, pp. 1594–1600, 1993.[2] K. Wood, D. Jensen, J. Bezdek, and K. Otto, “Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 363–373, 2001.[3] M. Regan and S. Sheppard, “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands- On Learning Experience: An Assessment Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 1996.[4] S. D. Sheppard, “Mechanical Dissection : an Experience in How Things Work,” Proc. Eng. Educ. Conf. Curric. Innov. Integr., pp. 1–8, 1992.[5] H. Sjöman, “Learning Outcomes Through Global Product Innovation Course in Aalto University,” Aalto University, 2014.
Construction Engineering Technology program is“to produce highly competent and technically trained graduates who possess a solidunderstanding of the fundamental[s] of engineering and construction/civil concepts.” Theprogram is designed to prepare graduates with the ability to work in the construction industryalongside various stakeholders. Graduates of the program are expected to be capable to workalong-side contractors, engineers, architects, operators and owners in the various phases of theconstruction process. The program offers instruction in modern techniques of construction toprovide students with competent technical and management skills needed in the constructionindustry.The graduates are granted a Bachelor of Science degree accredited by ABET
Paper ID #18123Using Antenna Modeling Software and an RF Analyzer - A Study for StudentOriented Helical Antenna ProjectsDr. Paul Benjamin Crilly, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Paul Crilly is a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He re- ceived his Ph.D. from New Mexico State University, his M. S. and B.S. degrees at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, all in Electrical Engineering. He was previously an Associate Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering at the University of Tennessee and was a Development Engineer at the Hewlett Packard Company. His areas of interest include
://engineering.tamu.edu/media/3717002/Prereq%20Flowchart%20for%20ME%20May%202016-139.pdf5 Genalo, L, and Chumbley, S., An Undergraduate Materials Recruitment and Outreach Program, ASEE AnnualConference, 2007. In Electronic Proceedings.6 AbdelSalm, R., and Rijk, W., An Undergraduate Research Program to Test a Composite Wetting Resin Materialfor Dental Applications, ASEE Annual Conference, 2014. In Electronic Proceedings7 DeBartolo, E., Zaczek, M., and Hoffman, C., Failure Analysis Projects as Teaching Tools in Materials Science,ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.8 Grave, I., and Hager, N., Integration of a Research/Teaching/Entrepreneurial Model at Elizabethtown College,ASEE Annual Conference, 2007. In Electronic Proceedings9 Krause, S., Douglas, E., Waters, C
Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report 1, 1991.[2]. Briggs, T. 2005. Techniques for active learning in CS courses. J. Comput. Small Coll. 21, 2 (Dec. 2005), pp. 156- 165.[3]. Bull, G., Bell, R., Garofalo, J., & Sigmon, T. (2002). The case for open source software. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(2), 10-17. Available: http://www.iste.org/LL/pdfs/index.cfm?sku=30210b.[4]. Clement, J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.[5]. Hundhausen, C., Douglas, S., and Stasko, J. A meta-study of algorithm visualization effectiveness. Journal of Visual Languages
theeducational point of view, curricular integration has been a recurring recommendation [18].Bibliography[1] V. Kosse and W. Senadeera, "Innovative Approaches to Teaching Engineering Drawing at Tertiary Institutions," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 39, no. 4, 2011.[2] P. Carrato, "Scared to sketch? The lost art of drawing," 16 09 2016. [Online]. Available: http://csengineermag.com/article/scared-to-sketch-the-lost-art-of-drawing/.[3] G. Romero, J. Maroto, M. Martinez and J. Felez, "Tachnical Drawings and Virtual Prototypes," International Journal fo Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 35, pp. 56-64.[4] S. A. Sorby, "Developing 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills," Engineering Design Graphics
learning styles,” presented at the Spring Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, 2016.[3] J. E. Caldwell, “Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.,” CBE Life Sci Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2007.[4] A. Kabalan, “Think–Pair–Share: A Case Study in an Electrical Engineering Class,” asee.org.[5] L. K. Michaelsen, W. Watson, and J. P. Cragin, “Team learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classes,” … Behavior Teaching …, 1982.[6] H. Lodish, D. Baltimore, A. Berk, and S. L. Zipursky, Molecular cell biology. 1995.[7] B. Alberts, Essential Cell Biology, 3rd ed. New York: Garland Science, 2010.[8] D. Richardson, “Kinemage.”[9] M. L. Epstein and G
those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Koretsky, M., M. Bothwell, S.B. Nolen, D. Montfort and J. Sweeney. (2016) Shifting Departmental Culture to Re-situate Learning. (2016) ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. New Orleans, LA. 10.18260/p.26183.2. Sweeney, J., M. Koretsky, M. Bothwell, S.B. Nolen, D. Montfort, and S. Davis. Re- Situating Community and Learning in an Engineering School. Paper and presentation at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June, 2017.3. McMurtrie, B, (2016) How to do a Better Job of Searching for Diversity, The Chronicle of Higher Education, September.4. Reed, T
foradvanced engineering study, Cambridge, MA.Dewey, J. (1933). A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process.Boston: Heath.Educational Testing Service. (2005). Introduction to the PATHWISE Framework InductionProgram. Retrieved February 3, 2017, fromwww.ets.org/s/efolio/pdf/Intro_PW_FW_Induction_Program07.pdfScales, P., (2012). Teaching in the lifelong learning sector. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126).Basic books.Wessling, F. C. & Roller, S. A. (2016). Lessons Learned and Adjustments Made while TeachingHeat Transfer with a Flipped Classroom. In American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition
Department at The University of Cincin- nati. She holds a PhD in Educational Leadership and Organizational Development for the University of Louisville, a MS in Industrial Engineering from Arizona State University and a BS in Industrial Engineer- ing from Virginia Tech. She also has extensive industrial experience.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective
. Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE North Central Section Conference. 12 p.Christy, A.D. 2011. Engaging Students to Prepare them for the Engineering Profession and Reflect upon their Undergraduate Career. ASABE Paper No.11-11605. St. Joseph, Mich: ASABE. 8p.Christy, A.D. and M. Lima. 1998. The use of student portfolios in engineering instruction. Journal of Engineering Education 87(2): 143-148.Crehan, M., Seery, N., Canty, D., & Lane, D. (2012), Constructivist e-Portfolios: The Use of Media in the Collecting and Evidencing of Student Learning. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21101Fasina, O., P. Srivastava, M. Dougherty, S. Adhikari, T. McDonald, S. Taylor, &
. URL http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13 325.35.asp.[2] Alexandra Fleischmann, Monika Sieverding, Ulrike Hespenheide, Miriam Wei ß, and Sabine C. Koch. See feminine – think incompetent? the effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women’s computer competence. Computers & Education, 95:63 – 74, 2016. ISSN 0360-1315. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.007. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013151530097X.[3] A. Rittmayer and M. Beier. Overview: Self-efficacy in stem. SWE-AWE CASEE Overviews, 2008.[4] S. Gibbs. Computer self-efficacy - is there a gender gap in tertiary level introductory computing classes? Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 17
. J. Elmer and N. Comolli, “Unifying Multiple Concepts with a Single Semester-Long Project: A Brewery Design Project for Heat Transfer Courses,” Proc. Spring 2015 Middle Atl. Sect. Conf. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., pp. 459–472, 2015.[7] S. Krishnan and M. R. Nalim, “Project-Based Learning in Introductory Thermodynamics,” ASEE Conf. Proc., p. 14.986.1-14.986.11, 2009.[8] M. Sozen, “A Design-and-Build Project for Heat Transfer Course,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2016.[9] M. S. Zarske, M. Dana, E. Schnee, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “The Impacts of Real Clients in Project-Based Service-Learning Courses,” ASEE Conf. Proc., p. 23.1213.1-23.1213.19, 2013.
]. Available:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/career-advice/why-more-women-arent-becoming-engineers/article1216432/[7] Editors, “Why aren’t there more women engineers?,” ParisTech Review [Online]. Available:http://www.paristechreview.com/2010/09/29/why-more-women-engineers/[8] D. Moore, “Gender Traits and Identities in a "Masculine" Organization: The Israeli Police Force,” Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1999, 139(1), 49-68.[9] J. Mills et al., “Introduction: Why we need Gender Inclusive Engineering Education,” in Gender InclusiveEngineering Education, New York, Routledge, 2010.[10] J. Archer and S. Freedman, “Gender-Stereotypic perceptions of academic disciplines,” Br. J. educ. Psychol, 59,306-313, 1989.[11] J. Calnan and L
H12 Mentoring H15 H11 Transparency of & Policies ProceduresFigure 2 Hypothesized Model of Academic Job Satisfaction (Model 2). This figure shows proposed expansions toBilimoria, et al.’s model, with their original hypotheses in light blue. New hypotheses (11-15), which involve thetransparency of policies and procedures, are labeled.• H11, H12: Perceptions of transparency will be positively related to career satisfaction ratings (H11) and to
, June, 2015. (4) H.W. Kraebber, E.S. Donaldson, and K. M. Hackney, Impact of Study Abroad – 10Years of Trips to Germany with Students, ASEE International Forum, Indianapolis, IN, June,2014. (5) S. Acharya, L. Nutt, and T. Kersmann, Development of a Faculty-Led Education AbroadProgram and the Lessons Learned, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2014. (6) R. O’Connell and M. Ayllon, Student Perceptions of Global Knowledge and SkillsAcquird During a Five-Week Study Abroad Program, IEEE 2016. (7) S. Berka, E. A. Serman, M. Echeverria, L. Erickson, S.Scholz, and A. Geithner,Integrating a Portfolio of Short with Long-term International Programs in the EngineeringCurriculum
the job search process and the motivation(s) behind thesearch. I then constructed the narratives based on these critical incidents, only using my ownwords to help with clarity and flow. The transcripts were coded verbatim, except for theexclusion of crutch words and phrases such as “umm”, “you know”, any instances of stuttering,etc. I organized each narrative into major themes that are consistent across each narrative, but thenarratives can be read individually or as a group. This paper more specifically focuses on thediscussion surrounding the job search process and why these professors wanted to pursuepositions at Baccalaureate Colleges and Master’s Institutions.The main purpose of this paper to present graduate students, past and present
a need to quantify the program’s efficacy as a tool forreducing the attrition rates of participating STEM majors as reducing the number that switchmajors or drop out altogether is considered to be the program’s primary goal. The end result ofthis research, along with all quantifying data, is slated to be the topic of a future paper.Bibliography 1. C. Brame, “Active Learning,” https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning/, (accessed Dec. 2016). 2. J. Handelsman, S. Miller, C. Pfund, Scientific Teaching, 1st ed., W.H. Freeman, New York, 2007 3. S. Freeman, S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M.P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
liked the workout challenge.Also, the survey results for the non-engineering segment of student population show that thesestudents don’t think they know much about engineering profession, and are only mildlyinterested in engineering. The results of interviews with third-year mechatronics studentsindicate that they are almost ready to build and program their own robots - but not necessarilyhumanoid robots.Bibliography1. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984.2. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in Engineering in Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, April
Literacy Development in Undergraduate Education.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32, no. 6: 573-82.3 McGuinness, 576-7.4 Franklin, 4.5 Buchanan, H., Webb, K. K., Harris Houk, A., and Tingelstad, C. (2015). “Curriculum Mapping in Academic Libraries.” New Review of Academic Librarianship 21, no. 1: 94–111. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2014.1001413.6 Brasley, S. S. (2008). “Effective Librarian and Discipline Faculty Collaboration Models for Integrating Information Literacy into the Fabric of an Academic Institution.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 114: 71-88. doi: 10.1002/tl.318.7 Bullard, K., and Holden, D. (2006). “Hitting a Moving Target: Curriculum Mapping, Information Literacy and Academe.” Paper presented
within the culture of the so-called“maker movement,” which “tap[s] into an American admiration for self-reliance [that]combine[s] open-source learning, contemporary design, and powerful personal technology like3-D printers” (Bajarin, 2014). The learning environment of the AFL is essentially studentshelping students, supervised by a staff member for safety. It utilizes an approach that is similar tothe Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development model (Vygotsky, 1962), where students areallowed to work with equipment to the point where they are uncomfortable/unfamiliar and needhelp. This means that a beginner who has never set foot inside a manufacturing lab is as welcomeas an expert who can operate equipment with minimal assistance, and each student
questions in ’05 & ’06 were worded somewhat differently.References 1. Silverstein, D.1; M. Vigeant2; D. Visco3; and, D. Woods4, How We Teach: Freshman Introduction to Chemical Engineering; Proceedings for 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; June 20-23, 2010, Louisville, KY, pp. 15.658.1-15.658.36; permanent URL https://peer.asee.org/15949 1 U. Kentucky, 2Bucknell U., 3Tennessee Technological U., 4McMaster U. 2. Chickerur, S.1 and O. Shabalina2, Integrating Problem-Based and Project- Based Learning for Effective Teaching learning in Engineering Education—a Case Study of Advanced Database Management Course; Advanced Science & Technology Letters, Vol 36 (Education 2013
of engage with ambiguous task or data. (“I’m not sure where this fits exactly, situations/stimuli as valuable but that’s okay”; “The data will never be opportunities for discovery of that which perfect.”) s/he does not yet know (“I like how open this is”). Learner may reframe ambiguous situations or stimuli but does not impose a solution or explanation prematurely. Learner considers
majorsin the Mechanical Engineering Concentration at our university. The sequence of presentation oftheoretical content in the course is coordinated with the requirements of the ski lift project, sothat students are presented with theory on an “as-needed” basis. Preliminary evaluation ofstudent perception of learning based on Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) datademonstrates that students feel that learning of theoretical content is improved when it ismotivated by the need to solve a problem for their ski lift design.IntroductionA course in the design of machine elements has been a part of most mechanical engineeringcurricula since the 1950’s. The content of this course has its roots in academic research in solidmechanics, mechanisms and
strategies), and choregraphing details (how exactly the RBIS may be used). The participants formed teams to reflect on the benefits and obstacles. This structure was based on Henderson et al.’s guide [9]. 4. Reichert and Absher [10] have aptly said that it’s not so much the details of what successful programs do, rather it’s the care with which they do it. Therefore, we emphasized the importance of passion in deploying the RBIS. 5. We then explained the challenges in implementating any new ideas based on Rogers’s work on innovation diffusion[11]. 6. The particiapants chose around three strategies to use in the subsequent semester and organized department-wise discussion on the plans. 7. All the
Civil Engineer for the Future, First Edition. (2004) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.30 Levels of Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level. (2005) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.31 Bloom, B. S., M. D. Englehart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, New York, NY.32 Krathwohl, D. R., B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia. 1964. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain, David McKay
. M. & Brent, R. The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 1: Models and challenges. Journal of Engineering Education 93, 269-277 (2004).5 Felder, R. M. & Brent, R. Understanding student differences. Journal of engineering education 94, 57-72 (2005).6 Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R. & Cook, K. E. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education 56, 430- 435 (2013).7 Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S. & Sutherland, J. W. Enabling sustainable thinking in undergraduate engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education 23, 218
131 15311.6 15311.6 116.9 Total 138 17026.9 S = 10.8112 R-Sq = 10.07% R-Sq(adj) = 5.27% Table 3. ANOVA Results on Outcome 4.4 with GPA Groups as Independent Variables. The table below shows the means and BL and EXP scores for all GPA groups. From thesemeans, the source of the interaction is fairly clear: Group 2 scores actually went down from theBL to the EXP groups, and Group 3 scores went up. GPA group BASELINE EXPERIMENTAL 1: 3.5-4.0 92.1 (n=37) 94.65 (n=23) 2: 3.0-3.4 92.79 (n=16) 87.63 (n=23) 3: 2.5-2.9 83.08 (n=15) 93.33 (n=15
of the rubric willimprove inter-grader variation, TA confidence in assignment evaluations, and studentperceptions of grading fairness. Ongoing studies will explore the validity of these findings byexpanding the cohort of TAs and student reports evaluated.References1. Franey, S., A. Gregerson, and M.T. Braun. Playing the TA Lottery A Study of How Teaching Assistants Impact Grades in Engineering Courses. in American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. American Society for Engineering Education.2. Powe, A. and J. Moorhead. Grading lab reports effectively: using rubrics developed collaboratively by ECE and technical writing instructors. in
. Cocking, Eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1999. [Online]. Available: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record id=9853[12] G. L. Murphy, The Big Book of Concepts. Cambrigde, MA: MIT Press, 2002.[13] J. J. Prinz, Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.[14] D. Hestenes, M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer, “Force concept inventory,” Phys. Teacher, vol. 30, pp. 141–158, Mar. 1992.[15] S. Steenbergen-Hu and H. Cooper, “A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) on college students’ academic learning,” J. Educ. Psychology, 2013, accepted for publication.[16] M. Linaje, J. C. Preciado