andethics. Uncertainty can be high and irreducible when dealing with complex natural systems, andwill need to be given proper consideration. Under conditions of scientific uncertainty, engineerswill participate in making decisions where value systems and ethics play a large role. Byexamining how values enter into engineering and exploring codes of ethics, educators canprepare students for real world situations.References1. Odum, H. T., W. L. Siler, R. J. Beyers, and N. Armstrong. 1963. Experiments with engineering of marine ecosystems. Publication of the Institute of Marine Science of the University of Texas 9:374-403.2. Mitsch, W. J. and S. E. Jørgensen. 1989. Introduction to ecological engineering. In: Ecological Engineering: An
from the Industrial Engineering (IE)program at OU and three faculty members from the Industrial Engineering and Management(IE&M) program at OSU have developed a strong working relationship and have crafted animportant niche in Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM). As part of these collaborativeactivities, the programs have fostered research exchanges including joint National ScienceFoundation (NSF) research projects, faculty and student exchanges, and two-way interactive,compressed digital video courses providing cross-institutional graduate credit.Integrated Production Management (IPM) ResearchA working sub-group of faculty from OU (B. Foote, S. Pulat, S. Raman and A. Badiru) and OSU(M. Kamath) were funded under a three year research
%) 16 (28%) Yes 6 2x or 3x: 6 2x or 3x: 4 Biweekly: 12 Biweekly: 13 Weekly: 6 Weekly: 7 No 10To evaluate student engagement with their team with respect to their assigned roles, the Springsurvey had two questions: (1) Comment on whether the team appreciated the contributions youmade within your role(s) as defined by the team, and (2) Comment on whether yourcontributions to the project were limited or enhanced by your role(s). Table 9 shows thecondensed results for these questions from both Spring iterations. Table 9: Student Engagement with their Team with respect to their Assumed Roles Spring (107 responses
and R. L. Hite, “Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project based learning,” Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 76–102, Jul. 2020. doi:10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663[5] H. J. Yazici, L. A. Zidek, and H. St. Hill, “A study of critical thinking and cross-disciplinary teamwork in Engineering Education,” Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering, pp. 185–196, Sep. 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_8[6] S. Zajac, A. Woods, S. Tannenbaum, E. Salas, and C. L. Holladay, “Overcoming challenges to teamwork in Healthcare: A Team Effectiveness Framework and evidence-based guidance,” Frontiers in Communication, vol. 6, Mar. 2021
Charlotte Lisa R. Merriweather is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She received her PhD in Adult Education with a graduate certificate in Qualitative Inquiry from the University of Georgia in 2004. Her research focuses on issueDr. Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Cathy D. Howell is a Clinical Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Community Health and Masterˆa C™s degree in Health Education at East CarolinaDilara Yaya Bryson, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. Edith Gnanadass, The University of Memphis Edith Gnanadass has a Ph.D. in Lifelong
-6435.References[1] I. P. M. Office. "Project team." University of Waterloo. https://uwaterloo.ca/ist-project- management-office/methodologies/roles-and-responsibilities/project- team#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20project%20team,or%20participation%20defined%20f or%20them. (accessed 05/07/2023).[2] R. E. Allen et al., "Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy," American journal of pharmaceutical education, vol. 77, no. 6, 2013.[3] L. K. Michaelsen, N. Davidson, and C. H. Major, "Team-based learning practices and principles in comparison with cooperative learning and problem-based learning," Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, vol. 25, 2014.[4] I. M. Inuwa, M. Al-Rawahy, S
discussed. textbook is thinking. ideas are discussed discussed. discussed. discussed. introduce and their d and impact is their explored. relevance is discussed in depthUnder- Extensive Extensive Some Good Some Minimum No evidencestanding analysis analysis analysis is understandi ability to understandi of backed demonstrate provided, ng of the apply ng of the understandiof subject up by s demonstrati subject is understandi subject is ng
National Science Foundation under IUSE (Grant# 2120252).References[1] E. D. Prada, M. Mercedes, and M. Pino-Juste, "Teamwork skills in higher education: Is university training contributing to their mastery?," Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, vol. 35, 2022.[2] L. Riebe, A. Girardi, and C. Whitsed, "A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education," Small Group Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 619-664, 2016.[3] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, "Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis," Review of educational research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21-51, 1999.[4] M. Alqassab, J. W. Strijbos, E. Panadero, J. F. Ruiz, M. Warrens
. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://neuralink.com/?202308049001[4] S. K. Mudgal, S. K. Sharma, J. Chaturvedi, and A. Sharma, “Brain computer interface advancement in neurosciences: Applications and issues,” Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery, vol. 20, p. 100694, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.100694.[5] M. Xiong et al., “A Low-Cost, Semi-Autonomous Wheelchair Controlled by Motor Imagery and Jaw Muscle Activation,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Oct. 2019, pp. 2180–2185. doi: 10.1109/SMC.2019.8914544.[6] “BCI Exploration of User Responses to Vulnerable and Expressive Robot Behaviors | Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
, No. 2219589. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B. C. Haynes, and A. Olney, “Autotutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 612–618, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/te/te48.html#GraesserCHO05[2] J. A. Kulik and J. D. Fletcher, “Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 42–78, 2016.[3] K.-I. Malatesta, P. Wiemer-Hastings, and J. Robertson, “Beyond the short answer
Outcomes from a Pilot Medical Innovations Course with Nursing, Engineering, and Biology Undergraduate Students,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 4, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0095-y.[5] D. Melian, J. L. Saorin, J. De la Torre-Cantero, and V. Lopez-Chao, “Analysis of the Factorial Structure of Graphic Creativity of Engineering Students through Digital Manufacturing Techniques*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 9, 2020.[6] M. E. Andrews, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[7] E. C. Hilton, K. G. Talley, S. F. Smith, R. L. Nagel, and J. S. Linsey, “Report on
, 2, 3) values as per equation (2) and sends the calculated 𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖 and(previous) 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖 values to the respective Arduinos #i. The Arduinos use these values to calculate 𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖and 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 as per equation (3) and send the new 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 values back to the Raspberry Pi (as indicated inFigure 6). Once all these 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 values are received, the Raspberry Pi calculates new 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖 values as perequation (4). Then, in order to meet the 0.02 (s) sampling time interval, the Raspberry Piintentionally executes an idle (compensation) time. 9 Figure 5. Flow chart of the program on Raspberry PiFigure 6 illustrates the flowchart for the Arduino controllers #i (𝑖𝑖
education," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2009.[2] E. W. Johnson and S. G. DeMaris, "Developing an International Engineering Experience for Undergraduate Students at a Small Institution," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 2, 2007.[3] M. H. Salisbury, P. D. Umbach, M. B. Paulsen, and E. T. Pascarella, "Going Global: Understanding the Choice Process of the Intent to Study Abroad," Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 119-143, 2009.[4] G. M. Warnick, M. S. Call, and R. Davies, "Understanding engineering and technology student perceptions: Barriers to study abroad participation," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
similar to the one discussed in this paper. Acknowledgment of Support & Disclaimer This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2215770. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References [1] NGSS Lead States. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies
critiques causes excessive cognitive load for students. WebTA users view a traffic light system to portray the severity of antipattern(s) found within a stu- dent’s program. A ‘Green’ light means no antipatterns and/or a good pattern was found within the code. A ‘Yellow’ light means a non- critical antipattern or error was found. A ‘Red’ light
(TALE). IEEE, 2015, pp. 72–76. [7] K. W. Van Treuren, “Applying active learning to an introductory aeronautics class,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [8] C. R. Compeau, A. Talley, and P. Q. Tran, “Active learning in electrical engineering: Measuring the difference,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [9] F. Portela, “A new and interactive teaching approach with gamification for motivating students in computer science classrooms,” in First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, 2020.[10] G. S. Tewolde, “Effective active learning tools for an embedded systems course,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education
involved conducting a comprehensive analysis of the overall system. Cruse et al.provide a detailed overview of the course topics, with project days and activities denoted [4].Survey And Data CollectionResearchers implemented a self-efficacy survey in the course structure to gain insights into theproject's impact on student self-efficacy. The instrument used to measure self-efficacy was anadapted from of the survey validated and discussed in Mamaril et al.'s Journal of EngineeringEducation paper entitled, "Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self-Efficacy: AValidation Study [8]." In this validation study, a self-efficacy instrument was identified to measureengineering efficacy in four areas: general engineering (Gen) and three engineering
, L. Landherr, D. Silverstein, S. Thiel, B. Vaughen and T. Vogel, "Process Safety Across the Curriculum," in AIChE Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2023.[2] L. P. Ford, K. D. Dahm, D. Crowl, C. Barr, J. Brennan, T. Carter, L. Landherr, D. Silverstein, S. Thiel, B. Vaughen and T. Vogel, "The 2023 Timepoint in the Development of Process Safety Education," Chemical Engineering Education.[3] M. S. Mannan and D. K. Startz, "Process Safety Curriculum in US Universities," Centerline, vol. 10, no. 1, 2006.[4] P. B. Hasan, "Process Safety Curriculum Survey," Centerline, vol. 16, no. 2, 2012.[5] J. A. Shaeiwitz and S. Abubakr, "Hazards Associated with Chemical, Physical, and/or Biological Processes in the ChE Curriculum," in AIChE
of Higher Education of the School of Engineering and Sciences, and her current role is Academic Services Director. Vianney belongs to the executive committee of the Matilda Latin American Chair for Women in Engineering and belongs to the mentoring and research groups. She belongs to the LACCEI executive board. She is a founding member of Ingenia Women in Engineering and Sciences participating in the linkage, mentoring and dissemination committees. Vianney is a founding member of the OWSD Mexico´s Chapter. She is an IEEE, WIE (Women in Engineering) and IEEE-HKN member. Vianney is a CB Coach certified by the Conscious Business Center. She belongs to the National System of Researchers (SNI). Her research lines
, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence studentˆa C™s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term succes ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Replicating the Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem – differences in outcomes across studentsIntroductionWith the ongoing transition to the knowledge-based, mobile economy, cities in the United Statesrecognize the importance of a STEM-literate workforce. In the depopulated, legacy industrialareas in the Midwest, cities fight to attract and retain an educated
. The GameThe method by which this paper teaches SOP minimization is a game with which students competeto capture the maximum number of true minterms. Upon capture by either player, a true minterm’ssquare or cell is highlighted with the player’s corresponding color. Once all true minterms arecaptured by either Player One or Player Two, the game is over and the player with a greater numberof true minterms covered wins. The player(s) can also capture true minterms occupied by the otherplayer to both reduce their opponents score and increase their own. However, if a player capturesa false minterm through any one of their moves via an incorrect Sum-of-Products, then the playerforfeits the game. As such, the game encourages students to naturally
Paper ID #42835Use of Virtual Reality to Improve Learning Experience on a Lean ManufacturingCourseDr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey Dr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez is professor – consultant in the Science Department in Tecnologico de Monterrey, Puebla campus. He studied a PhD in Financial Science in EGADE Business School (2016), a MSc in Industrial Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2011), and a BEng in Industrial and Systems Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2006). Dr. Sayeg-S´anchez has more than 11 years of experience in teaching statistics, mathematics, and operations research; and more
completed more variety of StaticViewproblems, more specific CAD models used as well as the timing on when they are introduced toyield more meaningful results.References[1] Steif, P. S., & Dollar, A. (2004, January). Reinventing engineering statics to address theconceptual difficulties of students. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition (Vol. 47233, pp. 47-52).[2] Wingate, K. A., Ferri, A. A., & Feigh, K. M. (2018, June). The impact of the physics, statics,and mechanics sequence on student retention and performance in mechanical engineering. In2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] Steif, P. S., & Dollar, A. (2005). Reinventing the teaching of statics. International Journal ofEngineering Education
Education, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34764[3] R. Fry, B. Kennedy, and C. Funk, “STEM Jobs See Uneven Progress in Increasing Gender, Racial and Ethnic Diversity: Higher Education Pipeline Suggests Long Path Ahead for Increasing Diversity, Especially in Fields Like Computing and Engineering,” Pew Research Center, Apr. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp- content/uploads/sites/16/2021/03/PS_2021.04.01_diversity-in-STEM_REPORT.pdf[4] A. Peng, J. Menold, and S. R. Miller, “Nature Versus Nurture: the Influence of Classroom Creative Climate on Risk-Taking Preferences of Engineering Students,” in Volume 4: 20th International Conference on Design Education (DEC
● Reread or rewrite notes or class material ● Perform note recall by recalling sections of notes and concepts as a form of review ● Summarize chapter, section of notes or textbook Understand ● Using flashcards or quizzes to test your understanding of key theories or concepts ● Explaining a problem or concepts to a classmate(s) (in a study session, at office hours, in class, Piazza, discussion board, etc.) ● Solving practice problems with guidance and support from notes and examples Apply ● Represent a concept or problem in a different form (graphically, equation, diagrams, explanation, verbally
design various methods of electrical power generation and distribution.” Originally, as discussed in section 1.1, this course was based strictly on traditional energy sources. To change its emphasis, several approaches have been successful, which will be discussed in the following sections. 3.1 Develop and support alternative energy clubs 3.1.1 Solar Boat Club As far back as the early 2000’s, K-State Salina students from multiple disciplines under the leadership of several faculty members started a Solar Boat Club. They designed and built a solar-powered boat and competed for more than a decade at Solar Splash, an international electric boat competition which is still active today. (https://solarsplash.com
York: Oxford University Press., 2003.[4] Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013. doi: 10.17226/18290.[5] A. L. Pawley, “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define ‘Engineering,’” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309–319, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01029.x.[6] W. Grimson and M. Murphy, “The Epistemological Basis of Engineering, and Its Reflection in the Modern Engineering Curriculum,” in Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values, vol. 21, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, and B. Newberry, Eds., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol. 21. , Cham: Springer
be helpful if themap was able to be shown within the tool rather than having to open a separate application. Thisfeedback will be provided to the the automated scoring tool development team to see if there areadditional elements that can be added to improve the user experience.References 1. “The Network,” KEEN - About. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx. 2. N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed‐Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes*,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 3. Kern Family Foundation, The, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 4. K
Conservation. NJ,USA: Noyes Data Corporation, 1979.[17] G.F. Froment, K. B. Bischof, and J. de Wilde, Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, 3rded. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.[18] A. Araújo and S. Skogestad, “Control structure design for the ammonia synthesis process,”Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2920-2932, Dec. 2008, doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.03.001.[19] R. Sinnott and G. Towler, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice, andEconomics of Plant and Process Design, 6th ed. Elsevier, 2020, doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-01555-0.Appendix A1. Chemical Process Project Description and Background. Plant for Productionof Ammonia: Haber-Bosch ProcessIntroduction and History:One of the most critical nutrients for
engineering students through community building (Evaluation) AbstractOver the past twelve years, the ESTEEM program, funded by the NSF S-STEM, at University ofCalifornia Santa Barbara (UCSB) has supported 161 low-income undergraduate students inengineering. This paper emphasizes the students’ changing needs and what they foundsupportive over time with a special focus on the shifting needs for community building before,during, and after COVID-19 pandemic remote learning. Without additional support, low-incomeengineering students, who often reflect additional intersecting minoritized identities and are morelikely to be the first in their family to attend college, leave the field at