leading to an empathic formation compass for co-design,” Internation Journal of Design, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 53–68, 2019.[17] N. D. Fila, C. T. Schimpf, and J. L. Hess, “Critical incidents in biomedical engineering students’ experiences of empathy in engineering design,” in preparation.[18] E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” Co- Design, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068[19] J. L. Hess, N. D. Fila, C. T. Schimpf, A. Godwin, A., and E. A. Sanders, “Board 203: A research study on assessing empathic formation in engineering design,” Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland
years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate Professional Development at Northeastern University’s College of Engineering. He is the recipient of the 2021 NSPE Engineering Education Excellence Award and the 2019 ASCE Thomas A Lenox ExCEEd Leadership Award.Dr. Camilla M. Saviz P.E., University of the Pacific Camilla Saviz is Professor and Chair of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. She received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an M.B.A. from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California
, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[6] J. B. Halkiyo, “Enhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learners through an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students in Focus,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41209[7] N. Dasgupta, M. M. Scircle, and M. Hunsinger, “Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering,” PNAS Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am., vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4988–4993, 2015, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422822112.[8] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Academic Science: A Changing
thecertification framework.AcknowledgementWe acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Defense [Contract No. W52P1J-22-9-3009]. References[1] J. S. Linvill et al., "Development of a Certification Framework for a MicroelectronicsWorkforce Development Program," Accepted for presentation as part of a competitively selectedpanel at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.[2] J. S. Linvill, I. Adams, E. Haluschak, B. Quezada, and T. J. Moore, "‘Good communicationskills are super, super important’: Developing students’ professional communication skills forcareer-ready engineers," Accepted for presentation as part of a competitively selected panel at theASEE Annual Conference &
Innovation Fellow, Andre Schleife, for guidance and support.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] P. H. Borgstrom et al., “Science and engineering active learning (SEAL) system: A novel approach to controls laboratories,” presented at the 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, Jun. 2012. doi: 10.18260/1-2--21900.[3] W. E. Dixon, D. M. Dawson, B. T. Costic, and M. S. de Queiroz, “A MATLAB-based control systems laboratory experience for undergraduate students: toward standardization and shared resources,” IEEE Transactions on
simulation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 280–285, Jun. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001[3] D. Laurillard and A. Masulis, Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. Routledge, 2013.[4] L. W. Barsalou, “Grounded cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 617–645, Jan. 2008. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639[5] K. Koenig, K. E. Wood, L. J. Bortner, and L. Bao, “Modifying traditional labs to target scientific reasoning,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 28–35, May 2019. doi:10.1080/0047231x.2019.12290473[6] B. A. Danielak, A. Gupta, and A. Elby, “Marginalized identities of sense
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 25999. doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[7] A. B. Diekman, E. S. Weisgram, and A. L. Belanger, “New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective,” Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–88, 2015, doi: 10.1111/sipr.12010.[8] K. L. Boucher, M. A. Fuesting, A. B. Diekman, and M. C. Murphy, “Can I Work with and Help Others in This Field? How Communal Goals Influence Interest and Participation in STEM Fields,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, 2017, Accessed: Feb. 07, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles
, “Software Carpentry: Getting scientists to write better code by making them more productive,” Computing in Science & Engineering (CiSE), vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 66–69, Nov. 2006. [8] A. Simperler and G. Wilson, “Software Carpentry – get more done in less time,” arXiv:1506.02575, Jun. 2015. [9] B. K. Weaver, “The efficacy and usefulness of Software Carpentry training: A follow-up cohort study,” Master’s thesis, The University of Queensland, 2019.[10] A. Berg, S. Osnes, and R. Glassey, “If in doubt, try three: Developing better version control commit behavior with first year students,” in ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), Feb. 2022, pp. 362–368.[11] V. Garousi, G. Giray, and E. T¨uz¨un, “Survey of the
interview questions but also look at intersectionalityand combine the qualitative analysis with the findings of our ongoing quantitative studies.MethodsThe qualitative pilot study was designed to contribute to overarching project goals, by providingstudent voices and discovering the reasons behind disparities in representation. We piloted aninterview protocol with undergraduate students for qualitative data collection and analysis tocomplement the ongoing quantitative study. This paper/poster focuses on the portion of thequalitative analysis that answers the research questions in Section Introduction and Motivation.The interview protocol was IRB-approved in all participating institutions (IRB protocol numbers:1354049, 2019 SP 59-R, and 201331
research at the Curricular Analytics Lab focuses on using machine learning and data analysis to enhance educational outcomes. Key contributions include developing a cohort-tracking analytics platform that assists in improving graduation rates by addressing curricular barriers. Melika has co-authored papers presented at conferences such as the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, exploring the intersection of curriculum complexity and student performance. Her technical proficiency spans multiple programming languages and cloud computing, furthering her research into innovative educational technologies.Kristina A Manasil, The University of Arizona Kristi Manasil is a first-year PhD student in the School of
. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
andEngineering, vol. 33, pp. 1399-1416, 2017, DOI: 10.6688/JISE.2017.33.6.1.[15] G. Nossoni, J. Nocito-Gobel, and R. S. Harichandran, "Relationship between PersonalityTypes and Topical Interests of Engineering Students, if Any: A Work in Progress," presented at2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 2019. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33234.[16] J. L. Holland, The Psychology of Vocational Choice. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell, 1966.[17] J.L. Holland, Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and workenvironments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.[18] D. T. Brown, "The application of values-based career counseling in practice settings," TheCareer Development Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 319-332
. His work has been published through the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE); he is an active member of both organizations. He holds a PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42797Dr. B ”Grant” Grant Crawford P.E., Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., F.ASEE, Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering for the School of Computing and Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is a former Director of
University of Maryland, College Park. He joined the university in 2017 as an assistant clinical professor and research educator for the Designing Innovation Research Stream, where he advises first-year and sophomore students on design research methodologies. Dr. Fazelpour developed two project-based courses aimed at teaching students design and design research. In 2018, he transitioned to the Department of Mechanical Engineering to teach design-related courses, including computer-aided design and machine design. Additionally, he introduced a new course focused on design for manufacturing and assembly. Dr. Fazelpour’s active engagement in professional organizations includes membership in ASME and ASEE. He has held various
andhow the industry, the type of company, and other participants’ demographics might affect thefrequency and types of ethics and equity issues the engineers face in their practice.References 1. Chintam, K., & Prybutok, A. N., & Archuleta, C. M., & Deberghes, A., & DiBiase, B., & Li, R., & Richards, J., & Seitz, L., & Cole, J. (2023, June), Designing, codifying, and implementing social justice content in a required course on engineering and research skills for first-year graduate students. Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43005 2. Shields, B. (2022). Justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion curriculum within
and R. W. Lent, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, pp. 42–69.[7] M. L. Savickas, “Career construction theory and practice,” in Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work, 2nd ed., D. Brown and R. W. Lent, Eds. 2013, pp. 147–183.[8] C. A. Pantoja, “How and why women leave engineering careers: Toward an integrated framework of counseling and organizational psychology career theories,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings, online, Jun. 2021[9] J. H. Kim, Understanding Narrative Inquiry: The Crafting and Analysis of Stories as Research. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.[10] J. Cruz, and N. Kellam,” Beginning an engineer’s journey: A narrative
how utilizing coursework during the firstyear and during the final year to introduce engineering leadership competencies supportsstudents’ understanding of the value of those competencies. Drawing on data from a survey andfocus groups, we consider the following questions: ● Upon completion of either course, are students better able to identify and communicate the value of specific leadership competencies necessary for success in an engineering career? ● Upon completion of both courses, are students able to identify and make meaning of the connection between the courses? ● What barriers do students perceive in developing professional competencies?Competency Development & Alignment with Leadership DevelopmentIn 2019, the
in both academic and professional settings?References[1] National Academy Of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. In Engineering. National Academies Press.[2] Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B., Millan, A., Miranda, D., & Kelarestani, M. (2010). Engineering leadership development programs: A look at what is needed and what is being done. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(3).[3] Chowdhury, T., & Murzi, H. (2019, July). Literature review: Exploring teamwork in engineering education. In Proceedings of the Conference: Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Cape Town, South
International Collaborative Experiential Program,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2023.[3] S. Shandilya, G. Raju, S. Y. Yoon, and C. A. Kwuimy, “Exploring Transformative Learning from a Summer Bridge Program,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , 2023.[4] J. Mezirow, Transformative dimensions of adult learning, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310: Jossey-Bass, 1991.[5] H. L. Bell, H. J. Gibson, M. A. Tarrant, L. G. Perry III, and L. Stoner, “Transformational learning through study abroad: US students’ reflections on learning about sustainability in the South Pacific,” Leisure Studies , vol. 35, no. 4, 2016. T. M. Chiang and J. F. Yao, “Transformative Learning Experiences through Short-term
. Retrieved from https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ece_rpts/55.[14] A. Karimi and R. D. Manteufel. Factors influencing student graduation rate. In 2013 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference. American Society for Engineering Education, March 2013.[15] W. Kilgore, E. Crabtree, and K. Sharp. Excess credit accumulation: An examination of contributing factors for first-time bachelor’s degree earners. Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly, 6(4):41–56, 2019.[16] D. A. Kramer, M. R. Holcomb, and R. Kelchen. The costs and consequences of excess credit hours policies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1):3–28, 2018. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44985444.[17] M. N. Kwenda. Tracking and explaining credit
. Bers, L. Flannery, E. R. Kazakoff, and A. Sullivan, "Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum," Computers & Education, vol. 72, pp. 145-157, 2014.[10] C. Kim, D. Kim, J. Yuan, R. B. Hill, P. Doshi, and C. N. Thai, "Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching," Computers & Education, vol. 91, pp. 14-31, 2015.[11] Y. Jin, C. Qian, and S. Ahmed, "Closing the Loop: A 10-year Follow-up Survey for Evaluation of an NSF REU Site," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug 23 2022 Minneapolis, MN. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/41048. [Online]. Available: https
,” presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, doi: 10.18260/1-2—4414.[2] W. Liu, R. Carr, and J. Strobel, “Extending teacher professional development through anonline learning community: A case study,” J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 99–112, 2009, doi: 10.18785/jetde.0201.07.[3] M. Dalal, A. Iqbal, and A. R. Carberry, “Blended implementation of existing precollegeengineering programs: Teacher perspectives of program impact,” IEEE Trans. Educ., pp. 1–13,2023, doi: 10.1109/TE.2023.3338610.[4] Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects.Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2009. doi: 10.17226/12635.[5] S. Brophy, S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C