), Impact Statement & Significance of Study*, Scope, etc.3. Literature Review---- Briefing of 3 or 4 of the most relevant previous projects;---- Summary of the major schools of thought---- Summary of problem and significance of problem*---- Author’s projected contribution(s) to this field of work4. Main Body under an appropriate heading and sub-headings.---- Heading will reflect and complement title of study---- Subheadings will reflect and follow SCOPE directions of introduction section.---- Theories, Concepts, Fundamentals, Rationale, Principles & Techniques that elucidate and guide study.5. Methodology---- Equipment Used---- Materials Used---- Procedure6. Results/Evidence---- Data Generated -à Tables & Graphs---- Narrative
the research process (Jolivette,2015). Surveys, interviews, and focus groups create great benefits for the institution and itsresearch team (in the forms of grant funding, tenure, and graduate degrees, among others) oftenwith little to no benefit for the subject community (which may or may not even receivecompensation). Fair financial compensation that matches or exceeds the per-hour wages of theresearchers is a way to strive for equal benefit for TGNC subject populations from a researchjustice perspective. Our participants were compensated at a comparable hourly rate as theresearchers in order to reflect the unparalleled value of the unique expertise that they brought tothe research project.Site-visitsThe site-visit activities were divided
teachersengaged in a pre-departure course, a four-week program in China, and a follow-up curriculumdesign and delivery activity. These researchers used the IDI to assess participants’ gains, as wellas other qualitative methods including ongoing reflections, and an assessment of the participants’curriculum design projects. Similar to Cushner and Chang (2015), He Lundgren and Pines(2017) did not see dramatic growth on the IDI, but did see some positive changes in theparticipants’ beliefs, insights, and teaching practices.Using a different assessment strategy, Oken, Jansen, Hoffman and Coelen (2022) foundinternational experience to have a significant positive impact on developing the interculturalcompetence of teachers. Finally, Charity Hudley, and
90% of the Hub's first-semester visitors were internationalstudents. They also reflect significant linguistic diversity, as 17% of the Hub's studentsreported they were comfortable speaking Chinese and 10% reported feelingcomfortable speaking Persian. Students also reported speaking Korean, Hindustani,Arabic, Greek, Urdu, and Bengali.Student visitors at the Hub represented every year of graduate study, with 30% in thefifth year of graduate study, 27% in the first year of graduate study, and 16% in thefourth year of graduate study. In terms of engineering departments, most (66%) camefrom computer science, but every engineering department (including chemicalengineering, biomedical engineering, electrical engineering, astronautical engineering
Falling Star, Comets, Asteroids, Meteorites 2000 Return to the Red Planet 2001 2001: An Edu-Space Odyssey 2002 Have Spacesuit Will Travel 2003 Exploring the Unknown 2004 Mars: Journey to the Red Planet 2005 Spinoffs: Bringing Space Down to Earth 2006 Return to the Moon 2007 Robotics and Space Exploration 2008 Space Travel: It’s Out of This World! 2009 Celestial Travelers 2010 Design a Mission to the Moon 2011 Earth’s Reflections: A View from Above 2012
be graded as low (less than -1 total factor score),moderate (between -1 and 1 total factor score), or high (more than 1 total factor score). The idealmodel level will be a reflection of how a model compares to other proposed ideas and keyconcepts.Coauthors collaborated in order to determine how particular models and model categories rate oneach scale. In addition, qualities emphasized by Atman, Haik, and other researchers1, 3, 5, 17 weretaken into consideration before rating a particular design model. Overall, particular ratings areobjectively based on experience.The evaluated models come from various engineering journals and books. These process modelsare often seen in engineering courses and have applications in a real world environment
need for increased STEM awareness, partly to increase interestin STEM majors & STEM careers, but also to develop an overall more technologically literatepopulace. Additionally, there is a concern that engineering should better reflect the nationalpopulation. Increasing diversity amongst engineering practitioners is important both from anequity perspective as well as a workforce development perspective (a more diverse populationmeans more diverse perspectives are represented, leading to innovation; also, to attract asufficient workforce we will need to attract women and underrepresented minorities). Researchsuggests that a majority of engineering undergraduates have a parent or another close familymember who is an engineer, and that this is
reflect upon their experiences throughout thesemester. The course met formally once per week. The main purpose of the meetings was tomake the students accountable for keeping up with their research, to discuss the journal articlesthat they were assigned, to provide opportunities for presenting their results, and interacting withtheir peers and the faculty supervisor. The following excerpt from the course syllabussummarizes the expectations for this research course: Laboratory notebook. The student will keep a notebook recording all his/her findings. This will be reviewed periodically by the faculty mentor to ensure that the essential data is properly recorded and organized so that it can be used to write the final report and poster
School Psychology Programs developed a task force to address issues with thepracticum.Practicums are common in a Master of Social Work program. Lee and Fortune (2013) conductedresearch on practicums in MSW programs in order to evaluate the importance of “thinking”activities in addition to “doing” activities. They concluded that student reflection is an importantpart of the learning process in a practicum, and that “school faculties can facilitate students’reflection by focusing on application of theories in practice situations” (p. 657).Several business programs require a practicum. At Stanford University, the Graduate School ofBusiness considers the practicum to be “a key element in the revamped program” for PublicManagement (Stanford
serve as a bridge between theoretical and practicalknowledge. 4 It is practical research that addresses an immediate, local need while providing Page 24.1130.2opportunities for deep reflection leading to individual professional growth. 5Although there are similarities, action research should not be confused with case study research.Typically, case study research involves an independent, outside observer studying a phenomenonin a naturally occurring environment, whereas an action research study includes a researcher whoactively participates in his or her own environment. For educators, this is often a classroom inwhich they teach. Action research
traditionallecture because students reflect about what they are doing after engaging in several learningactivities introduced in the classroom [1, 14, 16, 23-25]. In contrast, students in traditionallecture pedagogies receive information from the lecturer and their participation andengagement is minimal. As Smith, Sheppard [26] express: “students learn more whenintensely involved in educational process and are encouraged to apply their knowledge inmany situations” (p.87). According to Bonwell and Eison [22], the amount of informationretained by students declines considerably after ten minutes of listening, so traditionalinstructional strategies may not be effective, specially in engineering education. Also, thereflection promoted in active learning has been
-institutional.Our project starts with the notion that ethical and social responsibility (and here we includesafety, health, and environmental considerations, among others) is an integral part of the practiceof engineers and technologists. Shaping engineering education with this idea in mind is attentiveto the role of identity in what people do,30 and can serve to provide intellectual, conceptual, andnarrative resources to assist professionals as they navigate their work world. Engineering,similar to other professions, has a language,18 and that language frames how practitioners thinkof themselves and their work.27 As Korte notes in a 2013 study, “the developing professionalidentities of new engineers are reflected in the narratives they construct regarding
studies in learning, thinking, and reaction time2. Below, we summarize some ofthe relevant works on cognition relating to our research based on the extended summary ofcognition, value and decision-making research by Sprehn18.Earlier studies on cognition began in 1940s, where laboratory studies aimed at identifying groupsof people with significant differences in their cognitive processes. Some of the predominanttheories of this epoch are: 1) Perceptual versus Conceptual Groupers3, 2) Sharpeners andLevelers4, 3) Field Dependency/Independency5, and 4) Impulsive versus Reflective Thinkers6,7.We refer the readers to Kozhevnikov8 for an in depth review in this area. One salient criticism ofthese early theories, as voiced by Walker9, Kogan and Saarni10
/entrepreneur engineer characteristics important to each stage of the innovation process. 2. The characteristics or strengths of an engineer in one stage of the innovation process are not necessarily the same characteristics required in a different stage of the innovation process (Caldicott, 2013; Griffin, Price, & Vojak, 2012). This finding has implications for hiring, job placement/selection, team management, professional development and self-assessment of engineering professionals and their education and life-long learning.ConclusionsInsights into the critical characteristics of an innovative engineer will aid student and practicingengineers as well as engineering faculty in self-reflection, instruction and team
feedback onseparate subtasks, then we might indeed observe improvement in their ability to execute thedifferent subtasks.Thus, our goal is to sensibly designate the different subtasks or distinct skills that must bemastered to ultimately solve such problems. Of course, we also want the clarity of being able tocharacterize each attempt to use a skill as unambiguously correct or correct. We hope thefrequency at which those attempts are correct increases with practice. How then should wedivide up the overall task? Critical to that division is its granularity – how small are the actionsthat are deemed to reflect individual skills and how many different skills are recognized amongthe different actions of the same general type.To illustrate issues of
complex engineering problems.Apart from the core components highlighted above, there is also considerable ongoingexperimentation within the PMFC with other pedagogy-driven instructional elements. Theseinclude: Using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS)4-6 to categorize learning style preferences and tailor information delivery. The ILS is a relatively simple measure of how students prefer to receive information. The survey divides learning style preferences into four domains with opposing descriptors, visual-verbal, active-reflective, sensory-intuitive, and sequential-global. Using these domains, it has been established that students tend to prefer visual, active, and sensory modes, despite the fact
estimating, project management, and client coordination.The goal is to change the students’ role from a traditional reactionary model who listens tolectures and takes notes, to a subject matter expert. This new style of teaching has the studentstake the curriculum, research it, interface with the industry, utilize legal expertise, problem solvethe material and then teach the results to their peers. The new student transition increasedparticipation of other students and in their understanding of the topics being learned. Page 24.1248.5 Class FormatThe new class format reflected the students’ transformation
. It should be noted however, that at eachcompetition, the somewhat chaotic nature of the event, in which between 50 and 250 children,their siblings, class mates, parents and teachers were present within a single school facilitymeant that the observations did not provide any useful data other than a reflective narrativeaccount written by the researchers in which a number of relevant factors were recorded.The case-study ‘organisational’ fieldwork conducted in 2013 commenced with a documentanalysis of various internal documents, looking at coverage in terms of provision as well asexamining the initiative itself (in terms of tools used). Six in-depth semi-structured interviewswere then conducted with six members of staff responsible for
knowledge structure, although they are usually very objective30.As a result, objective tests may be unsuitable for assessing sustainability knowledge because theydo not allow students to reflect on the inherently broad content and interrelated structure ofsustainability. Open-ended assessment methods, such as essays and presentations, are usualalternatives to objective tests that disclose more about knowledge structure, but are oftenaccompanied by subjective scoring rubrics that are difficult to apply30. In addition, studentinability to produce acceptable artifacts (e.g. reports or posters) may be mistaken for lack ofknowledge in the domain30. Consequently, traditional open-ended assessments may beunfeasible for broad and accurate sustainability
satisfaction with the college experience than some othermajors, the source of that dissatisfaction does not appear to be reflected in a lack of involvementin extracurricular activities. In fact, undergraduate engineering majors are on par with othermajors in the amount of time spent on extracurricular activities. Extracurricular involvement caninclude a wide range of activities, which can have numerous academic and personal benefits (andsome drawbacks). However, little is known about the nature of extracurricular involvementspecifically among engineering and other STEM students, how it evolves year-to-year, and howit differs according to gender, ethnicity, and institutional culture. In this paper we analyze surveydata to examine STEM undergraduate
the capstone design experience that influence team and individual skilldevelopment include the use of collaborative project management tools, mentoring relationshipswith freshmen students in the Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Course, a checklist-basedapproach for creating an ongoing dialogue between the design teams and Industrial AdvisoryBoard project mentors, requirements to reflect on and evaluate decisions as a team, and asignificant emphasis on professional skills reinforced in an ongoing dialogue with teams andstudents. Page 23.1131.3Challenges to Developing Team Skills and Some Ideas for Overcoming ThemTeams and teamwork have
fluency, originality, and honingpositive critical thinking skills. This emphasis is reflected as the group creates a metric toevaluate their potential solutions.A specific case from undergraduate and graduate level engineering physics courses is describedto illustrate how the extensive work done in this arena in psychology, marketing, and businessenvironments can be applied to STEM education. Students were presented with the problem ofhow to measure the mass removed from a quarry. The classroom process is outlined and actualstudent results are presented to illustrate the method for other instructors who might be interestedin employing similar activities in a non-threatening, low-stakes learning environment.IntroductionIn the landmark report about
Bachelors-Level Manufacturing ProgramsThe four pillars model that emerged from the Curricula 2015 evaluation is an attempt to clarifythe boundaries of the manufacturing engineering discipline and to provide a “tool for promotinggreater understanding of the breadth and depth of the field of manufacturing engineering.”6 Itwas also meant to be descriptive, defining the body of manufacturing knowledge as reflected inABET’s manufacturing program accreditation criteria and SME’s manufacturing engineeringcertification criteria, to create a model useful for describing manufacturing education. Thecurrent version of the model was modified somewhat in format from the version described inCurricula 2015 report. The top level diagram (not including specific sub
measures ANOVA was used to determine anywithin-subject and between-groups effect by service, resulting in no significant (p<0.05) within-or between-groups interactions. Students in all three groups had similar changes in attitudes andperceptions over the course of the semester, reflecting the overall course patterns.Are female students differentially impacted by service-based projects?In an effort to understand the impacts of instructional practices in service-learning on femalestudents, we also analyzed our data set with respect to gender. Specifically, we compare thedifferences in self-reported technical and professional skills by female students between the threetreatment groups. Descriptive statistics were generated using a paired-samples t
into isolated STEM disciplines. A lookat STEM learning in elementary classrooms, however, reveals that the current implementationdoes not reflect the interconnectedness of the four STEM disciplines in the natural world3.However, providing high-quality STEM learning opportunities continues to be a challenge in theelementary classroom due to a number of factors. Increased demands on teachers, including highstakes testing in reading and math, are resulting in less time for science instruction in elementaryclassrooms8. These are not new challenges for elementary classrooms9, however the need forrecruiting a knowledgeable and diverse workforce in STEM fields requires that a differentapproach be taken2. Integration has been suggested as a way to
and testing physical models is a very effective tactic tomitigate design fixation. Tomorrow’s designers need to be trained to effectively build theirdesigns and to test them in order to be more effective innovators. Courses which emphasesexperimental design are critical.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation CMMI-1000954. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Green, G., and Kennedy, P.," Redefining engineering education: the reflective practice of product design engineering", International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 17
requirements.In addition to the Information Technology core requirements, students must complete a 3-credithour capstone course entitled, Integrated Technology Assessment (ITA), which involvesdevelopment and submission of E-portfolios. The Integrated Technology Assessment (ITA)process in Excelsior College’s BSIT Program provides students with an opportunity to create andmanage web-accessed electronic portfolios that document their knowledge, skills, andachievements from coursework, practical work experience, and other extracurricular activities.These portfolios support student reflection and provide a thoughtful accumulation of academicand non-academic work over a period of time.In order to continue to track the students’ progress after graduation
the end of both theFall 2011 and Spring 2012 semesters, for a total of two extensive interviews per participant.Cohort 2 participants have been similarly engaged in both check-in and extensive interviews.Cohort 2 participants engage in check-in interviews approximately once every two weeks tofacilitate their participation around their work schedules. They have also participated in twoextensive interviews, one in Winter 2011 and the other in early Summer 2012. More than 400check-in interviews and 75 extensive interviews have been conducted.Check-in Interviews The weekly or bi-weekly check-in interviews begin with very open-ended questionsintended to allow the participants to freely reflect on the previous one or two weeks and to
Paper ID #6903What makes an effective engineering diagram? A comparative study of novicesand expertsDr. Alisha A Waller, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Alisha A. Waller has been active within ASEE since 1991, serving the ERM Division in multiple capacities. She has won the Helen Plants Award three times and was awarded the Distinguished Service award in 1998. Her research interests include diversity, reflective learning, and multiple representations. Her teaching interests include optimization, probability, and statistics. She is currently affiliated with Biomedical Engineering Department at Georgia Tech.Prof
theuniversity is to serve the local population of the region in which it is located. 95% of students arecommuters [2], and over a third of the student body are transfer students, predominantly from thelarge network of community colleges serving the East side of Los Angeles. A very highHispanic-enrolling Minority Serving Institution (MSI), 70% of students identify atHispanic/Latinx [1], which is also consistent with the regional population.Student demographic characteristics at Cal State LA are also reflective of the systemicoppression broadly experienced by Communities of Color on the East side of Los Angeles. Themedian family income of students at Cal State LA is $40,300 per year [3], and 60% qualify forfederal Pell Grants [4]. While exact data is not