not well defined; embrace innovation and entrepreneurship; evaluate ideas using both qualitative and quantitative analysis tools; implement potential solutions using a variety of advanced prototyping techniques; have both a global perspective and an eye for detail; and lead when leadership is called for. Inworks MHCDI students complete a minimum of 23 credit hours, essentially completingthe certificate, plus two additional courses in a focus area of their choice and a capstoneexperience. MHCDI students must choose between two capstone options. The first is a moretraditional team-based semester-long project. In the second option, teams of students envisionand create a
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on
new engineering education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up
understand theinfluences of positions and other critical factors and their interaction effects. Due to the variedapplication of RFID, the authors have incorporated the experimental set up in undergraduate,Senior Project capstone course with team members drawn from both Mechanical andMechatronics Engineering technology.IntroductionRadio frequency identification (RFID) is a broad term that is used to describe a system thattransmits the identity (in the form of a unique serial number) of an object wirelessly, using radiowaves and categorized as an automatic identification technology. RFID is designed to enablereaders to capture to capture data on tags and transmit it to a computer system- without needing aperson to be involved. The different components
laboratory course will be shared. Inaddition, the students’ perspectives of writing transfer from FYC to the introductory engineeringlaboratory course will be discussed.1. IntroductionIn spite of the emphasis engineering practitioners place on communication, surveys of employersand alumni continue to show low satisfaction with the writing preparation engineering studentsreceive1,2. Often, students in the engineering program express enjoying hands-on activities, suchas engineering labs or capstone projects; however, they dislike writing lab reports or projectreports. Many studies report that engineering students struggle with writing in engineeringprograms. There are ongoing research efforts addressing the need for efficient writing skills.Conrad et
of 63 universities from 12 countries) to advance to the international University Rover Challenge being held June 2- 4, 2016 in Utah. As of 2016, all of the WSU BSME programs senior capstone design projects are 100% sponsored by industry partners such as Boeing. A WSU Everett chapter of Society of Women Engineers was founded in 2015 to promote, provide, and enhance the educational and professional opportunities for female students.Enrollment TrendsInitial student recruitment for the BSME program’s fall 2012 cohort started in January 2012 witha significant headwind. By this time, most students who were on track to complete theirprerequisite coursework for a fall 2012 transfer already had their minds
subscribed within days ofannouncement. Both programs are non-credit and are offered at no-cost to participating students. The facility is now an integral component within the engineering curriculum with studentinvolvement spanning the new Engineering 100 course to senior Capstone Design projects andnew student business start-ups. As with many new initiatives, the Aggie Innovation Space faceda particular challenge in overcoming unintended consequences that resulted from engagement inthe space, particularly the overuse by classes and occasional misuse by students. In an effort tobroaden student participation in the realm of innovation and entrepreneurship within a productdevelopment course, the instructor had the class meet in the space during
engineering programs among UUMs, ranging from49% for Females to 62% among African Americans.2-4Many strategies are currently being employed to reduce this disparity. These efforts include first-year seminars, internships, learning communities, and capstone projects.2, 5 Study abroad,however, has not been seriously considered as a high impact retention activity. The researchshows that UUMs struggle in mathematics and science intensive programs such as engineering,not simply because of academic under-preparation per se, but more importantly, due to feelingsof not belonging and lack of confidence in their ability to learn coupled with low self-efficacyand self-direction.6-8 In fact, the common theme among successful high impact retentionstrategies is
Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2800 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Dr. Lydia Ross is a clinical assistant professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–91, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1361332052000341006.[5] S. Howe, S. College, and D. Kotys-Schwartz, “Research Methods for the Capstone to Work (C2W) Project”.[6] S. Sin, “Considerations of Quality in Phenomenographic Research,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2010.[7] Appalachian Regional Commission 2022 Performance & Accountability Report, 2022,https://www.arc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FY-2022-Performance-and- Accountability-Report.pdf[8] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G., “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest
final project. Although we have yet not performed formal assessment measuring howmuch students re-use their work in our capstone course, anecdotal evidence suggests that ourjunior and senior Clinic students have increased their skills and familiarity in the selection anduse of sensors, and in acquiring data using PC-based DAQ systems. The custom data logger ismore representative of data acquisition systems that are used in Clinic (and industry), and modelcalibration using multiple channels of experimental data is a common task in our capstonecourse. Regarding Warren’s observation that students did not necessarily use time outside of labto build and test, our structure of E80 was designed such that students felt restricted from doing alot of
that our perceptions of reality are socially constructed andthat by focusing on positive stories and experiences, particularly from people whose identitiesare marginalized, we can create a more positive reality in work and learning environments [4].Despite its prominence for over two decades, it is unknown to what extent APPI has been used inengineering education research. Further, there is limited to no evidence of utilizing APPI as aneducational intervention.1.1. APPI as a Research Methodology vs InterventionAs a part of an early-stage research project on evaluating the impact of asset-based practices inundergraduate engineering courses, we employed appreciative interviewing to elicit studentexperiences in applying their assets to projects
orIndignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics, 2, 2010 .229-277.60. Scherer, and Ekman, Approaches to Emotion, 1984.61. Schön D.A. “The Reflective Practitioner – How Professionals Think in Action,” AldershotAshgate Publishing Ltd., 1991.62. Taajamaa,V. M. Eskandari, B. Karanian, A. Airola, T. Pahikkala, T. Salakoski, “O-CDIO: Emphasizing Design thinking in CDIO engineering cycle”, IJEE, June 2016 (Accepted forprint).63. Taajamaa V. et al. Interdisciplinary Capstone Project, 41th SEFI Conference, Leuven, Belgium,2013.64. Taajamaa, V. et al. “Dancing with Ambiguity – Design Thinking in Interdisciplinary EngineeringEducation,” Design Thinking conference, Shenzhen, China, 2013.65. Trott, P. “Innovation Management and New Product Development”, FT Prentice
makerspaces (aswell as academic makerspaces), has been previously reviewed and documented.1,2,3The rapid growth of makerspaces within higher education is significant. While originating inengineering programs, often as extensions of the infrastructure needed to support open-ended problemsolving in keystone and capstone courses, higher education makerspaces are also being created tosupport student learning in other disciplines.4 The concept of learning by creating in the physical anddigital space has also been adopted by liberal arts programs to promote critical and innovative thinking.5In a related development, the American Library Association identified makerspaces as an importanttrend in the evolution of libraries, including university libraries, as
-controlled Unit Operations experiments, and incorporating Design throughout the Chemical Engineering curricu- lum. She currently works as a freelance Engineering Education Consultant and Chemical Engineer. She is the Project Manager for NSF grant #1623105, IUSE/PFE:RED: FACETS: Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transforming Society, for which she is advising and coordinating assessment.Dr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From
revolutionize materials engineering industries. New interdisciplinary courses are needed, and students should be given an opportunity to work on a capstone project or final year dissertation thesis specifically in the area of materials and AI/machine learning. In fact, whenever possible, collaboration with a computing department or a computing school should be pursued. Such collaboration will enrich students’ experience and expand the selection of courses students can read in order to specialise and be competent in this niche field. 4.2.2 Materials and Sustainability Materials sustainability is cited as one of the emerging trends in materials engineering industry through our stakeholders’ analysis. It is rightfully so as
experts within the fields on their assessment of scenarios andethical problems. The students notably disagreed with the trained experts in half of theidentified scenarios. The disagreement between students and experts possibly shows thatfurther exposure to real-world scenarios may be needed in engineering ethics courses. Thesekinds of disagreement may have implications for algorithm bias instruction as well becausestudents are not trained to respond to cases of systemic bias but may be responding to scenariosfrom an individual perspective.A paper by Bowers, Maccarone, & Ricco [7] discussed their experiences integrating ethical,legal and societal issues within a senior design computing capstone program. The courseintegrated consideration of an
,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected domains, is extremely desirable and beneficial. Today, with theengineering profession undergoing dramatic changes on many fronts - there is realneed for faculty and students, to become involved with practical problems and toshare in providing solutions. We owe it to our students to prepare them to meet thechallenges ahead by focusing on real issues derived from tangible situations. Thesurest road to having a working college-industry relation is to come to a mutualunderstanding that both parties would gain from such a relationship.The discussion noted above may
in equipping our students with the “tools of the trade” thenwe need to alert our graduate students( the future engineering teachers) to the need ofdeveloping proper and enduring connections with industries in their locale, andeventually have a mutually beneficial relations with the industrial sector; not so muchto supplement their income; but, principally, to be able to reach the broader goal, i.e.,to gain valuable experience and be truly involved in real engineering.iii) Third, reaching out to the industrial sector and engineering services in the Region,and striving to form symbiotic partnerships between local industry and academiathrough: capstone projects, theses work with practical overtones, and applied researchprojects in selected
) describes fourexample projects that were designed to aid in the development of creativity in engineeringstudents along with suggested ways to assess creativity, all of which are rooted in creativityresearch.[6] Related to creativity, it appears that much more work is necessary. Sola, et. al.(2017) found that “freshman engineering students were significantly more creative than seniorengineering students … [and] senior engineering students were found to be no better at criticalthinking than their freshman counterparts.”[7]Another example of studying the development of a specific skill is provided by Paretti (2008)who provides suggestions of ways that instructors can assist the development of communicationskills, specifically within capstone design
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
can build self-efficacy directly and encourage moremastery experiences.Contextual examples of each of Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy in undergraduateengineering education: first, mastery experiences could consist of completing practice problemsto master theory, engaging in project work and hands-on activities to build engineering skills,and successfully working in teams and giving technical presentations. Second, role models whoshare a similar identity in populations of upper year students, alumni, outside speakers, or facultymay provide vicarious experiences. Third, classmates, teaching assistant, professors, mentors,friends and family may all provide social persuasion, and fourth, an individual's’ personal orextra-curricular
otherengineering disciplines.IntroductionEngineers must gain the ability to communicate and collaborate across disciplines in addition togaining a deep technical disciplinary knowledge. This is increasingly true in modern society inwhich scientists and engineers must address complex, interdisciplinary challenges on a globalscale. While current efforts at teaching interdisciplinary problem-solving at the collegiate-level(e.g., class projects, capstone courses) exist, the effectiveness of many of these approaches areineffective in achieving interdisciplinary learning objectives. Richter and Paretti (2009)identified two main learning barriers to common interdisciplinary approaches: (1) students areunable to identify the relationship between their own
and laterbecome motivated by the good in the world that can result from application of engineering.One of the alumni, Karl, traveled to Nicaragua as part of a senior research project, which hadgrown out of an international service-project in his senior capstone design course inenvironmental engineering. He noted: …poverty, it's one thing to know about it, it's one thing to study about it, … but it's a whole other thing when you are immersed in it and then... if you take it a step further and think how can I help these people, other than just be in poverty and experiencing that...just for me it was an eye-opener… And so I just realized, ...I wanna go this path.... There's a lot more need for a guy doing water and sanitation work than
), engineering education has seen a shift to the importance of design andproblem solving. The approach has been to educate by specific engineering field [24].Largely, students have relied on internships and coop programs to gain experience in the field.Capstone design projects with external clients are also common in engineering curricula,providing students opportunities to work on real problems with external clients. It is verycommon for students to reflect on these experiences highlighting a greater sense of clarity aboutengineering and its application. Indeed, when asked about their favorite or most impactfulexperience at the time of graduation, it is common that students highlight internship, coop andcapstone design experiences. Outside of capstone
realized how time intensive and expensivethe test would be. She decided to adjust her proposed method of analysis to the readily accessibleHACH Method. She put together the list of materials for testing and ordered it. Not longafterward, she realized she had ordered double what she needed. Luckily, with the help of facultyhere in the department, that mistake turned into an advantage for Melissa and three other studentsto use that extra testing material for capstone projects. She went through lab safety training, andprepared herself for experiments to be completed in the lab. For the first three lab meetings, hermentor was doing the experiments with her; after these supervised experiments, she felt ready toconduct the following procedures
Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a
titlesincluding “Requirements Engineering and Specification”, “Full Stack Development 1: SoftwareRequirements Analysis”, “Software and Safety Requirements Engineering”, and “RequirementsElicitation, Modeling, and Analysis”, many of the other programs embedded requirements concepts intoother courses. This may have been a project-based course or a general introduction to softwareengineering with a more substantial focus on requirements. In all but one case, requirements wereclearly mentioned in one or more courses as a topic outside of the capstone design experience.However, the security area is somewhat concerning. In reviewing the course descriptions, 49% ofprograms clearly required a course which focused on security. Course titles, seemed to be
paired F/T-LEARN cohort (FTIC students only for F-LEARN comparisongroup, transfer students only for T-LEARN comparison group); 2) first academic term ofenrollment is similar to the paired F/T-LEARN cohort; 3) declared as STEM in their first term(see Appendix A for a list of CIP codes that map to STEM majors for this project); 4) have notparticipated in another Living-Learning Community or other Enriching Learning Experience(e.g. honors in the major, National Merit Scholars, mentoring programs, etc.); and 5) have acumulative GPA similar to the F/T-LEARN cohort (high school GPA for FTIC; previousinstitution GPA for transfer students), which was done by computing the minimum andmaximum high school GPA or previous institution GPA for the F/T-LEARN
. She works with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and grad- uate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Brock E. Barry PE, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is an Associate Professor and Mechanics Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United