Page 24.788.10 Education & Research community with input from a large number of academic, industry, government, and association professionals over the period from 2008 through 2011.8. Future Directions for the Collaboration between Mechanical Engineering Education andManufacturing Engineering EducationDiscussions among the ASME Board on Education and the SME Center for Education haveidentified several areas of potential strategic alignment regarding the recommendations in theSME white paper Workforce Imperative: A Manufacturing Education Strategy8 and effectivestrategic and tactical ways of collaborating are being planned. The following points describepotential areas of alignment, extracted from the March 5, 2013 letter to Dr
University, Foundation for Family Science and the American Society for Engineering Education.Key words: STEM, education, engineering, elementary school, parents, family, technicalliteracy.IntroductionEnrollment in many engineering fields is static or declining and the number of science andengineering graduate students in the U.S. has continued to fall since 1993. However,demand for scientists and engineers is growing steadily, but the US is unable to meet thatdemand. The resulting shortage of technically skilled employees threatens nationaleconomic and technological competitivenessEfforts must be made to educate and inspire students to pursue STEM careers. A recentNational Academy of Engineering plan, “Taking Action Together: Developing aational
University of Washington. Her research focuses on: par- ents’ roles in engineering education; engineering learning in informal environments; engineering design education; and mathematical thinking.Mr. Todd P. Shuba, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd Shuba is a Master’s student in Education with a concentration in Educational Psychology at Pur- due University. He is also a Graduate Research Assistant with the Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) High School Program. His research interests include transfer of learning, collaborative learning, and student achievement and motivation. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Interdisciplinary En- gineering with a concentration in Environmental and Ecological
addition, many mathematics faculty also lack knowledge of the applications of theintroductory mathematics materials they teach. Many textbooks still do not provide agood source of up-to-date applications of the concepts that are covered. In addition, manymathematicians have had little exposure in their education to such application fields suchas engineering and other sciences and thus have little knowledge to offer students in theseareas.In an attempt to alleviate this problem, a collaborative effort among the mathematics,electrical engineering, industrial engineering, and mechanical engineering departments atNorth Carolina A&T State University entitled, “Enhance mathematics courses throughengineering applications,” is currently being
willsoon be seriously outdated. Coupled with the WWW are the related critical areas of datamanagement, collaborative efforts, and associated niche issues such as data exchange standardsand developments. Engineering design programs have long advocated the importance of teammethodology and concurrent engineering, with common data access, so the step to include thesenew areas should be logical and reasonable. Unfortunately, they will most likely be difficult toincorporate into existing academic programs. To provide realistic training in collaborativeengineering and the Web, for example, programs will need to provide for more cross-functionaland cooperative learning activities, where students from various majors, and even differentcampuses or
settings and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. Ava R. Wolf, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ava Wolf, PhD supports faculty in developing courses that emphasize active and engaged learning, and conducts research on interactive learning spaces, effective teaching strategies, and the integration of tech- nology.Mr. Nattasit Dancholvichit, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Nattasit Dancholvichit was born in Bangkok, Thailand in 1990. He received a B.A. degree in mechan- ical
making the learning experience engaging and motivatingfor students. This paper addresses results of a series of pilot studies that utilized hand-held devices,specifically an Analog Discovery (AD) Board, to support experimental centric, hands-on learningin introductory engineering classes. Pilots of use of the AD Boards were shown to be successfulacross a variety of instructional settings. The research undergirding the findings for this paper isderived from a collaborative grant-funded project supporting a consortium of 13 publicHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) investigating the impact of using hands-onexperimental-based pedagogical techniques on instruction to teach circuits concepts inintroductory engineering
increase in mentorship,entrepreneurial workshops and competitions. VII. Future WorkPrevious studies have proposed different methods of assessment for the impact ofentrepreneurship education on engineering students (Upton, Sexton, & Moore, 1995; Wheeler,1993). Some researchers have suggested using the ratio of entrepreneurs among engineeringalumni to entrepreneurs in comparison with business or general alumni population. Others usedthe number of start-ups founded per engineering alumni within x years after graduation incomparison with those by business or general alumni population. Some even suggested using taxdata to compare their household income. While entrepreneurship is important for the economy,these criteria may not be the best way
graduation by minimizing credit loss. However, these agreements arefrequently so confusing that students (Reeping & Knight, 2021; Z. W. Taylor, 2019) and evenprogram advisors (Giberson, 2020) may not fully understand them. Administrators find thateven with an articulation agreement in place, students may not know what courses will transferuntil a degree-specific transfer evaluation after being admitted to the university (Ott & Cooper,2014). Nevertheless, articulation agreements remain a cornerstone in transfer policy and serve asthe baseline for evaluations of course equivalency and credit loss.Engineering versus engineering technology The discipline of engineering focuses on design and analysis, while engineeringtechnology (ET
identified asfundamental courses for officer development [4]. Among the core courses are five engineeringcourses. Mechanical Engineering 220 – Fundamentals of Mechanics (ME 220) is most often thesecond core engineering course, the first being an introductory computer science course, that everystudent will take before graduating, usually during their sophomore year [4]. It is also thefoundational course for students who are pursuing a degree in Mechanical Engineering or Civiland Environmental Engineering. As one of the core engineering courses, ME 220 is expected tohelp satisfy certain institutional learning outcomes, primarily teaching students how to applyengineering problem-solving methods with an emphasis on design methodology [4]. Aninstitution
teaching. The reason for theslow rate of growth in using this new technology for teaching entirely online courses inengineering is not apparent. In Wyoming, there is even a greater need for online delivery ofbasic engineering courses so that transfer students, most of who live in distant and remote areas,and other prospective students can prepare themselves prior to arriving on campus. In Spring2000, with the sponsorship of the Engineering College and the School of Extended Studies, thelead author proposed and initiated a project to design, develop, and deliver a complete onlinecourse in Engineering Thermodynamics that would satisfy the University of Wyoming’srequirement for the accredited degree in engineering. The authors, then, did research
innovation.Although our study examines various types of public and private institutions with engineeringdegree programs, we observe that institutions with exclusive focus on undergraduate engineeringeducation are better positioned to align their reformation efforts with demands and gaps such aspromotion of ethical reasoning skills or other professional competencies such as communication,collaboration, and lifelong adaptability skills. The incentives to focus on student development, andfaculty promotion structures of institutions focused on undergraduate education allows high levelsof time investment by, and coordination among the faculty to materialize education reform andinstitute continuous improvement. The arguments for and contra engineering ethics
, reflection, mentoring andsustain the long-term practice of including hands-on laboratory activities aligned with theScience Frameworks. UA faculty, graduate students, and program directors continue to serve asmentors for participating teachers by phone, e-mail, and personal visits for technical assistanceand overall support. Follow-up activities include classroom observations by UA mentors andparticipating science teachers. At the end of each year of the project, final follow-up activitieswill include data collection by science teachers and a program evaluation. UA faculty reviewand disaggregate the data and collaborate with teachers to plan sessions for the upcoming year. The UA Science Partnership Program will be more successful if it is
deficiency in education, where the knowledge necessary for an engineer iscompromised. Allied with this fact, the evaluations of these students are also traditional,based on tests and descriptive evaluations. In Brazil, this scenario is prevalent because theresources designated to public universities for investments and improvements in teaching andlearning are limited.From traditional teaching methodologies, the development of professional skills can also becompromised [11]. The student needs to work in a team and work with structured problems inthe literature [12]. Other consequences observed in the literature are the unpreparedness ofthe future professional, school dropout [13], and lack of student commitment and cooperation[14].There are different
appropriateinfrastructure in place, and ensuring that faculty receive formal training in distance educationmethods and technology 20.Considerable research has focused on assessing distance education practices, and a number ofpublications have examined this topic in terms of what faculty can do to improve the educationalexperience for students: “What determines the success of distance teaching is the extent to whichthe institution and the individual instructor are able to provide the appropriate opportunity for,and quality of, dialogue between teacher and learner, as well as appropriately structured learningmaterials” 15, p. 6. However, tension can also exist between faculty and instructional designpersonnel. Whereas the ideal relationship would be one of
among engineering undergraduate students, EEI aims to assist students tobegin consciously developing their emotional intelligence, and to be more fully prepared for theirprofessional and personal lives. One of our main goals is to help students to bring awareness oftheir own emotions to their life experiences, and to develop the skills to recognize and work withthe emotions of others.As current research on emotional intelligence (EI) has demonstrated, EI is a significant indicatorof personal and professional success. Further, both industry and academia recognize that the bestengineering students will have well-developed inter- and intrapersonal skills in addition to theirtechnical skills. This paper provides a brief outline of the concept of
incorporate the constraints of global health technologies within engineering design at the undergraduate and graduate levels. She is the recipient of a CAREER Award from the National Science Foundation, a Teaching Innovation Prize from the UM Provost, and a UM Undergraduate Teaching Award. While at MIT, she was a winner of the MIT $50K Entrepreneurship Competition.Grace Louise Cravens Grace Cravens is a junior undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying Industrial & Operations Engineering. She is from St. Joseph, MI, and has worked for Sienko Research Group since 2013.Ms. Linh Huynh c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Evaluating best practices when
towardimmigration in the U.S. have recently experienced an uptick in negatively [29],[30] which mayexacerbate these problems. These findings point to potential challenges and also personalbenefits for engagement in CER among FB faculty.The literature has documented that civic engagement among immigrants can help them integrateinto American society [31], [32], [33]. This sometimes takes the form of “bounded solidarity”where they particularly devote their engagement to groups in the country with shared ethnicity[32]. Engagement in their community may also serve to reduce discrimination that immigrantssometimes face. Giving back locally may also help immigrants feel successful [28]. Almost nopublished research exploring “community engagement” and FB academics
importantengagement strategy to encourage women and girls to pursue STEM education and careers, otherstates can benefit from the story of the Wisconsin and Hawaii collaboration.Hawaii’s Maui Economic Development Board and Wisconsin’s Milwaukee School ofEngineering have partnered under a Women in Technology grant from the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. This grant is toencourage women and girls in rural areas to pursue STEM education and careers.Because students at the Hawaii and Wisconsin partner campuses were enthusiastic about theirMentorNet experience, the Women in Technology grant funded a two-year contract to waivemembership fees for MentorNet for all four-year and two-year University of
Paper ID #48093BOARD # 52: Integrating Material Focused on Climate Change into ExistingCourses in a Civil Engineering Degree ProgramProf. Andrew Paul Summerfield, Wentworth Institute of Technology Dr. Andrew Summerfield is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology. He received his BSCE (2013) from Tufts University and his MS (2018) and PhD (2021) in structural engineering from Northeastern University. His graduate research focused on the structural dynamics of offshore wind turbines. He is interested in developing teaching materials that help engineering students understand the broader
Paper ID #33437Inclusive Writing: Pre- and Post-COVID-19Dr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts ed- ucational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of her research focuses on the role
theengineering and technology curriculum, enhance students’, especially Hispanic students’knowledge in these areas using a holistic approach by providing new courses and laboratories,research support, seminars and workshops, internship and co-op opportunities9,10. Goals, aimsand objectives of our collaborative project are designed to align with the sponsor goals andobjectives: 1) The project aims and targets to increase the entry, enrollment and retention levelof women, minorities, with special attention paid to the Hispanic students in engineering majorsat participating institutions; 2) The proposed green energy and IT-based engineering curriculumimprovements aimed to provide hands-on instruction, skills, knowledge and experience whichthat are
guided work and has minimal oversight of completed work. This minimalteacher involvement goes against current educational research which states that, “effectiveteachers not only make students feel good about school and learning, but also that [effectiveteacher guidance] actually results in increased student achievement.”13 Rand Education goes sofar as to assert that among school-related factors, teachers matter most.14 Furthermore, becauseMOOCs provide self directed work, it does open the door for plagiarism and possible cheating.These issues have an effect on the acceptance of this form of education. This market acceptancewill be further discussed in the next section when looking at how MOOCs need to evolve as asystem.IV. MOOCs and System
connections lead to enhanced opportunities for students before and after graduation. • Robotics Engineering has proven to be a boon for the university and a source of pride for the students in it.6.2. RECOMMENDATIONS TO FURTHER ROBOTICS ENGINEERING EDUCATIONTo further Robotics Engineering education, we recommend the following: • Robotics Engineering should soon become a recognized branch of engineering. • Development of a set of robotics-specific criteria by ABET, following identification of a lead and cooperating societies from among ASME, CSAB, IEEE, and possibly others. • Enhanced robotics and mechatronics education community-building activities, including IEEE Robotics & Automation
freshmanclass placement). Since the freshman writing course schedules large group eveningsessions for Wednesdays at 7pm, two large group engineering speakers were scheduledfor evenings not used by the Writing program. To allow students to concentrate on examsand final projects for their other courses, the seminar course meets only during the first12 weeks of each semester. Through a group effort in which each faculty membercoordinated tours in his or her respective department, all sections visited at least threeengineering research labs during the semester. Page 10.444.5 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
to have a large number ofparticipants from many institutions contributing atthis in-person conference in this pandemic era.Our mission is to showcase the latestdevelopments in engineering education andstrengthen partnerships among engineeringeducators in the region. We are committed to bringing together the best talents fromour engineering community and fostering their growth. This is an ideal forum to interactwith engineering educators and to listen to the methods of educators in otherinstitutions as well as to listen to undergraduate and graduate students’ research. Wehope that this regional conference on engineering education will inspire and motivateour younger generation to pursue a career in engineering fields that uplift our worldand
a number of engineering and science fields making difficult to be covered in asingle course. However, renewable energy has a great potential for multi-disciplinary projects,both at undergraduate and graduate levels. Such projects can involve electrical, mechanical,civil, and chemical engineering aspects while still being accessible to undergraduate students.Design and development of renewable energy projects allow students to work on projects thatcan be relevant to current leading edge research and technologies. The development, content andstructure of an alternative energy course as part of this effort to embed renewable energy into ourcurriculum are also presented. Course motivation is outlined and a detailed description of thetopics
inanalytical and problem-solving skills, but those positive findings do not offset the missedopportunities for broad student growth and higher levels of overall satisfaction that lead to agrowing number of citizen engineers prepared for our newly global, age of information.Terenzini and Reason built upon the observations of Astin and found that the peer environmentplays a deeply influential role in the learning and development of college students. 7Furthermore, out-of-class experiences can have substantial impacts on student outcomes. Straussand Terenzini were able to show that graduating engineering students made gains in analyticalskills and groups skills through out-of-class experiences. 8 Yu and Simmons review of therelevant literature found that
debate case study to reflect the increasing level of difficulty oftopics and the decreasing amount of information provided by the instructor. The students wereprovided with a scored points outline (see Appendix B) attached to their written research papersso they were aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their research and debate preparation foreach case study.Summary and Lessons LearnedThe legal course was taught two times with the same text book before introduction of debates inthe course. The reason for introduction of the debates was not to improve overall course grades,which were in the 83% to 85% overall for those two semesters, but in the hopes of improvingstudent participation, motivation for learning the materials, and understanding
plan and decide on their future career plans, we deliver material to them on finding and seeking out internships (ENGR 331), finding and seeking out Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) (ENGR 331), understanding the graduate school experience and application process (ENGR 332), interviewing tips (ENGR 331 and 432), preparing resumes, cover letters, and personal statements (ENGR 331 and 432).(e) Professional Team Work and Team Management Skills – to prepare students to enter be effective team members and team leaders, we cover topics and have discussions on team building (ENGR 331), team performance evaluation (ENGR 331, 332, 431, 432), and conflict resolution (ENGR 432).During the past four years, the faculty