-based, active learning environmentsfor improvement of student comprehension and engagement.1,2,3 Active-learning requires Page 13.414.2students to be involved in key activities of analysis, synthesis and evaluation. 4 For universitystudents, these activities are most clearly present in the context of directed and independentresearch.5 While certain active-learning activities can (and should) be built into the structure ofwhat would normally be a lecture class (such as group discussions, demonstrations, and groupdesign projects), the level of student engagement supported by a research project would be hardto duplicate in a classroom environment
was their first researchexperience of any kind. We had a positive impact on influencing the career path of the REUparticipants, according to their self-reported plans. The mentoring program has been verysuccessful, as indicated by the number of return attendees and alumni of the Bio-Discoveryprogram, who recommend their younger sisters or friends to the program. According to ourassessment data, the Bio-Discovery Program has been the most rewarding part of the programfor several of the REU participants, even though it also presented a challenge, as it limits theamount of time REU students can dedicate exclusively to their research projects. With ourrecommendations for improvement, this program can be adopted by other faculty who wish
electricity and gasoline, seems to elicit disapproval of the price increasesbut little more. America has become indifferent to energy issues and continues to pay the higherprices without much thought. This paper will begin by examining the state of the general publicconcerning energy and its lack of energy literacy. Most people have not begun to understand thecomplex nature of the energy challenge. Poor energy literacy led the authors to submit aproposal to a local foundation in 2006 to develop an “Energy Room” at the Mayborn Museum onthe Baylor University campus. The Mayborn Museum is a facility that “provides a widespectrum of learning opportunities to engage all types of visitors.” Baylor Universityengineering students worked on several projects
, except for handful institutionsthat offer a Master of Science program in M&S, no other educational program is currentlyavailable at the undergraduate level, especially for electrical engineers. This demands thedevelopment of a curriculum and requirements for its assessment, which is the topic of thispresentation. The development is part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant for acourse, curriculum, and laboratory improvement project called Undergraduate STEMEducation Initiative in Creative Educational (USE-ICE) innovation for electricalengineering students at the College of Engineering, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln(UNL).1. IntroductionGlobalization and international research and development have changed the way the UnitedStates
holistic “cradle to grave” approach Do things right, having decided the right thing to do Beware cost reduction masquerading as value engineering Practice what you preachThe third lecture builds on Egan Review Skills for Sustainable Communities7. This is included tostimulate student thinking about their skills development, the other professions who they may beworking with in the future and to support their year-long first year design project which is Page 14.800.5looking at conceptual design of an eco-town for 20 000 people.The Egan Review presents seven components that are core to realising a sustainable community.They are
at the Colorado School of Mines and Research Associate Professor in Academic Affairs. Dr. Streveler holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Master of Science in Zoology from the Ohio State University, and a Bachelor of Arts in Biology from Indiana University at Bloomington. She is co-principle investigator of three NSF-sponsored projects: Developing an Outcomes Assessment Instrument for Identifying Engineering Student Misconceptions in Thermal and Transport Sciences (DUE - 0127806), Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (ESI-0227558), and Rigorous Research in Engineering Education: Creating a Community of Practice (DUE
, eucalyptus, musizi and pine to the U.S. Air ForceAcademy’s (USAFA) Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering for testing. Althoughthe number of wood samples tested was small, the results provided EMI more confidence aboutthe actual strength of these wood species used in East African construction, and are presented inthis paper. The project also provided opportunities for undergraduate engineering students atUSAFA and an EMI intern from Auburn University to participate in meaningful research. Morecollaboration is possible as Uganda Martyr’s University (UMU) Faculty of the BuiltEnvironment considers involving its facilities and undergraduate students in continued testing.The testing results proved valuable to EMI, and the students involved
and engineering literacy practices within K-12 science classroom and professional communities.Ms. Noreen Balos, University of California, Santa Barbara Noreen Balos is a doctoral student in the Learning, Culture & Technology program at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). Prior to UCSB, she served as Student Affairs Officer for UCLA’s Biomedical Research minor program advising undergraduate researchers in their pursuit of MD or MD- PhD. At ASU’s School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, & Energy (SEMTE), she was a Project Manager, overseeing with CO-PIs, an NSF Innovation through Institutional Integration (Iˆ3) grant col- laborating with academic departments such as mathematics, physics
by emphasing the need for Synergetic Configuration across the curriculumKey words: Synergy: Variety: Synergetic Configuration: Foundation students:Graduate Students 1. Introduction & BackgroundBased upon the pedagogically focused aspects of the RVS model of Engineering Education [1]and following an Action Research approach [2] the Great Expectations Project set out toidentify and find solutions to the issues around the ‘academic transition’ into university fortwo very different cohorts of students; those who enter university without the required pre-requisite qualifications and are therefore required to enrol upon a pre-undergraduate level‘conversion’ programme in general engineering; and students who, having graduated with aBachelor’s
format at The University of Texas at Dallas, is described in this Work in Progress(WIP) paper. While the traditional sections of the course are well established, appreciated by thestudents, and meet their educational objectives, the online section was developed during theSummer of 2018 for a first time offering in the Fall of 2018. The overall experience of teachingthis course online and the student’s feedback are described.The online section is considered successful because the work completed by students (homeworkassignments, exams, and design project) in the first offering of the online course is comparable towork performed in previous traditional sections with the same professor. Challenges with adesign project, which is included in this
STEM program to prepare pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops nanotechnology based lessons that integrate the STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design through empathy: how low vision simulators can be used to engage students in better design solutions (Academic Practice/Design Interventions) INTRODUCTION: One of the objectives of a first-‐year engineering design course is to engage students in a real engineering design project. The team project typically
current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise.Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines Leslie Light is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines, and the Director of the Cornerstone Design@Mines program. She received a B.S. in General Engineering, Product Design from Stanford University and an MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, specializing in Entrepreneurial Management. Prior to joining Mines she spent 20 years as a designer, project manager, and
design and demonstrating how the AmericanInstitute of Steel Construction Manual (AISC) codifies these concepts and theories for thepurpose of design (i.e., low-level Bloom’s taxonomy objectives such as remembering andunderstanding [2]). Time within the classroom typically focused on the practical application ofthese concepts and theories through examples as well as project-based learning (i.e., mid andhigh-level Bloom’s taxonomy objectives such as applying, analyzing, and evaluating [2]). Theexpectation was students would spend a similar amount of time studying for the course whencompared to the prior year (when the course format followed a “traditional” model withclassroom time dedicated to theoretical knowledge and less time allocated towards
Society for Engineering Education, 2019AbstractIn recent years, makerspaces have become an increasingly common feature in the engineeringbuildings of academic institutions. Through the creation and continued funding of these spaces,access to rapid prototyping technology has allowed for fast, straightforward project developmentacross the engineering disciplines. While many hypothesize that students’ participation withinthese facilities has a positive impact on their educational experiences and outcomes, there is littleempirical data that describes how and to what extent individuals are impacted by exposure to amakerspace.In this paper, we seek to understand how the use of a university makerspace in a course projectimpacts students’ engineering
, it will result in an MEng degree and will contain rigor essentially equivalent to USAprograms.7 Table 1 gives a side-by-side comparison the various programs. Year One Year Two Year Three Year Four Design & Innovation Engr. Analysis Mechanics System Design Strength of Materials Control & Inst. Engineering Mgmt. System Modeling Transport Tech. Power & Heat Engr. Materials Industrial Project Engineering Math Engineering Project Design & Mfg. Intelligent Control Calculus Business Develop. Leadership in Tech. CAD/CAM Differential Eq
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at
Paper ID #16126Evaluation of Interactive Multidisciplinary Curricula in a Residential Sum-mer Program (Evaluation)Mr. Guo Zheng Yew, Texas Tech University Guo Zheng Yew is currently pursuing his doctorate in civil engineering at Texas Tech University with a focus on finite element analysis and glass mechanics. He also teaches an introductory course to freshman engineering students. Prior to his graduate work in the United States, he obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Malaysia and has participated in research projects involving offshore structures in Malaysia.Dr. Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University Dr. Paula Monaco
knowing a foreign language. Anna’s work at International Affairs is multifunctional. it comprises interpreting at international conferences run by the University, administration of several international projects, interpreting at negotiations with partners, protocol assistance for international delegations, coordination of business trips of KNRTU management, and etc.Dr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Sanger is a professor in the School of Engineering Technology in the College of Technology of Purdue University. His focus and passion is real world, industry based, senior capstone experiences both domes- tically and internationally. He has successfully developed this area at Purdue and at
management, humanitarian and healthcare logistics, healthcare/medical in- formatics, and data standards. He has directed several projects funded by the National Science Foundation, Air Force Research Lab, and Wal-Mart Stores.Ms. Julia Leeds Page 26.1008.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Interactive Simulation for Introducing Industrial EngineeringAbstractThis study represents a simulation-based Industrial Engineering (IE) challenge activity in anintroduction-to-engineering course. The course is developed for incoming freshman students toraise their understanding of IE
students with more design-decision making experience to enable them to be ready to engineer upon graduation. In thisresearch, third and fourth year undergraduate mechanical engineering students were guidedthrough the process of designing learning aid prototypes to be used in general engineeringeducation. Students were encouraged to use advanced technologies such as 3D printing and virtualsimulation to realize their concepts. This project assisted students in identifying their own andtypical misconceptions and devise tools which corrected those cognitive errors. A series of self-evaluation methods were used to identify the student’s perception of their decision-making skilllevels. Over the multiple categories of design decision-making skills
where she was responsible for the structural and thermal analysis of payloads. She served as Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing and teaching the Engineering Projects in Community
engineering instructor. Assessment is a vast topic withmany options. There are generally two types of knowledge to assess: declarative and procedural.Instructors vary the assessment method depending on that category of knowledge. For example,instructors can easily measure a student’s declarative knowledge with a written exam and proceduralknowledge with a project. However, in a graduate engineering course assessing procedural knowledge ismore prevalent, since the student must apply the declarative knowledge appropriately in order to succeedin our competitive workforce. In addition to an instructor’s method to evaluate a project, both peer andself-evaluation are often used as a complement to an instructor’s evaluation. Assessing softwareengineering
Northeast- ern University’s involvement with the StepUP initiative, a partnership effort between five universities and eleven Boston Public Schools; Project Director, IMPACT New England: A Regional Curriculum Imple- mentation Effort, coordinated program development and implementation; Seminar Leader, Northeastern University School of Education, facilitated a group of students participating in the Introduction to Educa- tion course; Project Support Liaison, Teacher Innovation program, provided support to teachers/schools in the development and implementation of Teacher Innovation Programs (TIP), provided technical assistance to teachers through the proposal process, conducted proposal-writing workshops; Co-facilitator
disciplines. This limited literature may be attributed to multiple reasons such as asignificant emphasis on mathematics and science in the first two years of engineeringcurriculum, a strictly sequential degree path, and a lack of flexibility in the programrequirements. Engineering students often report difficulty in relating the theoretical content ofthe first few semesters to actual engineering applications. This study investigates theeffectiveness of undergraduate research as a possible means of overcoming these studentperceptions. Students are introduced to well-defined research projects at an early stage of theirundergraduate degree program by adopting a scaffolding approach. The primary focus of thisstudy is to understand student perceptions
non-electrical engineering students especially before they start working on their senior designprojects.In this course, students are introduced to the basics of electronic circuits and systems by first seeing a real-life measurement problem in the first lecture, followed by a discussion on how to synthesize a circuit thatcan solve that problem. The motivation for adopting this approach is to motivate the student and give themthe understanding that circuit theory can be used to realize important goals in the projects related to theirown engineering major. The specific example of the measurement problem introduced in the beginning ofclass may vary depending on the enrollment numbers from different engineering disciplines. For example,if the
following: design and make simple to complexparts using both CNC mill and 3D scanning/3D printing machines and compare SM and AMprocess parameters that include material, speed, complexity, accuracy, geometry, andprogramming; 3D scanning of objects, editing with proper CAD software, and printing theobjects using 3D printers (reverse engineering); casting of 3D objects using basic castingprinciples; and rapid prototyping challenge among student teams that includes designing,making, marketing, and selling the products that we all use. The difficulties encountered indeveloping the low-cost RP lab to provide hands-on experience to students taking this course,some of the lab projects completed by the student teams using AM technologies, student
educator is in thestructured approach in incorporating lifelong learning, whatever the definition or location, whichis still part of ABET ETAC and ABET EAC accreditation criteria and therefore an importantelement in these programs.In this paper, the incorporation of lifelong learning in a hands-on, technology focused, standardsdriven, engine systems laboratory course is explored. The current ABET ETAC Criterion 3student outcome on self-directed lifelong learning is translated to specific course activities,assignments, and assessments. An assessment instrument was developed for an engine systemscourse to evaluate the student’s methods of additional learning of existing technical knowledge.Additionally, the instrument asks students to project their
her knowledge in the field of change man- agement and hopes to study social network analyses of higher education organizations undergoing change to track buy-in, barriers, and adoption.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of
Paper ID #29251Photovoltaic Solar GrillMrs. Brittany Weber, Renewable Energy Society Brittany Weber is an Illinois State University undergraduate student in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy major with a Food Studies minor. She was the president of the Renewable Energy Society and head of the solar grill project from 2019-2020.Miss Katelyn Renee Dunnagan , Renewable Energy Society Katelyn Dunnagan is an undergraduate student at Illinois State University, where she is majoring in Sus- tainable and Renewable Energy. She is currently an executive board member for the Renewable Energy Society and holds a position as a
differences between groups.This paper reports the outcomes of using the Sustainable Design Rubric as a formativeassessment in a civil engineering capstone design course at a regional, teaching-focusedinstitution in the Southeast. The assignment was given to 35 students across 7 teams. First,students individually scored their projects for a subset of the criteria - teams divided up criteriaamongst their members so that at least two people would score each criterion. Next, studentsdiscussed their individual responses with team members to arrive at a set of consensus scores,with written justifications, for all 14 criteria. We reviewed students’ responses forappropriateness of scores and quality written justifications as part of the structural and