students - Frequent meeting and working in research labs Improve ethical reasoning and - Attend and actively participate - REU evaluations and surveys social awareness of all student in engineering ethics seminars - Feedback from seminar host. participants Table 5: Summary of Site objectives, activities, and data collection for Cancer Innovation REUdata using appropriate statistical methods, write a report including the findings from the data analysis, andshare it with the stakeholder. In addition, the report also includes relevant recommendations to improve theeffectiveness of the program. The report also addresses6 out of the 10 undergraduate students
workplace.” Participants emphasized specific examples of improvements, such as theircommunication with managers, understanding of job duties, team collaboration, problem-solving, and work ethic. Practical applications of engineering in their courses helped them totranslate theoretical knowledge into employment opportunities. As stated by one participant, “Ifeel like I was one of the few people in my internship … that was actually able to take myresearch in my own direction.” Additionally, participants expressed that the program heightenedstudents’ confidence in exploring career opportunities in engineering and engineeringtechnology. They identified examples of how the skills students develop in the engineeringprogram contributed to their efforts in
, skills, and Processes (ETool) and tools engineers use in their work.Issues, Solutions, and Impacts To solve complex and multidisciplinary problems, students need to be able to understand the impact of (ISI) their solutions on current issues and vice versa. Ethics (Ethics) Students should consider ethical situations inherent in the practice of engineering. In K-12 engineering education, it is important to develop students’ abilities to participate as a contributing Teamwork (Team) team member. Communication Related to Communication is the ability of a student to effectively take in information and to relay
Paper ID #20308Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educa-tional Experiences: A Cross Institutional SurveyDr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of
,and engage in professional development activities such as workshop on Application to GraduatePrograms, Resume Building, Ethics in Engineering and Science, etc.I. IntroductionUAVs have potential of replacing manned aircraft for many dull, dirty, and dangerous missions.Applications include traffic and infrastructure monitoring, surveillance of and search and rescuein disaster-hit areas, environmental gas monitoring, package delivery, aerial photography, borderpatrol, and precision agriculture. UAVs are cheaper than manned aircraft and pose no risk tohuman operators. The UAV industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of aerospace industries.However, there is a lack of professionals entering the workforce for UAV related jobs. There isalso a
identified eight outcomes of thefirst-year engineering program at the southwestern institution: (1) Teamwork, (2) EngineeringProfession, (3) Ethics, (4) Engineering Communication, (5) Engineering Design, (6) Math andPhysics Modeling, (7) Problem Solving, and (8) Algorithmic/Computational Thinking. Figure 2shows the engineering enculturation outcomes. Figure 2. Engineering enculturation outcomes in the first-year engineering programC. Taxonomies of Engineering EducationWith the growing areas of research and with the purpose of avoiding duplication of effort andfragmentation of the field, a team of engineering education researchers elaborated a taxonomy,entitled Engineering Education Research Taxonomy (EER Taxonomy) (Finelli, 2018
DevelopmentSystems thinking is the ability to view problems and develop solutions from a systems levelperspective, understanding the complex technical, industrial, social, and ethical implications. Webelieve this to be essential to a researcher’s ability to transform fundamental research intocomplete engineering systems [6]. The transformation of fundamental research into completesystems, known as translation, is a priority to the advancement of nanotechnology according toNSF [7] and a key focus area of the Centers. However important, systems thinking is not theonly skill necessary for success.A range of other professional and career skills are also valuable and are well articulated in theNational Academy of Engineering publication, The Engineer of 2020 [4
ECE Department at the University of Miami for the 2004-2005 academic year. Dr. Cotter worked at Nokia Mobile Phones as a senior design engineer between 2002 and 2004 in the DSP/Audio group on speech codec implementation and phone acoustic properties. Dr. Cotter received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering with an emphasis on Digital Signal Processing from the University of California at San Diego in 2001 and 1998 respectively. He received his undergraduate degree in Electronic Engineering from University College Dublin in 1994.Dr. Anastasia Pease, Union College Dr. Anastasia Pease is a lecturer in English and an award-winning teacher. Her interests include literature and science, ethics and
. Listening to “happy” music [5] may alsoimprove mood and lead to an increase in cooperative behavior.In the capstone design course that is the subject of this paper, working out the team dynamics is aone-time activity. However, studies of team function over time show that – as expected – teameffectiveness may vary over the duration of a long project. While capstone design is far lessintense than long duration space missions (although students may claim otherwise), studies of theperformance over time of teams operating in extreme situations has shown that crews’ abilities tothink divergently and make choices as a group decreased over time, while ethical decisionmaking and ability to execute tasks stayed relatively constant and increased, respectively
1.86 2.86 -1.00 3.30 4.00 -0.70 Project management 2.63 3.13 -0.50 2.00 2.43 -0.43 2.00 3.00 -1.00 Ethics in science 2.88 3.13 -0.25 2.14 2.57 -0.43 1.90 2.60 -0.70Students felt they knew more about all items in Table 7 after their participation in the REU(based on all difference scores having a negative value). Reviewing all three cohorts, participantsfelt they learned the most about poster design, rating their knowledge after the REU more thantwo points better than before the REU. Students also felt they learned a lot about preparingresearch presentations, interpreting research findings, presenting research findings, the
Paper ID #17898An Evaluation of a Research Experience Traineeship (RET) Program for In-tegrating Nanotechnology into Pre-College CurriculumDr. Justin L Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute. In this role, Justin is working on improving the state of STEM education across IUPUI’s campus. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role within engineering and design; de- signing STEM ethics curricula; and evaluating students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and
theseparticipants, 71% have presented their work at national professional society meetings, and two ofthem have become co-authors on three papers. Of the 17 who have since graduated, 13 are eitherin engineering graduate school or in STEM industry positions.REU students took part in an introductory bootcamp on the fundamentals of systems modelingand applied biostatistics and had multiple opportunities to present their research progressthroughout the summer to experts in the field. They also received professional developmenttraining through workshops and seminars on research ethics, technical communication, andlaunching careers in systems bioengineering. Post-REU surveys of participants revealed that100% of respondents rated their overall experience with the
broadly. A nationallyrepresentative study of engineering instructors and administrators showed that both programchairs and instructors reported their programs and courses gave only slight to moderate emphasison understanding how engineering solutions could be shaped by social, environmental, political,and cultural contexts or considerations, despite acknowledging the importance of such emphases[12]. Relatedly, in a longitudinal study of undergraduate engineering students, Cech [13], [14]found that students’ beliefs in the importance of professional and ethical responsibilities,awareness of the consequences of technology, understanding of how people use machines, andtheir social consciousness all declined over the course of their degree program
26.118.2Here the sustainable development of technology falls well within the umbrella of grandchallenges facing humanity. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)also requires engineering students to be exposed to sustainability in the context of technologydesign and development through student outcome (c): “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.” 4The National Academy of Engineering echoes this emphasis on sustainability in engineeringprograms in its description of the Engineer of 2020, calling engineering students to: “… be leaders in the
-emphasizing social and economicpillars. Furthermore, most instruction on sustainability, as reported in the literature, appears tofocus on teaching the engineering student to be an engineer who practices sustainabledevelopment rather than a consumer who has a role in sustainable practice. In part, thisemphasis on the engineer's role in sustainability is a result of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET)'s mandate that engineering undergraduates complete theirdegrees having achieved student outcome (c): “...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability
includes a focus on student teamwork, a greaterconsideration of social factors, improved communication with diverse constituents, andreflection on ethical decision making and problem solving. This vision of engineering willproduce graduates who can address a wider range of societal problems bringing new perspectivesto traditional areas.Summary of Curriculum DevelopmentOne of the goals of our NSF RED grant is to: “Develop the foundation of a revised engineeringcanon and empower faculty to develop and deliver a professional spine that prepareschangemaking engineers.” Efforts to address this goal include creating new classes anddeveloping lectures, active-learning exercises and assignments that contextualize engineeringthrough social justice
: InstrumentDevelopment and Preliminary Psychometric Data”. Proceedings from the 125th American Societyfor Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Paper #22372.[3] Zenios, S., Makower, J., & Yock, P. (2010) Biodesign: The process of innovating medicaltechnologies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[4] Cech, E.A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology,& Human Values, 39(1): 42-72.[5] Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: a new motivational model. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(4): 1129-1157.[6] Mamaril, N.A., Usher, E.L., Li, C.R, Economy, D.R., & Kennedy, M.S. (2016). Measuringundergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy
photosyntheticmicroorganism that is ubiquitous and has been used by many civilizations for various uses. Theseuses range for aquaculture feed to food for humans. In recent years the use has been expanded forbiofuels, cosmetics, nutrient removal from wastewater and much more. The algae basedexperiments present engineering fundamentals and scientific principles, and providestudents/educators hands-on experience with engineering experiments and problem-solving. Theexperiments also include concepts from both the humanities and social sciences, such as ethics,gender and racial biases. A subset of the modules described in this paper were tested with first-year students in engineering through the use of surveys and participation in a focus group. Fromthe conducted surveys
Design Assessment-Revised; and the Critical Thinking Assessment Test). The evaluator also skims through the list ofother instruments and notes that there are writing assessments, design instruments, teamworkassessments, an ethical survey, and critical thinking tests, among several others. The evaluatordecides that, based on the information available, he needs to visit with the research team again tobetter delineate the professional skills the team would like to assess. After visiting with the team,the evaluator goes back to ASSESS and locates an instrument that best meets the team’s goalsand logistical capabilities for implementing the selected assessment. Scenario Three. An instrument developer is seeking ways to make information about
participants each year, spending approximately 40 hours per week onresearch and professional development activities. A smaller-scale follow-up program (fewerstudents) was also carried out in the summer of 2016. Faculty mentors paired with students,along with graduate student mentorship, to guide research projects in the area of biomedicaldevices, culminating in a research poster session at the end of the summer. Although many ofthe supplemental professional development activities focused on preparation for graduate study(GRE preparation, graduate school applications, professional skills, research ethics), seminarsand field trips designed to promote understanding of intellectual property, entrepreneurship, andindustry careers were also included as
Paper ID #22984Collaborative Research: vObjects - Understanding their Utility to EnhanceLearning of Abstract and Complex Engineering ConceptsDr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and the Director of the Abilities, Creativity and Ethics in Design [ACE(D)]Lab. Bairaktarova’s ongoing research interest spans from engineering to psychology to learning sciences, as she uncovers how individual performance and professional decisions are influenced by aptitudes and abilities, interest, and manipulation of physical and virtual
Junior 2nd Year 4 Environmental Health Sophomore 1st Year 5 Computer Engineering Junior 2nd Year 6 Computer Engineering Junior 2nd Year 7 Mathematics Junior 1st Year3.1 ExploreDuring the 2018 REU, the students engaged in a set of four structured learning activities designedto help them develop a number of technical and conceptual skills. In addition, they participated inregular workshops with topics including research and ethics, effective poster presentationpreparation, reflecting on the research experience, and graduate school application preparation.The students also participated in a
. The course topics thatwere not covered in ERSP at UIC due to time restrictions included: ethics in research, oralcommunication, peer-review (reduced time from 3 classes to 2 classes), and basic statistics andhypothesis testing. We also had to remove the following in-class exercises due to timerestrictions: final proposal presentation and reflections.One of the components that was critical to our adoption of ERSP, especially in ENG 294, waslogging because it helped us to identify team issues and determine proposal progress. Anothercritical aspect of the course was allocating time during class to check-in with each of the teams.Check-ins were done by the faculty and the graduate student.ConclusionOverall, the changes made to the ERSP model were
Paper ID #25639STEM Servingness at Hispanic Serving InstitutionsDr. Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona Vignesh Subbian is an Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Systems and Industrial Engineer- ing, member of the BIO5 Institute, and a Distinguished Fellow of the Center for University Education Scholarship at the University of Arizona. His professional areas of interest include medical informatics, healthcare systems engineering, and broadening participation in engineering and computing. Subbian’s educational research is focused on ethical decision-making and formation of identities in engineering.Dr
Appendix B.On the first day of class (for undergraduates) or before the first session (for high schoolstudents), this survey was distributed and collected by a sociology graduate student, so thatrespondents would not feel that their answers would prejudice the professor towards them oneway or another. After removing unique identifiers from the survey, the engineering professorsgraded them. Each professor was responsible for the same questions at Time 1 (before thecourse) and Time 2 (after the course) so as to maintain as much uniformity in grading aspossible. No grade was attached to the survey, as per ethical guidelines, but students were told to“do their best.”Research Questions:Thus, our research questions include: i) what is the knowledge
, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the
was new and cutting edge (nano-carbons parts made on a 3D printer that may later be used for electronics). It is nice to learn while being on the forefront of this research. In the lab we were given free range to create these dyes using the given knowledge. We were then encouraged to try new procedures that could result in new dyes. This was satisfying because it gave me a sense of autonomy but was scaffold in a way that made us want to keep trying new ideas.No recommendations were made for program modification in regards to this objective.Objective E: Understand the social relevance and ethical implications of engineering activitiesrelated to manufacturing (human rights, environmental impact, etc
, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global preparedness in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of
. Students expected to gain confidence, skills, and relationshipsthrough the program.All students expressed an interest in pursuing a career in STEM and hoped to use thisprogram as a way to help them refine what they wanted to do for graduate school.Students reported an increase in knowledge about ethical research conduct, graduateeducation at UNL, and how to apply for graduate school. Other skills students gained werecommunication skills and interdisciplinary work. Students felt most strongly they gained anability to complete research independently. They also felt mostly satisfied with mentorinteractions and the social events during the REU. 4
to learn. She also studies organizational learning in higher education systems.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is a Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University Susannah C. Davis is a postdoctoral research associate in the School of Chemical, Biological and Envi- ronmental Engineering at Oregon State University. She received her Ph.D. and M.Ed. from the University of Washington, and her B.A. from Smith College. She is currently working on the NSF-funded REvolu