Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She was the first doctoral student to get a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from the University of Cincinnati. She also has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She is currently also furthering work on the agency of engineering students through open-ended problems. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of
ever had in the past. Suddenly, therewas a reason for learning what Dave was teaching them. The textbook Dave used in the coursebecame a reference where they could look for clues about how to solve the problems theyencountered, rather than a burdensome tome they were forced to confront in chapter-by-chapterfashion.Assessing OmegaThe research for this article is an exploratory study and comes out of our experiences teachingwith the case simulation in the linked technical communication course. For this article, AnthonyEllertson met with three different groups of students (14 students totally) drawn from bothsections, as well observed the classrooms during the course of the semester. Focus groups werechosen randomly before any work was begun on
understand its business processes, organization, strategies, and technologies to achieve improvements in operating results.A significant component of this integrated program is the six semester 10-credit design studiosequence that stretches from sophomore year to graduation (in addition to a five-credit freshmanclass that focuses largely on design and thinking skills). Students graduating from the designprogram demonstrate competencies in product and process design along with significant Page 14.331.5emphasis on and rigorous coverage of technical skills that facilitate ABET accreditation as wellas prepare students for the Fundamentals
,including our graduates inability to communicate effectively, to interact with co-workers andmanagement, and to think critically4,5,7,8,13,15. Among other problems, these weaknesses inhibit ourgraduates' ability to play an active role in team-oriented projects (which are becoming the normin many consulting and industry organizations11) and their ability to present these results tomanagement and the public. However, for reasons ranging from entrenched teaching strategies tolack of time, engineering education has been slow to respond to these needs. It has been ourexperience that the profession is dominated by the same learning paradigm that has educatedengineers for the last several decades, namely, passive classroom lectures, individual
struggling to advance research programs with a only few graduate students,to collaborate in research activities in a mostly extracurricular and informal environment.Therefore, one of the main motivations for starting a VIP program in our school was to betterarticulate the extra curricular research work that some faculty were already undertaking withundergraduate students. This allows students, on one side, to be in contact with researchactivities in more formal and possibly more rewarding conditions. Faculty, on the other side, canget critical junior members for their groups to help advance their research agendas. Ourimmediate goals regarding our VIP program are: Begin achieving technical results, in the form of prototypes, software and
) at school XXXX is depicted in Figure 1. Figure 1. An overall architecture of the Network Based Manufacturing Laboratory (NBML) Page 14.563.3 2Problem DescriptionThe ABET Engineering Criteria states the engineering students should be able tocommunicate effectively, function on multi-disciplinary teams and use the techniques,skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. This requires thedevelopment of creative education model to promote team-based collaborative learningfocused on engineering projects, establish close ties among different
requirements and capabilities to account for product variation without thetimely process of reorganizing and reengineering an entire product. While the product line approach is anemerging paradigm in the software development research and industrial communities, little attention hasbeen placed on its use as a methodology for developing and maintaining course projects in an engineeringcurriculum. As part of an Embedded Systems concentration at Arizona State University we are creatinga course in Embedded Systems Engineering that focuses on systems integration and applications develop-ment. For this course we are developing a home automation product line. By using a product line approach,students can gain exposure to new technologies in successive
EBIP for optimalstudent learning.Formulating the problemThis study intends to explore previous work on using EBIPs as an effective approach to teachelectrical circuits and so, these research questions have been developed “What evidence-basedinstructional practices have been reported to have the most impact on students' learning of circuitconcepts? How are these practices implemented in engineering learning environments?”Moreover, this study will be looking at the successes of the evidence used to facilitate moreeffective learning among engineering students, and how these pieces of evidence became thebasis for designing instructional approaches in teaching circuit concepts.Searching the literatureA comprehensive search was conducted using the
field experience opportunities for students and educators. • Grow the number of Hispanics and other minorities enrolled in photonics programs at two-year institutions. • Assist veterans to identify, enroll and complete a two-year photonics technician program. • Provide professional development for Project Coordinators.Goal 4 - Collaborate with partner educational institutions and employers to promotephotonics in the K-14 space to fill the student “pipeline.” • Increase the number of high school students entering photonics programs at two-year colleges. • Broaden photonics awareness and create support at the K-12 level. • Create interest in photonics-related careers among K-12 students.Goal 5 - Develop customized on
years of grantfunding.The project had four distinct phases. In Phase One, Cohort A, high school participants, engagedin an intensive summer university experience. While participating in classroom and laboratory-based experiences, they were exposed to cutting-edge research in NASA-Related Earth SystemScience. In collaboration with university faculty, graduate students and a professionaldevelopment team of master teachers, Cohort A systematically developed NASA-related STEMK-12 teaching modules for secondary students. The proposed module development activitieswere designed to help teachers translate their new NASA-related scientific knowledge during thesummer research experience into their instructional practices in the classroom.Cohort A
than weekly temporal resolution. It was designed primarily by electrical and mechanical engineering graduate students for installation in an Earth-observing window inside the International Space Station. REU Site participants contributed to astronaut training modules, graphical user interfaces for the flight and ground systems, and the design of custom ground test equipment.‚ Airborne Environmental Research Observational Camera (AEROCam). This payload is a three-band multispectral imager with one- to two-meter spatial resolution designed primarily by electrical and mechanical engineering graduate students for flight on UND Aviation fleet aircraft, with applications in precision agriculture and disaster response. REU
. In the past, a typical student graduating with ahigher-level degree in science and engineering would have little or no exposure to businessprinciples. The result has been a workforce entrant that has no preparation for many of tasks thatthey are expected to perform. By far the majority of such graduates will enter industry positionswhere they are involved in product development and support, as opposed to research anddevelopment. Understanding business objectives and how to work effectively as a team memberare critical aspects of product development and support.Creating a successful program requires integration of a number of factors. The critical rawingredients are qualified personnel to staff the Incubator, individuals with good ideas, and
. Instructors establish these linksrelate to course material to the best available and most suitable pertinent information on theWeb. At the same time, by logging into Blackboard, the student becomes a participant in thevirtual classroom. Here the student finds all the material necessary for successfullycompleting the course. Thus, this approach utilizes a course management tool, Blackboard,which provides innovative ways to teach, learn, communicate, and collaborate acrossdisciplines. By putting courses online, instructors of different disciplines now strive to createa networked learning environment among different departments.Case studiesComputer Systems Technology: As part of the requirements of the bachelor of technologyoffered by the Department of
Karis Boyd-Sinkler is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She also serves as support staff for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity where she is involved in the recruitment, outreach, and retention of engineering students. Her research interests include diversity in engineering and the role of engineering student support centers in regards to student attrition and persistence rates. Ms. Boyd received her B.S. in Engineering Science from the University of Virginia in 2014.Adam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical
exchange with schools in Germany in which there is anequal number of students in exchange over two or three year span between the KetteringUniversity and the participating schools in Germany. Also, this paper discusses in detailabout the assessment and evaluation tools for study abroad programs. Programs at othercountries such as Australia and Mexico are also available to the Kettering Universitystudents, while efforts are under way to explore opportunities in other parts of Europeand in Asia. Such study abroad programs provide an opportunity and promoteunderstanding across technical programs and other nations.Kettering University’s engineering academic and cooperative education make it uniqueamong Engineering Schools in the United States. One of
offaculty support will be the most important impediment. A university located “in the middle ofnowhere” may find generating nearby sponsors a difficult challenge. Even though projects aregenerated from industry, there must be lab space and technical support on campus to implementthe projects. If there is insufficient laboratory space, it is difficult for students to developappropriate models, mock-ups, software, tools and computer visualization. Most likely, allschools face some elements in all three of these categories.At a school with high research expectations of its faculty, the most significant impediment ismost likely the lack of enthusiasm among faculty for supervising such a course. The typicalindustry-sponsored senior design project course
short courses and research gatherings to facilitate discussion within an emergingcommunity of educators and practitioners (e.g., the Fourth Annual Conference on ScienceDiplomacy scheduled for 14 September 2018).A limited number of institutions have also begun to offer courses on science diplomacyincluding: Tufts [8]; Columbia [9]; and NYU [10], among others. Recently, SUNY has created amassively online open course (MOOC) in science diplomacy with a specialization in health [11],and in February 2017, the AAAS launched the, “SciDipEd page… as a platform to bring togethereducators and students in the United States and around the world interested in science diplomacyeducation,” [12]. In 2017 a monograph originally prepared in French was translated
Page 24.788.10 Education & Research community with input from a large number of academic, industry, government, and association professionals over the period from 2008 through 2011.8. Future Directions for the Collaboration between Mechanical Engineering Education andManufacturing Engineering EducationDiscussions among the ASME Board on Education and the SME Center for Education haveidentified several areas of potential strategic alignment regarding the recommendations in theSME white paper Workforce Imperative: A Manufacturing Education Strategy8 and effectivestrategic and tactical ways of collaborating are being planned. The following points describepotential areas of alignment, extracted from the March 5, 2013 letter to Dr
University, Foundation for Family Science and the American Society for Engineering Education.Key words: STEM, education, engineering, elementary school, parents, family, technicalliteracy.IntroductionEnrollment in many engineering fields is static or declining and the number of science andengineering graduate students in the U.S. has continued to fall since 1993. However,demand for scientists and engineers is growing steadily, but the US is unable to meet thatdemand. The resulting shortage of technically skilled employees threatens nationaleconomic and technological competitivenessEfforts must be made to educate and inspire students to pursue STEM careers. A recentNational Academy of Engineering plan, “Taking Action Together: Developing aational
University of Washington. Her research focuses on: par- ents’ roles in engineering education; engineering learning in informal environments; engineering design education; and mathematical thinking.Mr. Todd P. Shuba, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd Shuba is a Master’s student in Education with a concentration in Educational Psychology at Pur- due University. He is also a Graduate Research Assistant with the Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) High School Program. His research interests include transfer of learning, collaborative learning, and student achievement and motivation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Interdisciplinary En- gineering with a concentration in Environmental and Ecological
addition, many mathematics faculty also lack knowledge of the applications of theintroductory mathematics materials they teach. Many textbooks still do not provide agood source of up-to-date applications of the concepts that are covered. In addition, manymathematicians have had little exposure in their education to such application fields suchas engineering and other sciences and thus have little knowledge to offer students in theseareas.In an attempt to alleviate this problem, a collaborative effort among the mathematics,electrical engineering, industrial engineering, and mechanical engineering departments atNorth Carolina A&T State University entitled, “Enhance mathematics courses throughengineering applications,” is currently being
willsoon be seriously outdated. Coupled with the WWW are the related critical areas of datamanagement, collaborative efforts, and associated niche issues such as data exchange standardsand developments. Engineering design programs have long advocated the importance of teammethodology and concurrent engineering, with common data access, so the step to include thesenew areas should be logical and reasonable. Unfortunately, they will most likely be difficult toincorporate into existing academic programs. To provide realistic training in collaborativeengineering and the Web, for example, programs will need to provide for more cross-functionaland cooperative learning activities, where students from various majors, and even differentcampuses or
settings and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Ava R. Wolf, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ava Wolf, PhD supports faculty in developing courses that emphasize active and engaged learning, and conducts research on interactive learning spaces, effective teaching strategies, and the integration of tech- nology.Mr. Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Nattasit Dancholvichit was born in Bangkok, Thailand in 1990. He received a B.A. degree in mechan- ical
making the learning experience engaging and motivatingfor students. This paper addresses results of a series of pilot studies that utilized hand-held devices,specifically an Analog Discovery (AD) Board, to support experimental centric, hands-on learningin introductory engineering classes. Pilots of use of the AD Boards were shown to be successfulacross a variety of instructional settings. The research undergirding the findings for this paper isderived from a collaborative grant-funded project supporting a consortium of 13 publicHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) investigating the impact of using hands-onexperimental-based pedagogical techniques on instruction to teach circuits concepts inintroductory engineering
increase in mentorship,entrepreneurial workshops and competitions. VII. Future WorkPrevious studies have proposed different methods of assessment for the impact ofentrepreneurship education on engineering students (Upton, Sexton, & Moore, 1995; Wheeler,1993). Some researchers have suggested using the ratio of entrepreneurs among engineeringalumni to entrepreneurs in comparison with business or general alumni population. Others usedthe number of start-ups founded per engineering alumni within x years after graduation incomparison with those by business or general alumni population. Some even suggested using taxdata to compare their household income. While entrepreneurship is important for the economy,these criteria may not be the best way
teaching. The reason for theslow rate of growth in using this new technology for teaching entirely online courses inengineering is not apparent. In Wyoming, there is even a greater need for online delivery ofbasic engineering courses so that transfer students, most of who live in distant and remote areas,and other prospective students can prepare themselves prior to arriving on campus. In Spring2000, with the sponsorship of the Engineering College and the School of Extended Studies, thelead author proposed and initiated a project to design, develop, and deliver a complete onlinecourse in Engineering Thermodynamics that would satisfy the University of Wyoming’srequirement for the accredited degree in engineering. The authors, then, did research
innovation.Although our study examines various types of public and private institutions with engineeringdegree programs, we observe that institutions with exclusive focus on undergraduate engineeringeducation are better positioned to align their reformation efforts with demands and gaps such aspromotion of ethical reasoning skills or other professional competencies such as communication,collaboration, and lifelong adaptability skills. The incentives to focus on student development, andfaculty promotion structures of institutions focused on undergraduate education allows high levelsof time investment by, and coordination among the faculty to materialize education reform andinstitute continuous improvement. The arguments for and contra engineering ethics
appropriateinfrastructure in place, and ensuring that faculty receive formal training in distance educationmethods and technology 20.Considerable research has focused on assessing distance education practices, and a number ofpublications have examined this topic in terms of what faculty can do to improve the educationalexperience for students: “What determines the success of distance teaching is the extent to whichthe institution and the individual instructor are able to provide the appropriate opportunity for,and quality of, dialogue between teacher and learner, as well as appropriately structured learningmaterials” 15, p. 6. However, tension can also exist between faculty and instructional designpersonnel. Whereas the ideal relationship would be one of
identified asfundamental courses for officer development [4]. Among the core courses are five engineeringcourses. Mechanical Engineering 220 – Fundamentals of Mechanics (ME 220) is most often thesecond core engineering course, the first being an introductory computer science course, that everystudent will take before graduating, usually during their sophomore year [4]. It is also thefoundational course for students who are pursuing a degree in Mechanical Engineering or Civiland Environmental Engineering. As one of the core engineering courses, ME 220 is expected tohelp satisfy certain institutional learning outcomes, primarily teaching students how to applyengineering problem-solving methods with an emphasis on design methodology [4]. Aninstitution
, reflection, mentoring andsustain the long-term practice of including hands-on laboratory activities aligned with theScience Frameworks. UA faculty, graduate students, and program directors continue to serve asmentors for participating teachers by phone, e-mail, and personal visits for technical assistanceand overall support. Follow-up activities include classroom observations by UA mentors andparticipating science teachers. At the end of each year of the project, final follow-up activitieswill include data collection by science teachers and a program evaluation. UA faculty reviewand disaggregate the data and collaborate with teachers to plan sessions for the upcoming year. The UA Science Partnership Program will be more successful if it is