AC 2009-1454: ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS: EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATIONJess Everett, Rowan UniversityYusuf Mehta, Rowan UniversityJoshua R. Wyrick, Rowan UniversityMaria Perez-Colon, Rowan University Page 14.562.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Engineers Without Borders: Experiential EducationAbstractAn Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Club has operated at our University for approximately 6years, conducting projects in Asia, Africa, Central America, and North America. EWB projectsare completed cooperatively between club members and students enrolled in an experientiallearning course required by the engineering curriculum. EWB projects provide real
researchexperiments on various metals with the ability to run cycles with or without lubricants.What is a tribometer?Tribometers, also known as devices, that measure friction and wear, are mostly used in industryfor investigations and research on materials (base or working material and fluids or lubricants aswell). Experimentation with various metals could be tested under controlled conditions includingthe ability to apply lubrication or non-lubricative additives. Consistent contact between surfacescauses friction and wear resulting in the loss of structural integrity of the material over time.Therefore, lubrication and design play an intricate role in improving the life of metals operatingunder various load conditions.In this experiment, a Block-On-Ring
of a capstone design course. My objection here, however,relates to the current structure of most engineering programs. Requiring students to takeadditional courses in ethics may indeed help them develop a sense of social awareness.Unfortunately adding more required courses to an already requirement-heavy curriculum seemsunlikely. Engineering faculty currently argue that technical courses may be threatened by anyaddition to the curriculum; other concerns relate to personnel (hiring more faculty to teach ethicscourses) or engineering faculty development (training engineering faculty so they can include anethical dimension to their technical courses). Furthermore, ethics courses that remain separatefrom technical content, such as those that may
techniques for their students to facilitate their learning in engineering.Engineering Teachers will integrate engineering, such as engineering concepts, vocabulary,Integration activities, the EDP, EiE, and MEAs, into current curriculum or subjects.Engineering/ Teachers will introduce students to engineering and technology throughTechnology instruction on engineering vocabulary, difference between engineering andKnowledge technology, what engineers do, and examples of engineering in their everyday life.Engineering Teachers will include engineering activities, which are more hands-on and/orActivities use problem solving approaches.Thinking Skills Teachers wanted to develop students
. Electronic submission of work was also utilized, again with no problemsexperienced. Portions of assignments frequently required accessing a website and downloadingfiles, which also wasn’t an issue for this group.A final disturbing development was the numerous cases of academic integrity violations. This isa larger issue that deserves additional study and comment beyond the scope of this paper.Delivery Options – What Worked and What Didn’tThe class was scheduled in a computer laboratory with workstations for each student. It wasequipped with a white board and an instructor’s workstation that was mirrored on monitorsthroughout the room. Numerous delivery techniques were attempted with varying degrees ofsuccess.Initially, faculty would lecture at the
. As aresult of analysis of this effort, the instructors determined that a group of practicing classroomteachers would better appreciate and adapt the engineering content for 8-12 classrooms. The newversion of the course is integrated with a Curriculum and Instruction course, entitled PedagogicalApplications of Engineering Concepts in the K-12 Classroom. Each course carries one-credit.Students in the education college can use both courses for graduate credit.The combined courses will emphasize the engineering mechanics of stiffness and deformation,stress and strain, equilibrium, buckling, bending, and material properties. A design thread isused. The information is put together in a tight package that leads to the design of pinned trusses
depict how buildings are draftedand assembled. Physical model building is not part of the current curriculum for either of thesetwo courses. This study provides quantitative results from a spatial reasoning ability test andqualitative results from student surveys given to four separate sections of freshmen – Graphics Itest and control groups and Materials and Methods of Construction I test and control groups in2010. The Materials and Methods of Construction I test group had built an advanced framingmodel (an energy-saving framing system) and the Graphics I test group had built a 3‖ cubemodel of solids and voids as part of their courses prior to the spatial test and survey. The controlgroup in each course prepared an axonometric drawing instead
Engineering EducationFollowing is a description of the major activities of the WISE Office and the OMEP and howthey are helping to increase the number of women engineers in this nation, based on the researchthat has been reviewed.IV. Recruitment Efforts in the CEASThe Dean of the CEAS and the Dean of the College of Education are working together innational meetings and locally to try to solve the education gap between teachers and engineering.Engineering faculty are working with education faculty to enrich the pre-service and the in-service teacher’s curriculum with an integration of mathematics, science, and engineering.5 Thiscollaboration is a bold and new positive step to help get engineering into the K-12.In the meantime, the WISE Investments
research productivity (e.g., papers published). However, weacknowledge that excellent undergraduate research experiences often lead to peer-reviewed publicationsand help faculty career progression.In partnership with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), a workshop has been held forfour summers to help faculty integrate the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) into their work with researchstudents. We are interested in exploring the impact of this work on participation and sharing our findingswith the broader engineering community.Research questions: 1. How can faculty use an EM to adjust their approach to research activities and student mentoring? 2. What structures/practices from the workshop help faculty adjust their approach to
papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and
initial course offering, the faculty identified two principal areas ofimprovement. The first area concerned student team dynamics. Engineering and technologycurricula often focus on the technical abilities of students, neglecting the “soft skills” that willoften determine success or failure for a graduate when (s)he enters the workforce. As anexample, project management skills are often neglected in an engineering curriculum, requiringadditional training for those engineers who end up in management positions6. Skills such as theability to lead and work effectively as a member of a team are frequently identified as critical tothe success of an engineer, but typically are lacking in new engineering graduates7. The same istrue of business students
Paper ID #22397A Study on Measuring Self-efficacy in Engineering Modeling and DesignCoursesDr. Muhammad Safeer Khan, Arkansas Tech University Muhammad Khan received Ph. D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA in 2013. He is an Assistant Professor in the De- partment of Electrical Engineering at Arkansas Tech University (ATU). His research interests include signal processing for audio and acoustics, Wireless Communications, Internet of Things applications, non-destructive evaluation, engineering and integrated STEM education and K-12 and higher
used as further onboardingto the campus, with the remaining being integrated throughout the semester so interest is not lost.The Career Development Center and Student Success Center will be built into the curriculum toteach students about well-being and to develop ownership over their career. This design isadapted from the University of Tennessee study [3], as well as what the author personallyexperienced during their FYE experience as an undergraduate student to given demographic of aregional campus. This is the next step in applying the FYE model to develop a FYET program.References[1] K. Brannan and P. Wankat, “Survey of first-year programs,” in ASEE Annu. Conf., 2005, pp.10.118.1-10.1188.23, doi:10.18260/1-2—14986.[2] J. E. Froyd, P. C
orientation process towards thediscipline. It provides a transition from outreach and recruitment to retention initiatives at thecollege and departmental levels. Incoming students require integration into the nuclearengineering program that provides an introduction to the academic material, in addition tointeraction with faculty, staff and current nuclear engineering students. The sooner freshmanstudents make this transition and contribute to the field, the likelihood increases that studentswill matriculate into the discipline and go on to successfully complete the degree program.When to Start Retention initiatives start during the admission process. Once students have committed tojoining the department, there needs to be interaction with
IoT program between California Baptist University (CBU) andShanghai Aurora Vocational College (SAVC); the Overview of Course section presents thelearning objectives and assessment methods used in teaching this course; the Lab Modulessection lists the lab projects and design projects with descriptions and hardware/softwarespecifications; the Results and Discussions section discusses the effectiveness of the learn-by-doing approach and lessons learned.Background Over the past few years, engineering educators in North America have designed coursesand lab activities involving IoT technologies and integrated these components into existingengineering curricula. An IoT based Innovation Laboratory was created at Seattle University, aspart of
in any state or U.S. territory. In 2008 the program received391 applications but narrowed it down to 30 students, with an 8% acceptance rate. Thiscompares with a 17% acceptance rate of freshmen into Caltech. Selection criteria includeSAT/PSAT scores, high school transcript, student essay, and letters of recommendation fromteachers. Students are expected to have completed pre-calculus, excelled in their science andmathematics courses, and show interest and aptitude in science and engineering.The instructors are selected in February and meet regularly in the preceding months to create achallenging and engaging curriculum personalized to the team’s expertise. Caltechundergraduate students serve as residential counselors and are in charge of non
cognition.Mr. Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno Nelson Pearson is an Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes, social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture as well as engineering pedagogy. His education includes a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno.Mr. Benjamin P. Jackson, Purdue UniversityMs. Tara C. Langus, University of Nevada, Reno Tara C. Langus is a doctoral student pursuing her degree in STEM Education at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). She received her BS/MS in Biology from UNR where she studied insect immunology and chemical ecology. She has five years of teaching experience and currently
appropriateways to respond when ethically difficult decisions need to be made in the workplace.The focus of this study is on student responses to an open-ended question in the survey whichasked students to list two primary behaviors or actions that engineers must follow whenperforming their professional duties. Across the two samples, the most popular responses relatedto integrity, safety, honesty, and improving human welfare/society. While the workshop leadersemphasized that the study of ethics involves personal values or morals as applied to dealing withother people, it is notable that responses involving society were not the most frequent answersgiven during either semester. This might indicate that these students, as members of themillennial
area,with policies and best practices potentially having relevance in both parts of the world. Bothareas, for example, could re-examine tradition engineering courses in light of local developmentneeds. Engineering curriculum which focuses solely on globally competitive engineers andinnovation runs the risk of being overly outward-looking and lacking the resources to addressesthe problems within.Possible Solutions for India and Latin America • Integration - A framework for linking engineering education to local development should consist of an integrated approach that begins with an analysis of how accessible the engineering programs are to the society as a whole; conduct a monitoring of investments from the private
the interventionaffected non-white students differently than white students and non-transfer students differentlythan transfer students. No significant differences were found. We also analyzed the data bymajor grouping (electrical engineering, computer engineering, computer science, mechanicalengineering, and other) and found no significant differences.Conclusion This paper presented the current state of an NSF IUSE project that is studying the impact ofdeploying adaptive learning modules in digital circuits courses. Our research team has defineddetailed learning outcomes for a sequence of courses in digital logic and created acomprehensive set of curriculum tools to teach the material. A baseline of understanding wascollected using 600
bioelectricphenomena. The students are enrolled in the biomedical engineering concentration within thenewly accredited general engineering program at East Carolina University. Bioelectricphenomena were introduced through a group project so that, in addition to learning new subjectmatter, they would (A) integrate knowledge developed in prerequisite and co-requisitecoursework in a new setting, (B) develop their independent research skills, (C) gain experienceworking in teams, and (D) develop facility to apply their new knowledge, not just recite it. Thesetraits are considered to be important aspects of the program goal to producing work-readyengineers.Teams of 3-4 students were given a model of an axon, surrounding tissue and a stimulating nervecuff, written in
, lists,dictionaries, logic and branches, loops, functions, and data visualization.To actively engage students in hands-on exercises during this introductory programming class,the Micro:Bit is integrated into the second half of the class curriculum. The Micro:Bit, shown inFigure 1, is a user-friendly and cost-effective tool that doesn't require extensive technicalexpertise, making it accessible to first-year undergraduates. This compact device can bepowered either via USB from a personal computer or by battery. With functionalities like LEDdisplays, buttons, sensors, and wireless communication, the Micro:Bit's hardware iscomplemented by a user-friendly integrated development environment (IDE), as illustrated inFigure 2 [5]. The diverse
Paper ID #36943Adapting Chaos Theory for Undergraduate ElectricalEngineersBenjamin C. Flores (Professor)Hector A. Ochoa (Assistant Professor) Dr. Hector Ochoa is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Stephen F. Austin State University, where he develops curriculum and laboratories in engineering physics. Dr. Ochoa graduated with his doctorate and M.S. from the University of Texas at El Paso, and a Bachelor’s degree from The University of Guadalajara, Mexico. His current research interests include Radar Image Processing, Compressive Radar, and Engineering Education.Chandra S. Pappu (Assistant Professor
potentiallymake improvements in curriculum based on these findings. Therefore, this paper takes theFirst-year Engineering Honors Program at the Ohio State University in the United States andthe Engineering Experimental Class at Beihang University in China as their case studies ofinternational comparison of the entire first two years’ curriculum. As an intermediary ofteaching activities and the basic guarantee of achieving educational goals, course is ablueprint and plan for cultivating what types of people. This paper takes courses as theresearch object, compares the whole course setting, and studies the syllabi of basic coursesand teaching methods reflected in the syllabi. Methodologies including text analysis,frequency analysis, comparative research
deterring and a major barrier to retention andsuccess in the profession.[5-10]Several factors have been identified as key challenges: (a) the lack of exposure to engineering orcomputer science as fields of study or as career opportunities [11], (b) the lack of professionalidentity (inability to see oneself as a professional) [7], (c) an impaired sense of belonging [12,13], and (d) the lack of self-efficacy (how well one can execute a course of action to deal with aprospective situation) [14]. Adding to the challenge is the rigor of engineering curriculum whichsubstantially contributes to high dropout rates from engineering [15], averaging at 50%, andranging from 60 to 67% for minorities [12, 16, 17]. These numbers are strongly driven by highfailure
powerful tool in analysis and design of dynamical systems.The authors used SIMULINK in analysis and design of an automobile suspension system6 as an Page 11.1141.2exemplary model in vibrations’ class.This model example, which provided for follow-up homework assignments and a project, helpedstudents learn about efficient numerical methods, and how to employ technology tools,MATLAB and SIMULINK, in solving engineering problems, early in the dynamics class. Whatstudents learned here helps them a great deal in the subsequent courses in the curriculum. Thestate form of the governing differential equations of motion, introduced to students in the follow
institution and constantly strives to promote equity within the academy.Dr. Susanne I Lapp, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Lapp is an Associate Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning in the College of Educa- tion at Florida Atlantic University where she teaches undergraduate and graduate Content Area Literacy courses. Her research interests include the integration of mobile learning devices in k-12 classrooms.Dr. Dilys Schoorman, Florida Atlantic University Dilys Schoorman is Professor and the Chair of the Department of Curriculum, Culture and Educational Inquiry in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic University where she teaches courses in Multicul- tural/Global Education, Curriculum Theory, and
that “above all other skillsrequired to be an ‘effective engineer,’ communication was ranked as “essential” by over 60%of our survey respondents.” [1].When ABET adopted Engineering Criteria 2000 [2], which focused more specifically onprofessional skills in demand by employers, many engineering departments continued theirefforts to incorporate instruction on these skills into their curriculum in various ways. Somerelied on stand-alone courses or workshops [3], [4], whereas others integrated the teachingof these skills into courses such as senior design as well as lab classes [5], [6]. The majorityof these initiatives, especially those involving instruction on communication skills, relied onhiring graduate students from English departments or
, professional engineering development and other topics in civil and environmental engineering. He was an Associate Editor for the international research journal Waste Management from 2003-2009, and has been Associate Editor for Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems since 2014. He has a BSc from Harvey Mudd College, a MSc from Univ. Wisconsin—Madison, and a PhD from Carnegie Mellon University, and he is a New Zealand Chartered Professional Engineer. From 2009-2015 he has led the curriculum review process in his department, and has been a leader in curriculum innovations by developing new courses in engineering design, communication skills portfolio, and professional engineering development.Dr. Norb Delatte P.E., Cleveland
. The immediate and continuedsuccess of students involved in this two course sequence is described, as they put their lab skillsto work in the lab, at home, and on individual research projects. The evolution and expansion oflaboratory instrumentation is described and the assessment of this laboratory sequence isdiscussed.Introduction to Experimental MethodsIn the aerospace engineering curriculum at many universities, laboratory exercises are eitherincluded as an integral part of various classes, or separated into a sequence of courses taught inthe upper division. Previously at Mississippi State University, laboratory courses were offeredonly in the senior year, with one course being a lecture/lab class introducing experimentalmethods, and the