Conference Session

Aerospace Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Abdel Mazher

Copyright  2003, American Society for Engineering Educationcompared to their peers in foreign countries. Alienation from engineering and science begins earlyfor many students who might eventually, in their maturity, be active decision-makers in policy.High technological advances require engineers with satisfactory levels of math and science.Students are rarely motivated to appreciate the value of studying math and science. Math, scienceand engineering courses are intellectually more demanding and require more application and studythan some other fields of study. Our modern society needs problem solvers. Mathematics, scienceand engineering are integral part for problem solving methods. Improving the problem solvingskills will improve the quality of

Conference Session

Programmatic Curriculum Developments

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

W.B. stouffer; Jeffrey Russell

 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Liberal Arts Electives 33.8% Figure 2. Percentage of Average Curriculum Allocated to Liberal Arts Topics Liberal Arts Elec. 1 Liberal Arts Elec. 2 Liberal Arts Elec. 3 Liberal Arts Elec. 4 Liberal Arts Elec. 5 Liberal Arts Elec. 6 English Comp. I English Comp. II Speech Comm. Technical Writing Economics Open Elec. 1 Open Elec. 2 Open Elec. 3 Open Elec. 4 History Philosophy/Religion 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0

Conference Session

Potpourri Design

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Beyerlein; Denny Davis; Kenneth Gentili

performance factors are consistent withthe creative problem-solving model described by Lumsdaine et al.7 and the project-basedintroduction to design by Dym and Little8. The teamwork attributes are consistent withthe cooperative learning model by Johnson et al.9 The communication attributes areconsistent with recommendations by the writing across the curriculum movement andsummarized by Bean10.Knowledge of the Engineering Design Process • information gathering/understand problem/customer needs • problem definition/goals or requirements defined • idea generation/brainstorming/creativity • evaluation/analyzing ideas/testing/design modeling • decision making/selection/planning • implementation/produce/deliver design to customer • process review

Conference Session

Potpourri Design

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Barry Lineberger; Larry Stikeleather

. Once the assemblies are manufactured students runperformance tests on their “products” using statistical design of experiments (DOE) methodologyto evaluate the effects of two factors at two levels (2x2) and determine the setup giving the bestperformance. The project culminates in a written technical report, which the student teams presentorally to an audience of their peers and a panel of faculty and staff evaluators.Introduction BAE202 (Intro to BAE Methods) introduces basic design and problem solvingmethodology for Biological Engineering. The majority of the students are enrolled in theBiomedical Engineering curriculum with the remainder in Biological Engineering, which offersconcentration areas in bioprocessing, environmental, and

Conference Session

Information Literacy

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Jeanine Mary Williamson

share some overlap with the Myers-Briggs Sensing type but add somenew wrinkles for library instruction. 1. The thriftiness trait can be used to motivate Realistic engineering students. Mention a few prices of engineering journals or other resources, and they will pay attention. Mention that their tuition pays for library services. 2. Don’t embarrass Realistic engineering students by calling on them individually. Let them volunteer when they do the “oral pop quiz.” If asking an individual to do a search in front of the class, a librarian should make the point that the class has to help him. 3. Give reasons for new ideas such as using peer-reviewed journals instead of Google. It helps to appeal to Realistic

Conference Session

Intro to Engineering: Not Just 1st Year Engineers

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Janet Schmidt

stages,and learn to use the team and peer evaluation forms utilized during the adjourning stage. Thethird BESTEAMS introductory module on project management,13 which is discussed later in thispaper, is also demonstrated.Assessing Student Performance: Teaching Fellows, over the years, have been involved withassessing their students’ performance in ENES 100. In this module, Bloom’s “Taxonomy ofEducational Objectives”18 and how it relates to Kolb’s learning cycle7,8 are reviewed.Suggestions for preparing quizzes, tests and exams and grading practices for tests19 and writtenand oral reports are also discussed.20 TFs practice developing test questions that can be used onan ENES 100 quiz or exam.Academic Integrity: Since Teaching Fellows will likely

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Neal Armstrong, University of Texas at Austin; Sherry Woods, University of Texas at Austin; Kathy Schmidt, The University of Texas at Austin

Community: Faculty should have opportunities to discuss the “business of teaching and learning.” Through their interactions with peers, students and staff, faculty enhance their instructional skills to meet the needs of a diverse student body. 3. Learning Environment: Technology enhanced instruction appropriately used promotes learner outcomes and quality student/faculty interactions. Learning Ø Enhance the educational experience Experience through a focus on student learning Ø Support the faculty, staff, students and other constituencies in this endeavor

Conference Session

Teamwork & Assessment in the Classroom

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Sharon Sauer; Pedro Arce

DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ASSESSMENT OF HIGH PERFORMANCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Sharon G. Sauer and Pedro E. ArceI. INTRODUCTIONABET EC2000 is looking for positive changes in the engineering curriculum and theteaching process. Instructors should depart from old-fashioned, non-effectivemethodologies (from the learning point of view), and from non-motivating approachessuch the ‘solo performance’ with the back of the instructor to the students and/or with theinstructor writing equations, on overhead transparences, so small that the students seatedin the back can not see them. Ineffective engineering instructional methodologies havebeen the reasons for which, in many cases, very good candidates

Conference Session

New Ideas in Energy Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Alan Scaroni; Jonathan Mathews; Sarma Pisupati

. Figure 2 is a picture of students working in groups to generate a list of steps that individuals can take at home to reduce their water heater energy costs. This is not meant to be a laboratory course or a research project. However, peer-to-peer learning is found to be more effective than delivering formal lectures. Activities required for the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Maria Suchowski; Frank Severance; Damon Miller

solving skills; (2) motivating students and fostering confidence; (3) instilling anappreciation for the importance of prerequisite courses; (4) developing effective team players;(5) improving basic instrumentation and construction skills needed for the practice of ECE; (6)developing a physical intuition for electrical and mechanical systems; (7) clarifying careerchoices by learning if ECE is a good fit; (8) making students feel like part of the ECEdepartment; and (9) forming long-lasting peer support structures. Assessment results alsoreinforce the benefits of close instructor involvement, hands-on learning, and project-basedcourses. Additional details of the course are provided.NoteThis paper is based upon work supported by the National Science

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Advances II

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Stuart Bernstein

Follow-upsThe University of Wisconsin follows up their student, summer internships with a senior level Page 8.1127.6seminar in which the students report on their work experiences both orally and in writing. Thisseminar provides an opportunity for the students to discuss their experiences with their peers and “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering Education”their professors 2. It seems this would also be a good opportunity to discuss with the studentshow their academic

Conference Session

Retention: Keeping the Women Students

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Jackie Sullivan; Daniel Knight

have many men students in their classes. Page 8.1316.2Instructors have also observed a general pattern whereby women students assume team roles that Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationinclude writing and presentation preparation, journaling, and team organization — and excel atthese functions — while choosing not to perform roles requiring hands-on skills such as computer-aided drawing, machining and component assembly. In contrast, male students often choose toperform the technical, hands-on tasks

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Nancy Tuana; John Wisw; John Christman; Andy Lau; Thomas Litzinger

design and an initial application of themethodology to design learning objectives for ethics activities; participants are also introduced totaxonomies of learning objectives such as Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive objectives. Theparticipants are presented with a basic instructional design methodology including writing goodlearning objectives and linking them to pedagogical approaches and assessment. They also areintroduced to examples from the literature of various approaches to integrating ethics into coursesand for assessing the quality of student work. In one activity, participants are asked to writelearning objectives for their ethics activities and to discuss them with the group; another activityrequires them to complete a multiple-choice

Conference Session

Successful Entrepreneurship Programs

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Wierman John; Shoukas Artin; Robert Allen; Larry Aronhime

formed as follows: Team leaders apply to HBDA, are screened by faculty in the Springand choose their upperclassmen, who also apply to HBDA. In the Fall, the Team Leaders andupperclassmen select their freshmen, who are grouped into sets of three based on nonacademiccriteria. In the Fall, new hires are oriented into HBDA by participating in a number of smallprojects where they often perform themselves. Here, they learn basic skills such as takingmeasurements, creating mock-ups, making presentations, keeping a journal, writing reports, andperforming literature searches; using these skills, freshman can contribute meaningfully to themain project, which is drawn from outside sponsors. Based on their own interest, teams selectmain projects that

Conference Session

Assessment Issues

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Patrick Norris; Duco Jansen; Sean Brophy

class. Using the PRS, the instructor can pose a multiple-choice question and the studentscan respond with a small infrared transmitter. Students’ responses are aggregated immediatelyand can be displayed in the form of a histogram. The authors and other colleagues in VaNTH findthe system very helpful at engaging students in the classroom, and it provides valuable feedbackon what students currently understand about the ideas presented. Students have found this veryhelpful to have this feedback during class along with follow-up discussion with their peers and theprofessor’s explanation [2].Technology for this functionality has evolved over the past decade. One of the earliest systems isClasstalk, consisting of small palmtop computers or

Conference Session

International Collaborative Efforts

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Ronald Sterkenburg

Session 2003-637 The Continuing Globalization Efforts of the Purdue Aviation Technology Department – The China Experience Ronald Sterkenburg, David L. Stanley, James E. Lampe Purdue UniversityAbstract - A number of universities are seeking ways to increase their study abroad offerings.The Purdue University Aviation Technology Department began this process a few years back,and a plan was established for increasing student participation in various study abroadopportunities. A portion of the plan was to visit peer institutions in Europe, Asia, South Americaand North America

Conference Session

Innovative Curriculum in ET

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

William Stanley; Paul Kauffmann; Gary Crossman

institution arejust as well prepared for the four-credit course as their peers in engineering aftercompleting the Precalculus sequence. This first semester calculus course provides most ofthe fundamentals of both differential and integral calculus with a reasonable degree ofrigor. Page 8.67.2 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationThe major change from the previous mathematics sequence for engineering technologystudents will be a new four-credit course taught by engineering technology faculty at thejunior level

Conference Session

Engineering / Education Collaborations

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Steve Shooter; Micheal Hanyak; Matt Higgins; Marie Wagner; Ed Mastascusa; Dan Hyde; Brian Hoyt; Bill Snyder; Michael Prince

that faculty teams are harder to form than student teams but areessential because individual faculty efforts are not capable of producing systemic change.From the student point of view, the team structure seemed to prevent the weaker studentsfrom falling too far behind their peers. Second, effective teaming requires time and well-structured exercises in team development. Third, overcoming resistance to teamwork isdifficult and requires instruction in teamwork and problem solving skills in order to gainthe maximum benefit from cooperative learning. Fourth, more often than not, we foundourselves being driven to problem base learning because real problems provided arealistic, motivating context for the teams used in cooperative learning. Finally

Conference Session

The Climate for Women In Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Natela Ostrovskaya; Jan Rinehart; Susan Metz

) writing down a formal plan for studentresearch; and 5) giving students at least one teaching experience (strategies 4 and 5 were also tiedin the ranking)., “Why these experiences are so important,” respondents particularly put importance on technicalconferences by reporting: “Technical conferences let students practice skills, with some guidance and some backup,before they are expected to do them on their own. Prospective faculty members must be able toprovide their own motivation and feedback. Gives insight into academia.” “Technical conferences are the heart and soul of research in academia. An understandingof how they work, what is expected, the networking experience is invaluable.” “Students must understand expectations. Students

Conference Session

Student Learning and Research

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Stanley Kieta; Christopher Decock; Gregory Dick; Jerry Samples

Session Number 2150 Students Teaching Students: a Pedagogical Experiment Gregory M. Dick, Stanley J. Kieta, Christopher A. Decock. Jerry W. Samples University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownAbstractHow do you fill a course and laboratory instructor vacancy on no notice? What happenswhen the Adjunct Professor cannot arrange a schedule for the laboratory portion of thecourse? Peer tutoring has been utilized for years in the sciences, math and humanities. Isit possible to use an upper-class student to assist in an engineering technology laboratorysetting

Conference Session

Graduate Student Experiences

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul Bishop; Gary Lewandowski; Joel Fried; Carla Purdy; Anant Kukreti

exportable modules which can be used as is or modified to fit the needs of otherinstitutions and which cover elementary teaching skills, advanced teaching skills, proposal writing,time management, and preparation for the job search process. There is also a mentored teachingcomponent, which is individually structured for each student. Requirements for participation areset by each department. The program prepares students for the full range of academic positions,at research-intensive or more teaching-oriented schools. It also offers a forum for faculty toupdate their teaching skills and for the discussion of issues of diversity, learning styles, anddifferences in culture between instructor and students. In addition, an associated yearly lecture

Conference Session

Mentoring Women and Minorities

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Angela Linse; Rebecca Bates

already aware, “it would have been better to have a really brief intro to thetools and then have a discussion of how to use this technology - when are online toolsappropriate and helpful, how can we best make use of them in the kinds of classes we're likelyto teach, etc.”6. Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATs)This session was led by Wayne Jacobson of the Center for Instructional Development andResearch at the University of Washington. Discussion focused on the connection betweenassessment tools and learning tools. Because the class had been writing two-minute papers atthe end of every class, they were familiar with one type of classroom assessment. The readingsand discussions generated other ideas. Student experience with different types of

Conference Session

Capstone Design and Engineering Practice

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

John Gesink; S. Hossein Mousavinezhad

establishing project needs • Establishing, developing and writing design specifications • Developing design concepts • Testing the validity design concepts with physical and mathematical models • Feasibility: physical, economic and design team compatibility Page 8.189.4"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education" • Human factors • Intellectual Property (patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, etc.) • Engineering Design Methodologies • Project Planning

Conference Session

Graduate Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Shahram Varzavand; John Fecik; Recayi Pecen; Teresa Hall

, andproficiency in Greek and Latin . . .” [5]. Some institutions also used German and/or French forlanguage proficiency. Furthermore, the German institutions emphasized the research component whilethe English placed emphasis on teaching.By the end of the nineteenth century the prior requirements were strengthened and the thesis whichhad been adopted from the German practice embodied “ . . . the results of original research bearingthe written acceptance of the professor or department in charge.” [6]. In general, obtaining a Ph.D involves 20 or more increasingly specialized courses (may include master degree level courses), conducting research on a very narrow subject, and writing a dissertation that describes the research and its

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Stan Harris

. Page 8.1101.7“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” Advantage: Student Students may edit and polish their writing with electronic Q/E rather than paper and pencil Q/E even during the pressure of a Q/E experience. Advantage: Faculty Faculty may experience benefits of being able to grade at least marginally higher level student answers because computer use provides students with an enhanced ability to edit and polish their writing than is typically possible with paper and pencil Q/E. • Students have the ability to access any of their electronic notes. Advantage: Student

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanics Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

R.W. Carpick; K.W. Lux; Buck Johnson; Wendy Crone

- and Nanoscale Mechanics,” isdesigned to introduce students to mechanics whenpracticed on the microscale and nanoscale with anemphasis on the interdisciplinary nature of nanoscalescience and engineering. Traditional approaches toengineering education, including lectures, homeworkassignments, and laboratory experiments, are combinedwith reflective writing assignments and the submissionof a nanotechnology review article to a simulated peer-reviewed journal edited by the instructors and otherstudents in the course. These activities are seamlesslyintegrated into the course providing a coherent, multi-faceted structure for the education of the studentsenrolled in the course. Figure 1

Conference Session

Assessment in BME Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Peter Mente; Marian McCord; Joni Spurlin; H. Troy Nagle; Susan Blanchard

State.During this process, input was also sought from one group of constituents, juniors who arecurrently in the program. They were given the task of working in teams to brainstorm what therevised BME curriculum would look like given the following design constraints: 1. The NC Legislature has mandated that 4-year programs cannot exceed 128 hours of credit. 2. The curriculum must include fifty-one credit hours of courses mandated by the University and College of Engineering. These include 21 hours of humanities and social sciences courses, and a 4-hour writing course. ENG 111 and ENG 112 (Figure 8), two 3-hour courses, are to be replaced by a new 4-hour course, ENG 101, beginning in fall 2003. Other requirements include a 3

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Surya Mallapragada; Maureen Griffin; Mary Huba; Jacqueline Shanks; Kevin Saunders; Charles Glatz

Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationbiocompatibility, and understand bioethical issues associated with the use of biomaterials.Results: Problem-solving student accomplishments Each of the three modules shared common problem-solving course learning outcomes.Through these courses, students develop problem solutions using information from severalinformation sources, function effectively on multidisciplinary teams, express ideas effectivelyorally and in writing, plan and monitor progress, improve self-knowledge of how they learn, andself-assess their role in developing an effective solution. Rubric development and implementation. The term

Conference Session

Women in Engineering: New Research

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Donna Riley

after ties to ethnic or women’s studies have been severed, the helpfulaspects of the reforms for students of color and white women are often lost.* The name bell hooks is a writing voice the scholar, whose real name is Gloria Watkins, uses in order to remindreaders that she is a holistic self who embodies more than just her words. She does not capitalize the name (Bell Page 8.918.1Hooks is actually her great-grandmother’s name) in order to emphasize the importance of what she says over whosaid it. For the sake of accuracy and out of respect, bell hooks is not capitalized here.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for

Conference Session

What Makes Them Continue?

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Connie Della-Piana

for all STEMstudents, a center for teaching and learning (faculty and student assistant professionaldevelopment), an academic support center for STEM students, research and peer teachingexperiences for STEM undergraduates, and support for evaluation and assessment of MIEproject activities.In this paper we describe the design of the model for entering students and the findings of thefive-year longitudinal evaluation study of student retention in STEM and at the university.Student and institutional outcomes are linked to project activities through the use of an input-activities-output-outcomes program logic map of the entering students program. First, webriefly describe the entering students program. Secondly, we describe how the program logic