geometric design educationfrom being an almost mechanical implementation of design standards to assessing how AV im-pact human decision-making and safety. This, in turn, trains civil engineering students to be moreconscious of the needs of their clients and the community in their careers. This paper discusses how AVs were integrated into a geometric design class for upperclassmenand graduate students in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois througha Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach. The aim of the study is to discuss both changesto existing standards recommended by them as well as the reasoning behind it. Additionally, theeffectiveness of implementing this approach by building multi-disciplinary teams will be
the discussion, the facilitator asked if thefacial jewelry led to certain assumptions by the students. It is important to keep a sense of humorin this discussion and the facilitator to be comfortable with hearing untrue or unfair stereotypesbased on their appearance. By keeping it light and laughing or agreeing with the assumptions,students feel able to be more honest in their biases about the facilitator. This kind of discussionmay be more difficult for students to have with an authority figure and so faculty may need to bemindful of this as they are preparing for such a discussion. Similarly, this discussion may bedifficult for faculty members whose career is subject to students’ evaluations. Future study couldexplore the effect of having a
described in [11] is a single semester course with two main phases. The firstphase consists of defining the project and selecting a few possible design concepts, while thesecond phase is for students to build and test prototypes to meet the project requirements. Thereis only one design review, which takes place in between these design phases. The review is heldbetween the team, an advisory committee (consisting of two faculty members, a non-facultymember, and possibly a graduate student), and the client. Details of this review were notelaborated upon, but it was noted that there were weekly meetings with the advisory committeeto discuss progress and deliver feedback. Similarly, a two-semester, industry-sponsoredmechanical engineering capstone
politics.Dr. Cassandra Rutherford Dr. Cassandra Rutherford is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil, Constructions and Envi- ronmental Engineering. Her research focuses on geotechnical engineering and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021WORK-IN-PROGRESS: INVESTIGATING ON-CAMPUS ENGINEERING STUDENTORGANIZATIONS AS MEANS OF PROMOTING ETHICAL DEVELOPMENT 1. ABSTRACT Ethics is and should be intrinsic to engineering. However, many engineering students donot recognize that every engineering decision contains ethical dimensions and that underlyingvalues and current sociopolitical and cultural contexts can influence those
Paper ID #33371Work in Progress: A Framework for an Improv Intervention to IncreasePsychological Safety and Sense of Belonging on Student EngineeringDesign TeamsJenn Campbell, University of Virginia Jenn Campbell is a Ph.D. Fellow in the Behavioral Science for Sustainable Systems program at the Con- vergent Behavioral Science Initiative at the University of Virginia. Jenn spent 9 years working in a variety of roles in engineering and marketing before beginning her doctoral program, and her time in industry spurred her interest in behavioral science and how we can help people make better decisions. Her re- search
each other, engineering students more senior to themselves,departmental faculty and staff, and alumni. Each program attempts to activate criticalingredients known to influence professional wayfinding and academic success. Takencollectively, they provide a robust ecosystem for supporting better transitions to college,discovering personal motivations to pursue an engineering education (or not), and creatingpositive connections to others on campus.The co-curriculars also facilitate a culture of entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) adoptedthroughout MADE. The EML framework consists of (1) exploring one’s innate curiosity of theworld around them; (2) finding connections to realize how engineering is interrelated withcomplex sociocultural
“rigid classroom dynamics.” This resonates with another respondent’s descriptionof AB Engineering Studies classes as “more collaborative” than BS engineering. (Although thiswas a common observation, a single respondent felt that BS classes had “more camaraderie” thanAB classes.) Another response described the effect of different classroom styles on the student:“In BS classes, my thinking was myopic, and I was focused on simply absorbing the curriculum.In AB classes, I felt much more curious and open-minded.”Each of these responses related to an aspect of the “Faculty/Classes in Engineering Studies,”suggesting that a strength of the program is its faculty members and the classroom environmentsand experiences they facilitate. One aspect of this
course, focusing on how the incorporation of choice supports the courselearning goals. This analysis will provide insight into how choice may be leveraged withinfirst-year engineering courses to foster self-authorship, decision-making, and the development ofa Personal Action Plan.ENGR 110: Design your Engineering Experience is an introductory, two-credit elective coursethat serves the first-year engineering class at the University of Michigan. The design of thisintroductory course helps foster student autonomy as students explore the breadth ofopportunities available to engineers in both their education and careers. Students learn anengineering design process as a mechanism for making personal and academic decisions, andthrough a scaffolded
interest is in civil engineering curriculum development that enhances student engagement and inclusion. One of the first to develop and teach an introductory course on Geomatics in 1993 at Georgia Tech. A similar course is now required in numerous CE curriculums including Clemson’s.Mr. Matthew Ryan Stanley, Clemson University Hello! My name is Matthew Stanley and I am a graduate student in the Clemson University Glenn Department of Civil Engineering. I am pursuing a master’s degree in transportation systems, and plan to pursue a career in surveying engineering or roadway design. I am a graduate teacher’s assistant for the Geomatics course offered at Clemson University. American
Paper ID #34091Studying the Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects on StudentProfessional Formation and Views of Diversity, Equity, and InclusionDr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson, Lipscomb University Dr. Kirsten Heikkinen Dodson is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. She graduated from Lipscomb University with her Bachelors degree before completing her Doctoral Degree at Vanderbilt. Upon completing her research at Vanderbilt, she joined the faculty at her alma mater where she has focused on thermal-fluids topics in teaching and
career fairs can facilitate connections toprofessional opportunities, communication of professional competency (e.g. during interviews) isvital to successfully landing those opportunities. In the long-term, internalizing andcommunicating professional experiences is critical to being an effective lifelong learner, which isrecognized as an important competency for engineers [7]–[9]. Developing an ability to reflect onday-to-day professional situations and recognize opportunities for self-improvement andadaptation is a first step in pursuing additional professional training (e.g. professionalcertifications, graduate course work, professional seminars).Unfortunately, student engagement with technical and professional competencies often occur
two years. Since her appointment in 2014 she has been exploring active learning, peer instruction, team-based, hands-on, application-based techniques in her classes to fully engage her students. She was selected as a UIC Teaching Scholar for Spring 2017, named as an American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) ”35 under 35” winner in the education category for 2017 and named as American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) ”20 under 40” awardee for 2018. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Reporting the Progress and Latest Status of an Ongoing S-STEM Project: An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of
– both in the classroom and online. This delivery method istypically termed Hy-Flex and is an instructional approach very familiar to one of the authors.The course was assigned a classroom with a standard capacity of 100 students, but distancingrestrictions in place for the semester required that no more than 25 students participate in thephysical classroom at one time. Therefore, if students were scheduled to attend alternately inperson, each student would be able to attend one in-person class session every two weeks(equating to approximately seven total per semester). Further, all students and faculty enteringthe classroom were required to always wear masks and maintain a distance of at least six feetfrom one another.Given the classroom
Minority Engineering Program and the Purdue Office of Institutional Assessment, Dr. Stwalley collects, analyzes and manages data pertaining to the outreach, recruitment, retention and graduation of engineering students from historically underrepresented groups.Dr. Robert Merton Stwalley III P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Robert M. Stwalley III, P.E. joined the Agricultural & Biological Engineering department as a faculty member in the fall of 2013. He earned his Bachelor of Science in Agriculture and Biological Engineering (ABE) and his M.S.E. and Ph.D. from Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. Dr. Stwalley is the former Director of Professional Practice at Purdue, has more than 20 years in
education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Prof. Eakalak Khan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eakalak Khan is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Department and the Director of Water Resources Research Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. From 2002 to 2017, he was a Professor in Civil and Environmental
migrators faced the sameproblems as students who dropped out of STEM majors (leavers) but chose another STEMmajor. A qualitative study [15] on students migrating to industrial engineering (IE) showedthat students left their initial engineering major because of negative experiences with facultyand classes, very low interaction with faculty, and change in career goals to an industrialengineer. The other studies which have researched migrators are quantitative [10, 13] anddescribe metrics such as major stickiness (percentage of students that enroll and subsequentlygraduate in a major) and odds of graduation in the major. Quantitative studies into whystudents drop a major cannot provide the rich description obtained from a qualitative studythat is
by others [10]. Thereverse belongingness is alienation, social isolation, or rejection, leading to depression in thelong term [11]. Among factors that influence the sense of belonging of women to a major areidentity or being valued [12]; stereotype-free educational environment [13]; formal and informalstudent organizations supporting female students [12]; family, faculty and peer support [7]. Onthe other hand, and specific to the construction industry, many prior studies indicate thatpresence of gender stereotyping, low sense of belonging, lack of support system, and lack offemale role models factor to women opting out of construction-related studies and careers [14],[15], [16].Previous research on sense of belonging found that only when an
interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in Engineering: A Reflection on Methods and TheoryKeywords: Race/ethnicity, Black identity, undergraduate programsIntroductionThe recent emphasis on increasing the number of engineering graduates has been coupled withgreater concern about the lack of diversity in engineering fields. However, despite
ways, if any, do student understandings change between their first and second years?Broader Project BackgroundThis analysis used an existing data set generated as part of a larger project that encompasses sixuniversities across three countries. Member institutions are equally distributed, two each fromthe United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa. The research team for this project includesfaculty and graduate students from all three countries, with direct representation from five of thesix included institutions. The objective of the project is to capture various aspects of the studentexperience over the course of a student’s undergraduate career and is thus a longitudinalundertaking beginning in the first year and ending with the
students then become the person making the decisions and cannot duckor skirt around an issue, but must face the problems head on [9]. Figure 1. Opening statement for Scenario B, the biomedical device failure case.Since there are multiple decision points, the students can become more involved and invested intheir outcomes with each decision. Each case becomes more detailed as it plays out, such asincluding the full name of someone who died in each of the original scenarios (Fig. 2). Aspersonalized cases are more effective at developing critical thinking skills and rememberingfactual information [9], this allows the students to make the connection that their decisionsthroughout their careers will affect real people and not faceless
water quantity and quality in both natural and built hydrologic systems. She is also a Diversity and Inclusion Faculty Fellow at RWU and interested in evaluating evidence-based teaching and mentoring practices in STEM education, particularly those which may increase retention of underrepresented students in the engineering discipline.Dr. Selby M. Conrad, Roger Williams University Selby Conrad, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at Roger Williams University, Adjunct Assistant Professor (Clinical) at Brown University Medical School and a licensed psychologist on staff at Rhode Island and Bradley Hospitals. Dr. Conrad’s program of research has largely been focused on gender differences in risk and recidivism within the
said they were most looking forward to learning, making friends, finding theirpassion, working towards their career and exploring new places [7].Early research on the effects of COVID19 on student populationThere has been an influx of studies that investigated various immediate effects of COVID-19 onstudent populations. Due to the immediacy of the pandemic, there have not been any studieswhich look at the long-term effects of COVID-19 on students and it is unknown whetherstudents who started college during the pandemic were more affected than those who had alreadystarted college. Most papers written thus far have found that students reported increased stress,anxiety, and depression [20][21][22]. This included difficulty in concentrating
Engineering at York University, Canada. Before beginning his academic career, Dr. Czekanski worked for over 10 years in the automotive sector. Dr. Czekanski attention is dedicated to newly established Lassonde School of Engineering (York). He devotes his efforts towards the enrichment of Renaissance Engineering program by including interdisciplinary learning, industry collaboration and designing for positive social impact which contributes to the uniqueness of York’s engineering program. As an active participant in the establishment of the undergraduate and graduate Mechanical Engineering programs, his attention is devoted to providing students with both experiential learning and soft skills
). Oftentimes inschools, an attempt to focus on STEM can lead to actually ‘siloing’ science and math as separateentities. Teacher preparation, until most recently, did not include the integrated subjects ofSTEM, which was not only true at the 7-12 grade levels, but especially true at the elementaryand early childhood levels. The lack of effective teacher training for STEM content and theNGSS negatively impacts K-12 students as they lack positive engaging hands-on experiences inSTEM education that is very motivational. Prepare and Inspire [1] states that “we must inspire allstudents to learn STEM and, in the process, motivate them to pursue STEM careers.” There is adirect link between teachers’ self-efficacy in their ability to plan and facilitate
Paper ID #32323An Overview of the Hornet Leadership Program in the College ofEngineering & Computer Science at California State University, SacramentoDr. Harindra Rajiyah, California State University, Sacramento Dr. Harindra (Raj) Rajiyah’s career spans six organizations from Academia to Industry. He currently teaches as an adjunct faculty in the college of engineering & computer science at CSU. • Raj started his career at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta as an Assistant Professor in Engi- neering Science and Mechanics. He taught 5 undergraduate and graduate level courses, mentored graduate students and
virtues. 1IntroductionTeamwork is an integral component of engineering education. This significance is reflected inABET Student Outcome 5, which guides programs to graduate students that have “an ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [1]. Employers,engineering graduates, and faculty recognize teamwork as an important professional skill [2],[3]. In fact, one study showed that engineering alumni rated teamwork as the most important ofall ABET outcomes [4]. Other recent studies report that teamwork is one of the
Professor in Higher Education Counseling/Student Affairs at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He is Lead Principal Investigator for the NSF-funded California State University Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Alliance for Diversity and Strengths of STEM Faculty: A Culturally-Informed Strengths-Based Approach to Advance Early-Career Faculty Success. Dr. Almeida is also Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, Engineering Neighbors: Gaining Access Growing Engineers (ENGAGE). Dr. Almeida’s graduate training is in Urban Education Policy – Higher Education from the University of Southern
recipient of multiple awards, including the NSF CAREER Award, IBM Faculty Partnership Award, National Semiconductor Faculty Development Award, and the General Motors Faculty Fellowship Award. He is currently a senior member of the IEEE and a member of Eta Kappa Nu, Tau Beta Pi, and Sigma Xi honor societies.Mr. Edmund Himmie Smith, Morgan State University Edmund Smith is a Ph.D student at Morgan State University with a research focus on cyber-physical system. His research lies in side-channel analysis of lightweight cryptographic algorithm. He currently conduct research in the Center for Reverse Engineering and Assure Microelectronic (CREAM) and the Center for Assurance and Policy (CAP) at Morgan State UniversityMr
themopportunities to make autonomous discoveries in team-based design projects. Another might beto recognize that engineering students, who are taught to communicate design decisions throughtechnical tools and software, often struggle to describe complex information effectively to a laypublic. These subtle but important considerations in becoming empathetic to the needs ofengineering students make up an important component of effective teaching. It follows thatimplementing this type of consideration in engineering curricula is necessary for preparingstudents for a modern-day workforce that is less focused on academic achievement (knowledgeand scholarship) and more on emotional intelligence and skills like personality, independentthinking, and ability to
. Within the IBL model, student assessment is notperformed via the traditional methods of homework or exams. Instead, students are evaluated ontheir ability to relate and apply core course concepts towards a team innovation that introducesnovelty.This Innovation-Based Learning model has been implemented within a cardiovascularengineering course currently offered across four institutions. The diversity of the participatinguniversities and the enrolled students (both undergraduate and graduate) fosters an environmentfor innovative thinking. However, being an innovative multidisciplinary course createsdifficulties when evaluating students on their course outcomes. Based on their individualbackgrounds and skills, each student creates learning