upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1848498. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The authors wish to thank Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, the Project Evaluator, for hervaluable input, and Hannah Chiou for her assistance in reviewing codes. Additionally, we thankthe students, advisors and faculty who participated in the study for sharing their experiences.References[1] M. T. Cardador, "Promoted up but also out? The unintended consequences of increasing women’s representation in managerial roles in engineering," Organization Science, vol. 28, pp. 597-617
pedagogy.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1915614. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1]. Evaluation Consortium, University at Albany (2016) Experimental Centric Based EngineeringCurriculum for HBCUs Leadership Team, HBCU Year Three Report.[2]. Gough, A., & Gough, N. (2018). Beyond Tinkering and Tailoring: Re-de/signingMethodologies in STEM Education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & TechnologyEducation, 18(3), 284–290.[3]. Astatke, Y., & Connor, K. A., Newman, D., Attia, J. O., & Nare, O. E. (2016, June),Growing
)they foster collaboration; (e) they involve meaningful reflection; and (f) they allow competingsolutions and diversity of outcomes. Importantly, the tasks are similar to the type of workstudents will experience as professional engineers (e.g., hydrologic modeling, analyzing trends indata, and justifying decisions) and the product of the module is polished and realistic (e.g., anassessment report, a model, or code).Previous research shows that student learning is greater in courses where tasks regularly promotehigh-level reasoning and problem-solving and lesser in courses where the tasks are scripted orprocedural [25] - [27]. Litzinger et al. [28] researched the learning processes that support thedevelopment of expertise. Their findings
the College of Engineering and the engineering technology programs since 2010. Thesestudents were then assigned an admissions-type category to reflect how they entered anengineering technology program for the first time: • New First Time Freshman: A student who enrolled at Texas A&M University as an incoming freshman and selected one of the engineering technology programs at time of admission. It should be noted that this category only existed prior to academic year (AY) 2014-2015. After that, all freshmen entering the college were required to start in General Engineering. • Entry to a Major: A student who entered as a General Engineering student but then entered an engineering technology program
students (N=22) in 2020.The average score on technical questionsin 2020 improved 2.5 times between thepre- and post-module (p-value=0.006x10-3 ). Likewise, a statistically significantimprovement was measured in most of theEM skills in both the years. The resultsfrom Likert-scale questions (Table 1) fromthe pre- and post-surveys are shown in Fig.3. In 2019, even though students liked themodule, survey participation was low. Thiscould be attributed to lack of communication regarding the importance of the survey to thestudents. In 2020, students were informed of the importance of the survey, how it would helpthem to reflect on their skillset improvement and how dissemination of the results would help theeducational community. Considering the low
showed all sorts of professional practices and technology that are relevantto surveying today.” There was a sense that, as one student put it, they were “still able tosomewhat properly experience everything.”End-of-semester course evaluations reflected a slight change in student perception with regardsto the most valuable learning experiences of the class. When asked “what assignmentcontributed most to my learning”, 56 percent of students responding in the Fall 2019 semesteridentified the lab/lab assignments as contributing most. This is a marked increase from Fall of2018 (which used the traditional format), when only 43 percent of students responding identifiedthe lab as contributing most to their learning.Practice effect on Summative Quiz
values of and relationships among specific components of a mathematical model ● apply mathematical models to authentic, real-world problems ● interpret and draw conclusions from graphical, tabular, and other numerical representations of data ● summarize and justify analysis of mathematical models for problems ● express solutions to problems using an appropriate combination of words, symbols, tables, or graphs.Figure 1 contains an outline of the specific topics covered and the number of 50-minute classsessions dedicated to each. The graphic reflects topics covered during the Fall 2020 iteration ofthe course to provide the most recent picture of the course content.Figure 1. Engineering Math Course Topical OutlineAn additional
more about the next steps of theresearch component of the exercise. Despite being suggestions for improvements, these responsesalso reflected a high level of motivation about this curricular intervention.The curricular intervention did not include control groups (i.e., CE 251 and MCRO 224 studentswho were not involved in the curricular activities presented herein). However, anecdotal evidencebased on instruction of CE 251 in years prior to this curricular intervention suggests thatcontextualizing the regression unit of the CE 251 added a real-world relevance to this subject andincreased the level of student engagement and understanding of this course module. In MCRO224, the scope of the laboratory activities and test protocols developed and
under protocol number 14094. This work was supported by theCollege of Engineering and the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at theUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as part of the Strategic Instructional InitiativesProgram (SIIP), and by National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Awards (Grant Nos.DMR-1654182, DMR-1554435, DMR-1846206, and DMR-1555153). This material is also basedupon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship underGrant No. 1746047. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References [1] G Bergerhoff, ID Brown, F Allen, et al
, which can leadto discoveries of new knowledge and innovations. These learning outcomes can impact classmates,community members, and/or society. Figure 1. The progression of active learning pedagogies employed within the Cardiovascular Engineering course.Overview of the Innovation-Based Learning PedagogyAs with many active learning pedagogies, IBL works between two frameworks Constructivist andCynefin. The IBL pedagogy uses aspects from the traits of constructivism: student-centeredlearning, interdisciplinary lessons, collaborative lessons, reflection, and assessments [4
of race/ethnicityand gender. A survey instrument measured the students’ attitudes toward professionalconnectedness (PC), a sense that engineers should apply their skills to help others, using 19 itemswith a 7-point Likert-type response scale. A key methodological inconsistency in the dataset washow students were allowed to report their race/ethnicity in the demographic question at the endof the survey: 1088 students selected a single race/ethnicity category, while 2305 students couldidentify multiple racial/ethnic categories. The results show that constraining students to select asingle race/ethnicity likely fails to accurately reflect the multiracial identities of many students.For example, the percentage of students who responded to the
challenges of the virtual/in personlabs. Student's feedback was collected to reflect their overall lab experience in this special time.1. Introduction and BackgroundLabs are a vital component to learn engineering disciplines, since hands-on labs reinforce thetheory that the students learned in lecture. With the development of modern technology,universities are changing from face-to-face education to remote web-based learning. However, itis a challenge to bring hands-on labs online due to the complexity of the labs, which includevarious equipment, materials, and resources. Setting up a web‐system for e‐education requires asignificant amount of time, as well as the necessity of having a computer and other resources.Especially due to COVID-19, most
engineering major's significancein other countries.Theoretical-based coursework is one of the contributing factors of large numbers of first-year E/CSleaving the engineering field [10]. Such coursework makes relating concepts taught in class toreal-world scenarios quite difficult and creates a negative feeling of engineering concepts amongE/CS students. Students tend to enjoy their coursework if they can see the benefits in real-worldapplications and the flexibility to solve real-world problems. E/CS curriculum should be updatedaccordingly to reflect technological advancement in the field. Teaching students, especially first-year students, outdated technologies and innovation could discourage students from continuing intheir majors. Students might
as the end artifact (Lande & Leifer, 2009). The notion of learningprofessional work, like a “prototyping culture” (Schrage, 1996), can sometimes support courselearning goals. Oftentimes though the purpose of learning of a design process, and in particular,the discrete steps and associated values, takes a secondary role to the creation and delivery of afunctional system. There is less time than might be desired for reflection (Turns et.al, 2014),especially within the design process, in seeking feedback and actually doing iterative design.Iterative physical prototyping to learn and refine concepts further (Buxton, 2007) may suffer dueto time constraints.Future Time HorizonStudents’ futures thinking has been explored, though not within the
thisarticle, Wasburns suggests providing a gender-neutral classroom by avoiding using sportsexamples or providing assessments earlier and more frequently [3]. Other strategies for gender-focused inclusion can revolve around assigning personal reflections for students to helpunderrepresented engineering students feel a stronger sense of belonging [4]. While thesestrategies may prove useful for building inclusive class-based environments, these strategies mayfall flat when students are utilizing technology as part of their instructional practice.Technology is a critical part of instructional design; however, the types and implementation oftechnology can affect the success and motivation of students. For example, women are heavilyinfluenced by the
loading beam, configuration of support frame, erection of wall, and instrumentation; • Testing: conducting a cyclic loading protocol to collect data on wall strength and deflection as well as identify damage progression and final failure mechanism; • Analysis of data: evaluation of experimental results compared to NDS predictions for strength and deflection as well as reflection on anticipated versus observed behavior.To elaborate on the last point of data analysis, students computed wall shear strength via twoapproaches: (i) 2015 NDS Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic (SDPWS) [10]Section 4.3.3.1 which accounts for sheathing material, thickness and fastener penetration, type,size, edge spacing and
taught in sequence, one per semester, across four years.The catalog was updated to reflect these changes. In 2019, the UTEP catalog was updated toestablish common language usage across the College Engineering (terms such as tracks,emphases, specialties, etc.), confusing persons unfamiliar with the program. These changes areexpected as the program moves towards a stable profile.Other US Innovation and Entrepreneurship Offerings Programs in entrepreneurship, innovation, and leadership are beginning to blossom in theUS. The Technology Entrepreneur Center at the University of Illinois offers studies leading tothe Bachelor of Science in Innovation, Leadership, and Engineering Entrepreneurship (ILEE)[13]. The BS in ILEE degree is intended and
implicationsthan engineering inherently has.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1836504. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] U. National Academy of Engineering, The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[2] W. Faulkner, "Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[3] D. Riley, Engineering and social justice: Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society
studentexperience and what their experience has been like working on their research projects. Theinformation that is collected is used by the program staff to make any changes in mentor/menteeassignments and consider what additional programming might be needed for the participants.Participants also participate in a focus group interview with an external evaluator. Questions askparticipants to reflect on their experiences during the summer program, how the program hasimpacted their career and academic goals, and how the experience has developed confidence indifferent research skills.Data AnalysisA subset of eleven questions that considered students’ overall satisfaction, confidence, and self-efficacy in their research skills were considered for this study
, PedagogyIntroductionBuilding Information Model (BIM) uses a three-dimensional (3D), digital model to represent thefacility to be constructed and provides access to extract the information for various applicationssuch as visualization, quantification, structural analysis, coordination, energy modeling, andfacility management. Advancements in Information and Technology will enhance the BIMapplications in AEC domains. One of the Construction Management department's goals atKennesaw State University is to continue to improve the curriculum to reflect the current andevolving trends of information technology applications in the construction industry. TheConstruction Management department has included a BIM applications course in its undergraduateprogram’s curriculum to
research that indicates that the need to supportengineering faculty in curriculum development efforts so that all identities are represented andfully integrated into the engineering curriculum, assignments, and assessments [33], [37], [38].This is critical because students who have minoritized identities are able to recognize that notonly is their own identity excluded from the curriculum, but also other minoritized identities,which can amplify these students’ sense of isolation and lack of belonging in the engineeringmajor and career. Designing curricula, assignments, and assessments that reflect diverseperceptions of engineers and engineering work can help cultivate the professional formation ofengineering identity and encourage students with
; Sexuality Knowledge Community. Alex has an expertise in facilitation of training programs as well as performing institutional scans and program reviews. He has worked with higher education institutions, non-profits, and for-profit organizations on their inclusion efforts. Alex believes that authentic dialogue, reflection on our identities, an understanding of our history, and direct and consistent action are key to creating a more inclusive environment. Alex graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Communications with a concentration in Public Relations from the University of Hartford and completed his Master’s Degree in Student Personnel Administration in Higher Administration at Springfield College. He currently serves as
showed a high degree of engagement and interestin the programs and demonstrated both technical (i.e., problem-solving) and social (i.e.,leadership) skills as a result of participating in the programs. Participants also observed negativeattitudes in the youth towards completing program assessments and when unable to followparticular topics in the curriculum. These findings are promising and also point to areas thatfuture efforts can improve.8. AcknowledgmentsThis research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DRL-1723610,Grant No. DRL- 2005502, and Grant No. EEC-1623490. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of
careers andpathways. Phase I and II were done in collaboration with teachers participating in the teacher PDsessions, while Phase III entailed specific breakout sessions just for counselors. Participantsattended at least one synchronous session (approximately three hours) per week, including anintroductory kickoff meeting with the project team and collaborative sessions with teachers.Counselors were given opportunities in these sessions to undertake activities in teams.Discussions were held to share experiences and reflect on their learning of engineering.Asynchronous sessions afforded counselors with opportunities to work on engineering projectsindividually, read relevant literature, and construct mind maps demonstrating their understandingof
a specific program or course experience.While half the students showed an overall positive experience, further research needs to explorestudents' experiences in other courses and at other institutions of varying demographics;therefore, results cannot be generalizable. However, there is significant value in exploring thesestudent’s experiences, as small institutional experiences can be easily overlooked. Future workalso includes implementing MOOCIBL in other disciplines, grade levels, and other under-resourced venues.The student interviews provided rich reflection and feedback using MOOCIBL for an under-resourced academic program. Due to high costs and resources, a Cardiovascular Engineeringcourse would not be feasible to teach at a small
andproduct quality. To optimize the system performance, it is important to identify the key factorsthat play significant roles. This study presents a quality control application to optimize anelectrohydraulic system in the presence of extraneous variability. The performance measures ofthe system are response time of the cylinder to a target setpoint position and positioning errorsthat reflect the deviation of current cylinder position from the target position. The controllableprocess parameters (factors) in this system include fluid pressure, proportional gain of thecontroller configuration, and signal communication (local vs. remote). The ambient temperaturewill be used as the extraneous noise variable to simulate real-life manufacturing
review response as “just part of the game,” thesescholars are a part of a coalition of authors who have penned an anti-racist reviewer’s guide [19].In the development of this guide, the coalition has identified this kind of behavior for what it is:the centering of a particular way of knowing and communicating to the exclusion of other ways.The reviewer’s exclusionary behavior maps onto several faces of oppression, most notably,marginalization (of particular ways of making knowledge) [20]. Further, the proposedcommunication and knowledge-making suggested by the reviewer reflects Western ways ofknowing, making knowledge, and communicating [21]; as such, this aligns with culturalimperialism and, following Dotson, is a form of epistemic violence [22
100, were conducted online. But in 2005, thefinal exam was taken in a proctored location, either on campus or at a pre-approved testing site.In both semesters, the authors endeavored to predict each student’s final-exam score from thestudent’s class year, major, GPA, and scores on the three midterms. The R-squared statistic(coefficient of determination) was much higher in 2005 (0.4972) than in 2004 (0.0008),indicating that the final-exam score was much less correlated to other metrics of the student’sknowledge when the final exam was unproctored. This suggests that proctored exam results aremuch more reflective of other measures of knowledge than unproctored exam results.A comparison of proctored online with unproctored online exams was done
form mentoring programs, it is important to monitor theoutcomes over multiple years to accurately monitor the effects. There is also a lack of researchon the effect of mentoring programs on the mental health of students during COVID-19.Methods The mentoring program within the WISE program has now been running for threesemesters since Fall 2019 and the findings after the Fall 2020 semester were measured to 1)assess the cohort’s satisfaction and engagement in the program through a voice of customersurvey including reflections, 2) compare the increase in the number of mentor/mentee pairs fromthe initial pilot period of Fall 2019 compared to the Fall 2020, 3) compare the average GPAs and4) the retention in engineering and science for women
%) 108 (76.1%) Other 1 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.4%) Freshman 6 (4.0%) 4 (3.0%) 2 (1.4%) Sophomore 17 (11.3%) 14 (10.4%) 7 (4.9%) Class Standing Junior 91 (60.7%) 68 (50.7%) 72 (50.7%) Senior 35 (23.3%) 48 (35.8%) 49 (34.5%) Graduate 1 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 12 (8.5%) Online Classes Yes 111 (74.0%) 96 (71.6%) 125 (88.0%) in Past? No 39 (26.0%) 38 (28.4%) 17 (12.0%)3. ResultsData were analyzed in four parts, reflecting the type of perceptions that were explored. Inaddition to a visual inspection, a Chi-squared test for trends in proportions was