pairs? Pair programming adapts the XP approach to attain educational results and enhance the learning processRecent