moreefficient and increase performance.5 Development ToolsSemiconductor companies make their revenue based on how many chips they sell. This is thereason why recently most of the companies have code size or performance limited versions oftheir development tools for free in order to motivate designers to use their products. In practicalstudent assignments and laboratory exercises, the size of problems given fit within therestrictions of the free versions available. Students are encouraged to download these versions ontheir computers, so they can work anywhere rather than to be tied to the laboratory and itsavailable hours, which was the case some years ago when the platforms were rather expensivefor students to buy.Not only are the development tools
, sustainability, air Page 25.1186.5pollution, etc.), a panel of graduate students (to discuss applications, scholarships, graduateschool experiences), or 2-hour tours at local research laboratories (such as the National Oceanicand Atmospheric Association, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the United StatesGeological Survey, or National Renewable Energy Laboratory). The research experienceculminated with a research symposium where each student gave a 15-minute presentation withpowerpoint slides. The students were also required to submit a final written report. Studentswere encouraged to work with their mentors to submit a conference abstract, and
. The SJSUundergraduate AE Program has been known for its strong emphasis on laboratory education withadvanced equipment, full and balanced aeronautics and astronautics curriculum, and emphasis onapplications. The combined MAE faculty number 10 full-time, supplemented withapproximately 12 part-time lecturers from industry.A College Assessment Task Force (ATF) was formed in the Fall of 1997 to provide leadershipand support to all engineering programs for developing and implementing program assessmentplans. Faculty members attended national workshops and conferences on assessment andbrought back ideas to work with their colleagues. The task force has developed a collegeschedule, a framework, templates for various instruments for gathering
well as school and camp curriculums centered around Artificial Intelligence. Previously, he has worked as an instructor at Mathnasium, where he taught math to K-12, and as a lab assistant in an undergraduate laboratory at the University of Florida.Jacob Casey Yarick, University of Florida Jacob Yarick is an undergraduate student at the University of Florida pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science in Astrophysics. He works under the EQuIPD program where he designs, creates, and teaches lessons related to Python programming and Artificial Intelligence. Previously, he has worked at the Kika Silva Pla Planetarium, and the Calusa Nature Center & Planetarium. He has also tutored
see when preferential treatment was given to white students overstudents of color in engineering spaces. Often these events made participants questionwhether or not they belonged in the spaces they occupied because they were frequentlyremoved from those spaces automatically. For instance, Luz described her experience in thebiomedical engineering laboratory as she was doing research over the summer as detrimentalto her decision to continue in engineering for graduate school. She was under the supervisionof a white Ph.D. student, and worked in the lab with another Latina student and one whitestudent. She described the preferential treatment from the Ph.D. student toward his whitementee as follows: You could just tell, like, if we asked
Saturday Morning Session 1 - Student Solution Space Screening of a Hypersonic Endurance Demonstrator Amit Oza, Gary Coleman, Lex Gonzalez, Bernd Chudoba Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of Texas at Arlington Paul Czysz Hypertech Concepts LLC St. Louis, MO AbstractThe Solution Space Screening for a Hypersonic Endurance Demonstrator program was atwo and one-half month study to: Demonstrate the Aerospace Vehicle Design (AVD) Laboratory
includes development of biomaterials for regenerative engineering of craniofacial tissues. Her engineering education work has been published in biomedical engineering and biomaterials journals for the past few years and currently heavily interested in bridging the classroom and laboratory using her courses.Ms. Jillian Irene Linder, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Jillian Linder is a Master’s Student at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. Jillian has worked as a Teaching Assistant in the Biomedical Engineering Department for two semesters under Dr. Ozdemir. She also has worked with Middle Schoolers at Mission Middle School in Bellevue, Nebraska, to run a makerspace classroom during summer school to
closeone-on-one working relationships between research scientists and participating teachers. EachRET experience was structured to include the following components:1) Collaborative development of agenda, expectations, and goals for the specific research project and overall laboratory experience.2) Safety training and an overview of the laboratory facilities and equipment.3) Hands-on experiences in current laboratory techniques and studies being performed by scientists, which could lead to integration of cutting-edge science into inquiry-based learning. Page 22.1552.54) Focused research project with mentor scientist.5) Regular meetings with the
graduatestudents teaching in the undergraduate program. Also, the class size for lecture and laboratorysections are intentionally kept small, even during the first-year, in order to be consistent with themission of the School. Laboratory sections are geared to be between ten and fifteen students.Lifelong learning in the curriculum. A rubric was developed to assess students on thedemonstration of knowledge and awareness of lifelong learning, of application of skillsconsistent with, and of behavior associated with someone who is a lifelong learner. Performanceindicators constituting evidence that lifelong learning is occurring included: ● recognition of the need for further education and self-improvement; ● recognition of the necessity of continuing
populations. Participating teachers attend a ten day,six hour per day summer workshop, that is offered simultaneous to the graduate student summersession, and this workshop addresses the applications of mathematics and science to engineering.Joint sessions are held during the summer session among graduate students and teachers,allowing for collaboration and brainstorming on lesson plans that will be implemented during theacademic year. The bond between the graduate students and the teachers begins to developduring the summer and is strengthened throughout the academic year. These workshops aretaught in collaboration with expert district teachers, university faculty, and engineers andscientists from a local national laboratory. Each workshop further
immerseundergraduate students in the research community by giving them a full year of lab experiencethat also offers a global perspective on research challenges and opportunities in the field ofbiomedical engineering. It is our hope that this will inspire students not only to enter a graduateprogram, but also to seek a program with an international component.An additional, and equally important, goal of CURE is to build relationships between personnelin the three collaborating institutions by linking the collaborators and their work with each otherthrough these students. We conceptualized the participating student as a resource that would beshared by the collaborating laboratories and, thus, would be prepared by the Georgia TechTech/Emory PIs and mentors to
. Glasgow, H. B., Burkholder, J. M., Reed, R. E., Lewitus, A. J., & Kleinman, J. E., 2004. Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, vol. 300, no. 1-2, pp. 409–448.38. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V., 2006. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1–24.39. Balamuralithara, B., & Woods, P. C., 2009. Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108–118.40. Gomes, L., & García-zubía, J. (Eds
firm, Antoine Technical Consulting LLC, where she she continues to offer process design, scale-up and water management solutions to manufacturers principally in the chemical process industries. Keisha is the holder of two patents and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Texas.Dr. Kazeem B Olanrewaju, Prairie View A&M University Kazeem B. Olanrewaju is an assistant professor in the department of chemical engineering at Prairie View A & M University. His more than 10 years of experience in the chemical engineering profession both in the public and private sectors includes positions as Chemical/Cement Laboratory Engineer at State Highway Administration, Maryland Department of Transport
Paper ID #47586Exploring the Capability of Generative AI as an Engineering Lab ReportAssessment Assisting ToolDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University-Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In particular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to
Paper ID #45988Complete paper (evidence-based practice): Integrating Sustainability intoEngineering Education: The Impact of Complementary Field Activities onStudent EngagementMorgan F Rooney, North Carolina State University at RaleighNathalie Lavoine, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Since 2018, Nathalie Lavoine has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Forest Biomaterials at NC State University (Raleigh, North Carolina, US). She received her PhD degree in 2013 from the Laboratory of Pulp & Paper Sciences, and Graphic Arts under the supervision of Dr. Julien Bras and Dr. Isabelle Desloges, in
offer opportunities for local high schoolstudents, particularly underrepresented and first-generation students, to take college-equivalentcourses that are otherwise not available to them. The study will focus on five main themes thatwere integral to the course design: strategies used to create a cohesive and engaging learningcommunity, methods employed to help students manage their learning in an online environment,building students' self-efficacy in their engineering abilities, approaches used to maintain studentengagement, learning and motivation in a virtual setting, and the implementation of onlinehands-on laboratory sessions that students completed at home. By examining these themes, thepaper aims to provide insights into the effectiveness
in theprevious fifty years [12].In its introduction to the report which was published 1918 the Committee wrote “The historyof the origin and development of the (engineering) schools is concisely told, and theconnection between curriculum and changing demands of industrial activities is clearlynarrated”. The Committee would have been satisfied with that as a result but Mann wentmuch further causing the Committee to write that a “significant characteristic of the report isthe general failure to recognise such factors as ‘values and cost’ the importance of teachingtechnical subjects so as to develop character, the necessity for laboratory and industrialtraining throughout the courses, and the use of good English”The Committee were very
Dr. Mudasser Wyne, National University Dr. Lu Zheng, National University Keynote SpeakersDr. Don CzechowiczB.S. University of Southern CaliforniaM.S./Ph.D. Penn State UniversityDr. Czechowicz is currently Project Leader at General Atomics where he has worked for the last25 years on a variety of applied technology programs mainly focused on advanced energydevelopment. Previously Dr. Czechowicz was at Los Alamos National Laboratory where he didhis Ph.D. thesis research, and was involved in nuclear power programs for space applications.For the past 15 years Don has served as advisor to the UCSD Engineering Honor Society, TauBeta Pi. In this role Don has been a link between the best
competency with engineering conceptsand design approaches could focus solely on understanding the basics of how the devicescommunicate and how basic mathematics, such as trigonometry, can be used to develop codethat generates real-world movement. Meanwhile, higher-level courses where students are moreadept at use of instrumentation and component manipulation could incorporate those skills intothe troubleshooting process, or be presented with added challenges requiring motivation ofadvanced theoretical knowledge and laboratory techniques toward development of a feasiblesolution.The literature indicated that, in programs where a project-based approach to design integrationwas adopted, improvements in retention rates, increased student satisfaction
Modeling and Analysis Group in the Statistical Engineering Division of the Information Technology Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland. He earned his BA (1965) in Mathematics from LaSalle College, and PhD (1969) in Statistics from Princeton University. He joined the technical staff of NIST in 1969, and has more than 50 papers in refereed journals and 200 talks and short courses to his credit. In 2003, he became a Fellow of the American Statistical Association.Alan Heckert, National Institute of Standards and Technology Alan Heckert earned his B.S. degree in mathematics at the Frostburg State University in 1978, and his
http://www.asq.org/ASTC Association of Science Technology Centers http://www.astc.orgAVMA American Veterinary Medical Association http://www.avma.org/AWAA American Water Works Association http://www.awwa.org/Biophysical Society http://www.biophysics.org/BFRL Building and Fire Research Laboratory http://www.bfrl.nist.orgESA Ecological Society of America http://www.esa.org/FASEB Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology http://www.faseb.org/FMB Federation of Master Builders http://www.fmb.org.ukFMS Federation of Materials
college students to expose and increase their interest in pursuing Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. For over a decade now, Dr. Astatke has facilitated the donation of 250+ Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) portable laboratory instrumentation boards and has conducted capacity-building training workshops for five universities in Ethiopia. This work has improved the education of thousands of ECE students in Ethiopia annually. He has expanded his services to other African countries such as Nigeria, South Africa, and Cameroon. Dr. Astatke is recipient of several awards, including the 2016 Global Engineering Deans Council (GEDC)-Airbus Diversity Award, 2016 Black Engineer of the Year
http://www.aspp.org/ASQ American Society for Quality http://www.asq.org/ASTC Association of Science Technology Centers http://www.astc.orgAVMA American Veterinary Medical Association http://www.avma.org/AWAA American Water Works Association http://www.awwa.org/Biophysical Society http://www.biophysics.org/BFRL Building and Fire Research Laboratory http://www.nist.gov/bfrl/ESA Ecological Society of America http://www.esa.org/FASEB Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology http://www.faseb.org/FMB Federation of Master Builders
into agreements for the wrong reasons. Critically review the institution during the evaluation visit, looking for areas where their programs, activities, and laboratories can compliment those on the home campus. G. Potential for research collaboration One of the more enjoyable aspects of an exchange, other that observing the students making what for most is their first international trip, is the possibility for research collaboration. Carefully evaluate the research potential of their laboratories and their willingness to collaborate in one or more yearly projects. Do not necessarily expect this collaboration to happen immediately. It may take a year or two to develop, but when it
-- and allowing it to guide one’s behaviorThe study of this domain focuses on determining what teaching practices produce the most positiveattitudes or connections to a concept and how feelings and behaviors change throughout theprocess of learning a concept/topic. This domain is harder to study and quantify since it is moreabstract compared to the cognitive domain. Also, it can be hard to separate positive feelingstowards the information and process of learning of a concept versus positive feelings created bygenerally positive social interactions during certain activities, such as during a laboratory session.Thus, our research aims to find general trends based on students' experiences, perceptions, and/orthoughts towards engineering classes and
, doping, etching multiple layers,etc. The hands-on laboratory segment of the course provides students with a unique opportunityto work in a modern, clean room and physically perform the complex processes required todevelop MEMS wafers from scratch.As another assignment in this course, groups of students are expected to develop novel devicesthat utilize microsystem components for a particular application. This course segment requiresstudents to design, fabricate, test, and document a novel design in an application, which is energyharvesting in this paper. There are publications from similar course projects performed in thepast [1-6]. At the conclusion of this course, students are provided with a comprehensiveunderstanding of the practical
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering Seniors Survey: A survey is conducted every semester in the capstone designcourse to assess the opinions of graduating seniors on their success in achieving programoutcomes and on their attitudes toward the department. The results of the surveys are reviewedand summarized by the Chair and senior faculty and presented to the entire faculty at thedepartmental meetings.Student Exit Interview: The department chair interviews a diverse pool of graduating studentseach semester. Students provide feedback on their educational achievements, quality ofinstruction, facilities, laboratory equipment, and future plans. They also make suggestions onhow to improve the
a member as well as a leader on technical teams.These criteria appear simple and straightforward but they describe a wide range of skills. Forexample SO-1 describes competence on the body of knowledge (BOK), correct application oftechniques or methods, and use of appropriate tools of STEM to solve discipline-specificproblems. Competency in any of the five (5) student outcomes is developed gradually in aprogram through introductory lectures, experiential learning in laboratory sessions, followed upand reinforced in mid-level courses and finally mastery level skills that are taught at the highestcourse levels of the program.Table 1 presents a generalized assessment plan for any four year ET program. Here wedeconstruct each of the five