. “Design versus research in BME accreditation [ABET requirements and why research cannot substitute for design],” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 80–85, Apr. 2008.[15] “BME Design Course Syllabus and Outline,” Jan. 14, 2020, https://bmedesign.engr.wisc.edu/course/syllabus/.[16] G. N. Svarovsky and D. W. Shaffer. “Design meetings and design notebooks as tools for reflection in the engineering design course,” Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference, San Diego, CA, Oct. 2006, pp. M2G-7-M2G-12, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322548.[17] “Google,” 2020, https://www.google.com/.[18] “Google Scholar,” 2020, https://scholar.google.com/.[19] IEEE. “IEEE Xplore Digital
uploaded online for students to familiarize the (Freshman) Fusion 360 concept before the corresponding face-to-face lecture. Surveying The course was movedSpring 2019 2nd yr. Surveying class was moved to 1st yr. (Freshman) to 1st yr. 2nd yr Surveying class was renamed as CAD and CAD and SurveyingSpring 2019 Credit increase Surveying and the previous 2-credit class was (Freshman
Paper ID #28865 education (OBE) workshop. He manages the PhD in Computing programme and has been implementing OBE to design curriculum and courses, contributing to its successful accreditation. He serves as a pan- ellist in the accreditation of various programmes and courses. He publishes research works in the areas of applied artificial intelligence, networking, as well as information and communications technology in education.Dr. Ing. Joao Ponciano P.E., University of Glasgow Eur. Ing. Dr. Jo˜ao Ponciano (CPE, LLB (Hons), M.Eng (Hons) , M.A. (Distinction), PhD, FIET, C.Eng, MBCS, CITP, SFHEA, MIEEE, FinstLM) started his career as a researcher for the International Or- ganisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) in
lecture, thestudents participated in an in-class activity during which they determined the most importantaspects of a molecular biosensor. The influence instructors have on students’ career choices is aphenomenon that has been noted (e.g., [13]). When instructors connect course content to theirown passions, perhaps students are more likely to attain the maintained situational interest phasedescribed by Hidi and Renninger [9].Respiratory Bioengineering and Biomanufacturing were two track codes that were never used. Itis curious, with the abundance of advertising related to respiratory issues and drug deliverymethods, that no topics were proposed in this category. Perhaps the fact that the class, andtherefore the topics listed on the syllabus, did
major parts. Part 1was demographic information (4 questions). Part 2 was the main survey consisting of 33questions. Topics surveyed in the main survey included: efficacy and structure of department-level developmental programs, responsibilities for faculty development, developmental areas,developmental best practices, frequency of mentorship, time allocated to mentorship, juniorfaculty developmental goals, Academy-level knowledge repositories, mentorship in the fivefaculty domains, classroom observation, scholarship, course directorship, and academicpromotion. Parts 3 and 4 were two separate “follow-on” surveys that asked questions regardingfaculty recruitment, new faculty integration and training, and more specific questions concerningtopics
teaching. • Design of an effective class: students will be able to establish learning outcomes, align assessments with course outcomes, align activities and assignments with course outcomes, and prepare an effective syllabus. • Creation of a productive learning environment: students will be able to promote a civil and engaging learning environment and embrace diversity in course planning and activities, use concept maps and other visualization tools, and develop self-directed learners. • Active learning techniques: students will be able to implement flipped classroom approach and create active learning opportunities in lecture courses. • Technology in teaching: students will be able to understand the
students in howto give professional presentations, choose/read academic journals, and write a proposal andmanuscript via a series of assignments.Assignment DescriptionEarly in the course, students practice four aspects of the research communication process usinggenre analysis [13]: 1. Reading a technical journal paper and learning the function of each portion (abstract, introduction, methodology, observations, analysis, conclusions, citations, etc.), 2. Defining the key components of effective research communication, 3. Preparing a professional presentation, and 4. Identifying the process of writing a journal paper.Students then review the syllabus to determine what topic is scheduled on a specific day and selectthe day that interests
. Thegoal of the lecture was to reinforce topics already outlined in the course syllabus while onlypresenting additional information, if it was absolutely necessary for students to understandaspects of the modules. Some of the topics already incorporated into the course curriculuminclude linear equations and matrices, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and singular valuedecomposition. The lecture focused on methods for gathering data and representing such data inthe form of matrices and the utilization of basic applications of linear algebra on said matrices.The primary source for such data was www.data.gov and similar sites. In addition, students werepresented with the PageRank algorithm and a scenario utilizing it. Lastly, the lecture introducedthe topic
. TTF1 I view my role as an educator as a technical expert who delivers engineering knowledge content. TTF2 My students learn engineering best by taking good notes and paying careful attention to me during design meetings. TTF3 Careful planning by the faculty advisor and well prepared agendas maximize student learning. TTF4 Students develop an understanding of the content based upon information delivered to them in design sessions. TTF5 The syllabus provides guidance on what to teach students for their specific design project. TTF6 I encourage students to move on to new phases of their design project after they have expended the time allotted by the course
department also emphasizes service in the formof providing the materials necessary for everyday life.The statistically significant changes consistently noted in the Marietta classes deserve specialattention. While it could be partially due to the relatively lower scores with which studentsbegan, the course was different from the others in the study in substantive ways. It serves as aFirst Year Seminar (FYS), and the 2019 syllabus describes the course to students as encouraging“self-discovery and an awareness of your strengths and interests. It provides opportunities foryou to reflect on and make connections between your General Education classes, coursework inyour major(s) and minor(s), and your lives beyond the classroom. The FYS challenges you
; ● Outcome 5: An ability to function effectively as a member of a technical team.Project Specifications: In addition to a course syllabus, a detailed document specifying theproject requirements is provided to the students in the first semester of the project. The projectchallenges have gradually increased over the past three years and are described in the followingparagraphs.In spring 2018, as a pilot project, three teams consisting of EET and MET students were formed.The teams were assigned to procure an off-the-shelf RC car and integrate autonomous navigationcapability with obstacle avoidance as part of the capstone project. The duration of the projectwas for one semester. The design challenge was to include “high speed” as the main
contribute tothe development of self-efficacy, CS/M identity, and sense of belonging?" As discussed below,current research efforts are focusing on the effects of the seminars and the mentoring aspect ofthe program.The second main research theme of the project is the effect of early CS exposure (courseworkand career awareness in freshman year) on computer science and math majors. For CS/MScholars, the early exposure to CS consists of the first-quarter CS seminar, a first course inprogramming the following quarter, and program events where career opportunities in CS arediscussed. Because many incoming freshmen have limited knowledge of CS, early CS exposuremay attract such students to CS. Evidence from our previous S-STEM project indicates that
assignment, reading the Academic Integrity Policy for ouruniversity and the corresponding quiz, will be integrated with the week 1 lab quiz that iscurrently only over the lab syllabus. Finally, we will create rubrics to assess the performanceindicators for the “Reinforce” and “Master” learning levels.References[1] ABET, "Accreditation Criteria & Supporting Documents," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/. [Accessed 28 January 2019].[2] National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, "Mapping learning: A toolkit," University of Illinois and Indiana University, Urbana, IL, 2018.[3] B. S. Bloom, D. R. Krathwohl and B. B. Masia, Taxonomy of educational objectives : the classification of
(UGA) College of Engineering Capstone Syllabus, acapstone is a “two-semester sequence course that is project based and focused on problemframing, stakeholder analysis, concept generation, and project management skills.” The goal “isto review concepts in the design process and tools in design methodology with a focus onengineering systems development cycle. Students working in multidisciplinary teams areassigned to design problems that are open-ended, requiring creativity and involving iterativesolutions.” It continues to state that “Design systems will work independently with a facultymentor and adopts the design that can be rapid prototyped or manufactured and evaluated againstthe design requirements. Student teams present their design
, and tables in the text section. Number equations, figures, and tables (use the textbook format as a guide). Included the detailed calculations, computer programs, in the appendices. alternative design considerations o Results and discussion (include figures and tables in the text section). Continue numbering figures, and tables in sequence) o Conclusion describe the final selected design Student Outcome 2 (SO-2) in the course syllabus states “an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global
here: Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright 2020, c American Society for Engineering Education 3 4https://classnotes.ecs.baylor.edu/wiki/CSI 2334 Fry Spring 2019, (username: CSI2334S19, pass-word: FryMansiKuldaASEE2020). This includes the CSI 2334 Course syllabus, the CSI 2334Course calendar, and the CSI 2334 Spring 2019 Project (among other items).3 Students’ approach to the problem The students’ approach to the problem had three phases. The first entailed a preliminary ex-ploration of the
. Female students link engineering to problem solving,analytical thinking, innovative, creative thinking, decision making, and teamwork. Notsurprisingly, the top reason listed (75% of respondents) for their friends not choosing engineeringas their field of study was their lack of confidence in their abilities, especially in courses requiringadvanced knowledge of mathematics. Past research shows that for female students, the key driversof subject choice are how good they are at the subject (94%), the subject syllabus (92%) andwhether the subject teacher is knowledgeable (91%) while 87% believe whether the subject teacheris fun is also important. Some respondents mentioned that the female students were intimidated by the sheernumber of men
, learners who practice theconceptual tools in “authentic” community (i.e., the community in which the tools were meantfor use), “…build an increasingly rich implicit understanding of the world in which they use thetools and of the tools themselves. The understanding, both of the world and of the tool,continually changes as a result of their interaction”[15]; the implication for leadership learningbeing that the more we practice leadership skills in a variable workplace context, the deeper theunderstanding we attain on leadership and our work.Although critical leadership learning can happen through course-based team work and co-curricular activities such as student clubs and teams, such learning remains rooted in the cultureof classrooms and post