to collaborate toaccomplish the research goals by analyzing research and identifying significant results to guideyear 4’s activities.DisseminationIn line with our original dissemination plan, the research team has made presentations to severalcommunities of interest, including researchers interested more broadly in engineering education(presenting our Year 2 grantees’ poster at the ASEE conference) and engineering education in aninternational context (at the Frontiers In Education conference), as well as more specificallythose researchers interested in diversity in engineering education (presented at the CoNECDconference). In Summer 2020, one of our undergraduate researchers disseminated researchfindings by presenting a poster to a group of
lot of planning, resources and time allocation.Implications for PracticeResults from this study clearly indicated that faculty members who integrate active learning into theirteaching believed that active learning improved students and increased student engagement andmotivation. As pedagogical beliefs have been proven to be significantly impacting teaching behavior [15],faculty professional developments could focus on changing instructor beliefs about active learning. Onceconvinced about the effectiveness of alternative approaches to traditional teaching, faculty memberswould be more open to trying various active learning strategies.The fact that collaborative learning and problem-based learning were the most commonly usedapproaches and the
to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to leverage large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Mr. Kazuki Hori, Virginia Tech Kazuki Hori is a doctoral
-analysis software packages.These systems are part of a network being developed to meetour needs that require capabilities beyond those of the microbased systems. The student use of these systems and softwarewill be limited mostly to upper division classes. They do,however, provide excellent teaching tools for use at alllevels of instruction. Current examples are our IBM 4341 DEC11/34 and Data·General Nova systems. 3) Experimental/research systems dedicated to expanding the current technology base while providing the capabilities for new applications development. In defining our needs in this manner and as a result ofcareful planning, the requisite areas of overlap b~tweenlevels and their
presented, were invited to answerquestions. For class periods when neither tapes nor lectures were presented, avariety of activities were planned. These included small group dis-cussion, demonstrations, lab experiments, a panel discussion and exams.In addition, students were required to work in small groups on projectsrelated to novel and innovative uses of wood as an engineering material.Students were occasionally given short periods of time to work on pro-jects during class time, but were expected to do the major portion oftheir projects as homework. The last two class periods were set asidefor project reports. Students were required to submit a written projectreport at the end of the semester. Those students not enrolled forcredit were
into multiple classrooms and multiple schools in the district. This would havethe added benefit of providing an opportunity for these college students to volunteer and servethe community using their chosen major. It would give them the opportunity to share theirpassion for engineering and instill those concepts into future engineers.5. Benefits for Kindergarten Teacher and Engineering ProfessorBenefits for the engineering professor included both professional development and involvementin community service. The professional development plan for tenure and promotion atMinnesota State University, Mankato outlines five key areas in which faculty members areexpected to grow and contribute. Community service falls within one of these areas and
programs seeking to fulfill ABET criteria.5. Future EnhancementsThrough collaboration with the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program and pending continuationof funding from the National Science Foundation, we plan to award approximately fourscholarships per year to IRE students. Although granting MSU engineering degrees, the IREprogram and its students are physically located in northern Minnesota at Mesabi Range College.These four scholarship recipients will be fully integrated into our MAX Scholars cohort. Theywill attend weekly seminars via interactive video feed and will participate in interdisciplinaryteams. For example, a team working on a project and presentation would consist of 3 students inMankato and 1 student in IRE. The team members
such as grade inflation, excesstime planning and grading for the instructor, perceived fairness in when or to whom it is offered,lowering of academic standards, and a belief that during a semester a student has ampleopportunity to achieve the grade they truly deserve. A further contention is that extra creditassignments can induce a moral hazard (Wilson, 2002). In this situation the fear is that byoffering students extra credit they perceive less risk in performing poorly and will not study asthoroughly, as they will have the option to make points up in the future. The proponents of extracredit tout its ability to give students a second chance, rectify an exam which may have been toodifficult, or explore topics in further detail than scheduled
ConferenceRepresentative Sample KTSII Test Results for Senior Design Project StudentsResults from KTSII test for one particular semester for a particular course section of students inthe Senior Design project class are discussed next. It should be pointed out that the results arerepresentative of results from past tests but several more tests in future semesters are planned toincrease the rigor of the results and inferences from those results.The results in Figure 3 below are for a group of 30 students in a particular semester section of theSenior Design Project course who took the KTSII test. The results are shown by a team-wisebreakdown for team dynamics purposes besides composite results for the whole class. TEAM A TEAM B TEAM C TEAM D
the effort to recognize the challengesengineering programs face and plan to make those changes to achieve excellence. ABET4are in charge of accrediting Universities against a list of criteria and they have raised thestandards. A program developed in 2002 created the Center for the Advancement ofScholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE5) which is also an important group indictating excellence in engineering education. They define what should be taught inengineering and define excellence in education in terms of its effectiveness, engagementand efficiency. The Millennium Project6 at the University of Michigan studies the futureof American Universities providing a joined effort with creative students, faculty andbeyond campus to develop new
has been 4.6, and two journal and four conference papers have been published as adirect result of these courses. Furthermore, several of the most talented students continued theirstay at NDSU and enrolled in the graduate program. A future aspect of this integrated researchand coursework plan is to extend this concept to include other courses outside of the area ofelectromagnetics and work with other faculty within and outside of the ECE Department.Results from this broader research integration will be presented in a future paper.What Goals Should Our Course Have?Some outcomes that we expect are that: (i) students will be able to analyze and design thedevices studied in the course, (ii) they will have the background to work with related but
to system safety culture improvement. In thepresent study the taxonomy categories are not only adopted to analyze the cognitive processinglevel that this kind of development may provide. The present study also adopts the taxonomy asa scripting guide for the students. Students from diverse disciplines enrolled in environmentalhealth and safety program were asked to add to each of their response to the survey questions alabel that is based on one of the cognitive process categories in Bloom's taxonomy. Questions weasked were for example: what motivates and inspires the students who are attracted to theprogram, what types of careers do they plan to follow, and what specific issues are important tothem?This modified taxonomy attempts to account
offer only minordegrees without offering an equivalent higher degree? There are several possible reasons for this.First, offering a minor degree is a conservative first step into plans to eventually offer a major inone of these fields. Secondly, graduates with minor degrees are more attractive to aerospaceemployers, compared to those who do not have any aerospace related qualifications (even if theyhave an engineering bachelor’s degree in another field). This becomes more important if there isa large number of aerospace industry or government employers in proximity to the academicorganization. This will be examined more closely in the next section.2.5 Geographical DistinctionsThe locations of all the academic organizations offering an aero
feedbackfrom students, we attribute this to the effect of COVID-19 measures, whereabout half of the students were not able to attend the classroom, and com-plete hands-on activities. However, overall student approval rates show de-sign projects overall increased overall student agreement, with regular bellcurve peaking around 8/10 (30% approval) which was well received. More-over, about 12% students were completely satisfied with the course (10/10).2021 semester, with expected fully in-class experiences after COVID-19 mea-sures are released after herd immunity is reached. We plan to follow-up ourresults after Spring 2021 and Fall 2021 semester data have been collected,with a comparison of the affects of online learning modalities, and will po
that are required to complete this program:1) Registration; 2) Meeting with the counselor and action plan creation; 3) Pass Praxis exams orstate exams for teacher credentials; 4) Pass background check and screening; 5) Completestudent teaching hours; 6) Apply for state certification; 7) Create a resume, cover letter, and listof references; 8) Search for jobs by state; 9) Attend job fairs or TASC events; and 10) Startworking as a licensed teacher [17]. The program is scheduled to phase out by October 2021 [18].Veterans to Teachers in Commonwealth in VirginiaThe Commonwealth of Virginia requires 18 credit hours of courses related to the teachercertification [19]. There are eight broad career and technical education (CTE) areas
with the students. Additional scholarship opportunities wereoffered to AcES scholars to pursue summer school opportunities. Some students used theopportunity to remediate from a difficult spring term and others used the opportunity to getahead on their academic plan.3.0 Results and DiscussionResults from the survey responses of 59 students in the combined 2017, 2018, and 2019 cohortsare presented and discussed below. Of the 59 students in the study, 42 (71.2%) retained and 17(28.8%) left engineering before the beginning of their second year in college, which is slightlyhigher than the retention of non-calculus-ready students in the college during these years.As shown in Figure 1, below, Grit scores of retained students increased 0.12 points
with similar strength. The creation of new lightweight composites isalready being applied to the design of other vehicles [Prucz et al., 2013]. 2In the supply chain for the manufacturing of UAVs there is also a need to ensure that theproduction is compliant with design specifications. We define the four stages of the (advanced)manufacturing process as such 1. Development a. Research b. Analysis 2. Baseline Systems a. Prototype b. Design 3. Production a. Planning b. Testing 4. Logistics a. Delivery b. Support3. Introducing Advanced Manufacturing through UAV Construction and Analysis intoExisting
“Impact” in this case if you are still exploring evaluation methods?Surveys now being administered at end of Bias Busting workshops. Data being collected. Survey and evaluation plan being created for other workshops but no data collected to date. 10Enrique:Bias Busting Workshop post surveys also ask participants to respond to various statements shown on this chart with the percentage indicating “agree or strongly agree”: I learned something in today’s presentation. I would recommend this presentation to others. After participating in this workshop, I am more confident about recognizing bias. After participating in this workshop, I am more
Central Limit Theorem andExploratory Factor Analysis, the number of professionals taking part in the CCLP will be increasedin future NILAs. NILA 2020 was held virtually and significantly increased the number ofprofessionals from 37 to 140. Beyond 2020, future NILAs are planned to be hybrid eventscombining an in-person and virtual event to enable higher professional member attendance. Futuresurveys will include more personal career goal-oriented leadership questions. The results for suchquestions will enable researchers to determine which NILA curriculum components mosteffectively increase the attendees’ leadership self-efficacy.4. Conclusions The effect of SHPE’s NILA leadership framework on Hispanic engineering professionals’leadership self
Nevada, Reno. He graduated with his Masters in 2019 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and plans to pursue a career in academia in the future. His research interests are in graduate student attrition rates within academia, engineering identity development, and factors that influence decision making on persistence.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and learning ex- periences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem-solving processes, and cultural
) project. Dr. Lord is the 2018 recipient of the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in
, the researchers plan to analyze the results based on the racial and/or gender identitiesof the volunteers. Furthermore, we will highlight challenges and ways to enhance the volunteeringexperience for volunteers as a means to identify concrete practices for BPE programs.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the students who participated in this research study. This materialis based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Education and Centersunder Grant Number DRL-1614710, 1614739, and 1615143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect theviews of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesClary, E. G
experiences, previously described [27]. Future plans include using the survey inaddition to semi-structured interviews with students to better understand their attitudes and senseof belonging. The study will be expanded to include students in other engineering sciencecourses at both universities that discuss engineering problems and engineering within asociotechnical context and comparing their feelings of belonging with students in similar courseswhere engineering problems are defined more narrowly. Another avenue for future research isinvestigating the learning environments of various courses and how those environments affectstudents, especially students from underrepresented groups.ConclusionFindings of this preliminary study suggest that using a
, to incentive effort on this quiz andensure our results reflect knowledge rather than other learning strategies.This is the first study to examine the use of exploratory learning in undergraduate engineeringmathematics. We randomly assigned students to experimental condition, and used the exact sameactivities across conditions—just switching the order of activity and instruction. These featuresstrengthen the causal conclusions we can make about the benefits of exploring before instruction.We plan to replicate and extend these findings with new samples and new topics, withadjustments to the procedures as needed (e.g., requiring students to complete the Geogebra™activity).To our knowledge, this is also the first study to use an online
survey was given to understand their learningexperience and collect their feedback. The Next step tasks were related to a final project so thatstudents could build up their understanding and apply their study to an open-ended semester longproject.Gamification applicationGamification, also known as serious games, is the use of game thinking and game mechanismssuch as point-scoring, levels, challenges, leaderboard, or even rewards in a non-game context toengage learners in solving problems [4]–[10]. College students grow up immersed in technology,regularly play video games, have a shorter attention span, and prefer engaged and interactivelearning [11]. It is believed that gamification with careful thought and planning can be a greatway to motivate
., “Barriers to Student Success in Engineering Education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(4), 368-381 (2017)[14] Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N.M., “Talking about Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors,” Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Boulder: University of Colorado Bureau of Sociological Research, 1994[15] Jones, B.D., Paretti, M.C., Hein, S.F., and Knott, T.W. “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319-336 (2010)[16
rate for this course is 36%. In response tothis repetition rate, engineering design as an epistemic practice was introduced. Epistemicpractices are vital to student success when learning discipline-specific skills and knowledge [3-5]. Epistemic practices are systems of processes for generating and evaluating knowledge used todevelop epistemological understandings. In this case, an engineering design framework serves asan epistemic practice to better understand calculus concepts [4]. The ability to generate, evaluatecalculus knowledge and then plan an approach to use engineering to solve calculus problems aretwo major categories of developing epistemic understanding.To engage students in engineering design as they learned calculus, calculus
test and interpreting the results.Importantly, the course is delivered virtually, which makes the implementation very differentfrom that in an in-person classroom setting. This paper provides a detailed discussion of the virtual laboratory modules added to‘Nondestructive Evaluation of Flaws’. In addition, we report how the changes impacted thestudent learning in Fall 2020 compared to Fall 2019, when the delivery was strictly lecture-based. Finally, we discuss ‘lessons learned’ and modifications planned for the next offerings ofthis class. Our overall assessment results indicate a positive impact of the virtual laboratories on
Virgilio Gonzalez, Associate Chair and Professor of Practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at El Paso, started his first appointment at UTEP in 2001. He received the UT Sys- tem Board of Regents Outstanding Teaching Award in 2012. From 1996 to 2001 he was the Technology Planning manager for AT&T-Alestra in Mexico; and before that was the Telecommunications Director for ITESM in Mexico. His research areas are in Communications Networks, Fiber Optics, Wireless Sensors, Process Automation, and Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work -in-Progress: Online Electrical Engineering