Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Lakiesha N. Williams, Mississippi State University; Linda T Coats; Debora F Rodrigues, University of Houston (CoE); Judit Eva Puskas; Frank "Fritz" J Claydon, University of Houston (CoE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering degrees and reported thatunderrepresented ethnic minorities held 12.6% of B.S. degrees, 7.9% of M.S. and 4.6% of thePh.D.'s, and less than 10% of the faculty positions. Similarly, although women held 18.4% ofthe B.S degrees and 22% of the Ph.D.'s; only 13% of the faculty was women; of which only8.7% held the rank of full professor.19 Studies have also shown that the gap between male andfemale faculty was narrower in early career and widens significantly by 15 years after theirPh.D.18 Underrepresented minorities, both ethnic and gender based, need to comprise at least15% of academia before they can influence the culture and agenda.7The Computing Research Association for Women (CRA-W) has several mentoring programs forwomen in computer

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, Cal Poly Pomona; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Fang Tang, Cal Poly Pomona; Scott Matthew Boskovich, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Navigation,” U.S. Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-4462, May, 2008.5. Tanner, H.G. and Christodoulakis, D.K., “Decentralized Cooperative Control of Heterogeneous Vehicle Groups,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 811-823, 2007.6. Fechheimer, M., Webber, K., Kleiber, P. B., “How Well Do Undergraduate Research Programs Promote Engagement and Success of Students?,” CBE Life Sciences Education, Sundberg, MD, 2011.7. Anderson, N., Hagenauer, B., Erickson, R., and Bhandari, S., “Flight Testing of a UAV Airplane for Autonomous Operation using Piccolo II Autopilot,” Proceedings of AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Honolulu, HI, 18-21 August 2008.8. Bhandari, S., Pernalete, N., Bettadapura, A

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

. Ramos, R. F., “Introduction of Active Learning Techniques Increases Student Learning in a Systems Physiology Laboratory Course,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.4. Sieving, A. L., M. Pool, S. A. Jewett, T. Eustaquio, R. Madangopal, A. Panitch, K. Stuart, A. E. Rundell, “Development of Verification and Validation Engineering Design Skills through a Multi-year Cognitive Apprenticeship Laboratory Experience,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.5. Kirschner, P. A. “The laboratory in higher science education, problems, premises, and objectives,” Higher Education, vol. 17, pp. 81-90, 1988.6. Litzinger, T., L. R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, W. Newstetter, “Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hatice O. Ozturk, North Carolina State University; Dianne Raubenheimer, Meredith College; Alina N. Duca, NC State University; H. Joel Trussell, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

ASEE Conference, Chicago, IL, June 18-21, 2006. 6. Lopez, A. (2007). Mathematics education for 21st century engineering students: Literature review. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute. Posner, G. J., 7. Manseur, R., Ieta, A. & Manseur, Z. (2010). Mathematics Preparation for a Modern Engineering Program, Panel Session. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 8. Ganter, S., & Barker, W. (2004). The Curriculum Foundations Project: Voices of the Partner Disciplines. Mathematical Association of America. 9. Buechler, D.N. (2004a). Mathematical Background Versus Success in Electrical Engineering, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City

Conference Session

Concept Inventories and Assessment of Knowledge

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dion Timmermann, Hamburg University of Technology; Christian H Kautz, Hamburg University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

treated as ideal voltages sources. The long line indicatesthe positive terminal of the respective battery. All four bulbs areidentical.Question 1 (2 points, if both items are correct)Switch S is closed.Item 1.1 Bulb B is A off, e.g. does not glow, B less bright than bulb C, but not off, C equally bright as bulb C,! D brighter than bulb C,Item 1.2 because a the current from bulb B is used up. b the same current flows through both. c a part of the voltage drops at bulb B. d bulb C has a lower potential than bulb B. e the electrons flow through bulb C first.Question 2 (2 points, if both

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University; Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

not introduced as a tool; methods like brain-storming, trial-and-error, etc., are employed14. However, „system analysis‟ approach provides a roadmap to theproblem-solving process, by which the reasoning activity is streamlined and generalized. Thismethod may also be employed to demonstrate to the students how to formulate either wordproblems or a design basis. It also helps the teachers to show to their students how to switchfrom rote memorization to critical thinking.‘System Analysis’ ApproachThe system analysis approach considers the definition of a system as composed of componentswhich interact with each other to produce output(s) based on inputs. The best way to define thebehavior of a system is to define the variables which govern the

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dianna Newman, University at Albany/SUNY; Meghan Morris Deyoe, University at Albany, SUNY; Jessica M Lamendola, University at Albany/SUNY

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

structure, communication was noted by all as the key element for success. Initiative anddirection taken by students supports the flipped classroom approach. Table 3 Primary Decision-Maker by Activity* Decision-maker Team A member My team Decided Activities Instructor TAs Leader of my team as a group myself F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Steven C. Currall, University of California, Davis; Ed Frauenheim, The Great Place to Work Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University; Paul Rayes, Arizona State University; Brian McNamara, Arizona State University; Xiaoxuan Wang, Arizona State University; Yih-Fang Huang, University of Notre Dame; Daniel H. Robinson, Colorado State University; Xiang Gao, Arizona State University; Theodore Thompson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the mesh equation game.7. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the TransformingUndergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Program underGrant Nos. DUE-1044497 and DUE-1323773. We thank Drs. J. Aberle, M. Ardakani, R. Ferzli,S. Goodnick, R. Gorur, G. Karady, Hongwei Mao, B. Matar, L. Sankar, Donghoon Shin, MengTao, C. Tepedelenlioglu, T. Thornton, D. Vasileska, Chao Wang, Hongbin Yu, and Hongyu Yufor using our software in their sections of EEE 202 at ASU; A. Holmes for using it in his courseECE 2630 at the University of Virginia; and Y. Astatke for using it in his course EEGR 202 atMorgan State University. We thank Daniel Sayre of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for

Conference Session

Assessing URM Programs Targeting the K-16 Continuum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, The Mercer University; Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University; Gerardo Javier Pinzon P.E., Texas A&M International University; Mahmoud Khasawneh, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Wednesday Work on projects Work on projects 7/23 Mr. Luis Portilla - Rheem Mfg Thursday Work on projects Plant 7/24 @ 3:30 PM Friday Ms. Rosa E. Trevino @ 1:30 USDA tour @ 10:00 AM 7/25 PM Monday Mr. Adrian Uresti - AEP Mr. Peter S. Davis – 7/28 @ 10:00 AM

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Faculty Perspectives and Training

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

selected from VECTERS as seedsof conversation among faculty members. Discourse about not only the strategy but the specificsof value, expectation, and cost, are anticipated to enrich dialogue. This type of deeper discussionwill hopefully aid instructors in developing introspection regarding their own beliefs andperceived obstacles of implementation.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1524527References 1. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National AcademiesPress, Washington. 2. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryan Paul Ruddy, University of Auckland; Poul Fønss Nielsen, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

emphasized the ease ofholding the device, while the team on the right focused on miniaturization, using figure 2’s PCB.While both these groups used non-inverting buffer amplifiers for signal conditioning, others usedlevel-shifted inverting op-amp circuits.Student feedback is positive, with students valuing the project highly for its contribution to theirunderstanding. Student performance (as assessed via overall grades) has remained stable throughthe introduction of this project. Work is ongoing to determine the impact of this course moreprecisely, and to determine the best sequence of lecture content to complement the project.[1] Sheppard, S. D. and Jenison, R. (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An or-ganizational framework

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT); Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

describes reflection activities implemented in twobioengineering courses for the development of specific leadership competencies. The poster willinclude preliminary assessment data on the activities.          Bibliography    1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2).2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.4. Seemiller, C. (2014). The Student

Conference Session

CEED Paper Session 2: Leveraging Internships and Experiential Learning in Higher Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Mari Pina, University of Central Florida; Richard Allan Quinn, University of Central Florida; Jackie Herold, University of Central Florida; Kim A. Small, University of Central Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

Paper ID #14976Transforming the Culture of Internship Experiences through Social LearningCommunitiesDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of two NSF-funded S-STEM grants and program evaluator for two NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Ms. Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida Ms

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Angelina Lane, Seattle Pacific University; Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

: Lessons Learned From Community College Transfer Scholarship Recipients AbstractWith funding from the National Science Foundation’s S-STEM grant program, the ECASE(Engaging the Community to Achieve Success in Engineering) Scholarship at Seattle PacificUniversity (SPU) has targeted transfer students from urban and rural community colleges in theregion. For the past nine years, this program has provided scholarship and other support funds toassist these transfer students in obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering.The goal of the ECASE Scholarship is to provide pathways for financially needy, academicallytalented transfer students to thrive in the university environment, enter the workforce as well-trained

Conference Session

Automation, Instrumentation, and Computer Simulations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

Paper ID #15181Improving a Flipped Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseThomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh Thomas E. McDermott is an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, with over 30 years of industrial experience in consulting and software development. His research interests include electric power distribution systems, renewable energy, power electronics, electromagnetics, and circuit simulation. Tom is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and an IEEE Fellow. He has a B. S. and M. Eng. in Electric Power from Rensselaer, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Best Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anahid Behrouzi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Daniel Kuchma, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

week. The topics/activities foreach week and their type classification(s) are listed in Table 1. In this table, classifications A-Cwere developed by the authors to describe teaching approaches used in the DBE course thatrange from fully deductive to a combination of deductive/ inductive; D-G are based on theinquiry classification scheme proposed in Tafoya et al.7 and expanded by Staver and Bay8; andH-L are drawn from a comprehensive review of inductive teaching approaches assembled byPrince and Felder5. In general the classifications are listed left to right in Table 1 ranging fromdeductive to increasingly self-directed, inquiry-based methods. The remainder of this section willdefine each classification in the context of the DBE course.Table 1

Conference Session

That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Twin Cities; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

assessments from faculty, experiments they perform, and client corrections. Theassessments from faculty are often based on intuition and wisdom which allow them to predictwith some success the outcomes of the experiments the students perform. Regardless of thepredictions of the faculty and the students, the actual outcome of the experiments dictate nextsteps. Either the design works, or it does not. If it does not, which is most often the case, at thispoint in the semester there is little to no time for recovery. Finally, as a design comes togetherthe client(s) may provide feedback that the students did not appropriately frame the problem (i.e.the design is doing what was asked, but this is not what is needed) or that the design teammisinterpreted

Conference Session

Idea Generation and Creativity in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State University; Amy Rechkemmer; Jennifer Marguerite Wenger, University of Michigan College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

countsas flexibility, while also better evaluating interventions designed to improve flexibility.References1. Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Jablokow, K. W., Silk, E. M. & Rosenberg, M. N. Investigating impacts on the ideation flexibility of engineers. (2014).2. Kirton, M. J. Adaption-Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change. (Routledge: London, UK, 2011).3. Valle, S. & Vázquez-Bustelo, D. Concurrent engineering performance: Incremental versus radical innovation. International Journal of Production Economics 119 (1), 136–148, doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.02.002 (2009).4. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P. & O’Keefe, R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, interactive activities and assignments.In summary, although there are universally favored resources, there are differencesdepending on course type and assignment category (learning concept vs.programming/software assignment). Therefore, it is important to determine and developthe most appropriate resource for the student need.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325.References[1] Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry, A., Alford, T., Ankeny, C., Brooks, B., Gibbons, B. (n.d.). The Impact of Two-way Formative Feedback and Web-enabled Resources on Student Resource Use and Performance in Materials Courses. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.[2] Pego, J. (2013). Peer

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session II Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Jennifer Craig, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

International Forum

technical content is necessary and that contentmust be well organized and specific. Based on this analysis (often done in a matter ofminutes), a speaker can then determine the scope, style, and organization of what s/hewants to say.Experienced communicators do this analysis and synthesis without much difficulty, movingefficiently to the appropriate oral communication act. But students are usually novices at thiskind of thinking and speaking. Moreover, engineering students may be unused to thestandards of excellence in their technical discipline and thus fall back onto older strategies,often adopted from the humanities. Because they are novices, they need to learn activelyunder the guidance of instructors who help shape student skills.The design

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Deininger, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jennifer Chen Lee, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Development, 8(1), 22-41.3) Skaggs, P. (2010). Ethnography in product design-looking for compensatory behaviors. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3, 1.4) Kelley, T. (2007). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. Crown Business.5) Schrage, M. (2013). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate. Harvard Business Press.6) Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Adams, R. S. (2008). Students with differing design processes as freshmen: Case studies on change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 246. 7) Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2009). Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and

Conference Session

Graduate Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Hyungsok Choe, The University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Luis L. Martins, University of Texas, Austin; Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

modified version of Plett et al.’s five items. In addition, we propose amodel of key factors affecting engineering graduate students’ identities as shown in Figure 1.Constructs capturing the key factors affecting engineering identity and research identity areadapted from the undergraduate science and engineering identity model (Carlone & Johnson,2007; Godwin, 2016; Hazari et al., 2010; Prybutok et al., 2016 ). Based on the identity model, weexpect that graduate students’ engineering identities will be affected by three factors: engineeringcompetence/performance, engineering interest, and recognition as an engineer by others. On theother hand, previous work on research identity does not provide a framework for measuringresearch identity

Conference Session

Integrating Liberal Education and Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mehmet Vurkac, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, and biology, in the commonpractice of creating microorganism by the billions even in undergraduate labs, have also movedfrom the domain of observing and explaining, into the creative domain of ‘making’. Likewise,engineers in academia as well as corporate and government labs carry out primary research,discovering the principles underlying complex artificial systems17. The line has been blurred.Nonetheless, for the typical engineer at a company and the typical scientist at a research lab,Billington’s distinction that “[s]cience is discovery[;] engineering is design” restated as“[s]cientists study the natural [while] engineers create the artificial”18 still stands in the majorityof cases.In creating the artificial, engineers design products that

Conference Session

Two-year College Potpourri

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Diana Carmen Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reg Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

power quality issues caused by a large-size DC to ACinverter connecting the DG modules to the AC grid. This curriculum implementation provides aninnovative opportunity for future engineering technology students to gain necessary up-to-datecompetencies in a smart grid environment.IntroductionThe need for a knowledgeable workforce in fast innovating next generation power griddevelopment and implementation is essential. As the baby boomers employed in the electricalpower systems fields have started to retire, there is an urgent need to recruit and graduate anincreasing number of well-educated and well-trained next generation professionals from bothAssociate degree and Bachelor ’s degree programs. The fast pace of innovations in electrical

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

though males rated the females’leadership competency higher comparing to the females’ ratings of males, male students stilldid not believe in the leadership ability of female students as much as females themselvesbelieve.Based on the Rowan-Kenyon et al. [19]’s study, if a female student could lead a team, itwould be useful for teams because females tend to define leading as facilitating team andhaving the responsibility toward teams. This may cause conflict with male notions ofleadership, so some instruction may be necessary to legitimize alternative approaches toleadership. In addition, the last two studies in this section proved in teams that are led bystudents, underrepresented students showed better performance. These results highlight

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

andrecognizable ECG profile. Briefly, during Fall, 2018, 22 sophomores, in 11 student groups, wereable to successfully perform the requested tasks with high levels of engagement, as measured bythe StRIP instrument. For the performance indicators LED Programming, ECG SignalAcquisition, Graphics, and Cardiograph Project Presentation Materials, the following studentpercentages reached Exemplary and Satisfactory levels: 100%, 100%, 100%, 45%, respectively.Thus, students reached Engineering Science Student Outcome thresholds in three of fourperformance indicators. Evaluation of Part II of the cardiograph project is discussed in muchgreater detail in [55].Social Justice Case Study DaysThe class of 2020’s presentations and discussion of Hurricane Maria were

Conference Session

Active & Cooperative Learning in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shahnam Mirzaei, California State University, Northridge; Ana Cristina Cadavid; Vicki A. Pedone, California State University Northridge

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

,theresultsfromquestionnairesalreadyshowthattheprogramfavorablyimpactstheacademicskillsandattitudesoftheparticipantstowardtheirSTEMmajorsandSTEMcareers.URMparticipantsinparticularstronglyvaluethisearly‐careerresearchexperience.References[1] T.Litzinger,L.Lattuca,R.Hadgraft,W.Newstetter,“EngineeringEducationandthe DevelopmentofExpertise”,JournalofEngineeringEducation,January2011,Vol. 100,No.1,pp.123–150[2] Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. State University of New York: Stoney Brook; 1998.[3] Pender, M., Marcotte, D.E., Sto, M.R. & Maton, K.I. 2010, The STEM Pipeline: The Role of Summer Research Experience in Minority Students' Ph.D. Aspirations., Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., 18(30)[4] Slovacek, S.P., Tucker, S. and Whittinghill, J., 2008, Modeling Minority Opportunity Programs: Key Interventions and Success Indicators: Journal of Education and Human

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno; Constance Jones, California State University, Fresno; Arezoo Sadrinezhad, California State University, Fresno; Maryam Nazari, California State University, Fresno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Connections, ASEE, Ed., 2018.[2] California State University, "Student Success Dashboard," ed, 2019.[3] C. Corbett and C. Hill, Solving the equation : the variables for women's success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2015, pp. xi, 141 pages.[4] E. P. Bettinger and B. T. Long, "Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students," The American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 152-157, 2005.[5] NAP, Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2007.[6] P. Gallagher, S. Alestalo, S. Bhatia, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and S. Soundarajan, "Geotechnical Women Faculty