lendtowards basic electronic design. An analog circuit is designed to produce a given voltage orcurrent output. Digital circuits are circuits that utilize logic, relying on 0’s and 1’s (off’s andon’s) rather than specific analog levels. A microcontroller is the brain of an embedded systemand can be programmed with code to perform a particular function. The combination of analog,digital, and microcontroller devices create an embedded system. For engineering students,learning both these subjects are beneficial due to the integrative nature of circuits in manyengineering applications.A typical introductory digital circuit device is the Arduino Uno. An Arduino utilizes amicrocontroller to implement digital circuit applications. To immediately begin
culturallyresponsive classroom. They also need to recognize that the technical jargon that poses an extralayer of difficulty for linguistically and culturally diverse student populations can be systematicallytaught. Also, and certainly not least of all, teachers need to recognize that informal and out-of-school STEM learning spaces can circumvent the challenges of restrictive school policies and thedemand for more time with students and opportunities to pool from existing funds of knowledgewhile involving parents and assimilating into the society. 10 References[1] L. S. Shulman, “Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 57, no
views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Idicators 2018. Arliington, VA, 2018.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2008.[3] B. Hatt, "Smartness as a Cultural Practice in Schools," American Educational Research Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 438-460, 2012.[4] S. Secules, A. Gupta, A. Elby, and C. Turpen, "Zooming Out from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class," Journal of Engineering
, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10254[2] Meadows, L. A., & Sekaquaptewa, D., & Paretti, M. C., & Pawley, A. L., & Jordan, S. S., &Chachra, D., & Minerick, A. (2015, June), Interactive Panel: Improving the Experiences ofMarginalized Students on Engineering Design Teams Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24344[3] Stoddard, E. L., & Pfeifer, G. (2018, April), Working Toward More Equitable TeamDynamics: Mapping Student Assets to Minimize Stereotyping and Task Assignment Bias Paperpresented at 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference, Crystal City, Virginia. https://jee.org/29598[4] Larson, N. L., & Hoffart, G., &
of rotation ωl, ωr deg/s Angular velocity ω deg/s Wheel velocities vl, vr cm/s Rover Length L or 𝑙 cm Forward velocity v cm/s Wheel radius r cmConsider the ICC as the midpoint of a circle of radius 𝑅, and note that the length of the robot’s wheelaxis (L or 𝑙) is given as 8.8 cm, while the radius of the wheel (𝑟, as measured from the center of the hubto the wheel’s edge) is given as 4.5cm. Note these values for later use.The
would improve that aspect ofthe course.2) Is there any additional information or feedback that you would like to share with [the]instructor?3) Please describe the MOST valuable aspect(s) of this course.4) Please describe the LEAST valuable aspect(s) of this course.Below is a relative frequency chart for comments, separated by positive and negative responsesand grouped by SDT need. Individual students could state more than one item in each response. Sm 2020- THEMATIC CATEGORY S 19 Sm 19 F 19 2019 S 20 20 F 20 2020 2019 instructor helpful/caring 15.4% 8.3% 24.0% 17.3% 10.6% 0.0% 18.8% 11.6
add to US small businesses, particularlyduring product development and prototyping. The use of university students, professors and technicalstaff can help US small businesses to significantly lower the cost of product development which can helpthem to be competitive against their global counterparts. It will also enable them to access world classfacilities and personnel to develop innovative and competitive products in term s of quality and price. Onthe other hand, universities will benefit from such collaborations by providing their students with real lifeindustry-based projects that will enhance their graduates’ professional and technical skills. Theirgraduates will stand out and be competitive in the market place. Such industry-academia
them to be quite effective. Twelve lab videos were created using Camtasia in conjunctionwith PowerPoint slides, and Excel step by step instructions and demonstration. Creating each lab video was also atime consuming process.Lecture and lab videos were uploaded to YouTube with a link listed in MyCourses. I found that the YouTube Studiodoes automatic captioning with remarkable accuracy during the conversion to the high definition (HD) format.When we return to in-person instruction, I will replace the in-person lab instruction by lab videos. Lab assistantswill be available in the Friday labs to assist. For students looking for a challenge, I will use the lab time for anoptional class to teach numerical modeling.References1. S. K. Gupta
with manyissues never before seen on this scale; from a sense of isolation to mental fatigue. It will be up tothe professors to engage the students at every turn to reestablish the student community. Ifreestablished soon; the attitudes, mental health, and overall success of every student will beimproved. And the university community will be stronger than before the pandemic disruptions.References[1] N. Meda , S. Pardini , I. Slongo , L. Bodini , M. A. Zordan , P. Rigobello , F. Visioli and C. Novara. “Students’ mental health problems before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown in Italy”, Journal of Psychiatric Research 134 69–77, 2021, doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.045 © American Society for
learningmay lead to improved participation in these jobs.Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the teachers who participated in this workshop series andtheir principals and superintendents for their support in professional development, even duringCOVID-19 when substitute teachers are at a premium. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1930777.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. REFERENCES1. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts
appreciate RIT FEAD grant and college funding for supporting this work, and mymany students, co-ops, and teaching assistants for helping to make this work happen. Readerscan access the entire repository of work [55]. This reviewers’ comments on this paper wereextremely helpful, especially to clarify my call-to-action (a term which I used from the reviews)to connect researchers from different academic communities with this work.References PlotDB Ltd. “Pure CSS Loaders.” https://loading.io/css (accessed March 1, 2021). D. H. House and J. C. Keyser, Foundations of Physically Based Modeling & Animation. CRC Press, 2017 S. Marschner and P. Shirley, Fundamentals of Computer Graphics: 4th Edition. A K Peters/CRC Press, 2015. F. Gnass and T
-engineering-teaching-labs.html. [Accessed 7March 2021].[2] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., andWenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.[3] Redish, E., J. Saul, and R. Steinberg, “On the Effectiveness of Active-EngagementMicrocomputer-Based Laboratories,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 65, No. 1, 1997, p. 45.[4] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal ofengineering education, 93(3), 223-231.
Group. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdfAlqahtani, A. S., Daghestani, L. F., & Ibrahim, L. F. (2017). Environments and System Types of Virtual Reality Technology in STEM: A Survey. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(6), 77–89. http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORC ID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS :000405417600011&KeyUID=WOS:000405417600011Berg, L. P., & Vance, J. M. (2017). Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: a survey. Virtual Reality, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055
primer [3], there are between 105 and 252 STEMeducation programs or activities at 13 to 15 federal agencies; the key agencies involved in theeffort are Department of Education, National Science Foundation, and Health and HumanServices.Given that the interests are broad and federal efforts are spread across multiple agencies, there isa concern with perceived duplication of effort and a lack of coordination in the federal effort.Therefore, efforts to improve accountability and coordination have gained prominence in recentyears. The data currently available about STEM education paints a “complicated” picture [3].According to many indicators [3], overall graduate enrollments in science and engineering (S&E)grew 35% over the last decade; S&E
Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1733636. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohmann, Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring engineering has the right people with the right talents for a global society. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.[2] ASEE. (2016, Dec 18, 2017). About: ASEE Action on Diversity. Available: https://diversity.asee.org/[3] M. V. Svyantek, "Missing from the classroom: Current representations of disability in engineering education," in
. Winter has worked with major NSF initiatives (e.g., ADVANCE, HBCU-UP, S STEM) since 2003. KWE is the external evaluator for the AAC&U Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) initiative, Metacommunity for Broadening Par- ticipation; AAC&U PKAL’s Undergraduate STEM Education Reform (USER) project; and two five-year long consortia-based projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education (a FITW and an HSI-STEM). KWE’s areas of evaluation expertise include diversity in STEM, college student access and retention, professional development for faculty, and institutional cultural change. Dr. Winter is a member of the American Evaluation Association (AEA) and the European Evaluation So- ciety (EES), adheres to AEA professional and
experiential learning format.Although Besterfield-Sacre et al. (2012)’s work presents a tool for assessing entrepreneurialknowledge, the inventory is a measure of students’ self-assessed knowledge rather than a “directmeasure of measurement of the actual skills and knowledge” (p. 8). We argue that this approachdoes not completely capture students’ understanding of entrepreneurial concepts due to emphasison only students’ familiarity with concepts and terms, rather than their ability to internalize andapply entrepreneurial knowledge. In other words, overall there is almost no research that uses adirect measure of entrepreneurial knowledge to assess the impact of entrepreneurship programson student learning. Guided by this gap, in our study, we examined
. In this case, student 8o had taken an elective STScourse on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology (STS 3110).Even when students may have misunderstood ideas from prior classes there is anacknowledgement that technological change does not occur in a vacuum nor does it drive societyin some determined way. For example, Participant 77’s pre-map (not shown) includes the term“technological determinism” as a node linked to “design”, “unintended consequences”, and“ethical decision making” and a side note that states “I do not subscribe wholesale to this theory,but some professors in the past have treated this as doctrine.” It should be noted thattechnological determinism as an argument for what primarily drives social change is critiqued bySTS
and engineering careers.References1. Brownlow, J. ; Bullock, T.; Moore, L. M. J.; Norman, M.; Morgan, S. E. “Synthesis and characterization of di(perylene bisimides) for use as an electron accepting material in polymer photovoltaic devices” Abstracts of Papers, 253rd American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition, San Francisco, CA, April 2-7, 2017.2. Boleware, M.; Sharma, A.; Wiggins, J.S. “Cross-linking” physics and polymers: Making an "impact" in STEM education” Abstracts of Papers, 253rd American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition, San Francisco, CA, April 2-7, 2017.3. Wingo, K.; Morgan, S. E. “Developing polymer research lessons for the high school classroom – NSF RET at The University of Southern
Paper ID #20197Promoting academic and career success for Raleigh Future Scholars at NCStateDr. Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University Cheryl Cass is a teaching assistant professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University where she has served as the Director of Undergraduate Programs since 2011. Her research focuses on the intersection of science and engineering identity in post-secondary and graduate level programs.Prof. Leda Lunardi, North Carolina State University Leda Lunardi received the BS and MS from University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), S˜ao Paulo, Brazil, and Ph.D
). Students need challenge, not easy success. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 22–26. Retrieved from http://thinkingskillsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/risk_success_clifford_1990.pdf[3] Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2010). Studies in Higher Education The Conscientious Consumer : Reconsidering the role of learning The Conscientious Consumer : reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507012009936[4] Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In Feedback For Learning (pp. 1–17).[5] Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Sewall, J., &Koedinger, K.R., Proceedings of the 8th
Education & Nano Ctrs S&T Ctrs Education S&T Ctrs, 4 Science 6.66 13.17 Nano Ctrs, Workforce, 4.88 4.88 13.99 Science Centers Centers,National 57 Individuals 49.56 IndividualsNational and Groups
in this survey were collected and are currentlybeing analyzed in accordance with the findings presented here in hopes of further developingour understanding of these learners.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by grants from the National Science Foundation (PRIME #1544259 and EEC #1227110). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Zutshi, S., O'Hare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 218–227. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.8380672. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., &
on three criteria, per established guidelines of critical incident technique [27]: 1. Detailed description of an experience or series of experiences that are directly attributable to the aspect(s) of their way of understanding or approaching innovation. 2. Description or demonstration of one or more aspects of understanding or approaching innovation. (Note: Direct connections to innovation were preferred, but this connection could be inferred from a participant’s way of experiencing innovation (as seen in the previous study [9]) or contextual cues in the excerpt or elsewhere in the interview.) 3. A clear change, refinement, or crystallization in one’s view of innovation, especially as it addressed aspects of
, pp. 9–11, 1979.[2] J. Luce, J. Anderson, J. Permaul, R. Shumer, T. Stanton, and S. Migliore, “Service-learning: An annotated bibliography linking public service with the curriculum,” 1988.[3] G. H. Roehrig, T. J. Moore, H.-H. Wang, and M. S. Park, “Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2012.[4] N. A. Tran and M. J. Nathan, “Pre-college engineering studies: An investigation of the relationship between pre-college engineering studies and student achievement in science and mathematics,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 143–157, 2010.[5] N. Tsupros, R. Kohler, and J. Hallinen, “STEM education: A
to effective teamwork.References 1. Ritter, Barbara A., Erika E. Small, John W. Mortimer, and Jessica L. Doll. "Designing Management Curriculum for Workplace Readiness: Developing Students’ Soft Skills." Journal of Management Education 42.1 (2017): 80-103. 2. ABET. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019." Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET. N.p., Apr. 2017. Web. 05 Feb. 2018. 3. Loignon, Andrew C., David J. Woehr, Jane S. Thomas, Misty L. Loughry, Matthew W. Ohland, and Daniel M. Ferguson. "Facilitating Peer Evaluation in Team Contexts: The Impact of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training." Academy of Management Learning & Education 16.4 (2016
of Learners Classroom,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 399–483, Dec. 2002.[3] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410–8415, 2014.[4] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones, “Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning,” Structure, p. 66, 2009.[5] S. W. T. Choe and P. M. Drennan, “Analyzing scientific literature using a jigsaw group activity,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 328–330, 2001.
methods you would employ to gather user requirements? If you list 5 multiple methods, please rank them in order of importance. What challenges might you face when performing these requirements gathering 6 method(s)? How would you overcome these challenges? With respect to the user requirements and engineering specifications you developed for your design project: Specify the type of data you collected and from where this 7 data came from (also speak to data you haven’t collected yet, but hope to in the future). 8 Specify your methodology for collecting the data. Specify how you analyzed or brought together your data to develop user 9 requirements and engineering
Harvard-Danforth Center, 10-21. http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic771890.files/OTL3-Mosteller- Muddiest.pdf 5. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment technique examples. In Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd ed.) Retrieved from http://www.ncicdp.org/documents/Assessment%20Strategies.pdf 6. Hall, S. R., Wait, I., Brodeu, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., & Nasr, R. (2002). Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class. Frontiers in Education. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1157921 7. Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education 11, 113– 120. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033 8. Krause, S. J
Resources, Inc. 1997.[3] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. , “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals”, Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), pp. 109-132, 2002[4] Honken, N. & Ralston, P. “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look”. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), pp. 29-37, 1997.[5] Anderson-Rowland, Mary R. "Understanding freshman engineering student retention through a survey", Engineering Student Retention: Reducing Attrition and Improving Graduation Rates of Upperclassmen Engineering Students. An Annotated Bibliography, pp. 1-9, 1997.[6] Microsoft. “Microsoft releases national survey findings on how to inspire the next generation of doctors, scientists, software developers and