Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jerrod A. Henderson, University of Houston; Erik M. Hines, Florida State University; Ayesha Boyce, University of North Carolina - Greensboro; Jared Larenz Davis, University of Houston; Waldemiro Muanha Junqueira, University of Houston; Tyron Slack, Florida State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

my protégé. And she started getting a masters in nursing. So we were like going, who's gonna finish first?”Nathan’s wife encouraged him to pursue an advanced degree as she said, “…hey look, you should go forward to great opportunities. So I decided to do it and never looked back since then. It was a great experience. Great professors and yeah, that's pretty much it.”Alex reflected on who had a role in directing him toward the engineering field and mentioned hismother: “It was maybe, her, pushing me to do something else [other than her profession], you know, turned me more toward engineering.”Another participant said it like this “... they [my family] don't truly understand what I go through as a PhD

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Edel Reilly, Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

activitiespromoted ‘connectedness’ among SCOAM students and motivated students to work hard andcomplete their coursework.Small Group Activities and Monthly MeetingsStudents were asked to participate in 3 small group activities each semester. In cross-generational groups (i.e., freshman, upper classman, graduate student), students were asked toseek out and attend activities on campus or create their own social event. The purpose ofattendance at these activities was to encourage relationships between members of the cohort andto foster a sense of ‘belonging.’ After attending an activity, students were required to postpictures and a reflection on SCOAM’s online learning management platform. At least one ofthese activities had to focus on a social issue

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carolyn A. Nichol, Rice University; Alice Chow, Rice University; Carrie Obenland, Rice University; Christina Anlynette Alston, Rice University Office of STEM Engagement ; Carolina Avendano, Rice University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

80 63 14 13 2015 206 154 24 63 2016* 94 86 20 19*In 2016, we recruited one math teacher who was suitably matched to a research project, but he failed to completethe program.Table 2 shows the diversity of the applicant pool demographics reflecting the diversity of theteachers in the Houston region.Table 2. Demographics of the RET applicant pool (2014-2016).Ethnicity % Gender %Asian 13% Female 64

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Shatz, Suffolk University; Kerrie Pieloch, Suffolk University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

BPHS. 2. Have higher program retention rates for S-STEM Scholars than they would have had without the S-STEM program. Specifically, to have a 95% second-year retention rate and an 80% five-year graduation rate. 3. Improve the career-related knowledge of S-STEM Scholars through participation in career-development activities, including career counseling and formal reflection on internship experiences in relation to their assessed interests and values. 4. Have at least half of the S-STEM Scholars intern in the electric power industry and work in the industry upon graduation.Student Selection Process and Criteria The S-STEM program worked with the three partner high schools to recruit students fromeach high

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College; Nicholas Langhoff, Skyline College; Erik N. Dunmire, College of Marin; Thomas Rebold, Monterey Peninsula College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, theCALSTEP team will have as one of its priorities connecting with organizations (e.g., theCalifornia Online Education Initiative, or OEI) to find resources to support the effort todisseminate the CALSTEP resources and prepare additional faculty to use the resources in theirclassrooms.AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) program, Award No. DUE 1430789. Any opinions,findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Huma Shoaib, Purdue University; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

backgroundIn 2006, Jeannette Wing, at that time, head of the computer science department at Carnegie Mellon,promoted the term computation thinking (CT). She defined computational thinking as "a range ofmental tools that reflect the breadth of the field of computer science."[1] (p.33). In this same article,Wing invited the community to see CT not only as a set of skills concerning computer scientistsbut every professional.After 2006 a significant movement of supporters of CT started to look for a formal definition andcomposition of CT. In the last 14 years, over 20 definitions and frameworks for CT have beenproposed [2], [3]. Nevertheless, although there have been increasing efforts to compile a singledefinition, those were unsatisfactory[4]. It is the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pavan Kumar Moturu, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Prabhakar Reddy Pagilla, Texas A&M University; Satish Bukkapatnam, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

career following the REU experience.Acknowledgement: This research was supported by a REU Site grant from the National ScienceFoundation (# EEC 1757882). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendationspresented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References 1. Aggies Invent : Solving Problems in 48 Hours, Engineering Entrepreneurship program, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, https://engineering.tamu.edu/student- life/aggies-invent/index.html (accessed, May1, 2020). 2. Nepal, B., Pagilla, P. R., Srinivasa, A., Bukkapatnam, S., Moturu, P., 2019, “Preparing Next Generation of Manufacturing Leaders: A case of REU site in Cybermanufacturing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington; Jana Milford, University of Colorado, Boulder; Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Pamela Cosman, University of California, San Diego; John B. Schneider, Washington State University; Kevin Pitts, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University; Ann E. Delaney, Boise State University; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado, Boulder; Katherine Christine Tetrick, Washington State University; Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington; Tanya D. Ennis, University of Colorado, Boulder; Kevin O'Connor, University of Colorado, Boulder; Michelle Ferrez, University of California, San Diego; Tiffany D. Pan, University of Washington; Jessica Baldis, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, the shared Redshirt model consists of seven mainprogrammatic elements that are designed to improve the engagement and rates of retention andgraduation of students underrepresented in engineering and computer science. These elementsare “intrusive” academic advising and support services; an intensive first-year academiccurriculum; community-building; programming to develop career awareness and identification;mentoring by an engineering or computer science faculty member; financial support, includingthe NSF S-STEM scholarships; and second-year academic support. There is flexibility acrossinstitutions in how these core components are implemented, reflecting distinctions in theadministrative structure, resources, and student populations at each

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christian Enmanuel Lopez, The Pennsylvania State University; Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

laboratory environments.Acknowledgement This research is funded by the National Science Foundation NSF NRI #1527148. Anyopinions, findings, or conclusions found in this paper are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References1. National Robotics Initiative 2.0: Ubiquitous Collaborative Robots (NRI-2.0) (nsf17518) | NSF - National Science Foundation.2. Tucker C, Kumara S. An Automated Object-Task Mining Model for Providing Students with Real Time Performance Feedback. In: ; 2015:26.178.1-26.178.13.3. Hu Q, Bezawada S, Gray A, Tucker C, Brick T. Exploring the Link Between Task Complexity and Students’ Affective States During Engineering Laboratory Activities. In: ASME 2016

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley M. Berhan, University of Toledo; Aaron Lee Adams, Alabama A&M University; Willie Lewis McKether; Revathy Kumar, University of Toledo

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

; Faust 1994) by examiningimportant relationships reflected in the strength, direction, and complexity (or number) of tiesembedded in a network. The strength of such an approach is that it enables an analysis of socialphenomena beyond the abstract social structures (e.g. social, economic, political) traditionallystudied by researchers in the social and behavioral sciences (Wellman 1999).Ego-centered (or personal) networks make the individual the focus of attention where egodescribes people (alters) close to him or her (Boissevain 1974; Wellman & Berkowitz 1988).According to Wellman (1999), such investigations “enable researchers to study community ties,whoever with, wherever located, and however structured…and avoid the trap of looking

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Maria Antoun Henri, Texas A&M University ; Norma Perez, Houston Community College; Madeline Burillo, Houston Community College; Roberto Sanchez, Houston Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

demand STEM careers.AcknowledgementThis material is supported by the National Science Foundation under DUE Grant Numbers 1501952and 1501938. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Coleman, N., and Ford, M., 2014, "North Dakota and Texas now provide half of U.S. crude oil production," Today in Energy, July 1, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=16931 (Retrieved on July 25, 2014)2. Texas Wide Open for Business, 2013, "Manufacturing in Texas," TexasWideOpenforBusiness.Com, http://www.governor.state.tx.us/files/ecodev/Manufacturing_in_Texas.pdf (Retrieved on July 25, 2014)3. Modine, J

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keke Chen, Wright State University; Bin Wang, Wright State University; Prabhaker Mateti, Wright State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] Rakesh Agrawal, Anastasia Ailamaki, Philip A. Bernstein, Eric A. Brewer, Michael J. Carey, Sura- jit Chaudhuri, AnHai Doan, Daniela Florescu, Michael J. Franklin, Hector Garcia-Molina, Johannes Gehrke, Le Gruenwald, Laura M. Haas, Alon Y. Halevy, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Yannis E. Ioan- nidis, Hank F. Korth, Donald Kossmann, Samuel Madden, Roger Magoulas, Beng Chin Ooi, Tim O’Reilly, Raghu Ramakrishnan, Sunita Sarawagi, Michael Stonebraker, Alexander S. Szalay, and Ger- hard Weikum. The claremont report on database research. SIGMOD Record, 37(3):9–19, 2008. [2

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Matt Robert Bohm, University of Louisville; Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

metropolitan public university, designatedas High Doctoral Research by the Carnegie Foundation are also be participating. Studies at thissecond location are focusing on impact of teaching function on capstone design quality. Resultsof these studies are forthcoming.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation through grants 1525449, 1525170,and 1525284. Any  opinions,  findings,  and  conclusions  or  recommendations  expressed  in  this  material  are  those  of  the  authors  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  National  Science  Foundation.References1.   Pahl  G,  Beitz  W,  Feldhusen  J,  Grote  KH.  Engineering  Design:  A  Systematic  Approach.  3rd  ed:  Springer   Verlag;  2007.  2

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Warren, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ofIllinois or to the topic of state machines in digital logic. Interviews with instructors of digitallogic courses are ongoing. Comparisons between the reasoning and problem solving approachesof students and instructors will be compared in future studies to enable comparisons betweenexperts and novices.6. AcknowledgmentsThanks to Lance Pittman for his help with collecting data and supporting analysis. This projectwas supported by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC 1429348. The opinions,findings, and conclusions presented in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation or the authors’ institution.References1  Juhl, J. & Lindegaard, H. Representations and visual synthesis in engineering design

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Fleming Ph.D., National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

). Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE'04. Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on (pp. 271-280). IEEE.38. Martınez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353-368.39. Mawdesley, M., Long, G., Al-Jibouri, S., & Scott, D. (2011). The enhancement of simulation based learning exercises through formalized reflection, focus groups and group presentation. Computers & Education, 56(1), 44-52.40. Natishan, M. E

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Autar Kaw, University of South Florida; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Andrew Scott, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Age Group: {22 or under, over 22} 2. Gender: {male, female} 3. Under-Represented Minority: {yes, no} 4. Transfer Status: {admitted to engineering as a freshmen, transferred to engineering from a community college with an associate’s degree, other transfer status} 5. Pell Grant Recipient: {yes, no} 6. Combined Work and Credit Hours/Effort: {under 40, 40-65, over 65}The age categories reflect our interest in traditional vs. non-traditional engineering students, withthe traditional student starting college at age 18. The students in this course were juniors andseniors. The under-represented minority students consisted of Hispanic, American Indian,Black/African American, or Hawaiian/Pacific Islander students. The work and credit

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Luciana Cancado, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Cindy M Walker, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Dian Mitrayani , University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

researchexperience so that the students can learn how to conduct their own research projects.While other benefits may be experienced by particular students, they should not beconsidered an expectation for a successful URE for most engineering students.AcknowledgementsPartial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation's ResearchInitiation Grants in Engineering Education program under Award No. 1340324. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors would also like to thank Al Ghorbanpoor and Wendy Pero atUWM for their assistance with this project.Bibliography1. National Science Board

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Andrews Paulsen, Concord Evaluation Group; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Wolsky, WGBH Educational Foundation

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

 consider how we might provide resources and education to parents to help them support their children’s engineering­related interests.  Acknowledgement  Page 26.962.10 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Engineering Education and Centers, Grant Number 1129342. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.    References  1​  Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2014). ​ Occupational outlook handbook, 2014 edition​ . Washington DC: U.S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Carrico, Virginia Tech; Matthew Arnold Boynton PE P.E., Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

team to use existing codebooks to analyzethese responses. Although the number of pilot responses limits our ability to fully test thesecodebooks on the responses, our preliminary review suggests meaningful overlap.Remaining pilot data is planned for collection and analysis in early 2015 along with any changesdeemed necessary. Deployment of the final survey to the larger participant population is plannedfor the spring of 2015.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1232629. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xumin Liu, Rochester Institute of Technology; Rajendra K Raj, Rochester Institute of Technology; Chunmei Liu, Howard University; Alex Pantaleev, SUNY Oswego

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

guest lecturer issue.(3) Design the lightweight and more detailed version for each course module so that itwill take less lecture time and leave some work for student to do after class.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underAwards DUE-1140567, DUE-1141112, and DUE-1141200. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors alsothank the anonymous reviewers for their feedback.Reference:1. G. Bieber, L. Architect, and I. Ci. Introduction to service-oriented programming. In Openwings, 2001.http://www.openwings.org.2. P. Brusilovsky. Webex

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University; Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Peter Y Wu, Robert Morris University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

a comprehensive list of Case Studies, Class Exercises, and Video CaseStudies.3.1.1.1 Development MethodologyAn iterative development methodology depicted in Focus groups Decide on Active LearningFigure 1 was used to ensure the modules reflected both Contents and Formats (case study, class exercise, or case studyacademic research and industry best practices. The video)content development process began with a meeting of PI & Co-PI refine Contents Listthe focus groups at the author’s institution. The

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Eva Schiorring, StemEval; Paul S. Nerenberg, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thework was initiated through a STEM Collaborative grant awarded by the Leona M. and Harry B.Helmsley Charitable Trust. Development of the freshman engineering course was also supportedby the Boeing Company and by a STEM grant from the Office of Naval Research (ContractNumber N00014-15-1-2434). The authors are also grateful for support from the Provost’s Officefor the FYrE program, and to Professor Monika Kress of the Department of Physics andAstronomy at San José State University, who provided insight on her pre-physics coursedevelopment. Finally, the contributions of the entire FYrE faculty and staff team, notably DebbieWon

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Demetri Blackwood, Kettering University ; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 2010, p. 23.[17] S. Porter & P. Umbach, “College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit”. Research in higher education, 47(4), 2006, pp. 429-449.[18] J. Holland, Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.[19] K. Rask & J. Tiefenthaler, “The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics”. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 2008, pp. 676-687.[20] M. Anderson & J. Swazey, “Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview”. New directions for higher education, 1998(101), 3-13.[21] G. Malaney, “Why

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Diversity 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Doris J. Espiritu, Wilbur Wright College; Ruzica Todorovic, Wilbur Wright College

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Center 5. Continue the engineering specific tutoring and provide the engineering cohort leadership opportunities and a community in which they feel they can belong. 6. Create a programmatic pre-engineering track. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Approved by the City Colleges of Chicago IRB (IRB2018007). 11[1] T. D. Holmlund, K. Lesseig, and D. Slavit

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Student Learning 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian J. Skromme, Arizona State University; Caleb Redshaw, Arizona State University; Abhishek Gupta; Shatrughn Gupta, Arizona State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Deanna Bailey, Morgan State University; Willie L. Thompson II, Morgan State University; Srividya Kona Bansal, Arizona State University; Wendy M. Barnard, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

of the students at ASU, though some students there were also challenged by them.It may be desirable to introduce more features to customize the level of the exercises to differentstudent populations and to give instructors more flexibility on which levels they can choose toassign. Such adaptations will be explored in future work.The biggest differences between institutions appeared to be on the preference between CircuitTutor and other options, which may reflect the use of different electronic homework systems atdifferent institutions. For example, WileyPLUS is used at ASU and Pearson’s Fig. 5. Results of an end-of-semester survey at three different institutions in Fall 2019 covering the entire Circuit Tutor system (not just the topics

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: S-STEM 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University ; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Joseph Arthur Brobst, Old Dominion University; Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Andrew G. Klein, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

projects course on student retention,” in Proceedings ASEE Conference and Exhibition, 2003.[19] C. B. Zoltowski and W. C. Oakes, “Learning by doing: Reflections of the epics program.” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, vol. 9, 2014.[20] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. National Academies Press, 2005.[21] J. A. Mejia, D. Drake, and A. Wilson-Lopez, “Changes in latino/a adolescents engineering self- efficacy and perceptions of engineering after addressing authentic engineering design challenges,” in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2015, pp. 1–14.[22] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom Weller, University of South Florida; Carol M. Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC; Jeff Frolik, University of Vermont; Paul G. Flikkema, Northern Arizona University; Aaron T. Ohta, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Sylvia W. Thomas, University of South Florida; Rhonda R. Franklin, University of Minnesota; Wayne A. Shiroma, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

reflectivity, mechanical robustness, and environmental sustainability, such as carbides, sol-gel coatings, high temperature oxides, and sev- eral polymers. Her research is interdisciplinary in nature and fosters collaborations with Chemical and Biomedical, Mechanical, and Environmental Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Public Health, Medicine, and the Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC).Prof. Rhonda R. Franklin, University of Minnesota Rhonda Franklin (S’84-M’96) received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Texas A&M Uni- versity, College Station, TX and M.S. and Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from The University of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Adam Kirn, Clemson University; Beshoy Morkos, Florida Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Monthly Email Advisor. 2008;6(8):2–3.22. Nickerson RS. The teaching and thinking of problem solving. In: Sternberg RJ, editor. Thinking and Problem Solving. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1994. page 409– 49.23. Wankat P. Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education. 1999;88(2):195–203.24. Jonassen DH. Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving.pdf. Educational Technology Research & Development. 2000;48(4):63–85.25. Bowman D, Benson L. MuseInk : Seeing and Hearing a Freshman Engineering Student Ink and Think. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Louisville, KY: American Society

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Marissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Ethan Munson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

and do not necessarily reflect the viewsof the National Science Foundation. The authors would also like to thank Shuwen Tang,Cindy Walker, Todd Johnson, Tina Current, Sharon Kaempfer, and Jennie Klumpp (all atUWM) for their assistance with this project.Bibliography1.National Science Board. 2003. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential.Publication NSB 03-69. (www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf)2. Augustine, N. “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a BrighterEconomic Future”, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP), 2007.3. Good, J., Halpin, G., and Halpin, G. “A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: StudentsBecoming Peer Mentors”, J