Nu. His re- cent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems (EPAS) programs.Dr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph.D degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2001. She is currently a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at Rowan University, Glass- boro, NJ. Her research interests include virtual reality and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, and modeling and scheduling of computer-integrated systems. Dr. Tang is very active in adapting and devel- oping pedagogical methods and materials
research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Thomas Dick, Oregon State University Thomas Dick is a professor of mathematics at
, and senior electives. Exposure tobiomedical topics will provide excellent preparation for interested students to pursue graduatestudies in related disciplines such as biomedical engineering or medicine. Because the modulesare rooted in fundamental engineering principles, they will be equally valuable to students whopursue careers in other engineering areas. Once developed, the modules could be adopted byclassic engineering programs such as Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, as wellas specialized Biomedical Engineering programs, and could be implemented by faculty who donot have specialized biomedical expertise. A previous paper by Farrell et al. 3 focused on thedescription of the course modules. This paper focuses on the
. Candidate at the University of Washington. He received his B.A. from TheUniversity of Puget Sound and his M.A. from The University of Denver. He is currently a LIFE (Learningin Informal and Formal Environments) Center Research Assistant on The Knowledge In Action Project.He is also an Early Career Researcher, working in collaboration with Oregon State University and TheUniversity of Turku in Finland, looking at engagement across virtual and project-based environments. Hisresearch focuses on engagement and identity development and the role of designed and alternative envi-ronments on these processes. His dissertation focuses on students entering into alternative high schoolsand explores students’ re-engagement in school and re-negotiation of their
-groups analysis. The only task-specific self-concept that did not have a significant difference in either the within-subjects andbetween-groups comparisons was motivation; this was seen in both the overall data(Fmotivation(3,219) = 1.7, p = 0.2) and the within-subjects data (t(11) = 0.6, p = 0.5). Thisdemonstrates that freshmen, sophomore, juniors, and seniors experience similar motivationlevels when it comes to engineering design. This may be due to the fact that engineers begintheir undergraduate career with a high level of motivation, and there is not much room forimprovement in that area. The within subject pairwise results also showed the same trends fromfreshman to senior with high statistical significance for self-efficacy, expectancy
for Education Research. His most recent book is How Computer Games Help Children Learn.Dr. Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active
to conduct a research project,increased confidence in research skills, and an increased awareness of feeling or thinking like ascientist are often reported (Hunter et al., 2007; Russell et al., 2007; Lopatto, 2004; Seymour etal., 2004). Zydney et al. (2002) found that engineering graduates with undergraduate researchexperiences had self-reported “significantly greater enhancement of important cognitive andpersonal skills, including the ability to speak effectively, understand scientific findings, knowliterature of merit in the field, analyze literature clearly, and possess clear career goals.”Summer experiences represent one of the most common approaches for immersingundergraduate students in authentic research. Yet, students are often not
Early Concept Grant for Exploratory Research (EAGER) that tested the feasibility ofcoupling Maker concepts with real world concerns in manufacturing and production engineeringin high school classrooms. Through the EAGER, we engaged in a 3-year pilot research study onhow the Making as Micro-Manufacture M2 model may create a situated learning space. In the M2model, students can develop self-constructed educational experiences through their directengagement in Making for everyday, real world use. Practically, we applied the M2 model in theform of a practice-based learning career and technology education (CTE) course focused oncombining Making, Engineering, and elementary science curriculum implementation.For our study, we pursued the following two
Lindsay Jarratt is a PhD candidate in Educational Policy and Leadership Studies. Her research follows from fifteen years of experience in student support and equity roles in higher education, and is focused on the dynamics of equity and belonging in educational institutions.Dr. KC Culver, University of Southern California KC Culver is a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Southern California. Her research focuses on the core academic mission of postsecondary institutions with an emphasis on access, equity, and inclusion; she studies faculty careers, pedagogy and the curriculum, and the experiences and outcomes of students from diverse backgrounds.Dr. Alberto Segre, The University of Iowa Alberto Maria Segre is
students ratetheir interest in taking each on a scale of 1 to 5. A combined score is calculated using sixcourses relevant to biometrics, namely, computer forensics, biometric signal processing,machine learning, digital image processing, pattern recognition and biometric securitytechnologies. For questions 3 and 4, fourteen subject areas are given. For question 3,students rate each area in terms of pursuing a graduate degree. In question 4, students ratetheir interest in pursuing a career. A combined score is calculated using five subject areasrelated to biometrics, namely, image processing, computer forensics, machine learning,biometrics and speech processing. Table 2 gives the results. For questions 2 and 4, thereis a statistically significant
University. He was a recipient of the NSF CAREER award in 2009. He serves as an associate editor for the IEEE Power Engineering Letters and the IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. His research interests are related to electromechanical energy conversion and the analysis of power systems. More recently his work has focused on technologies that enable the integration of renewable energy sources in the electric power system, and the electrification of transportation.Prof. Maryam Saeedifard, Purdue University Page 23.422.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
linkbetween program impacts on student motivation and self-efficacy and ultimate graduate rates.The Wright State ModelIt is well known that student success in engineering is highly dependent on student success inmath, and perhaps more importantly, on the ability to connect the math to the engineering1-6.However, first-year students typically arrive at the university with virtually no understanding ofhow their pre-college math background relates to their chosen degree programs, let alone theirfuture careers. And despite the national call to increase the number of graduates in engineeringand other STEM disciplines7 , the inability of incoming students to successfully advance past thetraditional freshman calculus sequence remains a primary cause of
AC 2012-3670: ENGINEERING FUTURE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS: IN-CORPORATION OF PROCESS INTENSIFICATION CONCEPTS INTOTHE UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of chemical engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan. 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She re- ceived her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Tech- nological University in 1998. Minerick’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER Award and the
cleaned up but is far better than the previous ones. • Improve the isolation design. • Add one more +‐5V power supply. What is the most you would pay for a system like this if it were used in several classes over the course of your academic career? ___ $0 ___ $50 ___$100 ___$200 ___$300 ___$400 ___$500 (check one) Average response: ~$205 Page 25.892.14How would you prefer to pay that amount? ___lump sum ___payments across semesters LS: 4; PAS: 7 Would you prefer to pay a lesser amount as ‘lab fees’ each semester to fund the purchase and upkeep of a set of RASCL units that would be available for check
coming together to work on the projects. During the past threeyears, California State University Los Angeles faculty team worked collaboratively to developCPBL-beyond-Classroom pedagogy that has proved to be effective to enhance student learningon commuter campuses. As an extension to CPBL, a specific PBL model developed in theauthors’ previous work to address the retention issues of minority students in theirfreshman/sophomore year [5-7], CPBL-beyond-Classroom aims at preparing senior students forprofessional careers. To address the learning needs of students on commuter campuses, the newpedagogy emphasizes on virtual collaborative learning and community inquiry in a remotefashion. Iterative classroom implementation and assessment demonstrated
#1237868. Portions of this paper were orally presented at the SEACconference (2013), the Frontiers in Education conference (2013) and the National ScienceFoundation EESE PI meeting (2013). Attendees at each of these venues provided valuablefeedback. We are also grateful for the administrative and technical support received fromHUBZero, GlobalHUB, and Eckard Groll.INTRODUCTIONEducating future engineers to effectively handle novel ethical dilemmas they may encounter intheir careers, especially those developing and implementing new technology, is a critical andrelevant challenge for a nation that is advancing science and engineering technologies at an everincreasing rate. However, the ethics education programs of most engineering colleges do
modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic com- patibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published eight book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting and analysis, renewable energy, microgrids, turbulence and wave propagation, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education
, gender and performance in the prerequisitecourses were recorded. Additionally, as students in the course are typically further into theiracademic careers, students were identified by transfer status: first time in college (FTIC) –started their college at University of South Florida, transfer students from a community college(CC) with a completed Associate of the Arts degree, or other (OT) which includes studentstransferring from another institution without a completed degree. All of the above data werecollected from official institutional records.Student achievement in the course was assessed through a combination of homeworkassignments, class activities and examinations, including the final comprehensive examination.The same topics were covered
1987, and a Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1991, all in Mechanical Engineering. Among his many awards he received the National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Initiation Award, the NSF CAREER Award, the Ralph Teetor Educational Award from the SAE, and the Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award from SME. In 2006 he won the innovation of the year award from the State of Indiana. He serves in the editorial board of Elsevier Journal of Computer-Aided Design and ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. In 2008 he was a visiting Professor at Stanford University (computer sciences) as well as a research fellow at PARC (formerly Xerox PARC). He also serves on the Engineering Advisory sub-committee for the NSF IIP
correlated with an individual’s accomplishment level. With high self-efficacy, a studentwill use more cognitive and metacognitive strategies and be more likely to select challengingtasks due to their self-confidence. Upon encountering a problem, an individual with higher self-efficacy is often willing to put in additional effort and is more persistent in solving the problem.The continued effort, persistence, and perseverance will increase the likelihood that the studentwill be successful in accomplishing their task.Many reports have indicated that more engineers with strong design skills are needed. Self-efficacy is important because it is a large influence on career choice. If the engineeringcurriculum effectively develops good design engineers
environmental sciences and environmental engineering. He has retired from the city of Corpus Christi, Texas, where he was the Director of Animal Control as part of the City/County Health Department. His professional career has also included being a Golf Course Superintendent, as well as performing marine biology research, environmental science research, mariculture research, and consulting in environmental concerns. He is also a published author of original scientific research involving bird predation on shrimp mariculture ponds with a resulting grant to present the paper in Venice, Italy. He is married and has three adult children.Mr. Raul C. Rivas, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Raul Rivas is a Ph.D. candidate in the
education in instructional systems from Penn State, a master’s of education in computing in education from Rosemont College, and a bachelor of science in mathematics education from Penn State. Her research centers on the sustainability of innovations in education.Dr. Amy Freeman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Amy L. Freeman is Assistant Dean of Engineering Diversity at the Pennsylvania State University, where she received her Ph.D. in workforce education and her M.S. in architectural engineering. She is Co-PI on the NSF-Sponsored Toys’n MORE grant and currently manages several retention programs targeting more than 2,000 women and underrepresented technical students at all levels of the academic and career
Influences Makerspace Definition Among First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstract: Makerspaces, intended for open and collaborative learning, often struggle to attract adiverse group of users, particularly concerning gender diversity. These issues includemakerspaces becoming associated primarily with white male students, gendered connotations ofmachines and materials, and women’s perceived lack of self-efficacy in using makerspace tools.As a result, women may view makerspaces as unwelcoming, and societal stereotypes can affecttheir engagement in these spaces. Efforts to create more inclusive makerspaces are essential tofully realize the potential of makerspaces, encourage and boost confidence in marginalizedgroups to pursue careers in
, fluid mechanics, and renewable energy. Dr. Supan has research interests in degradation kinetics of biomass materials, microgrid development for cold regions, and implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering classrooms.Dr. Liz Johnson, Liz Johnson Education Consulting Dr. Liz Johnson (Lead Evaluator) left a career in academia to consult and work as an educational evaluator in 2020. Since, she has focused primarily on evaluation of NSF and USDA grant-funded programs that center faculty learning and systems-embedded student supports toward persistence and matriculation in STEM degree programs; in many cases at Hispanic Serving Institutions. Prior to 2020, Liz worked as a full-time faculty member at St
affirm • study abroad or experience• access affordable health care; engineering as worthwhile; engineering outside the• be in an environment that allows • be in an engineering community classroom; one to manage and work through that does not tolerate harassment, • schedules & curriculum flexible emotional issues; bullying, etc.; to accommodate student life• be one’s authentic self in all • obtain relevant technical work circumstances; spaces; etc. while a student; etc. • learn about alternative career pathways; etc.The
inconsistencies in outcome variables.They also highlight important future directions for study. Study 3 is an interview-driveninvestigation. We are currently conducting focus groups and interviews of engineering studentswho have ADHD, after which we will transcribe the data and begin analysis. Findings of ourthree-study project can inform policies and practices aimed at fostering inclusive educationalenvironments, support STEM students with ADHD, and enhance educational outcomes. Thispaper provides updates on the progress and findings of the three studies.IntroductionPursuing higher education is a transformative journey, offering students the opportunity toacquire knowledge, cultivate critical thinking, and shape their future careers [1]. Students
will also attempt to examine the role of reflective practice in problem solvingsuccess.ConclusionIn order to examine and remedy the problems engineering students face in transferringknowledge between their classes and eventually, into their careers, a series of think-aloud,problem solving interviews were completed in order to both examine the barriers students facewhen asked to transfer knowledge. Based on a survey of the literature, an intervention based onpriming and prompting prior knowledge was then developed with the goal of aiding students intransferring their prior knowledge to the current context and promoting problem solving success.Initial findings of this work indicate that students possess inaccurate or incomplete priorknowledge of
: 10.1126/science.1240487.[10] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado, "Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States," Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, pp. 311-334, 2014.[11] R. Battistoni, N. Longo, and K. Morton, "Co-Creating Mutual Spaces for Campuses and Communities," in Asset-Based Community Engagement in Higher Education, J. Hamerlinck and J. Plaut Eds. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Campus Compact, 2014.[12] M. LaForce, E. Noble, and C. Blackwell, "Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs," Education Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 92, 2017
research, pp. 311-334, 2014.[11] R. Battistoni, N. Longo, and K. Morton, "Co-Creating Mutual Spaces for Campuses and Communities," in Asset-Based Community Engagement in Higher Education, J. Hamerlinck and J. Plaut Eds. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Campus Compact, 2014.[12] M. LaForce, E. Noble, and C. Blackwell, "Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs," Education Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 92, 2017.[13] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, G. Gilot, S. Boukdad, and M. Krug, "The Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem Model: Learning from the Bowman Creek Experience," presented at the Engaged Scholarship Consortium, Minneapolis, MN, 2018.[14
-based learning environments, conceptual change in mathematics and science learning, and new forms of expertise in technology rich and networked environments. Email: erno.lehtinen@utu.fiProf. Marja Vauras, Centre for Learning Research, University of TurkuGavin Tierney, University of Washington Gavin Tierney is a Ph.D. Candidate at the University of Washington. He received his B.A. from The University of Puget Sound and his M.A. from The University of Denver. He is currently a LIFE (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments) Center Research Assistant on The Knowledge In Action Project. He is also an Early Career Researcher, working in collaboration with Oregon State University and The University of Turku in Finland