anchor which scopes and informs our beliefs research. Building onwork out of science and technology studies and the sociology of engineering, Robbins [16]describes and contrasts characteristics of traditional vs. reflexive (sociotechnical) engineers(Table 1), ultimately arguing that reflexive engineers are better equipped to addresssociotechnical challenges because they integrate broader social concerns into their work andactively value the community and environment they work with integrated with theirtechnological contributions. As our ultimate research goal is to enable engineering service-learning students to practice reflexivity about the value of diverse perspectives, Robbins’ [6]description of reflexive engineers has informed our methods
propulsion systems and Engineering Education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 ACE up your Sleeve: An Analysis of Student Generative AI Usage in an Engineering Statics CourseAbstractRapid technological advancements, including the emergence of computer-aided design andsimulation, have had a significant impact on the engineering industry. This, in turn, extends toengineering education, demonstrating a similar influential effect. The latest development to havesuch reverberations is the launch of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot known asChatGPT. ChatGPT utilizes a large language model (LLM) that trains the platform to understandand generate human-like responses
Paper ID #47375Exploring the Impact of Class Start Times on Student Engagement and AcademicPerformance in Second-Year Engineering CoursesDr. Sarah Rajkumari Jayasekaran, University of Florida Sarah Jayasekaran is an Instructional Assistant Professor at the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. Her work focuses on integrating smart technology to enhance engineering education and student engagement. She serves as Director-at-Large for ASEE-WIED and is actively involved in mentoring and student success initiatives. Her research centers on designing and evaluating educational tools that drive meaningful learning
with a demonstrated history of working in the design innovation and technology entrepreneurship areas. Skilled in Innovation Management, Applied Research & Product Design, Entrepreneurship, and Training Next Generation Innovators and Entrepreneurs.Danahe Marmolejo, Saint Louis University Dr. Danahe Marmolejo, an Assistant Professor in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at Saint Louis University’s School of Science and Engineering since 2022, specializes in Thermodynamics and Process Systems Engineering. With a background in Chemical Engineering, she teaches engineering courses, primarily for first—and second-year students. Her current research focuses on improving engineering education and fostering an
. such as part of a life vest, first aid -Cultivate comfort with failure in engineering design. kit, and office supplies. Device dissection/reverse engineering of blood pressure - Identify gaps in current technology where there is potential monitors. for innovative designs through clear problem definition. 2 - Evaluate how user needs and system constraints impact
includes technology aimed at facilitating physical therapy exercises at home.Patients who completed their physical therapy prescription at home have better outcomes relatedto health, mobility, and pain compared to their non-compliant counterparts [3]. The growingindustry is poised to incorporate cutting-edge technology if properly supported by engineering,particularly biomedical engineering. Biomedical engineers are uniquely equipped to developcreative solutions at the intersection of science and medicine. To properly train biomedicalengineers to tackle these complex problems, it is pivotal that they have opportunities to honetheir skills during their undergraduate biomedical engineering education.The goal of this paper is to showcase a newly
/08832323.2014.905765.5. Colvard, N.B.W., C. Edward; Park, Hyojin. The Impact of Open Educational Resources on Various Student Success Metrics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2018, 30, 262 - 276.6. Hilton, J. Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development 2016, 64, 573-590, doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9.7. Slomp, E.M.; Ropelato, D.; Bonatti, C.; Silva, M.D.d. Adaptive Learning in Engineering Courses: How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Can Improve Academic Outcomes. In Proceedings of 2024 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE), 10-13 March 2024; pp. 1-6
-degree credentials, and reimagining how learners represent themselves through their professional online presence.Dr. Ade Mabogunje, Stanford University Ade Mabogunje is a Mechanical Engineering Scientist and Designer who studies the character, behavior, and environment of designers when they do design particularly when they innovate. Ant-colonies design anthills, medical doctors design therapies, engineers design technologies, storytellers design narratives, entrepreneurs design social movements, and the list goes on. Design is basic to human survival, progress, happiness, and extinction. Ade received his PhD in Engineering from Stanford University and is a Senior Research Engineer at the Center for Design Research
Paper ID #49501The effect on student performance and course perception given an interactivemodule in online learningDr. Katie Leanne Basinger, University of Florida Instructional Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator at The University of Florida, in Industrial and Systems Engineering. My research is focused on practical applications of active and supplemental learning techniques for Generation Z students.Andrew Benjamin McGrath, University of FloridaHenry Maxwell Gonzalez, University of Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Title: The effect on student
thoughtfully with AI technologies in their future professional and personal lives.References[1] “ Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023 | ABET.” Accessed: Sep. 29, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering -programs-2022-2023/ [2] H. J. Passow, “Which ABET Competencies Do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in their Work?,”J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101,no. 1, pp. 95–118, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x. [3] National Academy of Engineering,Understandingthe Educational and Career
and N. K. Telang, “Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic Retention Approach in a First-Year Engineering Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2021, pp. 1–26, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 36803.*[17] B. Akram et al., “Increasing Students’ Persistence in Computer Science through a Lightweight Scalable Intervention,” in Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 2022, pp. 526–532, doi: 10.1145/3502718.3524815.*[18] N. Albarakati, L. Dipippo, and V. Fay-Wolfe, “Rethinking CS0 to Improve Performance and Retention,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2021, pp. 131–137, doi: 10.1145/3441636.3442314
undergraduate and graduate level ISE courses, including: Supply Chain Management, Senio ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Assessing Systems Thinking Skills in Engineering Education: Addressing Implementation Challenges and Unintended Consequences in Ill-structured ProblemsABSTRACTSystems engineering involves designing and managing complex systems that interact with human,environmental, and technological factors. Addressing implementation challenges early ensuressystems are both theoretically sound and practical. This proactive approach mitigates risks,optimizes resources, and meets intended standards. However, even well-intended decisions canlead to
environments.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Professor with a demonstrated history of working in the design innovation and technology entrepreneurship areas. Skilled in Innovation Management, Applied Research & Product Design, Entrepreneurship, and Training Next Generation Innovators and Entrepreneurs.Dr. Jalil Kianfar, Saint Louis University Dr. Jalil Kianfar is an associate professor of civil engineering at Saint Louis University and a registered professional engineer (P.E.) in the state of Missouri. In addition to his academic experience, Dr. Kianfar has five years of industry experience as a traffic engineer that informs his teaching, research and service. Dr. Kianfar research interests and
Paper ID #45641Bridging the Gender Gap in Mechanical Engineering: Fostering Female StudentEngagement at Union CollegeDr. hongyan miao, Union CollegeElsie Mae Lewin Paxton, Union CollegeJaqueline Nicole Anderson, Union CollegeMaia Chapin, Union CollegeLeza Sorn, Union College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Bridging the Gender Gap in Mechanical Engineering: Fostering Female Student Engagement at Union College Hong Yan Miao, Elsie Paxton, Shehrbano Syed, Jaqueline Anderson, Maia Chapin, Olivia Cunningham, Leza Sorn Union College, 807 Union Street
Manhattan College, a university specializing inengineering and business. The study demonstrates how continuous program assessments havebeen used to enhance and adjust the library IL program to better meet the needs of itsstudents.Lasting impacts were also demonstrated in Wong et al.’s [30] study at the Hong KongUniversity of Science and Technology. A survey was sent to students four to eight weeksafter the library sessions ended. They received responses from mostly undergraduates, nearlyhalf being engineering students. In general, responses were more positive if the participantwas more advanced in their studies (graduate students and up) and if they had attended avoluntary workshop, rather than an obligatory one. The researchers also found that
Paper ID #47476Using Generative AI Prompts for Summative and Formative Feedback onEngineering Writing AssignmentsDr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph is an Assistant Professor at Ohio Northern University in the Department of Electrical, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science (ECCS). Previously, she worked at The University of Texas at Austin and West Virginia University Institute of Technology (WVU Tech). She is actively involved in community outreach with a goal of increasing the number of women in STEM and creating effective methods for introducing young children to CS
] ABET. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2024-2025, Dec 2023. [3] A. M. Clyne and K. L. Billiar. Problem-based learning in biomechanics: advantages, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 138, 2016. doi: 10.1115/1.4033671 [4] D. H. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee. Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95:139–151, 2006. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x [5] David H. Jonassen. Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4):63–85, Dec 2000. doi: 10.1007/bf02300500 [6] H. S. Barrows and R. M. Tamblyn. An evaluation of problem-based learning in a
Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship (CMTE) at the University of Toronto. She also currently sits as the President of the Board for BrainSTEM Alliance and is the Executive Director of Work Integrated Learning at the Calgary Economic Development.Dr. Susan McCahan, University of Toronto Susan McCahan is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. She currently holds the positions of Vice-Provost, Innovations in Undergraduate Education and Associate Vice-President & Vice Provost, Digital Strategies.Dr. Greg Evans P.Eng., University of Toronto GREG EVANS PhD, P.Eng, FCEA, FAAAS is the Director of the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering
to enter careers in science, engineering, andtechnology. Most daunting is harmoniously integrating the three dimensions of science learninghighlighted by NGSS: Core ideas, science and engineering practices, and cross-cutting concepts.While the core ideas are similar to previous standards, the emphasis on students’ understandingof the approach and methods employed by engineers and scientists and the demand thatengineering and technology be integrated into the structure of science education by “raisingengineering design to the same level as scientific inquiry” [15] presented new challenges toscience teachers.The integration of these standards provides math, science, and engineering teachers theopportunity to develop students’ knowledge and
Based Learning ProgramIntroductionIn this research-track paper, we seek to identify the relationship between engineering identity andbelonging and neurodiversity in a co-op based program. Neurodivergent characteristics, such asattention to detail, creativity, and pattern recognition, align well with careers in STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, Mathematics), yet retention of neurodivergent students withinengineering programs is lower than neurotypical students [1]. Neurodivergent students whograduate or attempt to enter the workforce in a STEM discipline face bias and decreased successrates in job attainment after graduation [2]. By exploring neurodiverse engineering students’engineering identity and sense of belonging in a co-op based
& 2 lecture, recitations, and laboratory, Analytical Chemistry lecture and laboratory, Organic Chemistry laboratory, and Physical Chemistry Laboratory. Natalie’s research contributions focus on innovative teaching methods to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. Research interests include student misconceptions, instructional materials, and integration of technology to STEM courses. Outside of the university, Natalie has a passion for theater and architecture. Before finding her passion for chemistry education, she was a theater major and has an associate’s degree in computer aided Drafting and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Evaluating the
and holds over 10 U.S., international, and provisional patents. He is a technical committee member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) and a technical reviewer for multiple peer-reviewed scientific journals.Dr. Tiejun Bai, University of California, Irvine Dr. Tiejun (TJ) Bai is a seasoned executive, engineer, and educator with over three decades of leadership and technical experience spanning the aerospace, telecommunications, technology consulting, and education sectors. He earned his Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1992 and has since held prominent positions in both academia and industry. Dr. Bai is a Project Scientist in the
Paper ID #48709BOARD # 215: Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Pre-College EngineeringDesign Thinking (Work in Progress)Syeda Fizza Ali, Texas A&M University Syeda Fizza Ali is currently pursuing her PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M University. She works as a graduate research assistant at the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering, where her work focuses on educational technology tools and student engagement. Her research is shaped by a commitment to broadening participation in engineering and fostering learning environments that prioritize student well-being.Ayaan Sunil Rege, The Hill School
Paper ID #46556Knitting the knitters: Building and sustaining leadership teams for equity-orientedinstitutional changeSandra Laursen, University of Colorado Boulder Sandra Laursen is senior research associate and director of Ethnography & Evaluation Research (E&ER), where she leads research and evaluation studies focusing on education and career paths in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. She has studied ADVANCE projects for 25 years as an evaluator and researcher, and has published articles, books and online resources on strategies for institutional change to advance equity and
Paper ID #47327Comparing Feedback from AI and Human Instructor in an Engineering EconomicsCourseDr. Billy Gray, Tarleton State University Billy Gray is an Associate Professor at Tarleton State University in the Department of Engineering Technology. He holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington, a MS degree from Texas Tech University in Systems and Engineering Management, and a BS from Tarleton State University in Manufacturing Engineering Technology.Dr. Gloria Margarita Fragoso-Diaz, Dr. Fragoso-Diaz is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Tarleton State University. She
Undergraduate Robotics EducationAbstractThe growing popularity of robotics education in undergraduate engineering programs gives rise toa demand for robotic technologies to facilitate learning in the classroom. Robotics undergraduatecurricula require platforms and tools that grow with the students, remaining accessible to earlyundergraduate levels while supporting the implementation of advanced algorithms. In this paper,we describe a software framework for educational mobile robotic platforms designed withundergraduate robotics education in mind. The MBot custom robot platform is capable ofexecuting a vast range of robotic and machine learning algorithms using a variety of sensors. Oursuite of open-source tools is designed
Paper ID #46055BOARD # 60: Work in Progress: Learning how to develop engineering educationvideos: A beginner’s perspectiveDr. Jenna Wong, San Francisco State University Dr. Wong is an Associate Professor at San Francisco State University with research focused on structural resilience and incorporating technology in engineering education. She has a well developed background in her technical field with emphasis on computational modeling which has supported her educational work in exploring the approaches used for developing computational skills in students. She is a NSF CAREER awardee currently working on examining the impact
when engineers appreciate and strive forfairness [4]. Understanding the educational context and the importance of integrating equityissues is crucial to help engineers develop an equity ethic. However, the rigid and technology-focused nature of engineering education, rooted in meritocracy and a lack of political awareness,often prevents engineering students from exploring the social aspects of their field. To promotesocially just engineering practices, we must change how engineering students are taught andequipped to address issues of inequality in the workplace. Like in many other professions,engineering culture and values may be imparted to students through belief systems that arediscussed in more subtle ways rather than just fundamental
courseAbstractThis paper presents an innovative educational approach used in a sophomore systemsengineering course, where LEGO Mindstorms robots are integrated to accelerate theunderstanding of complex systems engineering concepts. While hands-on learning tools likeLEGO Mindstorms are often used in engineering education, our approach uniquely emphasizesthe unpredictability and complexity inherent in real-world systems engineering. Rather thanfocusing solely on technology or project completion, we incorporate controlled disruptionsduring exercises, such as modifying project requirements, changing team compositions, orremoving key components from the kits. These disruptions simulate dynamic environments,requiring students to adapt, manage resource limitations
), “Quick Facts,” https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/LFE046221, 2021. [2] The Brookings Institution, “The nation is diversifying even faster than predicted, according to new census data,” https://www.brookings.edu/research/new-census-data-shows-the-nation-is-diversifying-even-faster-than- predicted/, 2020. [3] United States Census Bureau (2010-2019), “National Population by Characteristics,” https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-national-detail.html, 2020. [4] American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers, 2022,” https://https://ira.asee.org/by-the-numbers/. [5] K. Kricorian, M. Seu, D. Lopez, E. Ureta, and O. Equils, “Factors