Engineering at Purdue Uni- versity. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interest includes big-data health analytics. He is actively in collaborating with international partners to enhance American engineering students’ global learning.Mrs. Eunhye Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette Eunhye Kim is a Ph.D. student and research assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests lie in engineering design education, especially for engineering stu- dents’ entrepreneurial mindsets and multidisciplinary teamwork skills in design and innovation projects. She earned a B.S. in Electronics Engineering and an M.B.A. in South Korea
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Designing a Streamlined Workshop for STEM-H Faculty Engaged in the Scholarship of Teaching and LearningIntroductionAcross the disciplines encompassed by STEM and Health Sciences (STEM-H), there has beengrowing interest among these disciplinary faculty towards learning more about how to conducteducation research within their disciplines. In a recent national effort, NSF has called for“Building Capacity for Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) EducationResearch” via its program solicitation 20-521. Projects are supported that build STEM-H facultycapacity to carry out high quality STEM education research that will enhance the nation’s
Standard (definitions of words, phrases, or othersymbology), and Test Method (actionable steps that lead to a specified result) [1]. Thisdemonstrates the wide variety of topics that are addressed by standards documents. Standardsstarted as consensus on units of weights and measures, but today standards are used in a widevariety of professions to ensure the safety of products and materials as well as the reliability ofgoods and services [2]. Due to the potential utility of this information format, academic librariesoften provide some standards to their patrons.Given the vast array of topics addressed by standards, students engaged in research or otherdesign projects in a variety of disciplines may have a need to identify and obtain full
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include algorithmic fault-tolerant adaptive systems, software defined radio, multi-user cellular communication, electrically-small devices, and pedagogies of teaching and learning. An amateur beekeeper, he currently mentors a project for improving the plight of honeybees. He worked for TRW Space and Electronics Group from 1995 until 1997 and at the University of Illinois from 2002 to present. His research interests are in adaptive digital signal processing, digital communica- tions, and education pedagogy. He currently serves the ECE department of the University of Illinois as a Teaching Associate Professor and an undergraduate advisor and is working to
2017 North Carolina A & T State University (NCAT) Rookie Research Excellence Award. Under her mentorship, Dr. Ofori-Boadu’s students have presented research posters at various NCAT Undergraduate Research Symposia resulting in her receiving a 2017 Certificate of Recognition for Undergraduate Re- search Mentoring. In 2016, her publication was recognized by the Built Environment Project and Asset Management Journal as the 2016 Highly Commended Paper. Andrea has served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation (NSF), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and several journals and conferences. In 2015, Dr. Ofori-Boadu established her STEAM ACTIVATED! program for middle-school girls. She also serves as the
. Researchers have noted the importance ofeffective ideation and demonstrated its influence on the success of the project (Nelson, Wilson,Rosen, & Yen, 2009).Second, we are interested in conceptual design phases because it is during this period that teamroles are formed and group norms are established (Butterfield & Pendegraft, 1996). Teaminteractions that are established early can set the tone for subsequent interactions and thereforedesign team effectiveness and success (Kolmos, Rump, Ingemarsson, Laloux, & Vinther, 2001;Liang & Lawrence, 2007; Roberts, 2012; Simmons, 2015; Yoon & Johnson, 2008). If ideationpractices can be developed to enhance both creative capacity and equitable interactions inengineering teams, understanding
. For faculty, the support for eachother and the sharing of the load makes things easier. For students, the academic interactions oncontent that they might not be familiar with initially stimulated questions and discussions, andultimately learning from brand new angles.One way to further deepen the collaboration is to do service-learning projects in the faculty-ledtrips, as our colleagues in health, education, etc. have done, with benefits stated in [18], althoughwe have not implemented any service-learning project yet, because our trips so far have been inmultiple cities without enough time at one place to finish a project. However, the incorporationof a service-learning project is expected to deepen the interdisciplinary collaboration
Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler
the degree program,and projected enrollment for the first five years of the offering at RELLIS.The decision tree for evaluating proposed programs of study is presented in Figure 4. Detailedconsideration for synergistic opportunities and necessary facilities are presented in Figure 5.When a proposal for offering a degree at RELLIS is received, the RELLIS Academic AllianceAdvisory Committee evaluates that proposal in the context of this decision tree.One of the considerations for selection of the degree programs is synergies that may exist withexisting programs at RELLIS. An implicit and necessary synergy is that the alliance communitycollege partner offers all necessary lower-division coursework required for completion of thebaccalaureate
Summarized potential reasons for patients Nitinol manufacturing failure Summarized reasons that failure would be use to patient and Materials expert at Sent role playing comments about procedural error rather than design a company Nitinol the reasons that a TAVR might fail and material issuesAn optional and anonymous Blackboard survey was posted for students at university A. Thesurvey consisted of four questions to gauge student interest in this unique project of collaboratingacross schools and cohorts of
. Specific duties of eachSO 1-7 committee include: • identifying specific assessments to be carried out for the SO in its purview, • evaluating the completed assessments for the SO in its purview, • discussing the committee’s collective experiences and challenges for delivering effective student experiences in this SO, and • making curricular/program recommendations to the Chair and/or Program as needed.The Assessment Coordinator (the designated individual who facilitates the CI procedures for theProgram) recruits individuals to serve on the SO 1-7 committees, and faculty with relevantacademic responsibility are approached first. For example, the capstone-project faculty arerecruited for the SO-2 (“engineering design”) committee, the
three questions you are most interested in using to guide aresearch project.” After prioritizing, learners think on their rationale for why they prioritizedcertain questions keeping in mind the QFocus, how many questions they asked in total, andwhere their priority questions landed in the sequence of all their questions. Learners are nowready to use these questions flexibly depending on the next steps of the learning process—whether it be for research purposes or otherwise.In the final element of the QFT, learners reflect on what they learned, how they learned it, andwhat they are thinking about differently after having gone through the process.The previous elements are the core components of the QFT. With this said, the strategy isflexible and
, how people define those steps is different. Like the high school Project Lead the Way, there's twelve steps in the process, [in] middle school I've cut it down to about six steps.In addition to incorporating engineering design into her technology education curriculum, shealso does so in after-school programs. In addition, she participates in technology-based profes-sional development, some of which is run out of a local engineering college. Julie’s approach to engineering education is reminiscent of Papert’s [12] intentions withthe design of Logo as an object-to-think-with. This connection is in no small part due to Julie’suse of constructionist technologies (e.g. LEGO Mindstorms, Snap!, and more) and the universityprograms
usual process of research we followed, all the six steps [Aisha].From the interview data it was found that there was no set process for a research study to getapproval from the institution. The participants explained that anyone interested in conducting anEER related activity could just start by themselves without any prior approval. However, once thefaculty decided to start an EER project, they followed steps that are typically taken in conductingresearch. The first step in conducting EER was problem identification followed by formulatingresearch questions. The faculty said that research questions helped them dig in deeper and tookthem in the right direction in the literature. They decided on the methodology and framework usingthe research
Paper ID #29099Building Capacity to Promote STEAM in Communities - The impact ofprofessional development for teachers, instructors and staff members –Work in Progress –Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers
responsible resource production, occupational health, and mine environmental monitoring. Dr. Sarver teaches about sustain- able development principles and practices for mineral and energy resource projects at the graduate and undergraduate levels.Dr. Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines Linda A. Battalora is a Teaching Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department, a Payne Institute for Earth Resources Fellow, and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines). She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola Uni- versity New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and Engineering from Mines. Prior to joining the Faculty at
portal frame subjected to both vertical and horizontal loads withvarious support configurations. This module focuses on students visualizing deflected shapesbased on the conditions and comparing the theoretical results to the observable deflected shapesin the classroom. Additionally, this module was used to further reinforce virtual work and theforce method. The following sections provide some background about the overall project along with thedesign and implementation of the experiential learning modules. There is also a brief discussionabout assessment efforts on the project and lessons learned by the project team thus far.Project Background The project as a whole includes several experiential learning modules covering fourcourses
leadership team of the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. In her role as CIMER Investigator, she is leading a project as a part of the APS’s NSF INCLUDES Inclusive Graduate Education Network (IGEN). From 2014-2019 she also served as Co-Director of the NIH-supported National Research Men- toring Network’s Master Facilitator Initiative. From 2008-2012, McDaniels served as Director of Michi- gan State University’s NSF ADVANCE Grant where she spearheaded the institution’s efforts to diversify the faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. In this role she was responsible for the development and implementation of MSU’s new
the Dissertation Institute, a one-week workshop each summer funded by NSF, to help underrepresented students develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty, an Outstanding Teacher Award and a Faculty Fellow Award. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, an M.S. in Materials Science
their minds, less important) content [16],[18]. Therefore, an alternative mode of integration, ethics across the curriculum (EAC), is beingadopted at several US universities, (e.g., University of Texas at Austin [19], The University ofMichigan [20] and Illinois Institute of Technology [21]). In the EAC approach, ethics is introduced to students in various technical courses duringfour-year undergraduate studies. During the second and third years, ethics are being discussed inconnection with the subject matter of technical course, and ethics discussion continues into acapstone design project in the senior year by considering the societal implications of a designproject[14], [22]. Continuous exposure to ethical content during the
assess science teachers’ instructional quality, including observational measures, value-added measures, student surveys, and performance-based tasks; and (3) extending and studying the use of these knowl- edge and instructional practices measures of science teaching quality as summative assessment tools for licensure purposes and as formative assessment tools integrated within teacher education and professional development contexts. She currently serves as principal investigator on three National Science Founda- tion (NSF) research projects. One study (NSF #1621344) is designed to develop, pilot, and validate a set of performance-based tasks delivered within a simulated classroom environment in order to improve pre
-related courses and does research with natural fiber composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship,sustainable engineering, and appropriate technology in developing countries.Ms. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University CYNTHIA C. FRY is currently a Senior Lecturer of Computer Science at Baylor University. She worked at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center as a Senior Project Engineer, a Crew Training Manager, and the Science Operations Director for STS-46. She was an Engineering Duty Officer in the U.S. Navy (IRR), and worked with the Naval Maritime Intelligence Center as a Scientific/Technical Intelligence Analyst. She was the owner and chief systems engineer for Systems Engineering Services (SES), a computer
Paper ID #29167The Engineering Education Experiences of Students Serving in theReserves or National GuardDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on
member.Undergraduate Research ExperienceUndergraduate research provides students with an opportunity to get exposure to research. It iscommonly recommended that undergraduate students gain research experience at the universitywhere the study took place, though what kind of research is not specified. There are severalmechanisms for students to become involved in research, through independent study credit, forhourly pay, or volunteering. It is not uncommon for research experience to vary dramaticallybetween labs, with regards to the tasks performed by undergraduate researchers or the level ofinput taken in project decisions.ParticipantsUsing purposive and snowball sampling [25], 14 students entering their third year, who were alsoplanning on engaging in at
critical reflection of the learner on the experience. Unlessembedded within a course as a service-learning activity (e.g. [13]), there may not be structuredreflection. This is particularly true in co-curricular activities, where advisors may worry thatformal reflection would deter college students from participating. However, the reflection couldoccur informally via a group discussion.Giles and Eyler [11] cite Dewey’s [12] four criteria for projects to be truly educative. The fourcriteria are: generate interest, worthwhile intrinsically, problems that demand new information,and cover a considerable time span. K-12 activities are often designed to be fun, so they arelikely to generate interest on behalf of both the college student and K-12 kids
district curriculum specialist in theWE2NG program was a huge asset to the other teachers participating that summer and played acritical role in vertical and horizontal collaboration efforts.Summer Program WE2NG summer trainings begin with an orientation session that includes an introduction to campusand the various research projects connected to the WE2NG program, as well as a laboratory safetytraining. In the weeks following orientation, teachers spent two and a half days per week immersed ina research project that best fit the needs of their classroom goals. They also spent one day per weekat a teacher-training workshop (various topics), one day per week on an industry field trip related towater and energy, and a half day focusing on
to generate awareness of the LGBTQIA+engineering student experience and research on this community, while also highlighting areasthat are lacking or receiving insufficient attention. This work is part of a larger project that aimsto review engineering education research with respect to LGBTQIA+ students, higher educationfaculty and staff, and industry professionals. This literature review was conducted in two phases.First, works from non-engineering disciplines were reviewed to identify popular threads andmajor areas of research on the LGBTQIA+ student experience. This phase was not an exhaustivereview; rather, it was meant to establish specific themes of importance derived from the largerbody of literature on the LGBTQIA+ student experience
-world problem.Students work in groups of 4-5 members and are matched based on skill level in terms ofprogramming and design experience. There are four phases distributed throughout thesemester, during which students need to identify a problem and an appropriate client doing a“rapid spin” around the UX lifecycle (phase 1), conduct contextual inquiry and analysis(phase 2), design a solution (phase 3), and finally prototype and evaluate their best design(phase 4). The major motivation for a project-based syllabus is to create a pedagogy ofengagement, where students have the opportunity to engage with the disciplinary activitiesand practice the taught process like a UX professional [34].The main objective of the course is for students to get
Engineering of the UFRJ’sEngineering School at Rio de Janeiro [14], [15]. Its history blends with that of GE, at least in thefirst years of grassroots engineering. Indeed, for instance, the Engineering and SocialDevelopment Meetings, the arena that made GE’s emersion and polishing possible, is created bySoltec, which also hosted its first four editions [3].Currently, Soltec develops six different GE projects: • PAPESCA: offering a community that makes its living from artisanal fishing support related to management, solidarity economy, empowerment, environmental sustainability, etc. [16]; • TIFS: providing technical support on software engineering to social movements, building with them apps, programs, websites, etc. [17