prior to entry into the demanding world of work2. Page 11.1142.3While some hold that Japanese undergraduates work less hard than their UScounterparts6,7, others conclude that workloads and effort expended are comparable8.Japanese education has also been characterized as a more dispersed life-long processcompared to the US, especially in technical fields6. It consists of rigorous broad-basedtraining before college, focused study as an undergraduate, and acquisition of applied orpractical knowledge on the job. In contrast, most aspects of career training in the UnitedStates are concentrated almost entirely into the undergraduate program. While
, andconverted [26], [27]. Through a funds of knowledge perspective, we capture engineering students’lived experiences; understand how their family and community knowledge is produced andtransmitted; and then investigate whether and how this knowledge is transformed into capital thatserves students’ trajectories through their career paths. Recognizing first-generation collegestudents’ funds of knowledge and how this knowledge is transmitted into forms of capital tosupport their engineering career pathway offers a way to position these students experiences asequally valuable knowledge in engineering.Research QuestionsTo understand how first-generation college students’ funds of knowledge support their engineeringcareer trajectory we used structural
learn more), and engage in the process oflearning. For instructors, the general attempt is to keep up with the students' learning pace byadjusting the course activities, and possibly content to the students’ capabilities. At the same time,the instructor is seeking ways to communicate ideas to the students in meaningful and relatableways. The goal of the instructor is to facilitate their learning and provide them the ability to employthese concepts in their future courses and careers. The hope is that students can learn, be engagedin the process of learning, and can adapt to what they learn as they progress in their careers.Expectations, Expected Role of Students: Students ViewAs a student, the expectation is that the instructor is fair/unbiased
, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Krishna Madhavan is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. In 2008 he was awarded an NSF CAREER award for learner-centric, adaptive cyber-tools and cyber-environments using learning analytics. He leads a major NSF-fundedprojectcalled Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (http://www.dia2.org) to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of STEM education. He also serves as co-PI for the Network forComputationalNanotechnology (nanoHUB.org) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20540
academia and therefore do not have any real world work experienceto share. This is a major problem as it creates a disconnect between what they can teach and howit will connect to the main reason why the majority of their students are in college in the firstplace – to be prepared for a career outside of academia. Therefore, engineering faculty withoutprofessional experience outside of academia who plan to use storytelling in their courses, mustmake an extra effort to find stories that are relevant to their course topics.3 They may borrowcourse-related stories from colleagues who do or have worked in the field, from professionalpublications, and from professional society meetings. However, answering student questionsabout these borrowed stories may
more than the amount of time spent on ethical theories and the case study inthe joint venture model. So this allowed students to gain more knowledge overall and to bringthat knowledge to bear in the discussion. Nevertheless, both methods have proven to work inhelping students see the importance of ethics and ethical thinking in their future careers. One limitation of the studies as we have conducted them thus far is that the modules andtheir content remain somewhat isolated interventions into the courses. This is because the contentof the case studies used is not weaved throughout the course itself but rather discussed onlyduring the duration of the module itself. This limitation is somewhat structural insofar as it is thecase that
responsibilities; 6. Communicate effectively with a range of audiences; 7. Analyze the local and global impact of your design on individuals, organizations, and society.Lean LaunchPad Innovation and Engineering Design ProcessNew Mexico State University has innovation and entrepreneurship programs to support studentswith their preparation for careers in engineering design, innovation, and the creative economy.For example, the College of Engineering has an “Innovation Space” that is both managed andstaffed by engineering students. The workshop’s emphasis on innovation and working in teamsdovetails well with the need to promote an innovation mindset and get students thinking aboutentrepreneurship. As it would turn out later, several students
and undergraduate students. The objective of these workshops andsimulation games is to provide the students with a practical understanding of Lean principles andprocess improvement methodologies. Several activities have been conducted over the last twoyears including workshops, simulation games, and practical projects with local industry. Table 4summarizes the different types of Lean activities and their descriptions. Table 4. Lean activities and their descriptionsActivity Name Activity Type Activity Description Target GroupExplorers Provides career exploration opportunities High SchoolEvent Workshop for young people aged 14 and up
social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Development of Engineering Students’ Metacognitive Skills in Informal Engineering Learning ActivitiesIntroductionThe ability to analyze and evaluate one’s own thinking and acquisition of knowledge and skills
greaterattention has been given to studies of attitudes toward engineering and knowledge of engineeringand engineering careers in an effort to steer more students into undergraduate engineeringprograms7-10. The factors that influence student choice of attending college, career path andattitudes toward engineering have also been studied11-12. However, few recent studies have beenfound regarding factors that impact the decisions of undergraduate engineering students topursue or not pursue graduate studies.Even students who intend to complete a Masters degree must consider many factors. Butcompleting a Ph.D. also requires extensive research skills including statistical data analysiswhich are not usually emphasized in undergraduate degree programs. Recent
most contributed to their ability and willingness to workas engineers.ConclusionInstitution-level metrics of engineering student persistence and graduation rates do not answerthe ultimate question: have we added to the numbers of engineers in the workforce? Census datasuggest a disconnect between graduation rates and numbers of those entering the workplace. Thetwo issues embedded in that question are whether graduates of engineering programs haveadequately learned the knowledge and skills needed for engineering careers, and whether ourgraduates want to use their newly gained knowledge and skills.Issues of students’ learning and motivation may best be detected at the course level, rather thanat the institutional one. Asking questions that look
. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of college academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971-990.Cordero, E. D., Porter, S. H., Israel, T., & Brown, M. T. (2010). Math and Science Pursuits: A Self-Efficacy Intervention Comparison Study. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(4), 362-375.De Feyter, T., Caers, R., Vigna, C., & Berings, D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self- efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 439-448.Gore, P.A. (2006). Predicting the performance and persistence of first-year college students: the role of non-cognitive variables. Proceedings from
Paper ID #18045The Students’ Experience Coming Back After Cooperative Education Expe-riencesDr. J. C. McNeil, University of Louisville JC McNeil is an Assistant Professor for the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at University of Louisville. Contact email: j.mcneil@louisville.eduMrs. Mary Andrade, University of Louisville, J.B. Speed School of Engineering Mary Andrade is the Associate Director of the Career Development and Cooperative Education office at the University of Louisville JB Speed School of Engineering. In this role she oversees the mandatory co-op program for more than 1000 students each year.Alex
Assistant Professor in the Departments of Educational and Organizational Leadership and Development and Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and Faculty Director for Clemson University Center for Workforce Development (CUCWD) and the National Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education Center for Aviation and Automotive Technological Education using Virtual E-Schools (CA2VES). Her research and experiences include implementation of digital learning solutions, development of career pathways including educator professional development, and analysis of economic development factors impacting education and workforce development. Kris earned an Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction in Education
performance. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82: 33–40. 5. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). An achievement goal perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, Vol. 25, pp. 92–104. 6. Matusovich, H., Streveler, R., Miller, R., and Olds, B. (2008). Will I succeed in engineering? Using expectancy-value theory in a longitudinal investigation of students' beliefs. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Jones, B. D., Paretti, M. C., Hein, S. F., & Knott, T. W. (2010). An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education
Paper ID #17699Managing Transformation to Crack Open Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist
State University. QMRA III is a one-and-a-half-week training program designed for advanced graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and earlycareer professionals to assimilate scientific data and implement computer programs towardsbuilding a risk assessment for assuring safety and health goals. Each cohort of QMRA IIIconsists of engineering, biological and social scientists with the goal of cross training. As part ofthe evaluation plan of the program, students were asked to construct a box-and-arrow diagramconveying a risk management plan involving the full range of biologic, economic, social,political, and cultural factors that impact risk during a pathogen exposure. Additionally, experts,professors and career professionals who were also the
room is of utmost importance. In orderof-Art technologies, so that the contents never to emphasize it, I would like to recite a number ofbecome obsolete. This assures preparing the Hi-Tech courses that I am involved in teachingstudents for the 21st century so that they can take and research at the moment.the suitable place in the technological world,thereby becoming the productive citizens in thesociety. During my teaching career of 30+ years,teaching Hi-Tech courses, I have foundintegration of fundamentals is very useful in thesecourses. However, teaching must translate intolearning by the students. No new information canbecome knowledge until or unless it is yokedwith the existing database of the students. Wemust
skilled in these subjects1. After noticing this challenge, the whole STEM society has madegreat efforts to increase STEM-related activities, which have the potential to promotecollaborative learning and inquiry as well as to contribute to the development of the 21st centuryskills2. The US government also realized the shortage of STEM workforces. It initiated the“Educate to Innovate” program to increase student participation in all STEM-related activities.The ultimate objective of these activities is to encourage more students to choose an education inthe STEM fields and pursue a STEM-related career in the future.Extra after-school curriculum programs have been reported to be an efficient way to promptSTEM education3. To name a few, these programs
instrumentation. Engineers are more concernedwith design equations. In both types of programs laboratory equipment provides a necessarylinkage to physical reality.PTEC programs provide training for individuals seeking careers as operators in the chemicalprocess industries. As such PTEC programs include training in chemical separation, such asdistillation or absorption; heat transfer; reactions; and how such processes are connected, i.e.piping and pumps. For further information on PTEC, please see the web pages of the NorthAmerican Process Technology Alliance [6]. Chemical Engineering (ChE) is the correspondingbranch of engineering which deals with the same set of topics. Training for both fields usessimilar equipment and similar exercises with, as
course in Technical communications, resume, memos, proposals, etc Communications 3 Degree requirements and Plan of Study (POS) From PPI Richmond 4 Teaming, Internships, COOP, Careers 4 ABET Outcomes and Ethics, Global/Societal Responsibilities Handouts 5 Handouts from previous Quality and Safety
young engineerswho are from demographics currently underrepresented in engineering, including women andminorities.Given this goal, it is important to develop instruments capable of measuring change in studentattitudes toward and interest in engineering. One important link in the validity argument thatincreasing student exposure to engineering will increase and diversify the population pursuingengineering careers, is that students become more interested in engineering and their attitudesmore positive as they engage in engineering out-of-school-time experiences and curricula. Tomeasure this assumption, we have developed an Engineering Interest and Attitudes (EIA) survey,drawing from earlier surveys used to measure student interest in and
career, which may be an understatement.From the survey results for the readings, the largest responses from the students were on the TataNano and India Inventors. Both of these had strong connections to engineering. The strongpositive rating for the India Inventors appears to be due to the positive impact on people in India.For the in class topics, most students chose the more technical topics on the Cost of Mars andCongolese Wireless Network (which is also a very dramatic story). As a general rule, the favoritetopics seem to be ones that involve the positive impact of technology on human need, that bringtogether the students’ expertise and career goals with their desire to help people and make adifference.Students selected most of the possible
, librarians, and end-users in effective use of IEEE Xplore and the patent analytics tool ”InnovationQ Plus”. - Coordinate customized promotional events at customer sites - Present work- shops on topics such as: career & networking opportunities, authorship, innovation & entrepreneurship workshop. - Represent IEEE at conferences and major industry events Prior to joining IEEE, I had an 18-year career with AT&T/Lucent and its predecessor companies. My roles included Bell Labs Reference Librarian, management trainer and administrator of education, information specialist for business systems, and electronic content coordinator for Lucent’s Digital Library c American Society for
focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Prof. Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. Tamara Moore received an NSF Early CAREER award in 2010 and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists
number who completed the survey for thatpopulation and scaling it to 100. Many of the categories aligned with the Likert scale questions.One category that was not included in the Likert scale responses was students who wished theywould have done the other software design project. There were more comments about studentswho wished they could have completed the game project than there were students who wishedthey could have completed the IR project. Figure 7: Student Responses to Open Ended QuestionsStudents viewed the IR project as a realistic, but constrained, experience that can be encounteredin industry. The greatest number of positive comments focused on its applicability to the robotproject, their career, or their life
, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). National data suggests that an urgent, sustained,comprehensive, intensive, coordinated, and informed national effort is necessary to increasesuccess of underrepresented minorities (URMs) in STEM [2]. URM is the classification given tothe following groups: African American, Hispanic American or Latino, Native American, NativeHawaiian or Pacific Islander. In the US, these groups comprise 31.1% of the population [3], yetthey are only 17.4% of the student population pursuing engineering degrees [4]. In general, the successful pathway to a career in STEM typically requires “the acquisitionof knowledge, skills, and habits of mind; opportunities to put these into practice; a developingsense of
Laboratories, Lucent Technology, Inc. as Member of Technical Staff and Ciena Corp. as Principal Engineer, doing research in photonic networks and optoelectronics. His teaching interest fo- cuses on the project-based learning (PBL) model of engineering education with self-directed learner as enhanced educational outcome. His research area focuses on optoelectronics, semiconductor lasers, and metamaterials.Dr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Associate Professor of physics and engineering at Sweet Briar College in Sweet Briar, Va. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 13 years in industry designing
differentiating characteristics for successful project teams (Howe et al., 2009). Asundergraduate engineering students must be instructed in solving “real world” practical problems(i.e., open-ended or ill-structured), we propose an educational framework within a multi-yearcapstone program to provide instruction on the professional skills necessary to prepare them forand support their open-ended capstone experience and transition towards career (Jonassen et al.,2006; Incropera & Fox, 1996; Harris & Jacobs, 1995). This paper provides a blueprint for ournew capstone program. As this program and its evaluation are in the beginning stages, wediscuss our plan for the program, including the assessment and evaluation plan, with assessmentresults to be
Paper ID #18002Is It Time For a Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(BOK)?Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education