boundaries coincide with those of a country, it does make sense for engineering students to gain experiences with people who are participating in, responding to, and/or challenged by cultural perspectives that differ from their own, regardless of how these differences might map across or within countries.” (2006) With an acknowledged need for our engineering students to graduate with some level of global competency and awareness, the focus currently rests on how best to define, achieve, and measure this competence for our students. Several approaches are available and under study which provide opportunities for engineering students to develop global and multicultural skills. Some of these approaches incorporate experiences where to varying
teaching assistants. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference.[6] Verleger, Matthew and Velasquez, Juan. Training of teaching assistants on technology driven lessondevelopment. 2007 ASEE Annual Conference.[7] Prieto, Loreto R. and Altmaier, Elizabeth M. The relationship of prior training and previous teachingexperience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 35:4 (July 1994), pp.481–497.[8] Jenkins, Susan. Cultural and linguistic miscues: a case study of international teaching assistant and academicfaculty miscommunication. International J. of Intercultural Relations 24:4 (July 2000), pp. 477–501.[9] Branstetter, Steven A. and Handelsman, Mitchell M. Graduate Teaching Assistants: Ethical Training, Beliefs,and Practices
almost any IAB discussion of the topic but they have muchgreater impact if they can be delivered directly by the members to the student body.TaxonomyWriting is never easy. Promises that it gets better with practice offer little comfort to strugglingstudents. It is more useful to demonstrate the many factors that are involved. Each factor iseasily understood and with some effort it can be mastered. However, the combinations andinteractions make the overall composition process complex. Figure 3 shows a very simpletaxonomy in the form of three lists. The number and scope of the topics can be readily adjustedto suit the application but those shown have been found to be adequate for most technical writingat undergraduate level
for engineering students [15]. The goal of this project is to develop high-impact online lab teaching practices and to testtheir effectiveness of them. Accordingly, during the two long semesters in 2022, we tested ourinnovative online lab teaching strategies in the laboratory sessions with the following activelearning strategies in the laboratory sessions by a) developing and implementing open-endeddesign experiences into lab work, b) establishing teamwork in online labs, c) creating an onlinelearning community and to overcome isolation, and d) incorporating pre-lab simulations and pre-lab video demonstrations. These core lab learning strategies were applied in five EE courses:Circuits, Electronics I & II, Microcomputers, and
its various academic programs [2]. UCD lists five reasonsfor performing research by undergraduate students. According to UCD, these are: 1. Exploring career directions 2. Building transferable skills and enhancing resumes 3. Learning to publicly advocate for and defend work 4. Getting a leg up on graduate or professional school 5. Contributing knowledge and impacting the worldAlthough it has some obstacles and challenges, a paper in the 123rd annual ASEE conference inLouisiana in 2016 demonstrated that undergraduate research still has many benefits, as perceivedby the students themselves [3]. The paper was on the efficacy of undergraduate research basedon a survey of undergraduate students. The students’ most common
, 2000.[4] E. Seat, J. R. Parsons, and W. A. Poppen, “Enabling Engineering Performance Skills: A Program to Teach Communication, Leadership, and Teamwork*,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2001.[5] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, “Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Jan. 2006.[6] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning,” in Active Learning, vol. 970, 0 vols., American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 34–53.[7] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2003.[8] P. M. Boynton and T. Greenhalgh, “Selecting
for attracting talent to the IT field.What we can learn from them will be theoretically relevant to less elite educational groups.Work to date has progressed along several separate, but linked, directions—1) developing acomprehensive database, 2) designing, testing, and then conducting a telephone interviewprotocol, and 3) defining research questions and database queries.The first component was to develop a comprehensive and clean database that contains all theavailable institutional records on academic performance and individual demographics of thecohort of 5,783 Georgia Tech alumni who graduated from 1994-1997. This work was doneprimarily by staff in the Georgia Tech Office of Minority Educational Development (OMED). Inaddition, during the
traditionalIntroduction to Environmental Engineering class. The objectives of this Podcast-Enhanced Learning (PEL) research are to provide guidance for the creation of suchpodcasts, pedagogical evidence supporting best use of such podcasts within a universitycourse setting, and student assessment of such efforts.The enhanced-podcast creation process is a multi-step workflow. Major steps includemedia design, sound, video, and post-production. Free software tools were used in theproduction of the podcast episodes. Podcast design guidance will be shared in the paper,as will typical workflow resource requirements.In the Introduction to Environmental Engineering class the enhanced-podcast wasintegrated into the class in three distinct methods for evaluation purposes
, providing insight into the best practices from anindustry and/or collegiate perspective. For example, the University of Hartford’s Ward College ofTechnology and New Horizons described the importance of identifying industry-specific needs,developing an appropriate plan, establishing a mutual agreement, and assessing the model in orderto make continuous improvement to the partnership and project 1 . This process created a projectthat could make mutually beneficial progress. In another example, Gannon University’s graduateprogram incorporates the academic program with application-based training of key real-worldindustry problems 2 . In explaining their success, the authors describe communication as the key tosuccess, and an annual review meeting
detract from student success and motivation. This information canbe used in practice for enhancing programmatic planning and design as well as potentiallydeveloping novel program components that contribute to students becoming more self-determined,motivated engineers. It is my hope that one day in the near future, engineering education faculty,administrators, and leaders will cultivate and measure success based on a more comprehensiveassessment of lived experiences. Additionally, this research is intended to help leaders betterrecognize how their decisions regarding programmatic structures impact students’ experiences andsuccess.Introduction and Literature OverviewInequalities are deeply rooted in the U.S. education system. Students from
Paper ID #33847CAREER: Learning from Students’ Identity Trajectories to ActualizeLatent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clem- son University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
. Page 6.1002.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationThe ETW experience made such a dramatic impact on the team’s teaching performance3 thatthey felt motivated to pass along these hints for successful teaching. The teaching hints, whichcan be categorized into four areas: organization, preparation, practice, and rapport, weredeveloped after review of the journals kept by each team member during the workshop and thediscussions of common experiences at their respective universities during the year followingETW. The journals not only stimulated reflection by each member (material, methodology
NASA.Andrew Azman, University of Colorado-Boulder Andrew Azman is a recent graduate of the University of Colorado at Boulder in Civil Engineering. Andrew developed and implemented the first use of biodiesel on the CU-Boulder campus, which has grown into widespread use of the fuel throughout the city. Andrew was the project manager for the Engineers Without Borders-USA CU-Boulder Chapter Peru project, developing a sustainable water infrastructure for a remote rural village. Andrew currently works as a water resource engineer for Cahill Associates designing sustainable low impact stormwater management solutions.Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado-Boulder Robyn Sandekian is Associate Director
Paper ID #36574WIP: Using Machine Learning to Automate Coding ofStudent Explanations to Challenging Mechanics ConceptQuestionsHarpreet Auby Harpreet Auby is a STEM Education MS and Chemical Engineering PhD student at Tufts University. He is a graduate research assistant working with Dr. Milo Koretsky within the Institute for Research on Learning and Instruction (IRLI). Harpreet received his BS in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current work focuses on machine learning applications in educational research and evaluation, learning assistants, and uptake
he was full professor at the Instituto Polit´ecnico Nacional, within the Applied Science and Advanced Technol- ogy Research Center (CICATA) in Queretaro, Mexico. He was part of Mexico’s National Researchers System in the period 2007-2021 at Level I. He was awarded the Prize for Best Research at IPN 2010 in the category of young researcher. He has more than 35 technical publications in academic journals, and has participated in academic and technological forums related to nuclear energy and applies physics, both in Mexico and abroad. Since August 2021 he is associate teaching professor at the Ken and Mary Alice Lindquist Department of Nuclear Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University
testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential
thousand employees worldwide. The participants were invited by receivingan email attached with a recruitment flyer and personal connections of two researchers in theteam, who were graduate students at the Department of Aerospace Engineering. Thequalifications to be interviewed were 1) having an engineering undergraduate degree, 2)being employed in an A&D organization since graduation, 3) having less than two years of 5full-time work experience. All the participants have been compensated with a gift card worth99.99 dollars from a shopping website. For the sake of confidentiality and privacy protection,all participants will be referenced using
. Third, they have aninherent ambiguity that requires a deliberation of alternative solutions, allowing students to usetheir moral imaginations. And finally, they offer rich possibilities for analysis, critical thinking,and problem-solving, essential skills required of engineers.This paper focuses on using cases in the classroom, including a brief background, tips, and awalk-through of a major engineering case, the Challenger disaster. Specific details regardingChallenger are provided as a research shortcut for instructors.Background of Case MethodologyWhile use of cases date to the peripatetic teachers of antiquity, modern usage begins withChristopher Columbus Langdell, dean of Harvard Law School from 1870-1895. A firm believerthat the then
Research (SOAR) Center as Senior Project Specialist evaluating and assessing the impact of educational outreach programs and other education-related projects.Dr. Melissa J. Guynn, New Mexico State University I am a cognitive psychologist with a primary research interest in human memory.Dr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State University As past Writing Program Administrator and current Interdisciplinary Studies Department Head, I have worked closely with academic departments interested in supporting the writing, communication, and aca- demic abilities of students. For many years, I worked with Integrated Learning Communities for at-risk, entry-level engineering majors, overseeing development and use of a curriculum adapted
, but at the general education curriculum as a whole and the multi-dimensional opportunities it affords to students in meeting the career and life goals that they, aswell as other stakeholders – faculty, future employers, etc.– deem important. The AmericanAssociation for Higher Education espouses similar best practices for assessing student learning,including involvement of “representatives from across the educational community,” and the useof approaches that “reveal change, growth and increasing degrees of integration,” by focusing onexperiences that lead to the expressed learning outcomes. As will be seen later, our design forassessment draws heavily on these principles.Another fundamental change made to the general education program at Penn
semester, enrollment requests have often exceededclass capacity limits. Feedback from recent graduates speaks to the courses’ benefits both inwork experiences and in everyday life. “This is a ‘must-take’ course for engineering students.”“By far, after 4 years at (another Ivy university) and 3 at Penn, the best, most interesting anduseful class I have ever had.” “This is a demanding course, but well worth it.” “Hands down,the best class I’ve ever taken. I will refer back to it for the rest of my life.” Page 8.499.8 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
Charlotte. She was the first woman PhD graduate from the Lee College of Engineering, with a research emphasis in microelectronic devices and solid state materials. She has served in numerous mentoring and educational roles for undergraduates, high school and middle school students. Page 11.1177.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Summer Camps in Engineering Technology: Lessons LearnedAbstractThere is mounting evidence that a nationwide shortage of qualified high-tech workers willjeopardize the economic future of the United States. It is also well established that a moreproactive approach must be
internship with U.S. Steel, he was a Graduate Assistant with Youngstown State University. In 2006, he was a Research Assistant with the Embedded Control Systems Research Lab- oratory, Cleveland State University, engaged in heuristic numerical optimization techniques. In 2008, he interned with the Digital Engineering Team, Philips Healthcare. In 2011, he worked on the the develop- ment of tracking algorithms for civilian aircraft as a Staff Engineer for ARCON in Waltham, MA, USA. In 2014, Dr. Ergezer joined the Research and Advanced Development signal processing team for Bose Corp. In 2017, he became an Assistant Professor for the Department of Computer Science and Networking at Wentworth Institute of Technology. Dr
Paper ID #36864Student experiences with the online learning environmentduring COVIDMaartje E. D. Van Den Bogaard (Research Fellow) Maartje Van den Bogaard holds a MSc. in Education Science from the University of Groningen and a Ph.D. from TU Delft, both in the Netherlands. She studied student success using linear and complex models and was awarded the Outstanding Dissertation Award by the International Society for Educational Planning. Maartje worked as a senior consultant in curriculum and instruction at Leiden University and served as head of program at the TU Delft STEM Education and Communication graduate
used in early education settings, it canbe applied to higher education for complex subjects that are being taught for the first time,particularly in the form of peer-scaffolding.A study on scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments, “Bridging Research andTheory with Practice,” explores the possible effects of student learning development “incollaboration with ‘more able peers’.” While it is apparent that peer-assistants are potentiallyvaluable to the cost-effectiveness and quality of education for their classmates and instructors,there is still limited data on the personal and individual effects on such peer assistants. One studytouches on some of the personal gains of a peer learning assistant stating, “The cognitiveprocesses
in terms of providing classes for 150200 students at a time, not 2050. There is also the issue of faculty skills. With tenure as a practice, the change in skill mix is very slow. Thirty year careers are very common, so only onethirtieth of the resident skills has the possibility of change every year. While practitioners and adjuncts help accelerate this process, in the long run those individuals are not permanent fixtures in the program. The second is that ASCE’s BOK2 “demands” are only one of a larger set of “demands” that current programs face. An example is preparation for graduate school, teaching students how to do scholarly research, about which the BOK2 is silent. Naturally, the BOK2 addresses
effectively" Outcome h: "the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context" Outcome i: "a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning" Outcome j: "a knowledge of contemporary issues" Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University Copyright © 2009, American Society for Engineering Education Outcome k: "an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice"Since these skills are important in the university setting, these are the
helping companies attract innovators.Carolyn Breden Voter, University of Wisconsin-Madison Carolyn Voter is a Ph.D. candidate in Civil and Environmental Engineering at University of Wisconsin- Madison where she focuses on urban hydroecology as part of the Hydroecology Lab with Dr. Steven P. Loheide II. She also currently serves as the project assistant for Water@UW-Madison, an umbrella organization which connects water scholars on the UW-Madison campus and beyond. As a certified instructor for the Software Carpentry Foundation, Voter regularly teaches scientists and engineers best practices for scientific computing by live-coding in a two-day, learner-centered workshop. She completed her Delta Certificate in Teaching
eight prominent and diverse southeastern colleges ofengineering with a shared vision of creating sustainable engineering education reform havingnational impact. This vision was articulated through the definition of a curriculum model based onthe desired attributes of engineering graduates. It was desired that the graduates of thiscurriculum be technically competent, critical and creative thinkers, life-long learners, effectivecommunicators, team players, and globally aware. They should understand process and systemsdesign and integration, display high ethical standards, and appreciate the social context ofengineering and industry business practices. The curriculum model was designed to develop thesequalities through changes in the curriculum
efficient in learning. All together with using active learning, instructors mustalso consider the ‘Student Resistance to Active Learning’ which remains a new area of interest forengineering education research [12]. ‘Student Resistance to Active Learning’ may be reduced byemploying the strategies proposed in literature such as varying the teaching methods usedthroughout the course and making and using a public grading rubric for students to avoidperception of grading unfairness, just to mention few [13-14]. Although, this paper focused on thedifferences in student expectations on the efficacy of instructional practices, the impact of thosechanges on the learning outcomes is yet to be determined and is the focus of our future work.References[1