information from. This section has student respond using another four-point Likert scale,which is labeled with “N/A”, “Learned a Little”, “Learned a Bit but Not a Lot”, and “Learned ALot”, for each of these six sources: introduction to engineering course, faculty (either in class orfrom syllabus), institution’s website, student handbook, other students, or other (with a prompt toelaborate). Once this section is completed, the survey closes.Method: Survey Instrument: Modified Part Two, Faculty SurveyWhen a respondent enters that they are a faculty member the instrument directs the respondent tothis single portion of the survey. It is the faculty version of Part Two, and the instrument presentsthe same 20 scenarios to be ranked. The one difference is
learning objectives, similar tothose university faculty would detail in the objectives of a syllabus. All but eight US states haveadopted common core state standards (http://www.corestandards.org/), but most curriculumstandards for each particular jurisdiction are often detailed online and may be found with asimple internet search. Before a visit to a school is proposed, it is important to identify and assesshow the team will specifically address the curricular needs of that particular classroom. For ourparticular project, we are targeting the core standards set by the state of Utah(https://www.uen.org/core/), but each state should have similar requirements. Because this project intersects with topics from mathematics to environmental
) and a PhD (from the University of Victoria) in Computer Science, and she has developed and taught over a dozen courses at the university level. Beyond her teaching experience, she also has over a decade of industry experience as a software developer. In industry, she has a history of solving ’unsolvable’ problems. She enjoys a great deal of personal satisfaction when her analytical and problem solving skills can be applied to solve complex technical problems and when she can find creative new ways to pass the things she has learned on to the next generation. Her first teaching experience was at Ozanam Sheltered Workshop teaching adults with mental and physical disabilities. The experience gave her the
, before grades are released.SET forms might be filled out online or with paper and pencil and typically take the form of a setof Likert-type questions that probe student perceptions of the instructor, classroom environment,learning outcomes, and an evaluation of the course and instructor. Students are often asked torate the degree to which they agree (e.g., from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”) withstatements such as “Overall, my instructor’s teaching was effective.” These scores are typicallyaveraged and used for comparisons across departments, colleges, and potentially the entireuniversity. In some cases, SET forms will include an open-ended text box where students canelaborate or express concerns not addressed in the quantitative
engineering, also addresses the need for engineering leadership intheir most recent syllabus update [6, p. 69]. The Canadian book, Fundamental Competencies forthe 21st Century Engineers, has also recognized this need, and has added leadership as anessential competency for engineers in their most recent edition [7]. The attribute of leadershiphas also been included in the new student outcomes for ABET (Accreditation Board for 1Engineering and Technology), which will become effective in the 2019-2020 accreditation cycle(replacing the “a-k” outcomes). Students must be able to “function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create
journal articles published under her name. She has also written in thegenre of science fiction, and published books in the body-mind-spirit genre about her empathic encounterswith horses. She has taught courses in Nanotechnology Ethics and Policy; Gender Issues and Ethics in theNew Reproductive Technologies; Religion and Technology; STS & Engineering Practice; The Engineer,Ethics, and Professional Responsibility; STS and the Frankenstein Myth. Rosalyn regularly incorporatesmindfulness practices into her engineering school courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Dimensions of Diversity in Engineering: What We Can Learn from STSIntroductionThe challenge of increasing diversity in engineering is
health, with a particular focus on pediatric hip disorders and MRI-based methods.Dr. Juan Abell´o P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver Juan Abell´o, Ph.D., P.Eng, is an Instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Vantage One program at the University of British Columbia. His teaching interests include the integration of engineering science and design with language instruction. His technical research is in rotorcraft blade- vortex interaction (BVI) noise reduction. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Creating problem taxonomies for WeBWorK in mechanical engineeringWeBWorK is an open-source, online homework system widely used in mathematics at the
project was an even mix between process and product, observing the students surprise at the amount of process needed to successfully launch a commercial product. The nature of the project was very interdisciplinary crossing between, software, firmware and hardware. • Credit hours and accreditation requirement: The course was two semesters for 8 credit hours. Several learning outcomes and educational objectives were documented in the course syllabus and assessment data was collected and monitored. • Outcome evaluation: Overall this was considered a “good” outcome in that the company is now selling commercial products. Reflecting on the project there was an obvious disconnect between the industry
diversity education into first year is an obviousimmediately achievable goal, with many programs already incorporating some elements atpresent. Another obvious place to include a deep dive in diversity would be in courses on ethicsand professionalism, or in co-op and capstone experiences. Here lessons about diversity can bereadily applied in workplace contexts, and future employers can readily build on educationaloutcomes in industry training settings. Finally, we must seriously consider how to build diversityeducation into the engineering core courses. One easily implementable way to do this would beto identify and highlight achievers in the field who are members of diverse groups. Studentscould do this as an assignment initially, and profiles
guidelines for engagement with individuals and evaluation of the quality of students’ work [1]. Examples of these would be a course syllabus, a program of study, student- teacher contracts, and/or any documented and written course expectations.2. Null Curriculum: Entails what is not taught in the classroom due to mandates from higher authorities, a teacher’s lack of knowledge, or deeply ingrained assumptions and biases [1]. An example of this would be teachers and school systems choosing not to explain certain concepts (e.g., Christopher Columbus’s colonization methods toward many native peoples when he "discovered" the Americas).3. Hidden Curriculum: Represents the unwritten, unofficial, and often unintended lessons, values, and
, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21645design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development,her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices indesign education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and
SustainableDevelopment sub-goals. Also in this section are the methods used to assess the programsusing both structured (e.g. reflection ladder described in Tranquillo, 2016) andunstructured prompts. Specific assignments and a timeline of topics and lectures aregiven in Appendices A and B.Senior Capstone IntroductionOver the past 12 years, teams of 2-3 students engaged in a design sprint as a kick-off tothe senior capstone (Tranquillo and Cavanagh, 2009). Rather than pass out a syllabus fora two-semester design capstone, the challenge served as an introduction to the course. Forthe past three years, the challenge has been driven by the UN Sustainable Development 7Goals