Conference Session

Best In DEED

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luciana Debs, Purdue University; Jiansong Zhang, Purdue University; Yunfeng Chen, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

nospelling and grammar mistakes, and professionally formatted. The final submittal was worth 10points. Then, on Tuesday, December 3rd, students were asked to provide a 10 minutepresentation to a panel of industry professionals. The small group meeting on that Tuesdaystarted one hour later than the usual meeting, to allow students’ further preparation, and theremaining 120 minutes were allocated for presentation and questions and answers (Q&A). Toprovide more authenticity to the task, course managers invited industry professionals toparticipate in an evaluation panel of the students’ presentation. They were recruited from theprogram’s industry partners (industry advisory board). In the call for industry professionals,instructors indicated

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christian Schnell, Stanford University; Johann Elmar Nordhus gen Westarp, Technical University of Munich (TUM); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

It's All About the Student: Integration, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Matthew Stephen Barner, Oregon State University; Masoud Ghodrat Abadi, California State University, Sacramento; David S. Hurwitz, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

carry water at a rate of 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s). What is the total headloss for this length of pipe? 2 Which 8-inch pipe with a length of 500 feet A. friction factor, fd = .015; would have the greatest headloss? Assume: Q = roughness coefficient, C = 160 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s), each pipe is made of new B. friction factor, fd = .02; unlined Schedule 40 steel, turbulent flow, each roughness coefficient, C = 140 pipe is flowing full, and there is no change in C. friction factor, fd = .025; elevation between point A and point B. roughness coefficient, C = 120

Conference Session

Curriculum and Assessment I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University; Debra Lee Davis, Florida International University; Ingrid A. Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University; Edward L. Jones, Florida A&M University/Florida State University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

opportunityfor schema construction (germane load) is possible. Note that although our model currently showsonly 4 LESs, we expect that this number will increase over time as more pedagogical approachesare integrated.The main objective of the proposed model is through research find the values of a, b, c, d, e, q, r, s,and t in the equations F2FA (aCL + bGA + cPBL + dSI + eLS) and OA(qCL + rGA + sPBL + tSI)that maximizes student learning and engagement. Where F2FA and OA are the face-to-face andonline activities respectively. CL - collaborative learning, GA - gamification, PBL - problem-basedlearning and SI - social interaction are the LESs, and LS - lecture style the traditional approach.You may think of a, b, c, d, e, q, r, s, and t as the percentage of

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Mohammad N Amin, National University; Ronald P. Uhlig, National University; Pradip Peter Dey, National University; Bhaskar Sinha, National University; Shatha Jawad Jawad, National University

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

development race. Major players in the USA include: Google, Microsoft,IBM and Intel. Some other companies in the quantum computing race include, but are notlimited to: Alibaba, Nokia, Intel, Airbus, HP, Toshiba, Mitsubishi, SK Telecom, NEC,Lockheed Martin, Rigetti, Biogen, Volkswagen, Amgen, D-Wave, 1QBit, Accenture, AlpineQuantum Technologies, AT&T, Cambridge Quantum Computing Limited, Elyah, EverettianTechnologies, Fujitsu, Hitachi, Honeywell, HRL Laboratories, Huawei, ionQ, InfiniQuant,Northrop Grumman, NTT Laboratories, Q-Ctrl, Qbitlogic International, Quantum Circuits,Siemens Healthineers, Delft Circuits, RIKEN, Strangeworks, Xanadu, Zapata Computing, andmany universities worldwide [9,55]. A large number of universities worldwide are engaged

Conference Session

Liberal Education Division Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

.[13] J. Cha and Y. He, Zhongguo gongcheng jiaoyu gaige san da zhanlue (Three Straetgies in Chinese Engineering Education Reform), Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2009.[14] Q. Gu, "The work, lives and professional development of teachers in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 235-238, 2013.[15] Y. Wei, "Yingjie jiaoyu yanjiu de xin fanshi: Shenjing jiaoyuxue [Embracing a new paradigm for educational research: Neuroeducation]," 19 December 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cae.cn/cae/html/main/col35/2012-12/27/20121227152437045647584_1.html. [Accessed 4 February 2019].[16] D. Starr, "China and the Confucian education model," Universitas, vol. 21, pp. 1-27, 2012.[17] R. L

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

deepening? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.19 Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.20 Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation, (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.21 Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. (2005). Evaluation theory, models, & applications, (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.22 Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.23 Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Eng. Entrep., vol. 4, pp. 55–78, 2013.[8] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 425–435, 2012.[9] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial Career Choice and Characteristics of Engineering and Business Students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[10] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2004.[11] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an

Conference Session

STEM Issues

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University; Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, but to also introduce them along the way to some basictheoretical knowledge needed to understand the complexity of the final product. The researchteam’s expectation was that exposing the participants to an introductory level of knowledge fromvarious fields will stimulate their interest and will help them identify engineering areas that areof specific interest to each of them. The workshops activities were split between hands-on, Q&Aand presentations, with the latest starting with a brief introduction to the theory of bio-inspiredrobot mechanisms, 3D modeling, animation, STL generation, slicing, G code generation, printingof the robot segments, and concluding with the prototype. The workshops focus was on theconnection between 3D computer

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

; Exposition, 2017.[36] D. J. Wilde, “Team Creativity,” in Education that Works: The NCIIA 8th Annual Meeting, 2004, pp. 77–80.[37] M. S. Kim and Y. S. Kim, “Analysis of perceived creativity and design team interaction,” in ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2007, pp. 559–568.[38] Z. Qian, Y. Lan, J. Feng, and Q. Yiping, “Teamwork approach for senior research projects for college undergraduates,” in 2012 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2012, pp. 1999–2001.[39] N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, and C. Amanti, Funds of Knowledge : Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence

Conference Session

ECE Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University; Phillip Wong, Portland State University; Robert Bass, Portland State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

(Q) are shown in Table 1 foreach of the three courses in the capstone sequence. We consider 1-5 scores greater than 4 and 5-1scores less than 2 to be exceeding expectations. The results in Table 1 show students meet orexceed expectations in these metrics. Tracking these results through the academic year providesinsights in how perceptions of team satisfaction and task conflict change over time. For example,we observe that Team Satisfaction scores degrade by about 12 to 15% and Task Conflict scoresincrease by 14 to 18% during the capstone period.Table 1. Results of the CATME peer-assessment tool showing results from six survey questions for each of the three terms of the capstone sequence. Scale range is 1-5. For (Q

Conference Session

ECE Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University; Joi D. Aybar, Morgan State University; Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University; Mohamed F. Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University; Shonda L. Bernadin, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Ibibia K. Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Abdelnasser A Eldek, Jackson State University; Demetris Geddis, Hampton University; Petronella A. James-Okeke, Morgan State University; John Carey Kelly Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; Pamela Leigh-Mack, Virginia State University; Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Mandoye Ndoye, Tuskegee University; Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; Ben O. Oni, Tuskegee University; Stella A. Quinones, University of Texas, El Paso; Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University; Lei Zhang, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Saleh Zein-Sabatto, Tennessee State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

UMI Workshop June 18-20, 2018 Monday, June 18th 6:00 pm Welcome Reception & Dinner The Alexandrian Hotel Tuesday, June 19th 7:30 am Breakfast 8:00 am Welcome and Introduction 8:05 am Introduction of Potential New Partners 8:15 am Overview of Status of the Project 8:30 am Q&A 10:15 am Morning Break 10:30 am Session – Mega/REU/RET 12:00 pm Working Lunch 1:30 pm

Conference Session

Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Natalie Rice, University of Tennessee ; Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jordan Kaufman; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

, Thailand, August 20 - August 28, 1999[7] R. Ali, N. Abu-Hassan, M. Y. M. Daud, and K. Jusoff, "Information literacy skills ofengineering students," International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies vol. 5, no.3, pp. 264-270, 2010.[8] Q. Q. Zhang, M. Goodman, and S. Y. Xie, "Integrating library instruction into the coursemanagement system for a first-year engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring theeffectiveness of blended learning on students' information literacy levels," College & ResearchLibraries, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 934-958, Nov 2015.[9] P. Ramamurthy and E. Siridevi, "Information literacy search skills of students in fiveselected engineering colleges in Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh: A

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Xi Zhou, Northern Arizona University; Fang Lei, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Delbert D Willie, Northern Arizona University; Andrew Chrysler, Northern Arizona University; Liangbo Xie, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Phillip A Mlsna, Northern Arizona University; Jie Yang, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

Chinese students is that they seldom ask anyquestions during the class, but they tend to gather around the instructor after the class and askquestions about the lecture. We believe this is related to the way students are expected to behaveduring lecture, which is to listen and not interrupt. As for NAU taught courses in China, theclassroom follows the more student-centered approach. Every NAU faculty would combine oneor several interactive class activities with traditional lectures to keep the students engaged inclass. Some typical activities include: a) Short Q & A sections: the roles are interchangeable as either the instructor or students can be the one to give questions. b) Asking students to answer short questions with a

Conference Session

ECCD Technical Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University; Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University; Awilma Paola Ventura Lugo, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

). 𝑃𝑄 𝑒= = 𝐹1 (𝑃, 𝑄, 𝜏, 𝜔) … . (2) 𝜏𝜔To determine the variables that affect pump efficiency of the fluid system the variables that affectequation (2) were defined. Identifying that flow rate 𝑄 is a function of q = displacement volume,ω = angular velocity, µ = fluid viscosity, and T = temperature. In addition, the overall efficiencyfunction shown in equation (3) was determined by knowing that output pressure P is a function ofτ = torque, 𝑄 = flow rate, µ = fluid viscosity, and T = temperature. 𝑒 = 𝐹(𝑞, 𝜔, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝜏, 𝜇, 𝑇) … . (3)In general, the efficiency of any pump system is a function of many independent variables

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

functions: Inflating a balloon The change in the volume of a constantly inflated / deflated balloon depends on thechange in its radius which changes as a function of time (Figure 10). Figure 10: Inflating a balloonQuestion: What is the change in volume of the balloon as a function of the incoming air flowq(t)?Assuming a spherical balloon, its volume V is 4 𝑉 = 𝜋 𝑟3 3If the radius changes with time due to the incoming air rate, q(t), then according to the ChainRule 𝑑𝑉 𝑑𝑉 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑞

Conference Session

Wireless Technology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University; Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University; Kyle Joseph Wheelhouse, Utah Valley University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

. Groza, and S. Bixwas, “Sensor Based Home Automation and Security System”, February 5, 2018 6. H. Huang, S. Xiao, X. Meng, and Y. Xiong, “A Remote Home Security System Based on Wireless Sensor Network and GSM Technology”, February 5, 2018 7. “Safer. Smarter. Z-Wave”, Z-Wave, Silicon Laboratories, http://www.z-wave.com/, February 5, 2018. 8. Blynk. Retrieved April 08, 2018, from http:docs.blynk.cc/ . 9. https://www.geekstips.com/temperature-sensor-dht22-ds18b20-arduino-tutorial/, Accessed on April 2018.10. https://www.google.com/search?q=arduino+light+sensor&safe=active&source=lnms&tb m=shop&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCm43PqLraAhVjx1QKHeIwBpsQ_AUICigB&biw=16 82&bih=921#spd=0, accessed on April

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 8: Survey and Instrument Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adurangba Victor Oje, University of Georgia; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Peter H. Carnell, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

factors. We will examine the multi-dimensionality of the academic resilience construct by testing the three-factor model against afour or five factor model. Future studies will explore diversity of participants, examine genderdifferences among different samples and explore other demographics. Lastly, we intend to usethe validated instrument as a tool to examine causal relationships between academic resilience,students’ school engagement, and other motivational factors that influence academicachievement, especially for students who are most vulnerable to high academic stress.References[1] G. Windle, K. M. Bennett, J. J. H. Noyes, and q. o. l. outcomes, "A methodological review of resilience measurement scales," vol. 9, no. 1, p. 8, 2011

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics in the First Year

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard T Cimino, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

/64/papers/14871/view​.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[7] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” ​J. Ed. Psych​., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[8] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in ​121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, ​[Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130​. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[9] L. Kohlberg, R. H. Hersh, “Stages of moral development,” ​Theory Pract.,​ vol. 16, pp.53-59,Apr. 1977.[10

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 11: Leadership and Collaborations in Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

learned at various stages of the project h) Applying strategies that seek to strengthen your interdisciplinary collaboration i) Developing strategies that contribute to your professional growth (e.g., diversifying for broader learning, relationship building, etc.)Q. 9 Please select all the programs you are associated with at your institution from the choices below. __Engineering __Education __Learning Sciences __Psychology __Engineering Education __Other ______Q. 10 For how many years have you been teaching in higher education? ______Q. 11 For how many years have you been involved with interdisciplinary engineering education research? ______Q. 12 Please select the job or title that best

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 15: Perspectives on Engineering Careers and Workplaces

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Rohde, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[21] N. Fouad, R. Singh, M. Fitzpatrick, and J. Liu, “Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering,” 2012.[22] L. M. Frehill, “Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering,” Sociol. Q., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 225–249, 1997.[23] National Science Board, “Chapter 3. Science and Engineering Labor Force,” in Science and Engineering Indicators, 2016, pp. 1–60.[24] A. Godwin and G. Potvin, “Chemical engineering students: A distinct group among engineers,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 145–153, 2013.[25] M. Schar, P. Bracken, K. J. Chew

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 4: Professional Development in Undergraduate Programs

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro Gutierrez, University of California, Merced; Christopher A. Butler, University of California, Merced; Abbas Ghassemi, University of California, Merced

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, "Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms," Engineering Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153-174, 2010.[13] R. F. Korte, "How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers," Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 285-306, 2009.[14] A. Q. Gates, S. Roach, E. Villa, K. Kephart, C. Della-Piana and G. Della-Piana, The Affinity Research Group: Creating And Maintaining Effective Research Teams, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2009.[15] N. K. Martin and K. Meyer, "Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Student Retention Rates at A Hispanic Serving Institution: Building Collaborative Relationships for the Common

Collection

2019 CIEC

Authors

Niaz Latif; Mohammad Zahraee; Deborah Blades; Mont Handley

smallbusiness community, including: “1 MillionCups (1MC)”, Founders Hours, and IntellectualProperty Legal Aid (IPLA). IMC engages entrepreneurs with local communities around theworld. Each week, two local entrepreneurs get an opportunity to present their startup story to adiverse audience of mentors, advisors and entrepreneurs. A six-minute presentation followed upwith 20 minutes of questions and feedback session provides tips that can benefit and helppromote start-ups. Founders Hours is a monthly 2-hr networking event for entrepreneurs that ishighlighted by a keynote presentation from a seasoned and successful start-up founder. A paneldiscussion follows the 10-15 minute keynote, with Q & A from the audience. And finally, theIntellectual Property

Collection

2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Michael R. Gardner; Nina K. Telang

Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018 Physical Response: A Review.,” Mod. Lang. J., setting: a confirmatory factor analysis.,” Res. Q. vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 79–84, 1966. Exerc. Sport, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 48–58, Mar. 1989.[11] N. G. Pope, “How the Time of Day Affects [13] S. G. Hart, “Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); Productivity: Evidence from School Schedules,” 20 Years Later,” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc

Collection

2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Amir Karimi; Randall Manteufel

each the process. chapter were completed. Starting with the second third of the semester period, the power pointB. For the followings, identify each item as: (A)- presentations of lectures for each chapter were posted Extensive property, (B)-Intensive property, or on blackboard in advance and students were asked to (C)-Not a property. review them in additions to the reading assignments. 3. Volume, V 4. Heat transfer, Q 5. Temperature, T 6. Work, W 7. Density, ρC. For the followings, identify each item as: (A)- Open System, (B)-Closed System, or (C)- Isolated System 8. A

Conference Session

CEED Technical Session I: WIP: Experiential Learning Potpourri

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jones, North Dakota State University; Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

competitions. It hasreviewed relevant literature and discussed the work of several robotics teams at the North DakotaState University. Future work will involve conducting a more in-depth analysis of participationdata and collecting data from additional participants over time to assess the long-term benefits ofrobotic program participation.References[1] J. Dias, K. Althoefer, and P. U. Lima, “Robot Competitions: What Did We Learn?,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 2016.[2] A.-B. Hunter, T. J. Weston, S. L. Laursen, and H. Thiry, “URSSA: Evaluating Student Gains from Undergraduate Research in the Sciences,” CUR Q., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 15–19, 2009.[3] A. Zdešar, S. Blažic, and G. Klančar, “Engineering Education in Wheeled

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Carlos Eduardo Martinez-Torteya, Tecnologico de Monterrey

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

graph for I2 as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning. c) Sketch a qualitative graph for the capacitor’s voltage VC as a function of time for 𝑡 ≥ 0. Show clearly the value at 𝑡 = 0 and for 𝑡 → ∞. Explain your reasoning.2. Quantitative Analysis.a) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of the sum of voltage, relate the voltage in the battery with the resistances R and the currents I1 and I2.b) For all times 𝑡 ≥ 0 and using the concept of potential difference, find a relation among current I2, resistance R, the charge stored in the capacitor Q, and its capacitance C. Take the derivative of this equation with respect to time to find a relation between the derivative of

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Rae Walsh, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Emily Diehl, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Divisions

Student

problem- based learning and predict performance,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1–21, 2018.[6] E. Nogueira and D. F. Tsunoda, “A Proposed Model for Consumer-Based Brand Equity Analysis on Social Media Using Data Mining and Social Network Analysis,” J. Relatsh. Mark., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 95–117, 2018.[7] X. Lin, X. Hu, Q. Hu, and Z. Liu, “A social network analysis of teaching and research collaboration in a teachers’ virtual learning community,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 302–319, 2016.

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maha Sultan Alsheeb, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Amy Hodges, Texas A&M University at Qatar

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

, pp. 271–286, May 2007.[8] T. E. Basford, L. R. Offermann, and T. S. Behrend, “Do You See What I See? Perceptions of Gender Microaggressions in the Workplace,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 340–349, Nov. 2013.[9] N. F. Sulaiman and H. AlMuftah, “A Qatari perspective on women in the engineering pipeline: an exploratory study,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 507–517, 2010.[10] A. Berrais, “Arab Women in Engineering Education: Current State and Future Perspective,” in Symposium Female Higher Education: Trends and Perspectives, 2011.[11] A. Powell, B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty, “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality,” Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 16, no. 4. pp. 411