,we decided to modify it in a manner that allows more room for an active-learning experience.Baumgartner [4] recommended a laboratory-alternating approach that allowed for more frequentexposure to high-level concepts. This model was deemed most useful where the linkage betweenunderlying theories and practical applications must be taught linearly, in other words, the conceptscontinuously build upon each other [4]. The original model consists of a cycle of mini-lectures andmini laboratory tasks. We decided to modify this model with in-class exercises replacing the labtasks and, instead, having a singular, independent laboratory session. 5Flipped
-person vs. remote) influenced science identity development.In what ways does participation in regular research group meetings impact science identitydevelopment?The weekly pulse survey focused on the REU students’ perceptions of identity related to theirparticipation in research group meetings. While regular research group meetings were a regularfeature of all the REU host laboratories, two remote REU students (Kiara and Saanvi) did notparticipate in these research meetings. Kiara was a unique case as she participated remotely fromKorea and the time difference precluded her participation. In both cases, the REU students metweekly with their PI and mentor rather than engaging with the full research group. Table 3 sharesthe results of the weekly
, the onlineassessments of content knowledge resulted in average scores of 74% (at NAU) and 89% (at ASU)on the 11-question assignment, thereby signifying good individual knowledge of the content.Additionally, students’ perceptions of the activities were captured, and revealed that studentsfound the activity interesting, engaging, and useful in promoting their learning of particles in theair. From a pedagogical perspective, this collaborative project was able to fuse traditionalclassroom-based basic teaching and learning of concepts with an applications-based activity in airquality engineering courses that are not set up as laboratory courses. The techniques that arediscussed in this paper are ones that can be translated to other courses
individuals with a broad range of abilities. IncorporatingUD, disability, and accessibility concepts into engineering courses is important in order toprepare tomorrow’s engineers to take into consideration the needs of a diverse set of users.Additionally, including these topics can serve to increase the participation of students withdisabilities and other underrepresented groups in the engineering classroom [2].The importance of preparing students to engage in UD and consider accessibility in their designwork is gaining recognition. Efforts to incorporate UD into engineering education includeengineering design and laboratory projects [3,4]. Many engineering programs offer designcourses focused on assistive technology, providing a clear opportunity
Paper ID #37426Evolution of an invention education summer camp as abridge from high school to college STEM (Evaluation)Gerald W. Recktenwald (Associate Professor) Gerry Recktenwald is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Portland State. His research interests are heat transfer, fluid mechanics and numerical analysis applied to building energy, hypothermia, solar power production and cooling of electronics. In addition to technical areas he does research on active-learning, problem-based learning, and laboratory-based pedagogy in engineering education. Gerry is the director of the
laboratory increased due to the need for change invarious aspects of teaching and learning. This enabled a greater engagement of the academiccommunity with the Teaching and Learning Center, enabling other departments to understandthe relevance of the center. In addition to providing consultancy, advice, and holdingworkshops, the center uses scientific methodology to prove that the methods work. In thisway, in addition to supporting the university community, they generate scientific knowledge.This developed knowledge is essential to convey confidence. For instance, research only withindustrial engineering and operations management students could be conducted by this centerto generate insights that can improve the teaching and learning for this
challenges, they were organized into four topical areas: 1. The Iron Cross (IC), one challenge; 2. The Virtual Biomechanics Laboratory (VBL), three challenges; 3. Jumping Jack (JJ), three challenges; and 4. The Knee, one challenge.The same instruction and testing methodology was used for each of these topical areas. First,some general background lectures on the topic were given using Powerpoint slide showsprepared by the first author. The students then took a pre-test and completed an affect survey Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
GraduateResearch Fellowship (DGE-133486). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. F. Grandt Jr., Fundamentals of structural integrity: Damage tolerant design and nondestructive evaluation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2004.[2] M. Usmen, J. Raad, and H. Aktan, “A laboratory for non-destructive evaluation of civil structures,” in 1997 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 1997, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.18260/1-2--6661.[3] G. Ellis, “Grand challenges for engineering,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, p. 3, 2009, doi: 10.1109/EMR
focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
impact a students’ perceived importance of teamwork skills in design.Students who perceived Engineering Track Core Courses were important during SD1, onaverage, perceived using machine shop tools skills as more important. Engineering Track CoreCourses offer students the chance to concentrate on a specific area of mechanical engineering. Inthe mechanical engineering curriculum from this study, one of the concentrations available tostudents has a laboratory component that requires students to become familiar with usingmachine shop tools. Additionally, other concentrations in the mechanical engineering curriculumalso have a laboratory component that requires students to work with machinery. However, 8 outof the ten skills tested did not yield a
a survey of the use of the flipped class to prepare for teachingclinical skills laboratory. The main benefits reported were positive changes in student behavior,including preparation and better use of time during labs by both the students and instructors.Although they focus on a non-engineering discipline, the classes use a hands-on lab. As such, thestudies’ conclusions may be pertinent for engineering disciplines with similar lab requirements.Vielma et al.[7] performed a study of best practices during COVID-19 stay-at-home instructionsand found that students’ preference is towards a flipped classroom model. Based on the feedbackfrom the students taking lab classes, Lee et al.[8] propose several methods for conducting labs inFall 2020. One
applications Multiple robot applications in agricultureThe course supporting the VIP Program is an elective with 2 credit points (80 hours). Thelectures and instructions, as well as prototyping, are organized within the premises of the RTUDesign Factory. Experiments and fieldwork are conducted at the laboratories associated with theadvisors of each project team.Unique to this Program: The program in Riga is organized with the support of RTU DesignFactory, which provides knowledge in engineering design, skills in technology prototyping, andavailability of equipment. The mentorship support is also provided to the professors to guide(when needed) students’ work.As the program has just started there are only a few general observations we can make so
,Engineering Disasters, and Technology, Society, and Values). The Civil Engineering departmentat Oregon Tech has a strong laboratory component in its curriculum with a majority ofprogrammatic courses including a laboratory. Given the motivations of these two departmentsand mutual interest of the project faculty in bridges, and Conde B. McCullough (Figure 1) inparticular, the faculty identified the potential for a field course to tour important Oregon bridges.Emphasizing those constructed to complete the Oregon coast highway, the course brings thehistory of these bridges together with their design and construction details. Changes in bridgedesign practice were discussed as an analog to the development of civil engineering moregenerally. Figure
Worcester Polytechnic Institute in 2003, and her master of science degree from the University of Michigan in 2007. Both of her degrees are in electrical engineering. She is currently pursuing a PhD in electrical engineering at the University of Michigan’s Solid State Electronics Laboratory. Emine is currently serving as a mentor in the EGSM program. Page 13.998.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Preparing Graduate Students to be Successful as Teaching Mentors and as Future ProfessionalsAbstractGraduate student instructors (GSIs) – or teaching assistants – are a
twenty years. The goal for ESP is to prepare high school students for collegestudy in the field of engineering and science, and to attract these students to the UW-Madison.The program targets students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds including AfricanAmerican, Latino, Native American, Cambodian, Laotian, Hmong or Vietnamese. We alsoselect female students who would be first generation college students.The students are exposed to basic foundational courses that are fundamental to the engineeringdiscipline: pre-calculus or calculus depending on the background of the student, physics,chemistry, computer science, and technical writing. Students are exposed to various engineeringfields through short discipline specific laboratories and
workshops on vi- sualization including: XSEDE14 plenary address (featured in HPC Wire online magazine), and an invited presentation at The Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Dr. Byrd works with XSEDE to provide on campus training on scientific visualization. She was the Principal Investigator for the highly competitive NSF VisREU Site: Research Experience for Undergraduates in Collaborative Data Visualiza- tion Applications for 2014/2015 at Clemson University. Dr. Byrd continues to mentor VisREU research fellows as well as students at Purdue University. Dr. Byrd received her graduate and undergraduate de- grees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, in Birmingham, Alabama which include: Ph.D. in
, whose background is in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design, teaches a Fundamentals ofProduct Design Engineering Laboratory course at Ohio State University in the Department of Mechanical& Aerospace Engineering. The course student body is primarily made up of senior- and graduate-levelstudents who are studying in Mechanical Engineering or Industrial & Systems Engineering, howeverstudents from other various engineering majors also enroll in the course. Enrollment in this course hashistorically been around 100 students each semester. As many readers will know, Ohio State University isa large, public, institution in Columbus, Ohio. OSU’s Department of Mechanical & AerospaceEngineering is a large department within a large school
] cites undergraduate research opportunitiesas a way to engage students from traditionally marginalized populations in STEM. Theseopportunities for students from traditionally underrepresented populations positively impact theirinterest in STEM, exposure to research, career aspirations, STEM identity and self-efficacy.Research experiences and other experiential learning formats are effective means for encouragingpersistence of underrepresented groups in STEM fields.Supporting students with disabilities in research and experiential learning activities is especiallychallenging. These experiences are generally unstructured and multi-faceted. Standardaccommodations made for students in a traditional classroom or teaching laboratory [8] –modifications
alligator clips to make free-form circuits because it was believed this would help the students visualize the circuits and also because of the lower cost. Breadboards were used in the laboratories, and it was observed that students had difficulty visualizing the physical connections in the
successfully completed that process. All three engineering programsproduced their first graduates in spring 2016, were reviewed for ABET EAC accreditation in the2016-17 review cycle, and received ABET EAC accreditation late summer 2017, retroactive toOctober 2015, so graduates from the programs’ first two years have ABET accredited degrees.While this transition was clearly a chance for us to improve the opportunities for program gradu-ates, one of the major concerns for everyone involved was the maintenance of the experientiallearning and significant laboratory components that had been hallmarks of the engineering tech-nology programs and one of the major reasons behind the success of engineering technology pro-gram graduates.We wanted to share our
Paper ID #29097A Partnership Model for Integrating Technical Communication Habitsthroughout Undergraduate Engineering CoursesDr. Kristine Horvat, University of New Haven Dr. Kristine Horvat earned a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical and Molecular Engineering and a Masters & PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from Stony Brook University. While in graduate school, she performed research at Brookhaven National Laboratory to investigate gas hydrates as an alternative energy source. Currently, Dr. Horvat is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of New Haven, where she teaches laboratory
design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 100 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4 million of research grants.Dr. Kristin L. Wood, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) Dr. Kristin L. Wood is currently a Professor and Head of Pillar, Engineering and Product Development (EPD), and Co-Director of the SUTD-MIT International Design Center (IDC) at the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Dr. Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Division of Engineering and Applied Science at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D
Paper ID #21119Automated Formation of Peer-learning Cohorts Using Computer-based As-sessment Data: A Double-blind Study within a Software Engineering CourseDr. Ronald F. DeMara P.E., University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Central Florida where he has been a faculty member since 1992. His educational research interests focus on classroom and laboratory instructional technology, and the digitization of STEM assessments. He has completed roughly 225 technical and educational publications, 43 funded projects as PI/Co-PI, and es- tablished two
across thecountry. The project also addresses the need for CRTCs and provides curriculum and trainingopportunities for students from other institutions, industry representatives, and displacedworkers.The overall goal of the project is to help meet the nation’s forthcoming need for highly trainedIndustrial Robotics workers. Strategies include developing, testing, and disseminating anupdated, model curriculum, laboratory resources, and simulation software package suitable foruse in both 2- and 4-year EET programs. To complement this effort, outreach to K-12 studentsand teachers will work to enlarge the pipeline and diversity of students interested in careers inrobotics. Programs will also be offered to students at other institutions and to workers
/ Philosophy of Engineering Division of ASEE. He is Professor Emeritus and former chair of engineering technologies at Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, Ohio. He is a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau- tics. Mr. Hilgarth has a 29-year career in academia instructing courses in industrial management, financial management, computer technology, and environmental technology, as well as leading seminars in the uni- versity’s general education program. Prior to academia, Mr. Hilgarth was employed as as engineer in the aerospace industry in laboratory and flight test development, facilities management, and as a manager in quality
Paper ID #26657Designing NGSS-Aligned Lesson Plans During a Teacher Professional Devel-opment Program (Fundamental)Mr. Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Sai Prasanth Krishnamoorthy received his BSEE from Amrita University and M.S in Mechatronics from NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY. He is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanical En- gineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, serving as a research assistant under NSF-funded RET Site project. He conducts research in Mechatronics, Robotics and Controls Laboratory at NYU and his research interests include swarm robotics, computer
. The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation. Simplicity – the art of maximizing the amount of work not done – is essential.The programmers were then introduced to their clients as part of a laboratory session where eachengineering education major provided a brief presentation on their lesson plan. Eachprogramming team had to evaluate and rank the lesson plans in a bidding-type process. Thesebids were reviewed by the instructor and teams were then assigned to specific lesson plans. Thefirst half of the next laboratory session was dedicated for the teams to interact with their assignedclient in order to discuss the specifics of the lesson plan and to
experimental studies of the role of prior knowledge base in learning; cognitive load in virtual and simulated laboratory experi- ments for science education; and critical thinking skills utilized in those roles. She focuses specifically at the use of virtual environments to deliver scientific inquiry curricula and science assessments to students in the classroom and at professional development to help teachers integrate scientific inquiry into their curricula. Her expertise in educational technology and online learning allows her to create virtual learn- ing environments for her students that may be used as both assessment tools and for student retention of learned information. Dr. Simon has authored several research papers
Scholar.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering
. The relatively new maker movement(and emerging groups like the Public Laboratory of Science, described below) are primeexamples of these new opportunities. This topic is perhaps the least well-known point inthis paper, and holds significant promise.In this paper, we describe our efforts to offer an interdisciplinary undergraduate classunder a flipped-content model utilizing open access content, coupled with team-basedlearning and student-defined projects. In this class we introduce students to the idea ofcommons-based peer production, and give them the opportunity to define and implementtheir own “open source science” project. Projects in our first offering of this class