accessible to all students.” [4] In engineering, the hidden curriculum includesprofessional socialization, processes of developing self-efficacy, navigation of internships,professional ethics, and numerous other domains that may be implicitly addressed duringfoundational courses but can be navigationally frustrating or undervalued experiences fortransfer students [5]. Mentoring supports transfer students by establishing trust, buildingrelationships, and developing interconnectedness with faculty and peers. APEX scholars receiveformal and informal mentoring from faculty, industry, peer mentors and each other.Several research questions are posed in this work, which guide data collection. The team seeksto examine: (1) how well APEX recruitment
sequence in the GEARSET pre-engineering pathway outlined above, admission requirements to the program (and thus thedefinition of academically talented for the S-STEM grant) was set at High School GPA of 3.0 orabove and enrollment in MATH 1330. To take MATH 1330 students must have either a 22 ACTmathematics subscore, an SAT math score of 540 or a score of 61 on the online Assessment andLEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) system.• GNEN 1010 Professional Development will provide students with information aboutprofessionalism, ethical responsibility, the engineering code of ethics, the importance of, and theneed for, lifelong learning, contemporary issues, the impact of engineering in a global andsocietal context, working on multi-disciplinary teams
undergraduate engineering programs. He has advised on over forty (40) Senior Design Projects and his teams of students have received five (5) National Championships and three Best Design Awards. In the recent years, he has challenged himself with the creation of an effective methodology for successful Invention and Innovation. He was part of a 14 member multi-disciplinary team to design and create the ”Society, Ethics, and Technology (SET)” course at TCNJ in 1994 and has taught multiple regular and Honors sections of this course since then. He is currently leading a multi- disciplinary team of faculty from TCNJ’s School of Engineering and the Department of Sociology for assessment of the Professional Formation of Engineers
Scholarship presented by American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chemical Engineering Division in 2017.Dr. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Programs and Professor-in-Residence in the De- partment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are game-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Dr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is
engineering, forensic engineering and Professional Ethics in Engineering. He has been devoted to various Federal Sponsored Project, currently being the Project Di- rector of two projects for the US Department of Education and one project as Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF. Doctor V´azquez obtained his BS, MSCE and PhD from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez and a Juris Doctor from the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico, all of them with honors. Finally, doctor V´azquez is both a Licensed Professional Engineer and a Licensed Professional Attorney at Law and Public Notary in Puerto Rico’s jurisdiction.Prof. Fabio Andrade Rengifo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Director of the
Paper ID #28731Developing Leadership in Civil Engineering: Turning Students’ Hindsightinto Others’ ForesightDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include workforce development and engineering ethics education.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., University of Florida Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She holds a
about the value of the ECE profession, theirinterest in the class, and their intensions to persist. The surveys also measured personalendorsements including the importance of ethical considerations in engineering decisions,the value of professional skills compared to technical training, and empathy. Data analysisrevealed that among novice students, the more they believed that the ECE professionafforded opportunities to benefit society and work with others (i.e., had prosocial value), themore interested they were in the class and in turn, the more they intended to persist in theirECE degree program. This persistence intentions relationship was not true for studentbeliefs about the ECE profession affording opportunities to gain wealth, power, and
. Bill Gates came up for his service to society to improve societal conditions (e.g. global health and Gates scholars for low income students). Parents Mother or Father who were the primary caretakers and serve as an example of strong work ethics, risk taking and success. Parent(s) that took risks, such as immigrating to US to begin a career or seek a better life, starting their own business. Parent(s) that worked hard to endure economic hardship. Close Similar role model as a parent. They are role models of people that took risks Family such as starting their own business and were successful. Club Cub Scouts and Girl Scouts organization provided
diversity andinclusion in an Engineering Department,” Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and Practice, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 1-12, April 2019.[5] M. N. Miriti. “Nature in the eye of the beholder: A case study for cultural humility as astrategy to broaden participation in STEM”, Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1-10, Dec.2019.[6] E. E. Anderson, S. Solomon, E. Heitman, J. M. DuBois, C. B. Fisher, R. G. Kost, M. E.Lawless, C. Ramsey, B. Jones, A. Ammerman, and L. F. Ross. “Research ethics education forcommunity-engaged research: A review and research agenda,” Research Ethics Education, vol.7, no. 2, pp. 3-19, March 8, 2012 [Online]. Available:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3. [Accessed Nov. 25, 2024
institutionsto ensure compliance with ethical practices. For our recruitment, we wanted to ensure that ourrespondents would have at least some experience with makerspaces, thus we recruited fromclasses that include a makerspace component. We recruited students in the Fall semester of 2024and are preparing for a second round of data collection in the Spring semester of 2025. Given thelength and complexity of our instrument, we are looking for at least 200 good-quality responsesfrom students in order to perform the EFA proposed for this phase.Conclusions We want to acknowledge the progress we made in the almost two years of the project aswe look into the future and anticipate the impacts of our research. First, we successfullydelineated and
. Johnson, C. Pee, and J. Hall, “Beyond Selecting a Methodology: Discussing Research Quality, Ethical, and Equity Considerations in Qualitative Engineering Education Research,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: May 10, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beyond-selecting-a-methodology-discussing-research-quality-ethical-an d-equity-considerations-in-qualitative-engineering-education-research[11] M. Josiam, T. Johnson, M. Ausman, and W. C. Lee, “Work in Progress: Navigating Undergraduate Engineering as a Woman of Color,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), College Station, TX, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109
been widely applied in higher education, and has shown success invarious contexts, such as application of ethical principles, improved problem-solving skills, andhigher participation rates and test scores [4-6]. Specifically within engineering education, CAcontinues to gain popularity due to its effectiveness in advancing students’ competencies andemphasis on contextual learning [7-8]. Engineering students involved in courses that used theCA framework have reported more positive attitudes toward the course, and a strong preferencefor CA due to its accommodation of diverse learning styles [9-10].The CA framework aims to teach novices the problem-solving techniques used by expertsthrough four dimensions: content, methods, sequencing, and
challenges for helping engineering students become better writers andcommunicators.Working in partnership with the lead instructor of the existing undergraduate engineering writingand communication course (second author), we sought to provide guidance on the ethical andeffective use of generative AI for writing and increase students’ AI literacy. As part of thisproject, we are iteratively developing, implementing, and evaluating a pedagogically-informedAI writing tool, which provides students scaffolded access to generative AI and researchersaccess to the student–AI interaction data. In parallel, we are creating professional development tosupport instructors’ use of the curriculum, tool, and instructional resources for integrating AIwriting tools
which provides funding for internsto travel to the UC Berkeley campus. Interns live in a traditional college residence hall for nineweeks and eat meals at a social dining facility. Additionally, they receive a $3,600 stipend aspayment for their work.The benefits of participating in the TTE program are well documented. A 2015 comparison ofpre- and post-program evaluation data found that participation resulted in enhanced confidenceto pursue further education opportunities and careers in science and engineering [5] [6]. A 2020follow-up study affirmed this finding, and additionally documented that participants were betterable to find scholarly resources, design ethical scientific experiments, conduct independentresearch, and analyze data [7
., University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Dr. Claretha Hughes is Professor of Human Resource and Workforce Development at the University of Arkansas (UA. Her research interests include valuing people and technology in the workplace, tech- nology development, diversity intelligence, learning technologies, and ethical and legal issues. She has published numerous articles and chapters in peer-reviewed journals, books, and conferences and has 13 books. She serves as a book proposal reviewer for SAGE, Emerald, IGI Global, Palgrave Macmillan, and CyberTech Publishing. She is currently involved in a National Science Foundation Research in Formation of Engineers project as a Co-PI. She has served in manufacturing leadership roles for
Ethics Center.Ms. Jennifer L Pratt, University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service Jennifer Pratt is a Research Analyst with extensive experience conducting quantitative and qualitative evaluation projects. Jennifer’s strong organizational skills impact a variety of environments in her role at the Muskie School as she guides process flow for several inter-disciplinary teams. She assists with the development and implementation of data collection protocols and surveys. In addition Jennifer develops and facilitates design of databases and use of database management systems, including computer assisted qualitative data analysis tools. She provides technical support and assistance in performance quality
thefields of water resources engineering, environmental engineering, cosmetics, and nutrition havebeen developed. By focusing on these fields, the positive impact that algae can have on issuesfaced by developing nations around the world was highlighted. Gas transfer and coagulationflocculation experiments have been used to research the sustainability of algae use in the watertreatment process, with a focus on the feasibility of replacing current processes with algae basedalternatives. Calorimeter tests have been conducted to research the potential nutritional benefit ofalgae based products. Exposure to social and environmental injustices along with ethics casestudies are also an integral part of the project. Ultimately, the purpose of this project
enterthe STEM/knowledge workforce and/or graduate school. For three years, the program recruits acohort of 10 students/year who work on a number of advanced manufacturing related projects for10 weeks in the summer starting from last week of May through first week of August. Eachstudent has to complete both research ethics and lab safety training before starting their research.All students are mentored by a professor and also a graduate student. In other words, eachstudent has a faculty and as well as a graduate student mentor. For 2018 cohort, all facultymentors were from College of Engineering. The mentors guide the students in selecting theresearch project and also throughout the progress of the research. Students participate in weeklymeetings
, voice,face, iris and other modalities). Multibiometric systems are also covered. This includesfeature fusion, classifier fusion and systems that use two or more biometric modalities.Biometric system performance and issues related to the security, ethics and privacyaspects of these systems will also be addressed.There is an acute need for biometrics education at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Institutions world-wide have an established graduate program in biometrics and offersenior level undergraduate elective courses [10][11] in the area. The University of WestVirginia offers a Bachelor of Science in Biometric Systems. The U.S. Naval Academyhas a Biometrics Research Laboratory with an aim to enhance undergraduate biometricseducation [11
confirmed by later studies.4,8 Perry7 began to question why college studentsresponded to similar learning environments differently and found that an individual’s differentepistemic stage plays a crucial role in organizing his/her learning process and dealing withunclearly defined problems. Perry’s original nine stages of epistemic development have beenrefined as four major stages:11 dualism (black-and-white types of thinking and their variations),multiplicity (acknowledging uncertainty and accepting multiple opinions), contextual relativism(acknowledging the importance of contexts for meaning making), and commitment withinrelativism (adding ethical and moral responsibility and professional commitments to contextualrelativism).Challenges of Second
students - Frequent meeting and working in research labs Improve ethical reasoning and - Attend and actively participate - REU evaluations and surveys social awareness of all student in engineering ethics seminars - Feedback from seminar host. participants Table 5: Summary of Site objectives, activities, and data collection for Cancer Innovation REUdata using appropriate statistical methods, write a report including the findings from the data analysis, andshare it with the stakeholder. In addition, the report also includes relevant recommendations to improve theeffectiveness of the program. The report also addresses6 out of the 10 undergraduate students
workplace.” Participants emphasized specific examples of improvements, such as theircommunication with managers, understanding of job duties, team collaboration, problem-solving, and work ethic. Practical applications of engineering in their courses helped them totranslate theoretical knowledge into employment opportunities. As stated by one participant, “Ifeel like I was one of the few people in my internship … that was actually able to take myresearch in my own direction.” Additionally, participants expressed that the program heightenedstudents’ confidence in exploring career opportunities in engineering and engineeringtechnology. They identified examples of how the skills students develop in the engineeringprogram contributed to their efforts in
, skills, and Processes (ETool) and tools engineers use in their work.Issues, Solutions, and Impacts To solve complex and multidisciplinary problems, students need to be able to understand the impact of (ISI) their solutions on current issues and vice versa. Ethics (Ethics) Students should consider ethical situations inherent in the practice of engineering. In K-12 engineering education, it is important to develop students’ abilities to participate as a contributing Teamwork (Team) team member. Communication Related to Communication is the ability of a student to effectively take in information and to relay
Paper ID #20308Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educa-tional Experiences: A Cross Institutional SurveyDr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of
,and engage in professional development activities such as workshop on Application to GraduatePrograms, Resume Building, Ethics in Engineering and Science, etc.I. IntroductionUAVs have potential of replacing manned aircraft for many dull, dirty, and dangerous missions.Applications include traffic and infrastructure monitoring, surveillance of and search and rescuein disaster-hit areas, environmental gas monitoring, package delivery, aerial photography, borderpatrol, and precision agriculture. UAVs are cheaper than manned aircraft and pose no risk tohuman operators. The UAV industry is one of the fastest growing sectors of aerospace industries.However, there is a lack of professionals entering the workforce for UAV related jobs. There isalso a
identified eight outcomes of thefirst-year engineering program at the southwestern institution: (1) Teamwork, (2) EngineeringProfession, (3) Ethics, (4) Engineering Communication, (5) Engineering Design, (6) Math andPhysics Modeling, (7) Problem Solving, and (8) Algorithmic/Computational Thinking. Figure 2shows the engineering enculturation outcomes. Figure 2. Engineering enculturation outcomes in the first-year engineering programC. Taxonomies of Engineering EducationWith the growing areas of research and with the purpose of avoiding duplication of effort andfragmentation of the field, a team of engineering education researchers elaborated a taxonomy,entitled Engineering Education Research Taxonomy (EER Taxonomy) (Finelli, 2018
DevelopmentSystems thinking is the ability to view problems and develop solutions from a systems levelperspective, understanding the complex technical, industrial, social, and ethical implications. Webelieve this to be essential to a researcher’s ability to transform fundamental research intocomplete engineering systems [6]. The transformation of fundamental research into completesystems, known as translation, is a priority to the advancement of nanotechnology according toNSF [7] and a key focus area of the Centers. However important, systems thinking is not theonly skill necessary for success.A range of other professional and career skills are also valuable and are well articulated in theNational Academy of Engineering publication, The Engineer of 2020 [4
ECE Department at the University of Miami for the 2004-2005 academic year. Dr. Cotter worked at Nokia Mobile Phones as a senior design engineer between 2002 and 2004 in the DSP/Audio group on speech codec implementation and phone acoustic properties. Dr. Cotter received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering with an emphasis on Digital Signal Processing from the University of California at San Diego in 2001 and 1998 respectively. He received his undergraduate degree in Electronic Engineering from University College Dublin in 1994.Dr. Anastasia Pease, Union College Dr. Anastasia Pease is a lecturer in English and an award-winning teacher. Her interests include literature and science, ethics and
. Listening to “happy” music [5] may alsoimprove mood and lead to an increase in cooperative behavior.In the capstone design course that is the subject of this paper, working out the team dynamics is aone-time activity. However, studies of team function over time show that – as expected – teameffectiveness may vary over the duration of a long project. While capstone design is far lessintense than long duration space missions (although students may claim otherwise), studies of theperformance over time of teams operating in extreme situations has shown that crews’ abilities tothink divergently and make choices as a group decreased over time, while ethical decisionmaking and ability to execute tasks stayed relatively constant and increased, respectively
1.86 2.86 -1.00 3.30 4.00 -0.70 Project management 2.63 3.13 -0.50 2.00 2.43 -0.43 2.00 3.00 -1.00 Ethics in science 2.88 3.13 -0.25 2.14 2.57 -0.43 1.90 2.60 -0.70Students felt they knew more about all items in Table 7 after their participation in the REU(based on all difference scores having a negative value). Reviewing all three cohorts, participantsfelt they learned the most about poster design, rating their knowledge after the REU more thantwo points better than before the REU. Students also felt they learned a lot about preparingresearch presentations, interpreting research findings, presenting research findings, the