AC 2008-2203: RENEWABLE ENERGY EDUCATION OF FUTURE ARMYLEADERS AT THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMYGunnar Tamm, United States Military AcademyA. Ozer Arnas, United States Military AcademyDaisie Boettner, United States Military AcademySeth Norberg, United States Military Academy Page 13.1034.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Renewable Energy Education of Future Army Leaders at the United States Military AcademyAbstractThe United States military is the world’s single largest energy consumer, with an energy budgetof over $10 billion each year. In this role, there is both a great responsibility and greatopportunity for renewable and
Paper ID #30570Convergent Learning from Divergent Perspectives: An Executive Summaryof the Pilot StudyMrs. Renee Rigrish Pelan, The Ohio State University Renee Rigrish Pelan is an Engineering Education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She is working on the AISL grant as a Graduate Research Associate under Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez. She holds an M.S. degree in Industrial & Human Factors Engineering and a B.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Wright State University. Her research interests include diversity in engineering, teaching methods, and informal learning environments.Tylesha D. Drayton
Learning for Engineering at Stanford Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Industrial Engineering from Stanford, an MA in Technology Strategy from Boston University, and an MBA from Harvard Business School. She has more than 20 years of industry experience managing complex supply chain projects; her teaching focuses on experiential project-based operations courses and community engagement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Infusing the STEM Pipeline Through Community Engaged Learning 1AbstractThis year, Stanford University’s Clayman Institute for Gender Research launched a new initiative
Paper ID #18724Research Experience for Undergraduates: Integrated Optics for Undergrad-uate Native Americans (IOU-NA)Dr. Allison Jane Huff-Lohmeier, University of Arizona Dr. Huff-Lohmeier is the Education Director for a National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center, Center for Integrated Access Networks, at the University of Arizona where she also teaches Tech- nical Communication in the College of Optical Sciences. Prior to this, Dr. Huff-Lohmeier worked with the United States Embassy Association in Lima Peru, Central Michigan University, University of Mary- land, College Park, and University of Oklahoma
necessarily adaptable to the needs of a general electrical engineering educationallaboratory.6,7 In most cases it appears that the equipment and space required are not necessarilyadaptable to a studio-style classroom environment, which we have found to be a successfulinstructional approach.8,9Our laboratory equipment as well as the overall course approach is designed with several goalsin mind. We required a small laboratory footprint due to space limitations. Furthermore due tobudget concerns we wished to exploit conventional bench equipment as much as possible,allowing us to leverage both space and the instruments used for our core 2nd and 3rd-year courses.Also, we wished to introduce switching regulator concepts at a level that is approachable
Paper ID #15733Team Membership Change and the Critical Role of CommunicationMs. Amanda Deacon, University of Calgary Amanda is currently in her first year of her PhD in Industrial Organizational Psychology at the University of Calgary under the supervision of Dr. Tom O’Neill. Her area of focus is teams within organizational contexts and that results in a plethora of research conducted with engineering departments. Amandas lab uses these results to better prepare engineering students for teamwork within institutions of all kinds, educational and business.Dr. Tom O’Neill, University of Calgary O’Neill is a Professor of
product will positively influence therecruitment and retention of young minds into the STEM fields.AcknowledgmentsThis project was partially supported by a grant from the National Space Grant Foundation. Workcontinues on this project with partial support by a grant from the Department of Education,award # P120A110067. A group of six systems engineering students at TAMIU (SofíaMaldonado—Team Leader, Pablo Cisneros, Ralph Lopez, Fernanda Uribe, Alejandro Ramirez,and Gerardo Enriquez) worked on this project in Fall 2011. Another group of three systemsengineering students at TAMIU (Enrique Villarreal—Team Leader, Andres Ortegon, andEduardo Vasquez) is continuing work on this project in Fall 2012. Special thanks to Mr. PhillipHebert and Mr. Bryon
willing to give their teammates low peerevaluations12.All of the methods tried thus far were based entirely on peer evaluations and have been relativelytime consuming for the instructors. With this in mind, we sought out an automated method that isnot based on peer evaluations to help the instructors determine if an adjustment to an individual’sgrade was necessary.MethodsSamplingThe grade adjustment method presented in this paper was evaluated using an introductoryfreshmen engineering course (ENGR 100) at the University of Nevada, Reno. The course is arequired multi-disciplinary first-year engineering course that is taken by all engineering majorsand was developed with funding from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation13. This courseis taught
AC 2012-4692: FRESHMAN CAD MODELING COMPETITION TO IN-CREASE STUDENT INTEREST AND RETENTIONDr. David Miller, Pittsburg State University David Miller completed a B.S. in biological systems engineering at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, in 2000, a master’s of science in bioengineering at Arizona State University in 2002, and a doctorate in biomedical engineering at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, in 2008. After completing his Ph.D., he worked in the medical industry as a product development engineer for three years before coming to Pittsburg State University, where he has been a tenure-track member of the mechanical engineering tech- nology faculty for the past year. He teaches courses in engineering
classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, 2003.14 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Assessment results of multi-intelligence methods used in dynamics,” Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.15 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Increasing success in dynamics course through multi-intelligence methods andpeer facilitation,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R., editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool (Expanded Edition). National Academies Press, 2000.17 Kypuros, J. A. and Tarawneh, C., “Multimodal Modules for Non-Calculus-Based Engineering MechanicsCurriculum,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.18 Kypuros, J
for better understanding the design process are possibleby the use of this technology. Working professionals and engineers who may not be ableto attend traditional classes due to their full time jobs can use this web-based method tostudy online. An additional benefit is the design projects can be easily archived forviewing and use by students in future courses.IntroductionIt is well known that courses in design form an important part of the curriculum forstudents majoring in mechanical, aerospace and civil engineering. In design coursesstudents are taught to analyze problems using various equations and theories forcomputing forces, stress, strains and displacements 1. Since the design problems concernreal world objects such as shafts, gears
Paper ID #45383NSF S-STEM Funded iAM Program: Lessons Learned Implementing a CollaborativeSTEM Workshop for Community College and University PartnersProf. Margaret A Hunter, Hofstra University Margaret Hunter,Ph.D., is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Engineering at Hofstra University in the Fred DeMatteir School of Engineering and Appplied Science. She has been teaching in the Civil Engineering program for 25 years. Her educational research focuses on broadening the participation in enigineering. This has included both formal and informal learning activites in pre-college, developing a course framework to aid
SBPRDFprogram, in 2019 NSF/IIP (Industrial Innovation and Partnerships) program leadership selectedASEE to administer the Innovative Postdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF)program. The overarching goal of the IPERF program is to emphasize and strengthen theentrepreneurial development of underrepresented fellows. The IPERF program also aims toadvance best practices in postdoctoral programs and impart cross-disciplinary expertise in theapplication of new technologies like AI and IoT in “new industries” based on bioengineering andbiochemistry technologies. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education
Engineering Education” 2Farmingdale State University, along with most other universities, has embarked on a program offeedback from the very people and institutions that hire our graduates. There is nothing newabout this for it has always been the desire of universities to prepare their students for the worldin which they must eventually operate. Whether going from graduation to work or an advanceddegree program, some attributes simply must be there. Farmingdale State University has set upa program to ascertain feedback from those who see our graduates next. In the Architecture &Construction Management Department, an Industrial Advisory Committee has
Paper ID #14290Differences in Leadership and Project Based Learning Outcomes in Devel-oped and Developing CountriesMr. Andrew Thomas Conley, Michigan Technological University Andrew is studying mechanical engineering, is minoring in aerospace engineering, and is completing the Global Technological Leadership certificate at Michigan Technological University. Andrew has signif- icant project experience as the project manager of the Aerospace Enterprise—one of Michigan Tech’s largest enterprises—and the Oculus-ASR project—a satellite project sponsored by the US Air Force Re- search Lab for university students to design, build
AC 2011-2407: COLLECTIVE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF THE IN-TERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE: RISING SOPHOMORE ABROAD PRO-GRAMElizabeth M. Tront, Virginia TechJoseph G. Tront, Virginia Tech Electrical & Computer Engineering Faculty Director of Extended Campus Programs for ECE Page 22.338.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Collective Review and Assessment of the International Experience: Rising Sophomore Abroad ProgramAbstractDeveloping global leadership in engineering is dependent upon getting students involved ininternational leadership experiences early in their college career
AC 2010-544: WOMEN AND LEADERSHIP: PREPARING (FEMALE) STUDENTSFOR THE LEADERSHIP CHALLENGERalph Ocon, Purdue University CalumetOpal McFarlane, Purdue University Calumet Page 15.1378.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Women and Leadership: Preparing (Women) Students For the Leadership ChallengeAbstractThe workplace can provide many career opportunities and challenges for graduatingstudents. While pursuing their careers, many engineering and technology students willperform roles that are outside their principal academic field of study. In addition tohaving to deal with career issues related to global competition and technological
Paper ID #7332Promoting STEM with an Electric Energy SystemMr. Al Mundy, United States Air Force Academy Al Mundy received his M.S. from the University of Syracuse in 2000. Since that time, he has been associated with the United States Air Force Academy focusing in the areas of microelectronics and green/renewable energy.Lt. Col. Andrew Laffely, US Air Force Academy Lt. Col. Andrew Laffely is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the United States Air Force Academy. As a faculty member with eight years of teaching experience, he has taught ten different courses from intro circuits to
request. Being able to fill out forms, incident reports, and daily progress reports in thefield increases efficiency and overall accuracy of such reports. These technologies also save timeby reducing the amount of trips back and forth to the job trailer to acquire needed information, Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education 167allowing for more immediate decision making in the field. Ultimately, readily availableinformation allows companies and project teams to reduce risk and exposure to failure as projectteams will
Paper ID #46608Validating Scales to Measure Undergraduate Students’ Interest and CareerAspirations in Geoscience and SedimentologySyeda Fizza Ali, Texas A&M University Syeda Fizza Ali is currently pursuing her PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M University. She works as a graduate research assistant at the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering, where her work focuses on educational technology tools and student engagement. Her research is shaped by a commitment to broadening participation in engineering and fostering learning environments that prioritize student well-being.Dr. Anna Stepanova
mentoring practicesAbstractThis full research paper discusses the experiences of five Latiné/x faculty in engineering andwhat motivated them towards developing equity-minded educational practices for theirundergraduate students. The five faculty participants provided written reflections on how theirlife and professional experiences have informed said practices. From a social constructionismparadigm and using narrative inquiry methodology, a combination of in vivo and descriptivecoding (first cycle) followed by emergent and focused coding (second cycle) were used by thefirst three authors to generate a codebook. The theoretical frameworks of Community CulturalWealth, LatCrit, and Hidden Curriculum guided the data analysis and interpretation
PRESS. FELDER, R. M., & SILVERMAN, L. K. (1988). LEARNING AND TEACHING STYLES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION. ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 78(7), 674-681. GARDNER, H. (1985). FRAMES OF MIND: THE THEORY OF MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES: BASIC BOOKS. GERLAI, R. (1998). CONTEXTUAL LEARNING AND CUE ASSOCIATION IN FEAR CONDITIONING IN MICE: A STRAIN COMPARISON AND A LESION STUDY. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 95(2), 191-203. HONEY, P., & MUMFORD, A. (1986). USING YOUR LEARNING STYLES: PETER HONEY MAIDENHEAD,, UK. HULL, D. (1995). WHO ARE YOU CALLING STUPID?: THE REVOLUTION THAT'S CHANGING EDUCATION: CORD COMMUNICATIONS.JOHNSON, E. B. (2002). CONTEXTUAL
ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3-5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA A Hybrid Electrical and Optical Networking Topology of Data Center for Big Data Network Mohammad Naimur Rahman Dr. Amir Esmailpour Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of New Haven University of New Haven West Haven, CT, USA West Haven, CT, USA MRahm1@unh.newhaven.edu aesmailpour@newhaven.eduAbstract
Paper ID #37924Developing a 3D-Printed Statics Modeling KitSeyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani Dr. Ardakani is an assistant professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department and the Coordinator of Statics for the T.J. Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He has previously served as Project Engineer at Englekirk Structural Engineers and Lecturer at South Dakota State University. He obtained his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interests include seismic performance and design of reinforced concrete structures, computational modeling of
AC 2012-5536: CAN WE MAKE STUDENTS LIFELONG LEARNERS THROUGHSOCIAL NETWORKS?Dr. Gonca Altuger-Genc, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Gonca Altuger-Genc is a full-time faculty member in the Plastics Engineering Department at UMass, Lowell.Mr. Yegin Genc, Stevens Institute of Technology Yegin Genc is a Ph.D. candidate at Stevens Institute of Technology. Page 25.280.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 CAN WE MAKE STUDENTS LIFELONG LEARNERS THROUGH SOCIAL NETWORKS?AbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering Education and Technology (ABET) criteriarequire
.[6] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[7] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, “A Guide to Outcomes-based Criteria,” 2015.[8] J. J. Pembridge and M. C. Paretti, “Characterizing capstone design teaching: A functional taxonomy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 197–219, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20259.Appendix 1: Questionnaire for students of study 1Données démographiques (demographic data) ● Vous êtes dans quel programme? (Which program are you in?) ● Êtes-vous dans une équipe multidisciplinaire? (Are you in a multidisciplinary team?)The scale used for the rest of the questionnaire is as follows: Totalement en désaccord (Strongly disagree) En désaccord (Disagree
Paper ID #36110Survey of Educational Robotics Applications in Secondary EducationMr. Patrick Connolly, Robert Morris University Born in Camp Hill, PA in 1999, Patrick has been studying Manufacturing Engineering at Robert Morris University since the Fall of 2016 Semester. He has been the research assistant of Dr. Arif Sirinterlikci since his Junior year and completed a PA state research grant with him in the summer of 2021.Miss Madyson Orlando-Jepsen , Robert Morris University Madyson Orlando-Jepsen is a fourth-year mechanical engineering student set to graduate from Robert Morris University in May of 2022. With a minor in
Paper ID #36744Shifting to a Virtual Summer STEM Program for HighSchool Students (Evaluation)Alison Haugh Nowariak (Graduate Student STEM Education Researcher) Alison Haugh Nowariak is a Ph.D candidate at the University of Minnesota in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. She is also a STEM specialist teacher for K-5th grade students in ISD 196 in Minnesota. Prior to working in the schools and attending the University of Minnesota, she worked as an undergraduate researcher at the Playful Learning Lab in the Department of Engineering at the University of St. Thomas.Annika Marie GehlGillian Roehrig (Professor
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
combine teaching with research areessential to the improvement of undergraduate education [15, 16, 17, 18]. With this in mind, wenow introduce the model that governs and sustains the teaching and research mission of ouruniversity laboratory. The synergistic interaction between teaching and research, their driversand end-results is also illustrated. These drivers can be classified into those of resource needs(e.g. qualified personnel) and technology related issues. Resource needs can be further classifiedinto three types – (1) design and application engineers, (2) radar system integrators andmanagers, and (3) research and development scientists. These needs are met by BS, MS, andPhD graduates, respectively. Thus our undergraduate and graduate